Clostridioides Difficile Infection Diagnosis Research Articles

Rise to the Challenge: Master the Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant public health challenge in the developed world. Although previously CDI was primarily a health care-acquired infection, there are now rising numbers of community-acquired cases in patients without traditional risk factors, such as antibiotic exposure. The landscape for the treatment of CDI has changed significantly during the past decade, including newer diagnostic tests, novel antibiotic regimens, and strategies for microbiome restoration in the form of traditional fecal microbiota transplant and approved live biotherapeutics in an effort to address the underlying pathophysiologic process of gut microbial dysbiosis. We present a concise review for clinicians on the diagnosis and management of both primary and recurrent CDI.

Comparison of rectal swabs and fecal samples for the detection of Clostridioides difficile infections with a new in-house PCR assay.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In clinical laboratories, CDI testing is currently performed on stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea. However, the diagnosis of CDI can be delayed by the time required to collect stool samples. Barriers to sample collection could be overcome by using a rectal swab instead of a stool sample. Our study showed that CDI can be identified rapidly and reliably by a new PCR assay developed in our laboratory on both stool and rectal swab specimens. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce the time for the detection of CDI and improve the management of this infection. It should also provide a useful alternative for infection-control practitioners to better control the spread of C. difficile.

Impact of the Reverse 2-Step Algorithm for Clostridioides difficile Testing in the Microbiology Laboratory on Hospitalized Patients.

Multistep laboratory testing is recommended for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The aim of this study was to present the impact of multistep CDI diagnostic testing in an academic hospital system and evaluate the toxin B gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values of PCR-positive tests. In October 2022, our system began reflex testing all PCR-positive stool samples with the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (Techlab), an enzyme immunoassay-based test with results for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and C difficile toxin A/B. Hospital-onset (HO) CDI and CDI antibiotic use before and after testing were tracked. Ct values were obtained from the Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory. Receiver operating curve analysis was used to examine the sensitivity and specificity for identifying GDH+/toxin+ and GDH-/toxin- at various Ct thresholds. The HO-CDI rate decreased from 0.352 cases per 1000 patient-days to 0.115 cases per 1000 patient-days post-reflex testing (P < .005). Anti-CDI antibiotics use decreased, but the decrease was not commensurate with CDI rates following reflex testing. PCR+/GDH+/toxin+ samples had a lower mean Ct value than PCR+/GDH-/toxin- samples (23.3 vs 33.5, P < .0001). A Ct value of 28.65 could distinguish between those 2 groups. Fifty-four percent of PCR+/GDH+/toxin- samples had a Ct value below that cut-off, suggesting the possibility of CDI with a negative toxin test. Reflex testing for a laboratory diagnosis of CDI results in rapid, systemwide decreases in the rate of HO-CDI. Additional research is needed to distinguish CDI from C difficile colonization in patients with discordant testing.

Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes of Clostridium difficile Infection in a Tertiary Care Center in Bahrain.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant healthcare challenge associated with antibiotic use and healthcare settings. While healthcare facility-onset CDI (HO-CDI) rates have been extensively studied, the incidence and risk factors of CDI in various settings, including the community, require further investigation. Aim This study aims to examine the incidence rates of CDI in a major governmental hospital in Bahrain, identify risk factors for CDI, and assess the effectiveness of infection control measures. Method We conducted a retrospective study at the Salmaniya Medical Complex (SMC), analyzing all confirmed cases of CDI over a 30-month period from January 2021 to June 2023. CDI cases were screened using glutamine dehydrogenase antigen detection and confirmed using molecular assays like polymerase chain reaction and/or toxin assaysfor confirmation.The study categorized CDI cases based on their onset (hospital or community) and explored associated risk factors, including antibiotic use, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and patient demographics. Infection control practices were also evaluated for their role in managing CDI. Results About 57 new CDI cases were identified during the study period, with a HO-CDI incidence rate of 0.5 per 10,000 patient days. While HO-CDI rates remained stable, community-onset (CO)-CDI cases increased. The median patient age was 61.8 years, without notable differences between genders. Key risk factors for CDI were antimicrobial therapy, use of acid-reducing agents, age, and underlying comorbidities. The mortality rate stood at 35.1%. The ATLAS score (i.e., age, treatment with antibiotics, leukocyte count, albumin level, and serum creatinine) was a reliable predictor of mortality. Critical care admission and low albumin levels emerged as significant independent risk factors for mortality. Conclusions The study demonstrates a low incidence rate of HO-CDI at SMC, attributed to effective infection control and antibiotic stewardship programs. The overall CDI rate increased during the study period, driven by a rise in CO cases; further investigating the risk factors among this category in our study revealed that most patients were exposed to antibiotic therapy within the past three months of their CDI diagnosis. The rise in CO-CDI cases underscores the need for broader community-based interventions and awareness regarding antibiotic and PPI use.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection: guidelines and status of practice in Korea

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection that is expected to increase with the increases in the elderly population, immunocompromised patients treated with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive drugs, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and invasive medical technologies. Accurate diagnosis is critical for proper treatment and management of CDI. Clinical laboratories typically use four methods to diagnose CDI: C. difficile culture, toxin detection using immunoassays, detection of glutamate dehydrogenase using immunoassays, and detection of toxin A/B gene. Each CDI diagnostic test has strengths and limitations, and varies in performance. Guidelines for CDI diagnosis have been developed by organizations that include the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and American College of Gastroenterology. Certain other countries have guidelines. In Korea, surveys on CDI diagnosis performed in 2015 and 2018 revealed a shift in CDI testing in clinical laboratories in Korea. It is necessary to develop standardized diagnostic guidelines for CDI appropriate for the Korean context.

Rapid Isothermal Detection of Pathogenic Clostridioides difficile Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification.

Nosocomial-associated diarrhea due to Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is diagnosed after sample precultivation by the detection of the toxins in enzyme immunoassays or via toxin gene nucleic acid amplification. Rapid and direct diagnosis is important for targeted treatment to prevent severe cases and recurrence. We developed two singleplex and a one-pot duplex fluorescent 15 min isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assays targeting the toxin genes A and B (tcdA and tcdB). Furthermore, we adapted the singleplex RPA to a 3D-printed microreactor device. Analytical sensitivity was determined using a DNA standard and DNA extracts of 20 C. difficile strains with different toxinotypes. Nineteen clostridial and gastrointestinal bacteria strains were used to determine analytical specificity. Adaptation of singleplex assays to duplex assays in a 50 μL volume required optimized primer and probe concentrations. A volume reduction by one-fourth (12.4 μL) was established for the 3D-printed microreactor. Mixing of RPA was confirmed as essential for optimal analytical sensitivity. Detection limits (LOD) ranging from 119 to 1411 DNA molecules detected were similar in the duplex tube format and in the singleplex 3D-printed microreactor format. The duplex RPA allows the simultaneous detection of both toxins important for the timely and reliable diagnosis of CDI. The 3D-printed reaction chamber can be developed into a microfluidic lab-on-a-chip system use at the point of care.

Assessment of Knowledge and Practice of Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia Regarding Clostridioides difficile Infection Diagnosis and Management: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study.

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) depends on clinical presentation and laboratory testing. Stool diagnostic tests are essential for effective detection of toxigenic C. difficile strains. No study to date has evaluated the readability of microbiology labs in Saudi Arabia to test for CDI and evaluated the knowledge and practice of healthcare providers regarding CDI management. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia regarding CDI diagnosis and treatment. A cross-sectional, descriptive, questionnaire-based study was conducted on healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia, primarily physicians and clinical pharmacists. The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review and input from infectious diseases experts. The questionnaire was administered online. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Of 183 respondents, 27.9% had adequate knowledge on CDI diagnosis and management. The majority were internal medicine specialists (37.7%) working in governmental or semi-governmental hospitals (80.9%) in central (46.6%) or southern (30.1%) regions of Saudi Arabia. Most participants assessed laxative use (86.3%) and reported positive C. difficile specimens to infection control (67.2%). However, knowledge varied, with 57.4% supporting unnecessary retesting and 53% assuming positive PCR test indicates moderate CDI probability. Factors such as specialization, hospital accreditation status, and bed capacity influenced knowledge levels (p<0.01 for all factors). The study revealed a significant knowledge gap among Saudi healthcare providers regarding CDI diagnosis, management, and severity classification, highlighting the need for improved education and adherence to guidelines to improve patient outcomes and reduce recurrence risks.

The combined effect of systemic antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors on Clostridioides difficile infection and recurrence.

Antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are recognized risk factors for acquisition and recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), yet combined effects remain unclear. To assess the short- and long-term effects of antibiotics and PPIs on CDI risk and recurrence. Population-based study including all 43 152 patients diagnosed with CDI in Sweden (2006-2019), and 355 172 matched population controls without CDI. The impact of antibiotics and PPIs on CDI risk and recurrence was explored for recent (0-30 days) and preceding (31-180 days) use prior to their first CDI diagnosis, using multivariable conditional logistic regression presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and other drugs. Compared to controls, the combined effect of recent PPIs and antibiotics [ORAB+PPI = 17.51 (17.48-17.53)] on CDI risk was stronger than the individual effects [ORAB = 15.37 (14.83-15.93); ORPPI = 2.65 (2.54-2.76)]. Results were less pronounced for exposure during the preceding months. Dose-response analyses showed increasing exposure correlated with CDI risk [recent use: ORAB = 6.32 (6.15-6.49); ORPPI = 1.65 (1.62-1.68) per prescription increase].Compared to individuals without recurrence (rCDI), recent [ORAB = 1.30 (1.23-1.38)] and preceding [ORAB = 1.23 (1.16-1.31); ORPPI = 1.12 (1.03-1.21)] use also affected the risk of recurrence yet without significant interaction between both. Recent macrolides/lincosamides/streptogramins; other antibacterials including nitroimidazole derivates; non-penicillin beta lactams and quinolones showed the strongest association with CDI risk and recurrence, particularly for recent use. PPI use, both recent and preceding, further increased the CDI risk associated with almost all antibiotic classes. Recent and less recent use of PPIs and systemic antibiotics was associated with an increased risk of CDI, particularly in combination.

Diagnostic Guidance for C. difficile Infections.

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) can be challenging. First of all, there has been debate on which of the two reference assays, cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) or toxigenic culture (TC), should be considered the gold standard for CDI detection. Although the CCNA suffers most from suboptimal storage conditions and subsequent toxin degradation, TC is reported to falsely increase CDI detection rates as it cannot differentiate CDI patients from patients asymptomatically colonised by toxigenic C. difficile. Several rapid assays are available for CDI detection and fall into three broad categories: (1) enzyme immunoassays for glutamate dehydrogenase, (2) enzyme immunoassays or single-molecule array assays for toxins A/B and (3) nucleic acid amplification tests detecting toxin genes. All three categories have their own limitations, being suboptimal specificity and/or sensitivity or the inability to discern colonised patients from CDI patients. In light of these limitations, multi-step algorithmic testing has been advocated by international guidelines (IDSA/SHEA and ESCMID) in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy. As a result, a survey performed in 2018-2019 in Europe revealed that most of all hospital sites reported using more than one test to diagnose CDI. CDI incidence rates are also influenced by sample selection criteria, as several studies have shown that if not all unformed stool samples are tested for CDI, many cases may be missed due to an absence of clinical suspicion. Since methods for diagnosing CDI remain imperfect, there has been a growing interest in alternative testing strategies like faecal microbiota biomarkers, immune modulating interleukins, cytokines and imaging methods. At the moment, these alternative methods might play an adjunctive role, but they are not suitable to replace conventional CDI testing strategies.

Clostridioides difficile infection in the allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipient.

Clostridioides difficile (CD) is one of the most important causes of diarrhea in hospitalized patients, in particular those who undergo an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) and who are more at risk of developing a CD infection (CDI) due to frequent hospitalizations, iatrogenic immunosuppression, and prolonged antibiotic cycles. CDI may represent a severe condition in allo-HCT patients, increasing the length of hospitalization, influencing the intestinal microbiome with a bidirectional association with graft-versus-host disease, and leading to unfavorable outcomes, including death. The diagnosis of CDI requires the exclusion of other probable causes of diarrhea in HCT patients and is based on highly sensitive and highly specific tests to distinguish colonization from infection. In adult patients, fidaxomicin is recommended as first-line, with oral vancomycin as an alternative agent. Bezlotoxumab may be used to reduce the risk of recurrence. In pediatric patients, vancomycin and metronidazole are still suggested as first-line therapy, but fidaxomicin will probably become standard in pediatrics in the near future. Because of insufficient safety data, fecal microbiota transplantation is not routinely recommended in HCT in spite of promising results for the management of recurrences in other populations.

A Survey of Physicians’ Perceptions of Diagnostic Tests for Clostridioides difficile Infection

Background: This study aimed to investigate perceptions of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) diagnostic tests among physicians who prescribe CDI diagnostic tests as part of providing direct patient care. Methods: In August 2018, we provided a 12-question survey of gastroenterologists (the most common referral source for CDI testing) to 35 medical institutions in Korea, asking them about their perceptions of CDI diagnosis and testing. Results: A comparison of the perceptions of physicians and clinical pathologists (CPs) found that physicians had a lower perceived sensitivity of the toxin AB enzyme immunoassay test. For nucleic acid amplification tests, physicians exhibited a perception of higher assay sensitivity and specificity than CPs. The specificity of culture tests was generally perceived as high by physicians, whereas CPs regarding expressed mixed opinions. All but one physician and one CPs found the algorithmic test useful. Concerning the CDI isolation criteria, physicians commenced patient isolation by concurrently assessing both test results and clinical symptoms, rather than exclusively relying upon test results. Among CPs, 84.6% said they could rely on symptoms to determine when to release a patient from isolation, while 46.2% of physicians said they would rely on test results. Conclusion: This study provides useful information on the status of laboratory diagnosis of CDI in Korea and what needs to be improved, which will help to standardize and improve laboratory diagnosis of CDI in Korea.

A retrospective study investigating the management, risk factors, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with Clostridioides difficile infection

AbstractBackgroundThe rate of clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Australia has increased by more than 8% between 2016–2018. This can be attributed to multiple factors including an ageing population, widespread antibiotic and proton‐pump‐inhibitor usage.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate the management, risk factors and outcomes for CDI to identify strategies to reduce its incidence.MethodA single‐centre retrospective audit was completed using medical records for patients admitted to a 250‐bed regional Queensland hospital with CDI in 2020–2021. Data surrounding CDI management for each patient was analysed against the Therapeutic Guidelines. This study was approved by The Prince Charles Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference No: LNR/HREC/QPCH/81287).ResultsThere were 72 cases with CDI during the study timeframe. Recent antibiotic prescription, proton‐pump‐inhibitor (PPI) use and antibiotic allergy labels were common. Thirty‐five per cent of cases were treated appropriately. Eight per cent died, and nine per cent had relapsed CDI within 12 weeks of diagnosis. Common gaps found in the results included inappropriate selection of antibiotics based on the severity of disease and lack of documentation surrounding CDI cases left untreated.ConclusionThere are multiple opportunities for pharmacists to improve the care of patients with CDI which range from promoting guideline adherence, influencing prescriber antibiotic selection based on disease severity, prompting review of PPIs upon CDI diagnosis and prompting provider follow‐up of CDI laboratory results pending at the point of patient discharge. The results of this study have prompted antimicrobial stewardship service review of all CDI admissions at the study site and indicates the need for a larger multiple‐site study to raise awareness of CDI risk factors and severity criteria.

CLINICAL OUTCOME AND SEVERITY OF CLOSTRIDIOIDES (CLOSTRIDIUM) DIFFICILE INFECTION AT A TERTIARY REFERRAL HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.

•The outcomes of CDI were evaluated in 65 patients with CDI in a Brazilian tertiary hospital. •Lack of clinical improvement after treatment and the severity score (ATLAS) increased the risk of death. •The use of multiple antimicrobial agents was associated with longer hospital stays. •Patients with high Charlson comorbidity index (>7) were more likely to recur. Background - Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a potentially severe disease that can present with refractoriness, recurrence, and evolution to death. In Brazil, the epidemiology of CDI seems to differ from that of the United States and most European countries, with only one ribotype (RT) 027-related case and a high prevalence of RT106. Objective - The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CDI and its possible association with ribotypes at a university hospital in Brazil. Methods - A total of 65 patients with CDI were included and stool samples were submitted to A/B toxin detection and toxigenic culture, and toxigenic isolates (n=44) were also PCR ribotyped. Results - Patients' median age was 59 (20-87) years and there were 16 (24.6%) deaths. The median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 4 (0-15) and 16.9% of the patients had CCI ≥8. The ATLAS score and non-improvement of diarrhea were related to higher mortality. A longer length of hospitalization was related to the enteral nutrition and use of multiple antibiotics. The period between CDI diagnosis and hospital discharge was longer in those who received new antibiotics after diagnosis, multiple antibiotics, and required intensive care treatment. Recurrence was associated with CCI >7. Twenty ribotypes were identified and RT106 was the most frequently detected strain (43.2%). No relationship was observed between the ribotypes and outcomes. CDI was present in patients with more comorbidities. Conclusion - Risk factors for higher mortality, longer hospital stay and recurrence were identified. A diversity of ribotypes was observed and C. difficile strains were not related to the outcomes.

A new score to predict Clostridioides difficile infection in medical patients: a sub-analysis of the FADOI-PRACTICE study.

Medical divisions are at high risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) due to patients' frailty and complexity. This sub-analysis of the FADOI-PRACTICE study included patients presenting with diarrhea either at admission or during hospitalization. CDI diagnosis was confirmed when both enzyme immunoassay and A and B toxin detection were found positive. The aim of this sub-analysis was the identification of a new score to predict CDI in hospitalized, medical patients. Five hundred and seventy-two patients with diarrhea were considered. More than half of patientswas female, 40% on antibiotics in the previous 4weeks and 60% on proton pump inhibitors(PPIs). CDI diagnosis occurred in 103 patients (18%). Patients diagnosed with CDI were older, more frequently offemalesex, recently hospitalized and bed-ridden, and treated with antibiotics and PPIs. Through a backward stepwise logistic regression model, age > 65years, female sex, recent hospitalization, recentantibiotic therapy, active cancer, prolonged hospital stay (> 12days), hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3g/dL), and leukocytosis (white blood cells > 9 × 10^9/L) were found to independently predict CDI occurrence. These variables contributed to building a clinical prognostic score with a good sensitivity and a modest specificity for a value > 3 (79% and 58%, respectively; AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.79, p < 0.001), that identified low-risk (score ≤ 3; 42.5%) and high-risk (score > 3; 57.5%) patients. Although some classical risk factors were confirmed to increase CDI occurrence, the changing landscape of CDI epidemiology suggests a reappraisal of common risk factors and the development of novel risk scores based on local epidemiology.

Comparison of Different Antibiotics and the Risk for Community-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Case-Control Study.

Antibiotics are the greatest risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Risk for CDI varies across antibiotic types and classes. Optimal prescribing and stewardship recommendations require comparisons of risk across antibiotics. However, many prior studies rely on aggregated antibiotic categories or are underpowered to detect significant differences across antibiotic types. Using a large database of real-world data, we evaluate community-associated CDI risk across individual antibiotic types. We conducted a matched case-control study using a large database of insurance claims capturing longitudinal health care encounters and medications. Case patients with community-associated CDI were matched to 5 control patients by age, sex, and enrollment period. Antibiotics prescribed within 30 days before the CDI diagnosis along with other risk factors, including comorbidities, health care exposures, and gastric acid suppression were considered. Conditional logistic regression and a Bayesian analysis were used to compare risk across individual antibiotics. A sensitivity analysis of antibiotic exposure windows between 30 and 180 days was conducted. We identified 159 404 cases and 797 020 controls. Antibiotics with the greatest risk for CDI included clindamycin and later-generation cephalosporins, and those with the lowest risk included minocycline and doxycycline. We were able to differentiate and order individual antibiotics in terms of their relative level of associated risk for CDI. Risk estimates varied considerably with different exposure windows considered. We found wide variation in CDI risk within and between classes of antibiotics. These findings ordering the level of associated risk across antibiotics can help inform tradeoffs in antibiotic prescribing decisions and stewardship efforts.

Clostridioides difficile Infection in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients: A Nationwide Analysis.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant healthcare-associated infection with implications for patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. However, the connection between CDI and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and its influence on patient outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to examine the association between CDI and COVID-19, specifically investigating whether CDI worsens outcomes in patients with COVID-19. By utilizing the extensive National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and analyzing pertinent factors, this research endeavored to enhance our understanding of CDI within the context of COVID-19. The NIS database was searched for adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in 2020. Patients with a secondary diagnosis of CDI were identified and separated into two groups based on CDI status. Baseline characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and outcomes were compared between the two groups using Chi-square and t-tests. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were performed for the identification of independent predictors of CDI and mortality. A total of 1,045,125 COVID-19 hospitalizations were included, of which 4,920 had a secondary diagnosis of CDI. Patients with CDI and COVID-19 were older (mean age 69.9 vs. 64.2 years; P < 0.001), more likely to be female (54.1% vs. 47.1%; P < 0.001) and white (60% vs. 52.4%; P < 0.001). The CDI and COVID-19 group had a longer length of stay (14.1 vs. 7.42 days; P < 0.001), higher total hospital costs ($42,336 vs. $18,974; P < 0.001), and higher inpatient mortality (21.6% vs. 11%; P < 0.001) compared to the COVID-19 group without CDI. Patients in the CDI and COVID-19 group had a higher CCI score (51.7% with a score of 3 or more vs. 27.7%; P < 0.001), indicating a higher comorbidity burden. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed CDI was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.37; P = 0.001) and showed that the female gender and several pre-existing comorbidities were associated with a higher likelihood of CDI. CDI is independently associated with increased mortality in patients admitted with COVID-19 infection. Female gender and several pre-existing comorbidities are independent predictors of CDI in COVID-19 patients.

Prevention and treatment of C. difficile in cancer patients.

We provide an update on the recent literature on Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in cancer patients. Distinguishing between colonization and infection remains challenging in cancer patients. Many patients with negative toxin analysis are still treated for CDI, and some meet criteria for severe cases. The incidence of CDI is high in cancer patients, especially those with haematological malignancies. Disruption of the gut microbiome due to antibiotic consumption, chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the primary factor contributing to CDI development. The severity of CDI in cancer patients is often unclear due to the absence of well-defined severity criteria. Certain microbiome species predominance and specific ribotypes have been associated with worse outcomes. Whole genome sequencing could be helpful for differentiating recurrence from reinfection and exploring potential nosocomial transmission. While certain new drugs such as fidaxomicin or bezlotoxumab show promise, the optimal treatment and prevention strategies for CDI in cancer patients remain uncertain. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) holds potential for reducing CDI recurrence rates. Further studies are needed to provide robust recommendations for diagnosis, grading severity, and therapeutic management of CDI in cancer patients. Recurrences are particularly concerning due to subsequent exposition to CDI risk factors.

Impact of early identification of patients meeting testing criteria for Clostridioides difficile on standard infection ratios

Background:Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) poses a health burden to patients and a financial burden to hospital systems. Timely identification of CDI patients can reduce the impacts by allowing for prompt treatment and ensuring that proper isolation precautions are in place to prevent spread. It also ensures correct CDI event categorization according to the NHSN. Community-onset (CO) CDI cases are tested on or prior to hospital day 3, and hospital-onset (HO) CDI are tested on or after hospital day 4. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing an electronic health record (EHR) report to reduce CDI standard infection ratios (SIRs) by identifying potential CDI cases prior to hospital day 4. Methods: From August of 2021 to September 2022, an EHR report was implemented in a 5-hospital healthcare system in the Midwest to identify patients with 3 or more type 6 or 7 stools in a 24-hour period based on Bristol stool chart classification. All inpatients with 3 or more type 6 or 7 stools in 24 hours without an active order for a Clostridioides difficile test were listed. Patients with a laxative in the previous 48 hours, tube feedings without fever or leukocytosis, or a known cause of diarrhea were excluded. The attending provider of the patients meeting criteria were notified with a recommendation to test for C. difficile or provide alternative reason for symptoms. Results: In total, 26 patients were tested for C. difficile using polymerase chain reaction testing. Of those tested, 5 (19.2%) tested positive for C. difficile. There were 13 HO-CDI cases for the healthcare system during this period, for an SIR of 0.351. If the early identified cases were not identified until after hospital day 3, the SIR had the potential to have been 35.6% greater at 0.476. Conclusions: We were able to identify 5 CDI cases prior to hospital day 4 using an early identification report during this 13-month period. Although these cases may have been identified without the use of the EHR report, we were able to obtain a timely CDI diagnosis, potentially limiting the spread of C. difficile and preventing an increase in the CDI SIR by 35.6%. An EHR report to identify patients meeting C. difficile testing criteria may be an effective way to identify CO-CDI prior to HD 4 and thus reduce CDI SIRDisclosures: None

Trends in the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection in Germany.

Despite reports of a declining incidence over the last decade, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is still considered the most important healthcare-associated causes of diarrhea worldwide. In Germany, several measures have been taken to observe, report, and influence this development. This report aims to analyze the development of hospital coding for CDI in Germany over the last decade and to use it to estimate the public health burden caused by CDI. Reports from the Institute for Hospital Remuneration Systems, German Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS), the Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI), Saxonian authorities and hospital quality reports during 2010-2021 were examined for CDI coding and assessed in a structured expert consultation. Analysis was performed using 2019 versions of Microsoft Excel® and Microsoft Access®. Peaks of 32,203 cases with a primary diagnosis (PD) of CDI and 78,648 cases with a secondary diagnosis (SD) of CDI were observed in 2015. The number of cases had decreased to 15,412 PD cases (-52.1%) and 40,188 SD cases (-48.9%) by 2021. These results were paralleled by a similar decline in notifiable severe cases. However, average duration of hospitalization of the cases remained constant during this period. Hospital coding of CDI and notification to authorities has approximately halved from 2015 to 2021. Potential influential factors include hospital hygiene campaigns, implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs, social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and a decrease in more pathogenic subtypes of bacteria. Further research is necessary to validate the multiple possible drivers for this development.

Clostridioides difficile Infection in an Italian Tertiary Care University Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, mostly in frail patients. Notification is not mandatory in Italy, and data on incidence, risk of death, and recurrence are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine CDI incidence and risk factors for mortality and recurrence. The "ICD-9 00845" code in hospital-standardized discharged forms (H-SDF) and microbiology datasets were used to retrieve CDI cases at Policlinico Hospital, Palermo between 2013 and 2022. Incidence, ward distribution, recurrence rate, mortality, and coding rate were considered. The risk of death and recurrence was predicted through multivariable analysis. There were 275 CDIs, 75% hospital-acquired, the median time between admission and diagnosis was 13 days, and the median stay was 21 days. Incidence increased from 0.3 to 5.6% (an 18.7-fold increase) throughout the decade. Only 48.1% of cases were coded in H-SDF. The rate of severe/severe-complicated cases increased 1.9 times. Fidaxomicin was used in 17.1% and 24.7% of cases overall and since 2019. Overall and attributable mortalities were 11.3% and 4.7%, respectively. Median time between diagnosis and death was 11 days, and recurrence rate was 4%. Bezlotoxumab was administered in 64% of recurrences. Multivariable analysis revealed that only hemodialysis was associated with mortality. No statistically significant association in predicting recurrence risk emerged. We advocate for CDI notification to become mandatory and recommend coding CDI diagnosis in H-SDF to aid in infection rate monitoring. Maximum attention should be paid to preventing people on hemodialysis from getting CDI.