Diagnosis Of Patent Foramen Ovale Research Articles

Diagnostic Value of Micro-Bubble Transcranial Doppler Combined with Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale.

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to cryptogenic stroke (CS) caused by the patent foramen ovale (PFO). This study aims to evaluate the value of microbubble transcranial Doppler (MB-TCD) combined with contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) in the diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO. From January 2014 to January 2019, patients who suffered from CS were recruited and divided into the cTTE group and MB-TCD combined with cTTE group. All patients were further checked by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). A total of 130 patients accepted cTTE examination, and 109 patients accepted MB-TCD combined with cTTE. In the group, 52 of the 54 positive patients were finally confirmed by TEE with PFO, and 12 of the 76 negative patients were finally confirmed by TEE with PFO. In combined group, 50 patients were negative on both two examination (Negative group), 54 were positive on both two examination (Positive group) and finally confirmed by TEE indeed with patent foramen ovale (PFO), while remaining five (5) patients were positive only on MB-TCD (Suspected group). After checked by TEE, three (3) of five patients with MB-TCD positive were confirmed by TEE indeed with PFO. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and Youden's index of cTEE in diagnostic of cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO were 81.25%, 96.97%, 26.82 and 0.78, respectively, and these for MB-TCD combined with cTTE were 100%, 96.15%, 25.97 and 0.96, respectively. MB-TCD medium can sensitively discover PFO in cryptogenic stroke patients with 100% sensitivity and a missdiagnosis rate of 0. The combination of MB-TCD and cTTE can improve the sensitivity and specificity of PFO diagnosis in cryptogenic stroke patients. MB-TCD medium also had high sensitivity and specificity.

Case fatality rate and fatal bleeding complication in patients with pulmonary embolism and patent foramen ovale

Abstract Objectives In patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), right atrial pressure is elevated, which increases risk for right-to-left shunt when patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present and thus potentially increases risk for paradoxical embolism. Little is known about the clinical outcome of patients with PE and concomitant PFO. Methods We analysed data on patient characteristics, treatments and in-hospital outcomes for all PE patients (ICD-code I26) with concomitant presence of PFO in Germany 2005–2018 (source: Research Data Center (RDC) of the Federal Statistical Office and the Statistical Offices of the federal states, DRG Statistics 2005–2018, and own calculations). Results Between January 2005 and December 2018, 1,174,235 patients with acute PE (53.5% females) were included in this analysis; of those, 5,486 (0.5%) had a concomitant diagnosis of PFO. Trends analysis demonstrating an increasing frequency of diagnosed PE with additional PFO from 2005 (n=299) to 2018 (n=556; p<0.001). While patients with PE and PFO presented more often with signs of haemodynamic compromise such RV dysfunction (37.6% vs. 28.5%) or shock (7.1% vs. 3.9%) as well as paradox arterial emboli (47.8% vs. 3.2%) or intracerebral bleeding (3.3% vs. 0.6%), PE patients with PFO died less often compared to PE patients without PFO (11.1% vs. 15.8%). Patients with PE and PFO were younger (65 [IQR 52–75] vs. 72 [60–80]; P<0.001) and were more often treated invasively with a reperfusion treatment approach like embolectomy (10.2% vs. 4.2%) or systemic thrombolysis (5.0% vs 0.1%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a 27.6-fold increased risk for paradox arterial emboli (OR, 27.6 [95% CI 26.1–29.1]; p<0.001) and a 3.9-fold increased risk for intracerebral bleeding events (OR, 3.9 [95% CI 3.3–4.54]; p<0.001) for patients with PE and concomitant PFO. In normotensive patients with RVD and PFO, embolectomy were not associated to affect the rate of intracerebral bleeding events (OR, 0.8 [95% CI 0.2–2.6]; p=0.720) compared to conventional non-reperfusion treatment; instead of systemic thrombolysis, which is associated with a higher risk of intracerebral bleeding (OR, 3.5 [95% CI 1.8–6.59]; p<0.001) compared to conventional non-reperfusion treatment. Conclusion Patients with acute PE and the concomitant presence of PFO are associated with a high risk for paradox arterial emboli and intracranial bleeding events. Especially in normotensive patients, the use of systemic thrombolysis should be considered with cautious. Thus, our findings may improve the clinical management of patients with PE and PFO. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

The role of cardiac CT throughout the full cardiac cycle in diagnosing patent foramen ovale in patients with acute stroke.

We explored the hypothesis that the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomography (CT) throughout the full cardiac cycle would be superior to single-phase CT and comparable to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing patent foramen ovale (PFO). From May 2011 to April 2015, 978 patients with stroke were diagnosed with PFO by TEE. In patients with stroke, cardiac CT was performed if the patients had more than two cardiovascular risk factors. We prospectively enrolled 70 patients with an indication for cardiac CT. Cardiac CT images were reconstructed at 10% increments of the R-R interval. The sensitivity of cardiac CT throughout the full cardiac cycle in diagnosing PFO was compared to that for TEE and single-phase cardiac CT. To evaluate the specificity of cardiac CT, we analyzed patients without PFO confirmed by TEE who underwent cardiac CT within 1 month of pre-cardiac surgery. Sixty-six patients with cardiac CT and TEE were included in the final analysis. Throughout the full cardiac cycle, cardiac CT had a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 92.3% in diagnosing PFO, compared to TEE as a reference. PFO was primarily detected in the 60% and 70% intervals in 10-phase reconstructed images. The sensitivity of PFO diagnosis with cardiac CT was 81.8% when analyzing both the 60% and 70% intervals instead of the full cardiac cycle. Cardiac CT throughout the full cardiac cycle outperforms single-phase cardiac CT in detecting PFO. Cardiac CT can be used as an alternative method to TEE for detecting PFO in stroke patients. • Throughout the full cardiac cycle, cardiac computed tomography (CT) had a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 92.3% in diagnosing patent foramen ovale (PFO), compared to transesophageal echocardiography. • The sensitivity of diagnosing patent foramen ovale with cardiac CT was 81.8% when analyzing 60% and 70% R-R intervals instead of the full cardiac cycle. • Cardiac CT with retrospective electrocardiographic gating throughout the full cardiac cycle can increase the detectability of PFO, compared to single-phase cardiac CT.

The Prevalence of Microembolic Signals in Transcranial Doppler Sonography With Bubble Test in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is noninvasive and highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO). We evaluated the diagnostic implications of the TCD with a saline agitation test as a routine work-up for ischemic stroke patients. A TCD bubble study was performed in all consecutive ischemic stroke patients as a routine work-up. We evaluated the prevalence of microembolic signals (MES) for each stroke etiology and the optimal number of MES for predicting the PFO-attributable stroke. Subjects (N=499) with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. A significant fraction of patients had MES during both normal respiration (5.7-44.4%) and the Valsalva maneuver (19.5-55.6%) across all stroke etiology categories. The optimal MES threshold for the diagnosis of PFO-attributable stroke confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography was 46 MES during the Valsalva maneuver (96% sensitivity and 95% specificity). Applying ≥46 MES during the Valsalva maneuver as a threshold effectively increased the ability to differentially diagnose PFO-attributable stroke from other etiologies. The number of MES during the Valsalva maneuver was negatively correlated with increasing age (r=-.108; P=.016). A significant fraction of patients had right to left shunt across all Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment etiologies. A threshold number of MES facilitated the differential diagnosis of PFO-attributable stroke from other etiologies, and the optimal threshold was 46 MES during the Valsalva maneuver.

Comparative analysis of the diagnostic value of several methods for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale.

The aim of this research was to compare the sensitivity and positivepredictive value of contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD), contrast transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE), and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE), to determine the best method for diagnosing patent foramen ovale (PFO) and to provide a reference for the further improvement of clinical practice. We investigated 161 patients who suffered from migraines, cryptogenic stroke, TIA, and cerebral infarction of unknown cause. All patients underwent transcatheter examination, and the results of the right heart catheterization(RHC) were considered the gold standard for PFO diagnosis. The present study revealed that c-TTE with the Valsalva maneuver had a higher sensitivity in detecting PFO related right-to-left shunt (PFO-RLS), c-TCD performed similarly to c-TEE but maybe produce more false positives. Moreover, when we observed color shunt from the slit-like channel between the septum primum and the septum secundum on TEE, the positivepredictive value was the highest. Patients with suspectedPFO should be examined with c-TTE and c-TEE for confirmation. When there were a large numberof bubbles in the left heart, especially in the presence of color shunt, the positivepredictive value was the highest. The positive results of c-TCD only point out the presence of right-to-left shunt and cannot exclude extracardiac shunt, so c-TCD should not be used as a screen for PFO, additional measures such as c-TTE and c-TEE should be used.

A review of diving practices and outcomes following the diagnosis of a persistent (patent) foramen ovale in compressed air divers with a documented episode of decompression sickness.

The presence of a persistent (patent) foramen ovale (PFO) increases the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) whilst diving with pressurised air. After the diagnosis of a PFO, divers will be offered a number of options for risk mitigation. The aim of this study was to review the management choices and modifications to diving practices following PFO diagnosis in the era preceding the 2015 joint position statement (JPS) on PFO and diving. A retrospective study was conducted of divers sourced from both the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne and the Divers Alert Network Asia-Pacific during the period 2005-2015. Divers were contacted via a combination of phone, text, mail and email. Data collected included: diving habits (years, style and depths); DCS symptoms, signs and treatment; return to diving and modifications of dive practices; history of migraine and echocardiography (ECHO) pre- and post-intervention; ECHO technique(s) used, and success or failure of PFO closure (PFOC). Analyses were performed to compare the incidence of DCS pre- and post-PFO diagnosis. Seventy-three divers were interviewed. Sixty-eight of these returned to diving following the diagnosis of PFO. Thirty-eight underwent PFOC and chose to adopt conservative diving practices (CDPs); 15 chose PFOC with no modification to practices; 15 adopted CDPs alone; and five have discontinued diving. The incidence of DCS decreased significantly following PFOC and/or adoption of conservative diving practices. Of interest, migraine with aura resolved in almost all those who underwent PFOC. Many divers had already adopted practices consistent with the 2015 JPS permitting the resumption of scuba diving with a lowering of the incidence of DCS to that of the general diving population. These results support the recommendations of the JPS.

Current status of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a highly prevalent structure among the adult population. It allows the shunt of blood through the inter-atrial septum and has been associated with cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attack, significant right to left shunting resulting in resting and exercise-induced hypoxemia, platypnea orthodeoxia syndrome, and decompression sickness after scuba diving and migraines. Currently, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler are the most important diagnostic tools, for the diagnosis of PFO. The sensitivity and specificity of the study depend on the modalities available: transthoracic (TTE), transesophageal (TEE), and transcranial Doppler (TCD), as well as the intravenous use of agitated saline and the site of injection.

The Efficacy of Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography and Contrast Transcranial Doppler for the Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale Related to Cryptogenic Stroke.

Background Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been linked to the pathophysiology of cryptogenic stroke. Contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) is the current gold standard for PFO diagnosis, but it has the disadvantage of being semi-invasive and does not exempt from risks. As a diagnostic test, the efficacy of contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) and contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD) is controversial. This study is aimed at investigating the efficacy of cTTE and cTCD versus cTEE in PFO detection, exploring a more cost-effective and reliable method for the diagnosis of PFO related to cryptogenic stroke. Methods From August 2019 to January 2020, a total of 213 patients with suspected PFO were included in our study. All patients underwent cTEE, cTCD, and cTTE examinations. cTTE3 was named for using a cutoff of 3 beats to detect PFO during cTTE, and cTTE5 represented a cutoff of 5 beats. A cutoff of cTCD grade III was named cTCD III. A cutoff of grade IV was named cTCD IV. cTTE3+cTCD IV was used for the combination of a cutoff of 3 beats during cTTE with grade IV of cTCD. cTTE5+cTCD III combined a cutoff of 5 beats during cTTE with cTCD grade III. Taking cTEE as the gold standard, we compared the sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio (-LR), and misdiagnosis rate for PFO detection among the above methods. Results A total of 161 of 213 (76%) patients had PFO confirmed by cTEE. With the spontaneous Valsalva maneuver, the sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio (-LR), and misdiagnosis rate of cTTE3 in PFO diagnosis were 60%, 90%, 44%, and 10%, respectively, and those for cTTE5 were 76%, 78%, 31% and 22%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio (-LR), and misdiagnosis rate of cTCD III were 80%, 71%, 29%, and 29%, respectively, while those for cTCD IV were 55%, 90%, 49%, and 10%, respectively. When cTTE and cTCD were combined to diagnose PFO, the specificity and misdiagnosis rate were significantly improved, especially cTTE3+cTCD IV, with 100% specificity and a misdiagnosis rate of 0. Conclusion cTTE or cTCD can be used for preliminary PFO related to cryptogenic stroke findings. The combination of the two methods can improve the specificity of PFO diagnosis, especially using the cutoff of cTTE3+cTCD IV.

The Value of c-TCD in the Diagnosis of Migraine and Cryptogenic Stroke Caused by PFO

Objective: To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced transcranial doppler (c-TCD) in the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO) of patients with migraine and cryptogenic stroke. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 160 patients undergoing c-TCD monitoring in our hospital from June 2014 to June 2019 was performed. Among them, there were 80 cases of patients with migraine (38 cases with aura and 42 cases without aura) in group A, and 80 cases of patients with cryptogenic stroke in group B. The positive detectable rate of PFO in the two groups were calculated and analyzed. Results: The detectable rate was 50.00% in group A, and 40.00% in group B. There was no statistical significance between the two groups (P> 0.05). Among them, the detectable rate of PFO in migraine with aura in group A (62.50%) was higher than that in group B(37.50%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); In the two groups of PFO-positive patients, the difference didn’t have statistical significance, comparing the proportion of the inherent type to that of potential type (P>0.05); There was no statistical significance of the difference between the RLS incidence of grade I and that of grade II among two groups of PFO-positive patients (P>0.05); the incidence of RLS in grade III in group B (50.00%) was higher than that in group A (25.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: c-TCD can accurately screen migraine and cryptogenic stroke caused by PFO, and grade and classify it as a clinical diagnosis of migraine and cryptogenic caused by PFO. It can also act as a objective reference of estimating the effect of treatment in different diseases and preventing cryptogenic stroke.

Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale: The Combination of Contrast Transcranial Doppler, Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography, and Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Objectives To access the distinct values of contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD), contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE), and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) in the diagnosis of right-to-left shunt (RLS) due to patent foramen ovale (PFO) and to define the most practical strategy for the diagnosis of PFO. Methods 102 patients with a high clinical suspicion for PFO had simultaneous cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE performed. The agitated saline mixed with blood was used to detect right-to-left shunt (RLS). Results In all 102 patients, the shunt was detected at rest by cTCD in 60.78% of cases, by cTTE in 42.16%, and by cTEE in 47.06%. The positive results of all 3 techniques with Valsalva maneuver (VM) were significantly improved. cTCD showed higher pick-up rate than cTTE (98.04% vs. 89.22%; χ2 = 12.452, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, t = 3.135, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, t = 3.135, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, t = 3.135, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, Conclusions The best method to diagnose PFO should be the combination of cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE. And cTCD should be applied as the first choice for screening RLS. Then, cTTE should be performed to quantify the severity of the shunt. Last but not least, cTEE should be performed to assess the morphologies of PFO when the closure is planned. The study provides for clinicians the most practical strategy for diagnosing PFO in the future. However, further trials with a large sample size are required to confirm this finding.

Importance of Abdominal Compression Valsalva Maneuver and Microbubble Grading in Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography for Detecting Patent Foramen Ovale

Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) may be useful for patent foramen ovale (PFO) screening, the optimal methodologies remain unclear. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of the abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver and identify the optimal cutoff value of microbubbles in contrast TTE for detecting PFO, compared with transesophageal echocardiography and catheterization as the reference. One hundred thirty-four patients with cryptogenic stroke or migraine who had suspected PFO and underwent TTE and transesophageal echocardiography plus catheterization were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TTE for PFO detection were analyzed according to different provocations (spontaneous Valsalva maneuver, abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver) and different cutoff values of microbubbles for a positive result (at least one microbubble, at least five microbubbles). Eighty patients had PFO confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography and catheterization. When the cutoff was at least one microbubble, the sensitivity of TTE in detecting PFO was 93% with the spontaneous Valsalva maneuver and 99% with the abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver. When the cutoff was at least five microbubbles, sensitivity was 85% with the spontaneous Valsalva maneuver and 99% with the abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver. With the abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver, specificity was increased using the cutoff of at least five microbubbles compared with at least one microbubble (89% vs 57%). The abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver with the cutoff of at least 5 microbubbles provided the greatest accuracy of 95%. TTE with the abdominal compression Valsalva maneuver had excellent sensitivity. The cutoff of at least five microbubbles increased specificity. Our findings suggest that TTE with these criteria is valuable for PFO diagnosis.

Atrial Septal Defect and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in the Perioperative Period of Noncardiac Surgery

Stroke is a serious complication of noncardiac surgery. Congenital defects of the interatrial septum may be a potent risk factor for perioperative stroke. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between atrial septal defect (ASD) or patent foramen ovale (PFO) and in-hospital perioperative ischemic stroke after non-cardiac surgery in a large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized in the United States. Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery between 2004 and 2014 were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Patients without an in-hospital echocardiogram were excluded. The presence of an ostium secundum-type ASD or PFO was identified by ICD-9 diagnosis code 745.5. The primary study outcome was perioperative acute ischemic stroke. Between 2004 and 2014, there were 639,985 admissions for noncardiac surgery with an in-hospital echocardiogram. An ASD or PFO was documented in 9,041 (1.4%) hospitalizations. Perioperative ischemic stroke occurred more frequently in patients with an ASD or PFO compared with those without an ASD or PFO (35.1% vs 6.0%, p <0.001). The association between ASD or PFO and ischemic stroke persisted after adjustment for demographics and clinical covariates (adjusted odds ratio 6.30, 95% confidence interval, 5.59 to 7.10) and in all non-cardiac surgery subtypes. In conclusion, in a large, nationwide analysis of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, a diagnosis of ASD or PFO was associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic stroke overall and in all surgical subtypes. Additional measures are necessary to mitigate stroke risk in patients with septal defects who are planned for non-cardiac surgery.

Closing the gap on patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The treatment options for prevention of recurrent of cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) have been intensely debated in the recent decades. The suggested options were percutaneous closure of PFO versus medical therapy. However, up to these date there is a controversy regarding the indication of percutaneous closure. Multiple meta-analysis and recent randomized control trials showed the benefit of PFO closure when compared with medical therapy alone.Areas covered: The article reviews the prevalence, physiology, diagnosis and treatment options of PFO after cryptogenic stroke. Furthermore, it will discuss the results of randomized control trials that compared the PFO closure to medical therapy.Expert opinion: The association between PFO and unexplained cryptogenic stroke has been well established in the multiple studies. The diagnosis and management of PFO might be challenging in some cases. Although multiple studies showed that PFO closure is associated with lower rates of recurrent stroke in patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke, the indication and patient selection for this intervention are not well established yet in the guidelines.

IMPORTANCE OF ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION VALSALVA MANEUVER AND MICROBUBBLE GRADING IN CONTRAST TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR DETECTING PATENT FORAMEN OVALE

Accurate diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is essential. Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) may be useful for PFO screening, the optimal methodologies such as the provocation and the microbubble cutoff value have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the

What's new in the management of patients with patent foramen ovale?

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with a number of clinical syndromes in which it plays variable roles that, often, cannot be accurately determined. This situation creates conflicting data and controversial studies. However, in 2017 and 2018, four randomized clinical trials have been published, allowing for the clarification of certain issues pertaining to cryptogenic stroke. Shortly after this, 8 European scientific societies collaborated to publish the first official international position paper on PFO and cryptogenic stroke, based upon best-available evidence. In the current report, the main positions are presented, relating to PFO diagnosis, general management, and therapeutic choices. Generally speaking, given the complexity of PFO roles, an interdisciplinary and personalized approach was chosen, especially taking into consideration patient involvement at all stages of management. This approach is not suitably addressed by standard guidelines, but can be accommodated in a position statement like this. For this reason, it was possible to offer an approach capable of aiding clinicians to make rational, patient-shared decisions, even when the available evidence is either weak or scarce.

Abstract TP49: Trends of Patent Foramen Ovale (pfo) Closure From 2008 to 2014 at National Level: Us Experience

Introduction: Evidence for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has been controversial, as was reflected in the guidelines published by AHA/ASA in 2014. Prior to 2014, three randomized controlled trials compared PFO closure and medical management. Evidence of PFO closure was lacking however PFO closure was being performed in both trial settings and non-trial settings. Methods: We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient sample (NIS) from 2008 to 2014. Ischemic stroke (IS) patients with primary diagnosis using ICD 9 codes were selected along with secondary diagnosis of PFO/ ASD (ICD 9 code: 745.5). Further we selected the patients who underwent the PFO closure procedure using ICD 9 procedure codes: 35.51 and 35.52. We evaluated the rate of PFO closure, characteristics of patients receiving closure and evolution of trend during that time period at the national level. Results: Total number of patients admitted over 7 years in US with Ischemic stroke associated with PFO was 77964. Only a minority of patients [n=1487 (1.9%)] received PFO closure and about half were females (50.2%). Majority of treatments (70%) were performed in teaching hospital setting. Patients who underwent PFO closure were younger, mean age 55.3 years (± SD 16.6) years versus 61.4 years (± SD 16.7) (p&lt; 0.001) in patent who did not receive closure. Medical comorbidities were significantly lower in group receiving treatment (Congestive heart failure 0.9% vs. 7.6%, hypertension 55% vs. 64.6%, atrial fibrillation 6.9% vs. 11.6%) but no difference was noted in deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and diabetes mellitus. We noted a significant downward trend of PFO closure at the national level and at teaching hospitals over 7 years (see graph 1) Conclusion: National database demonstrated that only a minority of patients received PFO closure in setting of ischemic stroke and overall a downward trend was noted over the years in setting of negative randomized trials.

Clinical value of right heart echocardiography in judging right-to-left shunt of patent foramen ovale

Objective To compare thecontrast transcranial dopple(cTCD), contrast transthoracic echocardiography(cTTE) and contrast transthoracic combined with transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) to diagnose the patent foramen ovale. Methods 120 cases of migraine patients caused by other reasons were excluded from our hospital. The three methods of cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE were observed. Whether there is a right-to-left shunt and a semi-quantitative grading of the number of microbubbles, and then comparing the three methods with intraoperative and postoperative data. Results In the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO), the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic rate of cTTE were higher than those of cTCD. The detection rate of cTEE was higher than cTTE, and patients with moderate or higher right-to-left shunt and MRI confirmed cerebral infarction were successfully treated with PFO blocking surgery under the guidance of TTE. 1 month after surgery, cTTE showed that 50 cases of right-to-left shunt disappeared in Valsalva and severe cough, and 3 cases still had a small amount of right-to-left shunt.Conclusion cTTE is simple, safe and reliable. It has significant advantages in the diagnosis of unexplained migraine diseases and has high clinical value. cTTE can not only clearly show the existence of right-to-left shunt of PFO, but also determine the degree of right-to-left shunt, which provides a direct basis for clinical treatment of PFO. It can also be used as an important tool for clinical follow-up after PFO closure.

Implications of detection of foramen ovale patent after cryptogenic ischemic stroke

Therapeutic uncertainty is inherent in decisions in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke. We aimed to determine clinical implications of PFO identification in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after a cryptogenic ischemic stroke. Consecutive TEE done between 2011 and 2015 in patients with previous cryptogenic stroke was evaluated. Clinical implications of PFO identification (closure and/or medical therapy) were retrieved from the medical records and discharge summaries. Adverse events related to therapy, stroke recurrence and death were analyzed during follow-up. Three-hundred one patients (mean age 59 ± 11years; 61% male) underwent a TEE, of which 77 (26%) patients had a diagnosis of PFO. Patients with PFO were younger (56 ± 13 versus 60 ± 14, p = 0.03). Of those with PFO, 23 (30%) underwent percutaneous closure of PFO and these patients had more frequently complex or large PFO (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The remaining 54 (70%) were treated with medical therapy: 30 (39%) with antiplatelet therapy and 24 (31%) with oral anticoagulation. During follow-up (44 ± 17months), only two patients had another stroke (both referred for PFO closure, while they were waiting for the procedure) and two patients, on whom PFO closure was not performed, died (not for cardiovascular causes). PFO's (size and complexity) and patients' characteristics influenced clinical decision when PFO was detected on TEE. The risk for recurrent stroke was not increased in patients who did not undergo PFO closure; although two patients waiting for PFO closure had recurrent stroke, demonstrating its importance.

Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: To Close or Not to Close? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The optimal strategy of secondary stroke prevention in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) is controversial. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the device closure (DC) versus the medical therapy (MT) in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and PFO. Summary: Randomized controlled trials with active and control groups receiving the DC plus MT and MT alone in patients with history of cryptogenic stroke/TIA and diagnosis of PFO were systematically searched. The main efficacy outcome was stroke recurrence. Subgroup-analyses were performed according to age, shunt size, and presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). Safety endpoints included any serious adverse event (SAE), atrial fibrillation (AF), and major bleeding complications. Risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated. Five trials were included, involving 3,440 participants (DC = 1,829, MT = 1,611). There was a protective effect of closure in the risk of recurrent stroke (RR 0.43 [0.21–0.90]; p = 0.024; HR = 0.39 [0.19–0.83]; p = 0.014). The benefit of PFO closure was significant in patients with PFO associated with substantial right-to-left shunt or ASA. There were no differences in the risks of SAEs and major bleedings between the groups. The rate of new-onset AF was higher in the DC than in the MT arm (RR 4.46 [2.35–8.41]; p < 0.001). Successful device implantation and effective PFO closure were achieved in 96 and 91% of the patients respectively. Key Messages: In selected adult patients with PFO and history of cryptogenic stroke, the DC plus MT is more effective to prevent stroke recurrence and is associated with an increased risk of new-onset AF compared to the MT alone.

Association of Preoperatively Diagnosed Patent Foramen Ovale With Perioperative Ischemic Stroke

Perioperative stroke is a major complication for patients undergoing surgery. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) represents a possible anatomical link between venous thrombosis and stroke. To determine whether a preoperatively diagnosed PFO is associated with increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke. Retrospective cohort study from Massachusetts General Hospital and 2 affiliated community hospitals between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. Participants were 182 393 consecutive adults undergoing noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia. Preoperatively diagnosed PFO. Perioperative ischemic stroke occurring within 30 days of surgery; stroke subtype by Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification and stroke severity by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Among the 150 198 patient cases analyzed (median [SD] age, 55 [16] years), 1540 (1.0%) had a diagnosis of PFO before surgery. A total of 850 (0.6%) ischemic strokes occurred within 30 days of surgery (49 [3.2%] among patients with PFO and 801 [0.5%] among patients without PFO). In adjusted analyses, patients with PFO had an increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with patients without PFO (odds ratio, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.96-3.63]; P < .001). The estimated risks of stroke were 5.9 for every 1000 patients with PFO and 2.2 for every 1000 patients without PFO (adjusted absolute risk difference, 0.4% [95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%). Patients with PFO also had an increased risk of large vessel territory stroke (relative risk ratio, 3.14 [95% CI, 2.21-4.48]; P < .001) and a more severe stroke-related neurologic deficit measured by NIHSS (median, 4 [interquartile range {IQR}, 2-10] vs median, 3 [IQR, 1-6] for those without PFO; P = .02). Among adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery at 3 hospitals, having a preoperatively diagnosed PFO was significantly associated with increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days after surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine whether interventions would decrease this risk.