Diagnosis Of Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction Research Articles

Is there cardiac autonomic dysfunction in children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchospasm?

ABSTRACT Background The pulmonary impairment in patients with bronchoconstriction induced by eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea(EVH) goes beyond the respiratory system, also impairing autonomic nervous modulation. This study aimed to evaluate the behavior of cardiac autonomic modulation in young asthmatics with and without EIB after the EVH test. Research design and methods A cross-sectional study design using 54 asthmatics(51.9% female), aged between 10 and 19 years, investigated with the EVH test. Forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1) was measured at 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after EVH. Heart rate variability(HRV) measures of time were assessed pre and 30 min-post EVH. The diagnosis of Exercise-Induced bronchoconstriction with underlying clinical asthma(EIBA) was confirmed by a fall in FEV1 ≥10% compared to baseline. Results Thirty(55.5%) asthmatics had EIBA. Subjects with EIBA have reduced mean of the R-R intervals in relation to baseline until 15 minutes after EVH. Individuals without EIBA had increased parasympathetic activity compared to baseline(rMSSD) from 5 min after EVH(p < 0.05). This parasympathetic activity increase in relation to baseline was seen in individuals with EIBA after 25 minutes (rMSSD = 49.9 ± 5.3 vs 63.5 ± 7.2, p < 0.05). Conclusion Young asthmatics with EIBA present a delay in the increase of the parasympathetic component after EVH when compared to asthmatics without EIBA.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in the assessment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: A multicenter retrospective analysis of UK-based athletes.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is not only highly prevalent in people with asthma, but can also occur independently, particularly in athletes. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is an indirect biomarker of type 2 airway inflammation that has an established role in the assessment and management of asthma. The aim was to evaluate the value of FeNO in the assessment of EIB in athletes. Multicenter retrospective analysis. In total, 488 athletes (male: 76%) performed baseline FeNO, and spirometry pre- and post-indirect bronchial provocation via eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for established FeNO thresholds-that is, intermediate (≥25 ppb) and high FeNO (≥40 ppb and ≥ 50 ppb)-and were evaluated against objective evidence of EIB (≥10% fall in FEV1 ). The diagnostic accuracy of FeNO was calculated using receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC). Thirty-nine percent of the athletes had a post-EVH fall in FEV1 consistent with EIB. FeNO values ≥25 ppb, ≥40 ppb, and ≥ 50 ppb were observed in 42%, 23%, and 17% of the cohort, respectively. The sensitivity of FeNO ≥25 ppb was 55%, which decreased to 37% and 27% at ≥40 ppb and ≥ 50 ppb, respectively. The specificity of FeNO ≥25 ppb, ≥40 ppb, and ≥ 50 ppb was 66%, 86%, and 89%, respectively. The ROC-AUC for FeNO was 0.656. FeNO ≥40 ppb provides good specificity, that is, the ability to rule-in a diagnosis of EIB. However, due to the poor sensitivity and predictive values, FeNO should not be employed as a replacement for indirect bronchial provocation in athletes.

Cut-off value for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction based on the features of the airway obstruction.

The current cut-off value for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in adults—percent fall in FEV1 (ΔFEV1) ≥ 10% after exercise challenge test (ECT)—has low specificity and weak evidences. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the cut-off value for EIB that provides the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Participants who underwent the ECT between 2007 and 2018 were categorized according to ΔFEV1: definite EIB (ΔFEV1 ≥ 15%), borderline (10% ≤ ΔFEV1 < 15%), and normal (ΔFEV1 < 10%). Distinct characteristics of the definite EIB group were identified and explored in the borderline EIB group. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off value. Of 128 patients, 60 were grouped as the definite EIB group, 23 as the borderline group, and 45 as the normal group. All participants were men, with a median age of 20 years (interquartile range [IQR:] 19–23 years). The definite EIB group exhibited wheezing on auscultation (P < 0.001), ΔFEV1/FVC ≥ 10% (P < 0.001), and ΔFEF25–75% ≥ 25% (P < 0.001) compared to other groups. Eight (8/23, 34.8%) patients in the borderline group had at least one of these features, but the trend was more similar to that of the normal group than the definite EIB group. A cut-off value of ΔFEV1 ≥ 13.5% had a sensitivity of 98.5% and specificity of 93.5% for EIB. Wheezing on auscultation, ΔFEV1/FVC ≥ 10%, and ΔFEF25–75% ≥ 25% after ECT may be useful for the diagnosis of EIB, particularly in individuals with a ΔFEV1 of 10–15%. For EIB, a higher cut-off value, possibly ΔFEV1 ≥ 13.5%, should be considered as the diagnostic criterion.

Volatile organic breath components and exercise induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children

IntroductionAsthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood and is generally characterized by exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Assessing EIB is time consuming and expensive as it requires a fully equipped pulmonary function laboratory. Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath is a novel technique for examining biomarkers which may associate with asthma features. The aim of this pilot study was to identify potential markers in the relationship between EIB and VOCs.MethodsChildren between four and 14 years old were asked to provide a breath sample prior to undergoing an exercise challenge test to assess for EIB.ResultsBreath samples were collected and analyzed in 46 asthmatic children, 21 with EIB and 25 without EIB (NO-EIB). Molecular features (MFs) were not significantly different between EIB and NO-EIB controls. 29 of the 46 children were corticosteroid naïve, 10 with EIB and 13 without. In the corticosteroid naïve group EIB was associated with increased MF23 and MF14 in the lower breath sample (p-value < 0.05).ConclusionThis pilot study shows that EIB was related to an increased MF14 and MF23 in corticosteroid naïve children. The tentative identities of these compounds are octanal and dodecane/tetradecane respectively. These candidate biomarkers have a potential to enable non-invasive diagnosis of EIB in steroid-naïve children.Trial registration This study is registered in the Netherlands trial register (trial no. NL6087) at 14 February 2017.

The feasibility of eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea for the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in a community pulmonary practice

Objective Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a common condition and is typically treated empirically based on symptoms alone. However, symptoms of EIB are typically nonspecific. Objective testing with eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) is a sensitive and specific method to diagnose EIB and may suggest alternative etiologies such as exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO). To this point, EVH has been primarily utilized in large academic centers and in elite athletes. We intend to discuss the feasibility and clinical application of utilizing EVH to diagnose EIB in a community-based pulmonary practice. Methods Retrospective analysis of 62 patients who completed EVH at The Oregon Clinic Pulmonary Clinic. Patients with inspiratory flow volume loop flattening or clinical symptoms were assessed by otolaryngology for evidence of EILO. Results: 61 of 62 patients were included in the final analysis. 52 of 61 patients (85%) achieved an interpretable test with a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) >60%. There was no difference in baseline spirometry or patient characteristics between those who were able to reach an MVV >60% and those who did not. 14 (23%) patients were diagnosed with EIB, 18 (30%) with EILO, and 4 (7%) were diagnosed with both EIB and EILO. Only 1 patient had a non-diagnostic evaluation with MVV <60% and negative for EIB and EILO. Conclusions EVH is a feasible diagnostic modality to evaluate for EIB in a community pulmonary practice and may suggest alternative conditions such as EILO. Accurate diagnosis is paramount to prescribing proper therapy, decreasing inappropriate medication use, and relieving exercise-induced symptoms.

Management of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Athletes

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a phenomenon observed in asthma but is also seen in healthy individuals and frequently in athletes. High prevalence rates are observed in athletes engaged in endurance sports, winter sports, and swimming. The pathophysiology of EIB is thought to be related to hyperventilation, cold air, and epithelial damage caused by chlorine and fine particles in inspired air. Several diagnostic procedures can be used; however, the diagnosis of EIB based on self-reported symptoms is not reliable and requires an objective examination. The hyperosmolar inhalation test and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea test, which involve indirect stimulation of the airway, are useful for the diagnosis of EIB. A short-acting β-agonist is the first choice for prevention of EIB, and an inhaled corticosteroid is essential for patients with asthma. Furthermore, treatment should accommodate antidoping requirements in elite athletes. Tailoring of the therapeutic strategy to the individual case and the prognosis after cessation of athletic activity are issues that should be clarified in the future.

Diagnostic value of bronchoprovocation challenge with adenosine monophosphate versus exercise testing in early diagnosis of asthma

BackgroundAirway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of bronchial asthma and is diagnosed using direct and indirect bronchoprovocation tests. The diagnosis of AHR is a challenge in symptomatic patients with a normal baseline prebronchodilator spirometry and postbronchodilator spirometry. Exercise-induced asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a distinct form of AHR. There is no single test that is sufficient to exclude AHR in symptomatic military personnel with normal spirometry. This study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of indirect bronchoprovocation test using inhaled adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and exercise challenge test (ECT) in the diagnosis of EIB. MethodsA crossover study was conducted with consecutive sampling of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of asthma and with normal spirometry results who were subjected to both ECT and bronchoprovocation test using inhaled AMP on separate days. ResultsForty participants were recruited (the mean age: 25 yrs, 100% male). The commonest presentation was breathlessness on exercise (55%). With exercise alone, 40% tested positive for AHR, while with AMP alone, the positivity increased to 53%, and the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.03). Exercise alone failed to detect 8 cases that tested positive for AHR by inhaled AMP challenge. ConclusionIndirect bronchoprovocation test using inhaled AMP may be used to diagnose AHR in conditions in which exercise challenge testing is not available or the patient is unable to complete ECT.

Diagnosis of Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction in Swimmers: Context Matters

This study aimed to compare the bronchoconstrictive effect of a chlorinated inspirate EVH test and swim test to a laboratory-based EVH test in swimmers. Fifteen collegiate swimmers (n = 5 male, n = 10 female; 21 ± 2 yr) completed 3 d of testing in pseudorandom order; a standard EVH test (EVHL), a pool air EVH test (EVHCl), and a swimming test (Swim). Spirometry was measured at baseline, and 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after each test. EVHL elicited a forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) fall index of -9.7% ± 6.4% compared with -6.6% ± 9.2% and -3.0% ± 7.5% after EVHCl and Swim, respectively (P < 0.05). Using Bland-Altman analysis, we found good agreement between EVHL and EVHCl (bias = -2.8, r = 0.79; P < 0.05) with poor agreement between EVHL and Swim (bias = -6.7, r = 0.20) and between EVHCl and Swim (bias = -3.9, r = 0.50; both P < 0.05). Forced expired flow between 25% and 75% lung volume and peak expired flow were significantly reduced by the EVHL compared with the EVHCl and Swim tests (P < 0.05). EVHL elicits a greater forced expired volume in 1-s fall index compared with EVHCl and Swim. The unique aquatic environment of swimmers potentially protects against bronchoconstriction and should be considered in the determination of EIB.

Can Pediatricians Assess Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction From Post-exercise Videos?

Objective: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a highly prevalent morbidity of childhood asthma and defined by a transient narrowing of the airways during or after physical exercise. An exercise challenge test (ECT) is the reference standard for the diagnosis of EIB. Video evaluation of EIB symptoms could be a practical alternative for the assessment of EIB. We studied the ability of pediatricians to assess EIB from post-exercise videos.Methods: A clinical assessment was performed in 20 asthmatic children (mean age 11.6 years) and EIB was measured with a standardized ECT performed in cold, dry air. EIB was defined as a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥10% post-exercise. Children were filmed before and after exercise in frontal position and bare chested. The clinical assessment results and videos were shown to 20 pediatricians (mean experience 14.4 years). Each assessed EIB severity in 5 random children providing 100 assessments, scored on a continuous rating scale (0–10) and in severity classifications (no, mild, moderate, severe) using a scoring list including physical asthma symptoms. Correlations between predicted scores and objective scores were calculated with Spearman's rho and Cohen's Kappa. A generalized linear model was used to assess the relationship between physical symptoms and fall in FEV1.Results: Median fall in FEV1 after exercise was 15.1% (IQR 1.2–65.1). Pediatricians detected EIB with a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI 66–87%) and a specificity of 40% (95% CI 27–55%). The positive predictive value for a pediatricians' diagnosis of EIB was 61% (95% CI 50–72%). The negative predictive value was 60% (95% CI 42–76%). The agreement between predicted EIB severity classifications and the validated classifications based on the ECT's, was fair [Kappa = 0.36 (95% CI 0.23–0.48)]. The correlation between predicted EIB severity scored on a continuous rating scale and fall in FEV1 after exercise was weak (rs = 0.39, p < 0.001). Independent predictive variables for fall in FEV1 were wheezing (−11%), supraclavicular retractions (−8.4%) and a prolonged expiratory phase (−8.8%).Conclusion: The ability of pediatricians to assess EIB from post-exercise videos is fair at best, implicating that standardized ECT's are still vital in the assessment of EIB.

Differences in laryngeal movements during exercise in healthy and dyspnoeic adolescents

ObjectivesTo compare glottic and supraglottic movements in healthy adolescents and adolescents experiencing dyspnoea during strenuous exercise. MethodsUsing the continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE)-test laryngeal movements during exercise were analysed in healthy controls (n = 28) and compared to subjects with exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) (n = 10), exercise induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) (n = 10) and subjects experiencing exercise-induced dyspnoea without having any of these diagnoses (n = 31). Images from the video recordings were assessed regarding glottic angle, glottic area and supraglottic area using the software measuring tool EILOMEA. ResultsNo significant differences were detected between controls, the dyspnoea group without a diagnosis of EIB or EILO and the EIB group regarding glottis angle, glottis area or supraglottic area at maximum effort. All three parameters differed significantly in the EILO group compared to the other groups (p=<0.001). In the group with EILO all but one had supraglottic obstruction (corresponding to a CLE-test score ≥2). Movement of the laryngeal structures, corresponding to a CLE-test score of 1, at glottic and/or supraglottic level was seen in 26 of 35 (74%) of controls, 34 out of 41 (83%) of patients in the dyspnoea group, and in 25 of 38 (66%) of EIB-subjects. ConclusionMinor movements at both glottic and supraglottic level are equally common in healthy controls as among adolescents with exercise induced dyspnoea without EIB or EILO and adolescents with EIB. Adolescents with EILO had a statistically significant more pronounced supraglottic obstruction than the other groups.

A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Agreement Between Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperventilation and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests for Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is very common in athletes. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) have traditionally been used for the diagnosis of EIB. However, alternative indirect bronchoprovocation tests have recently been used as surrogate tests. One of these is the eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH). This meta-analysis studied the agreement between the two tests. An extensive search in PubMed and Medline was conducted for studies where participants underwent both CPET and EVH with measurement of forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1). After extracting data using two-by-two contingency tables, pooled positive and negative agreements were first calculated between the two tests, with EVH benchmarked against CPET, and then, pooled positive and negative agreements were calculated with CPET benchmarked against EVH. The pooled positive and negative agreements between EVH and CPET (with CPET as the reference) were 0.62 [(95% confidence interval 0.54-0.70), I2 77%] and 0.61 [(0.56-0.65)), I2 81%]. The pooled positive and negative agreements between CPET and EVH (with EVH as the reference) were 0.36 [(0.30-0.42), I2 93%] and 0.82 [(0.77-0.86), I2 78%]. The average of positive test results with EVH across all studies was greater than that of CPETs (58.84% vs. 39.51%). Results of this meta-analysis show poor positive agreement between the two tests but high negative agreement (specifically using EVH as reference), suggesting that either test can be used for correctly identifying those without EIB. Results also suggest that the chances of a test resulting positive are higher with EVH than with CPET.

Prevalence of Exercise Induced Bronchoconstriction in Recreational Adult Hockey Players as determined by Sport Specific Field Exercise Challenge Test

BACKGROUND: Exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is provoked by exercise and results in narrowing of the airways. Studies have shown an EIB prevalence of 11-50% in athletic populations. The diagnosis of EIB is dependent upon objective measurement of respiratory function, as respiratory symptoms are unreliable. Cold and dry ambient conditions contribute to the severity of EIB. The environmental conditions and manner of exertion an athlete is exposed to in ice hockey are significantly different than any current standardized laboratory test to evaluate for EIB. In a prior study of elite women hockey players, 39.5% presented symptoms of asthma and 21% demonstrated EIB. Sport-specific field exercise challenge tests (SSFECT) have been validated for the assessment of EIB, and are more sensitive than laboratory challenges in elite winter athletes. PURPOSE: To use a SSFECT to determine the prevalence of EIB in adult recreational ice hockey players, and the correlation between reported symptoms and diagnosis by this method. METHODS: Participants were 18 males and 2 females (mean age of 34.7 yrs, mean height of 1.78 m); who participated in 1 of 2 recreational ice hockey leagues in Chicago, IL. Using a Piko-1 portable spirometer, FEV1 was measured prior to the hockey game and immediately following periods 1, 2, and 3. All respiratory measurements occurred with hockey equipment adorned. Airway response was expressed as the percent fall in FEV1 from the baseline value. Diagnosis of EIB was given if athletes had a greater than 10% decrease in FEV1 from baseline measured at any time point. Athletes also completed an intake questionnaire prior to testing which included clinical symptoms, exercise history, and past medical history. RESULTS: EIB was diagnosed in 3/20(15%) athletes. A prior diagnosis of asthma or exercise induced asthma was reported in 5/20 (25%) athletes, yet only one of these had a decrease of > 10 % of FEV1 as measured by this test. Of the three EIB+, two were symptomatic (67%); and of the EIB-, 9/17 (53%) reported respiratory symptoms. Diagnosis of EIB was consistent for all three periods in all but one athlete. Mean FEV1 for the three periods was 4.08, 4.07, and 4.07 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms remain unreliable for diagnosis of EIB. SSFECT can be utilized for diagnosis of EIB in ice hockey athletes.

Global prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in childhood: A meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children and adolescents. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Virtual Health Library-BIREME from inception to December 23, 2017. We selected observational studies that reported the prevalence of EIB (diagnosed by exercise challenge test) in children and adolescents aged 5-18 years. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled prevalence of EIB and 95% CI. We included 66 studies (55 696 participants, 5670 cases of EIB) in the review, of which 33 in general population of children and adolescents, 10 in child and adolescent athletes and 23 in children and adolescents with asthma. The global mean prevalence of EIB in the general population of children and adolescents was 9% (IC95%: 8-10%), with a higher rate (12%) in Asia-Pacific and America. The mean prevalence of EIB was 15% (95% CI: 9-21%) in child and adolescent athletes, and 46% (95% CI: 39-53%) in children and adolescents with asthma. We estimated that, globally, around 16.5 million (95% CI: 15-18 million) children and adolescents up to 18 years of age may have EIB. EIB in childhood should be considered as a global public health problem that needs more attention. The substantial heterogeneity between studies highlights the need for evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis of EIB in this age group.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma: An observational cohort study.

The diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was established by changes in lung function after exercise challenge. The prevalence of EIB and factors related to EIB were not fully described in children with asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and predictors of EIB in children with asthma. A total of 149 children with physician-diagnosed asthma above 5 years of age underwent standardized treadmill exercise challenge for EIB and methacholine challenge for airway hyper-responsiveness from October 2015 to December 2016. EIB presented in 52.5% of children with asthma. Compared with children without EIB, there were more patients with atopic dermatitis in children with EIB (p=0.038). Allergic to Dermatohagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae were also found more in children with EIB (p=0.045 and 0.048 respectively). Maximal decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) were highest in patients who were most sensitive to methacholine provocation (provocation concentration causing 20% fall in FEV1 [PC20]≤1mg/mL). Patients, who were more sensitive to methacholine challenge (with lower PC20 levels), develop EIB with more decline in FEV1 after exercise challenge (p=0.038). Among patients with EIB, airflow limitation development in patient with methacholine-induced airway hyper-responsiveness was more abrupt and severe compared with patients without airway hyper-responsiveness (p=0.045 and 0.033 respectively). EIB presented in 52.5% of children with asthma. The more severe methacholine-induced hyper-responsiveness, the higher prevalence of EIB as well as the severity.

Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm and Allergy.

Sport is an essential part of childhood, with precious and acknowledged positive health effects but the impact of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) significantly reduces participation in physical activity. It is important to recognize EIB, differentiating EIB with or without asthma if the transient narrowing of the airways after exercise is associated with asthmatic symptoms or not, in the way to select the most appropriate treatment among the many treatment options available today. Therapy is prescribed based on symptoms severity but diagnosis of EIB is established by changes in lung function provoked by exercise evaluating by direct and indirect tests. Sometimes, in younger children it is difficult to obtain the registration of difference between the preexercise forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) value and the lowest FEV1 value recorded within 30 min after exercise, defined as the gold standard, but interrupter resistance, in association with spirometry, has been showed to be a valid alternative in preschool age. Atopy is the main risk factor, as demonstrated by epidemiologic data showing that among the estimated pediatric population with EIB up to 40% of them have allergic rhinitis and 30% of these patients may develop adult asthma, according with atopic march. Adopting the right treatment and prevention, selecting sports with no marked hyperventilation and excessive cooling of the airways, children with EIB can be able to take part in physical activity like all others.

Maximizing Respiratory Health In Elite Swimmers - A Systematic Approach To Optimize Total Airway Health

Elite Swimmers are known to have high prevalence of exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), nasal and sinus disorders. There is however limited data available regarding the impact of a systematic assessment, addressing all aspects of airway health in this cohort. PURPOSE: To report the findings of a systematic approach to evaluating total airway health in elite swimmers with EIB, prior to the 2016 Olympics. METHODS: 15 elite swimmers (9 males, 6 females), age 22.2 ± 2.9 yrs underwent a systematic assessment of total airway health three months prior to the Olympics. All swimmers had a prior diagnosis of EIB, confirmed by indirect bronchoprovocation challenge and measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). All were prescribed appropriate inhaler therapy and educated on inhaler technique. At the systematic assessment spirometry, FeNO, inhaler flow-rate, nasal flow was measured and they also underwent an assessment with a pulmonologist. Results were analysed using paired t-tests and are presented as mean ± SD. RESULTS: All swimmers had at least one co-existing condition in addition to EIB including nasal disease, reflux, sensations of laryngeal closure, recurrent respiratory tract infection and abnormal breathing sensations. One-third reported side effects from inhaler use. All swimmers demonstrated sub-optimal inhaler technique based on an inhalation rate of 348 ± 49.4 L.min-1. Despite being prescribed treatment for EIB, three swimmers had on-going airflow obstruction with bronchodilator reversibility of FEV1 by 12.9 ± 7.7 % above baseline. At the review FeNO was reduced (pre: 27.7 ± 15.1, post: 16.3 ± 6.5 ppb (p = 0.006) from first consult. CONCLUSION: Despite being prescribed EIB treatment over half of an elite cohort of swimmers reported troublesome respiratory and allied symptoms. Moreover, inhaler technique was sub-optimal with frequent report of side-effects. Respiratory health in elite swimmers can be optimized through systematic assessment of airway health.

Role of bronchoprovocation tests in identifying exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in a non-athletic population: a pilot study.

Studies on diagnostic tests for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) have centered around the asthmatic and elite athletic population. Traditionally, the exercise challenge test (ET) was recommended to assess EIB. We aimed to compare the performance of surrogate testing, mainly the hypertonic saline (HS) test, and methacholine challenge test (MCT) versus ET in identifying EIB among non-athletic subjects. We prospectively recruited subjects who did not have confirmed active asthma, but who reported exercise-induced dyspnoea. The participants underwent HS and ET on separate days within two weeks. MCT performed within one year were obtained retrospectively from medical records. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each diagnostic test were calculated using ET as the gold standard. We recruited 27 participants (mean age 20.6±2.5 years; 92.6% male). Five (18.5%) had a history of self-reported asthma prior to recruitment. Eleven participants (40.7%) had a positive ET test. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of HS in diagnosing EIB was 90.9%, 62.5% and 74.1%; while that of MCT was 88.9%, 83.3% and 85.7% respectively. Six subjects were positive to HS but had negative ET test. Both HS and MCT were found to be suitable alternatives to ET in screening for EIB in the non-athletic population in this pilot study. Further large scale studies are required to confirm this finding. These tests have the potential to replace ET for the diagnosis of EIB in centres without ET equipment or facilities.

Exercice-induced bronchoconstriction among athletes: Assessment of bronchial provocation tests

Diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) requires the use of bronchial provocation tests (BPTs). We assessed exercise-induced respiratory symptoms (EIRS), EIB and asthma in athletes and evaluated the validity of BPTs in the diagnosis of EIB. Rhinitis and atopy were also assessed.Athletes with (n=55) and without previous asthma diagnosis (n=145) were tested by skin prick tests, lung function and eNO measurements. EIRS were recorded and EIB was assessed by methacholine (Mch), eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH), mannitol and exercise test.EIRS were highly reported and history of asthma was common among athletes. A high prevalence of atopy (48.7%) and allergic rhinitis (30.5%) was found. Athletes with asthma had a higher response rate to Mch and to EVH, as compared with athletes without a previous asthma diagnosis (P=0.012 and P=0.017 respectively). Report of EIRS, rhinitis and atopy were not associated with a positive BPT response.Screening athletes for EIB using BPTs is suggested, irrespective of reported EIRS or a previous asthma diagnosis.

Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea: Gold Standard for Diagnosing Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Athletes?

In athletes, a secure diagnos is of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is dependent on objective testing. Evaluating spirometric indices of airflow before and following an exercise bout is intuitively the optimal means for the diagnosis; however, this approach is recognized as having several key limitations. Accordingly, alternative indirect bronchoprovocation tests have been recommended as surrogate means for obtaining a diagnosis of EIB. Of these tests, it is often argued that the eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) challenge represents the ‘gold standard’. This article provides a state-of-the-art review of EVH, including an overview of the test methodology and its interpretation. We also address the performance of EVH against the other functional and clinical approaches commonly adopted for the diagnosis of EIB. The published evidence supports a key role for EVH in the diagnostic algorithm for EIB testing in athletes. However, its wide sensitivity and specificity and poor repeatability preclude EVH from being termed a ‘gold standard’ test for EIB.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0491-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparing Hypertonic Saline and Methacholine Challenge Tests for Diagnosis of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

Comparing Hypertonic Saline and Methacholine Challenge Tests for Diagnosis of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction