Abstract
This study aimed to compare the bronchoconstrictive effect of a chlorinated inspirate EVH test and swim test to a laboratory-based EVH test in swimmers. Fifteen collegiate swimmers (n = 5 male, n = 10 female; 21 ± 2 yr) completed 3 d of testing in pseudorandom order; a standard EVH test (EVHL), a pool air EVH test (EVHCl), and a swimming test (Swim). Spirometry was measured at baseline, and 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after each test. EVHL elicited a forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) fall index of -9.7% ± 6.4% compared with -6.6% ± 9.2% and -3.0% ± 7.5% after EVHCl and Swim, respectively (P < 0.05). Using Bland-Altman analysis, we found good agreement between EVHL and EVHCl (bias = -2.8, r = 0.79; P < 0.05) with poor agreement between EVHL and Swim (bias = -6.7, r = 0.20) and between EVHCl and Swim (bias = -3.9, r = 0.50; both P < 0.05). Forced expired flow between 25% and 75% lung volume and peak expired flow were significantly reduced by the EVHL compared with the EVHCl and Swim tests (P < 0.05). EVHL elicits a greater forced expired volume in 1-s fall index compared with EVHCl and Swim. The unique aquatic environment of swimmers potentially protects against bronchoconstriction and should be considered in the determination of EIB.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
