Diagnosis Of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Research Articles

Risk-specific intensity of surveillance practices in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Results from the BCAN/SUO/AUA/LUGPA electronic survey.

251 Background: The ideal surveillance regimen for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is uncertain. Given different grade- and stage-specific risks of recurrence and progression, there is some question whether it might be acceptable to pursue less intensive surveillance practices for patients with lower risk disease, and there is a paucity of data on current patterns of care in this area of practice. Methods: An electronic survey was developed by the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) to elicit self-reported practices of cystoscopy, cytology, and radiographic testing in the setting of surveillance for patients with a history of NMIBC. The survey was circulated to urologists via the AUA, SUO and LUGPA distribution lists. 512 respondents completed the survey. Results: Among respondents, 66% report performing cystoscopy every 3 months on all patients for at least the first two years following diagnosis of NMIBC. The remaining 33% report performing surveillance cystoscopy less frequently, 95% of whom report doing so in the setting of low grade pathology. Similarly, 51% report using cytology with every cystoscopy, 23% do so for all high grade cases, and 30% report not using cytology with every cystoscopy. In the absence of recurrence for patients with an initial high grade diagnosis, upper tract reimaging is performed annually in 48%, biannually in 37% and never in 3%. The corresponding figures for patients with an index diagnosis of low grade disease are 14%, 37% and 28%, respectively. In the event of a recurrence in the bladder, 80% of respondents report reimaging the upper tracts for patients with high grade disease, versus 45% in the event of a low grade recurrence. Conclusions: A substantial number of urologists responding to a survey report using relatively less intensive surveillance practices in patients with lower risk NMIBC. These results suggest a lack of consensus on the ideal intensity of evaluation in this setting, and provide a basis for prospective studies to validate the safest and most cost-effective strategies for surveillance. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Survival after primary and deferred cystectomy for stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

Context:The optimal time of cystectomy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is controversial.Aim:This study aims at comparing cancer-specific survival in primary versus deferred cystectomy for T1 bladder cancer.Settings and Design:Between 1990 and 2004, a retrospective cohort of 204 patients was studied.Materials and Methods:Primary cystectomy at the diagnosis of NMIBC was performed in 134 patients (group 1) and deferred cystectomy was done after failed conservative treatment in 70 (group 2) Both groups were compared regarding patient and tumor characteristics and cancer-specific survival.Statistical Analysis Used:Cancer-specific survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:Mean follow-up was 79 and 66 months, respectively, in the two groups. Tumor multiplicity was more frequent in group 2; otherwise, both groups were comparable in all characteristics. The definitive stage was T1 in all patients. Although the 3-year (84% in group 1 vs. 79% in group 2), 5-year (78% vs. 71%) and 10-year (69% vs. 64%) cancer-specific survival rates were lower in the deferred cystectomy group, the difference was not statistically significant. In group 2, survival was significantly lower in cases undergoing more than three transurethral resections of bladder tumors (TURBT) than in cases with fewer TURBTs.Conclusions:Cancer-specific survival is statistically comparable for primary and deferred cystectomy in T1 bladder cancer, although there is a non-significant difference in favor of primary cystectomy. In the deferred cystectomy group, the number of TURBTs beyond three is associated with lower survival. Conservative treatment should be adopted for most cases in this category.