Introduction: Obesity has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and linked to increased odds of metaplasia. Latest studies are now relatively old, small or with limited number of outcome measures. The aim of our study was to explore the association between BMI categories and BE occurrence and associated mortality and resource utilization using a national database. Methods: This case-control study utilized the 2014 National Inpatient Sample. All patients with BE were included using ICD9CM codes. None were excluded. The cohort was stratified into four categories: malnourished, normal/overweight, obese and morbidly obese using ICD9CM codes and compared to non-BE controls. The primary outcome was the odds of BE across cohorts. Secondary outcomes included top admission reasons, length of hospital stay (LOS), total hospitalization charges and costs. Multivariate regression adjusted for age, sex, income in patient zip code, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), hospital region, location, size and teaching status. An interaction term allowed odds comparison between cohorts. Propensity matching yielded a 1:1 matching population for gender, age and CCI. Results: 113,355 patients with BE were propensity matched to controls including 4,450 malnourished, 92,095 normal/overweight, 9,240 obese and 7,570 morbidly obese. All cohorts had higher odds of BE, with the obese cohort featuring the highest odds at 1.34 (p<0.01) compared to controls. After adjusting for confounders, malnourished patients had increased mortality odds (aOR:2.48,p<0.01), and obese patients had decreased mortality odds (aOR:0.60,p=0.05), though results did not differ clinically from non-BE populations. Table 1 and 2 display all outcomes and top admission reasons. Cohorts did not differ in total costs or hospitalization charges compared to controls. Malnourished and morbidly obese BE patients had shorter LOS compared to non-BE controls (p=0.03). Conclusion: The malnourished, obese and morbidly obese cohorts had higher adjusted odds of BE. Subgroups with the highest unadjusted mortality were the malnourished, normal/overweight, morbidly obese and obese, though differences were not statistically significant on multivariate analysis when comparing BE and non-BE patients. No clinically significant differences in LOS, total costs or charges were noted between BE and non-BE cohorts. This suggests that the slow disease progression does not significantly impact clinical outcomes in inpatients.368_A Figure 1. Means and Adjusted odds ratios for the evaluated parameters in malnourished, obese and morbidly obese patients when compared to normal/overweight controls, stratified by the presence or absence of Barrett’s esophagus diagnosis.368_B Figure 2. Top five admission diagnoses in patients with Barrett’s esophagus.