Clostridioides Difficile Infection Diagnosis Research Articles

Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile PCR ribotype 181 after the COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Greece.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most significant causes of diarrhea in hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and epidemiology of CDI after the COVID-19 pandemic in hospitalized patients in a rehabilitation center in Thessaloniki, Greece. Αretrospective observational cohort study was performed in inpatients diagnosed with diarrhea of all ages (January 2023 - December 2023) who were initially screened for CDI. From the total cohort of patients with proven CDI, some patients were randomly selected based on their monthly isolation incidence throughout the study period, to investigate their epidemiological data and clinical characteristics. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI was performed by enzyme immunoassay, followed by specific anaerobic culture and molecular testing for detection of toxigenic C. difficile. The isolated C. difficile strains were further characterized by PCR ribotyping. The annual incidence of CDI during the studyperiod was 27.1% (130/480). The linear trend of CDI incidence decreased from 32.5% to 18.2% (P= 0.024). The all-cause mortality rate was 5.0% (3/60). A positive correlation was observed between the length of hospital stay and the number of recurrences (r = 0.546, P < 0.001), while 28 patients (46.7%) experienced recurrence of the infection. Seven different PCR ribotypes were identified in thisstudy. C. difficile tcdA+, tcdB+, cdtA+, cdtB+ PCR ribotype 181 (RT181) was the predominant (76.6%, 46/60), followed by toxin A-negative PCR RT017 (11.6%, 7/60). The annual incidence of CDIdecreased after the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study demonstrates predominance of C. difficile RT181 with tcdA+, tcdB+, cdtA+, cdtB+ toxin gene profile after COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Greece.

Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile infection among patients at high risk for recurrence based on real-world experience.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common nosocomial infection and is associated with a high healthcare burden due to high rates of recurrence. In 2021 the IDSA/SHEA guideline update recommended fidaxomicin (FDX) as first-line therapy. Our medical center updated our institutional guidelines to follow these recommendations, prioritizing FDX use among patients at high risk for recurrent CDI (rCDI). This pre- post- quasi-experimental study included patients with a presumptive diagnosis of CDI at risk for recurrence (age >/= 65 years, immunocompromised, severe CDI) that received vancomycin (VAN) or FDX between October 2019 to October 2022. Patients who received bezlotoxumab, had fulminant CDI, or received <10 days of the same antibiotic for their full treatment course were excluded. Patients were evaluated for rCDI within 8 weeks of completion of therapy, subsequent episodes of CDI within 12 months, and CDI-related admissions within 30 days. Of 397 CDI regimens evaluated, 196 received VAN and 201 received FDX. Rates of rCDI (9.2% vs 10%, P = 0.86), subsequent CDI within 12 months of therapy completion of therapy (19.4% vs 26%, P = 0.12) and 30-day CDI-related readmissions (3% vs 4.5%, P = 0.6) were similar between patients who received VAN versus FDX. Outcomes were similar between patients treated with FDX and VAN for the treatment of CDI among those at high risk for rCDI, using our outlined criteria. Although we observed a trend toward lower rates of rCDI among immunocompromised patients, this finding was not significant. Further investigation is needed to determine which patients with CDI may benefit from FDX.

Evaluation of the clinical performance of a multistep algorithm for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection and patient characteristics in a clinical setting

Evaluation of the clinical performance of a multistep algorithm for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection and patient characteristics in a clinical setting

Diagnosis and management of Clostridioides difficile in inflammatory bowel disease.

Patients with IBD have an increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), which can lead to worse IBD outcomes. The diagnosis of CDI in IBD patients is complicated by higher C. difficile colonization rates and shared clinical symptoms of intestinal inflammation. Traditional risk factors for CDI, such as antibiotic exposure, may be lacking in IBD patients due to underlying intestinal microbiota dysbiosis. While CDI disproportionately affects people with IBD, patients with IBD are typically excluded from CDI clinical trials creating a knowledge gap in the diagnosis and management of these two diseases. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CDI in IBD patients. Distinguishing CDI from C. difficile colonization in the setting of an IBD exacerbation is important to avoid treatment delays. When CDI is diagnosed, extended courses of anti-C. difficile antibiotics may lead to better CDI outcomes. Regardless of a diagnosis of CDI, the presence of C. difficile in an IBD patient should prompt a disease assessment of the underlying IBD. Microbiota-based therapies and bezlotoxumab appear to be effective in preventing CDI recurrence in IBD patients. Patients with IBD should be considered high risk for CDI recurrence and evaluated for a preventative strategy when diagnosed with CDI. Ultimately, the co-management of CDI in an IBD patient requires a nuanced, patient-specific approach to distinguish CDI from C. difficile colonization, prevent CDI recurrence, and manage the underlying IBD.

Clostridioides difficile Infections in Children: What Is the Optimal Laboratory Diagnostic Method?

The diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the pediatric population is complicated by the high prevalence of asymptomatic colonization, particularly in infants. Many laboratory diagnostic methods are available, but there continues to be controversy over the optimal laboratory testing approach to diagnose CDI in children. We evaluated commonly used C. difficile diagnostic commercial tests in our pediatric hospital population at Sidra Medicine in Doha, Qatar. Between June and December 2023, 374 consecutive stool samples from pediatric patients aged 0-18 years old were tested using: Techlab C. diff Quik Chek Complete, Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile, QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel, and culture using CHROMagar C. difficile. The results of these tests as standalone methods or in four different testing algorithms were compared to a composite reference method on the basis of turnaround time, ease of use, cost, and performance characteristics including specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value. Our study showed variability in test performance of the different available assays in diagnosing CDI. In our population, a testing algorithm starting with Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile PCR assay or QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal panel as a screening test followed by toxin immunoassay for positive samples using the Techlab C. diff Quik Chek Complete kit showed the best performance (100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value) when combined with clinical review of the patient to assess risk factors for CDI, clinical presentation, and alternative causes of diarrhea.

Best Practices in the Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Developing Nations.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a well-known cause of hospital-acquired infectious diarrhea in developed countries, though it has not been a top priority in the healthcare policies of developing countries. In the last decade, several studies have reported a wide range of CDI rates between 1.3% and 96% in developing nations, raising the concern that this could represent a healthcare threat for these nations. This review defines developing countries as those with a human development index (HDI) below 0.8. We aim to report the available literature on CDI epidemiology, diagnostics, management, and prevention in developing countries. We identify limitations for CDI diagnosis and management, such as limited access to CDI tests and unavailable oral vancomycin formulation, and identify opportunities to enhance CDI care, such as increased molecular test capabilities and creative solutions for CDI. We also discuss infection prevention strategies, including antimicrobial stewardship programs and opportunities emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic, which could impact CDI care.

High Prevalence of Multistep Algorithms in Diagnostic Clostridioides difficile Laboratory Testing.

Laboratory testing practices for diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) have evolved in response to published guidelines, availability of highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), perceived problems with the specificity of NAATs, and CDI reporting requirements. To assess the current state of laboratory practice for diagnostic CDI testing. An optional 8-item supplemental questionnaire was distributed in December 2019 to the 1374 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists C difficile Detection (CDF) proficiency testing program challenge CDF-C. Of 1374 CDF-C participants, 1160 (84.4%) responded, predominantly representing laboratories based in the United States (1077 of 1160; 92.8%). The majority reported using a multistep testing algorithm (684 of 1159; 59.0%). Initial testing with a glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B combination test followed by NAAT for discrepant results was the most common testing method (360 of 1146; 31.4%). NAAT alone (299 of 1146; 26.1%) was next, then NAAT followed by an assay that included toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay if NAAT is positive (258 of 1146; 22.5%). Only 5.4% (62 of 1146) reported using toxin A/B immunoassay alone. Most respondents (1093 of 1131; 96.6%) reported rejecting CDI tests on formed stool, but rejection of CDI testing in pediatric patients was uncommon (211 of 1131; 18.7%). Rejection of CDI testing in patients using laxatives was reported more often by US-based respondents (379 of 1054 [36.0%] versus 9 of 77 [11.7%], P < .001). Multistep algorithms for CDI diagnosis are widely used in line with published recommendations. Most respondents reported rejection of formed stool for CDI testing, but few reported rejection of testing in infants and patients taking laxatives, suggesting these may be areas of opportunity for laboratories to pursue in improving CDI testing practices.

Clinical Characteristics and Cycle Thresholds Among Discordant and True Positive Test Results for Clostridiodes difficile

Background: The diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is challenging. Despite guideline-directed, multistep testing algorithms and diagnostic stewardship, the treatment of C. difficile colonization persists. The testing algorithm at our system utilizes an initial real-time PCR test (PCR) for Toxin B gene, which if positive, reflexes to an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting Toxins A and B. Discordant results (PCR +/EIA -) are suggestive of colonization, but the majority of patients with discordant results are treated for CDI. Correlation of C. difficile EIA B polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle thresholds (Ct) with the presence of free EIA and disease severity has been observed, but the ability to use Ct in the decision to treat patients with discordant results is unclear. Our study assesses if Ct values and other clinical characteristics favor treatment in select patients with discordant Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of adult patients (≥ 18-year-old) with positive C. difficile PCR results that were admitted to our health system between June 01 and August 31, 2023. C. difficile PCR and Ct results were obtained by Cepheid GeneXpert and Toxin A and B EIA results were obtained by Meridian Bioscience Immunocard. Patients with discordant (PCR+/EIA) and true positive (PCR+/EIA+) results were compared. We assessed demographics, past medical history, clinical characteristics, severity of illness, PCR Ct values, treatment, and clinical outcomes including: 30-day all-cause mortality and re-admission, and 60-day CDI repeat testing and treatment. Results Of the 122 patients identified, 89 patients had discordant results and 43 had true positive Results: Severity of illness and other clinical and laboratory characteristics were similar between both groups. Mean Ct values were significantly lower for true positive results compared to discordant results, 24.28 vs 29.27, respectively (p26 (p=.08). Of the patients with discordant results, 73 completed treatment for CDI and no difference in clinical outcomes was observed compared to patients with discordant results that were not treated. Conclusion Ct values were lower among patients with true positive results compared to patients with discordant Conclusion: There were no statistically significant different rates of severe or fulminant CDI among patients with discordant results and Ct values &lt; 26, although this finding may be limited by sample size and Ct may be helpful in deciding which discordant patients to treat.

Comparison of Medicare Claims-based Clostridioides difficile infection classification to chart review using a linked cohort

Background: Medicare claims are frequently used to study Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) epidemiology. Categorizing CDI based on location of onset and potential exposure is critical in understanding transmission patterns and prevention strategies. While claims data are well-suited for identifying prior healthcare utilization exposures, they lack specimen collection and diagnosis dates to assign likely location of onset. Algorithms to classify CDI onset and healthcare association using claims data have been published, but the degree of misclassification is unknown. Methods: We linked patients with laboratory-confirmed CDI reported to four Emerging Infections Program (EIP) sites from 2016-2020 to Medicare beneficiaries using residence, birth date, sex, and hospitalization and/or healthcare exposure dates. Uniquely linked patients with fee-for-service Medicare A/B coverage and complete EIP case report forms were included. Patients with a claims CDI diagnosis code within ±28 days of a positive CDI test reported to EIP were categorized as hospital-onset (HO), long-term care facility onset (LTCFO), or community-onset (CO, either healthcare facility-associated [COHCFA] or community-associated [CA]) using a previously published algorithm based on claim type, ICD-10-CM code position, and duration of hospitalization (if applicable). EIP classifies CDI into these categories using positive specimen collection date and other information from chart review (e.g. admit/discharge dates). We assessed concordance of EIP and claims case classifications using Cohen’s kappa. Results: Of 10,002 eligible EIP-identified CDI cases, 7,064 were linked to a unique beneficiary; 3,451 met Medicare A/B fee-for-service coverage inclusion criteria. Of these, 650 (19%) did not have a claims diagnosis code ±28 days of the EIP specimen collection date (Table); 48% (313/650) of those without a claims diagnosis code were categorized by EIP as CA CDI. Among those with a CDI diagnosis code, concurrence of claims-based and EIP CDI classification was 68% (κ=0.56). Concurrence was highest for HO and lowest for COHCFA CDI. A substantial number of EIP-classified CO CDIs (30%, Figure) were misclassified as HO using the claims-based algorithm; half of these had a primary ICD-10 diagnosis code of sepsis (226/454; 50%). Conclusions: Evidence of CDI in claims data was found for 81% of EIP-reported CDI cases. Medicare classification algorithms concurred with the EIP classification in 68% of cases. Discordance was most common for community-onset CDI patients, many of whom were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of sepsis. Misclassification of CO-CDI as HO may bias findings of claims-based CDI studies.

Use of PCR Cycle Threshold and Clinical Interventions to Aid in the Management of Pediatric Clostridioides difficile Patients

Better diagnostic tools are needed to improve the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) and reduce the overtreatment of colonized children. In this study, we evaluated two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile and the Gastroenteritis PCR Panel by QIAstat-Dx) as a standalone method in combination with the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value in positive samples to predict the presence of free toxins. We also evaluated the clinical impact of reporting toxin production results and provided comments alongside the PCR results in our pediatric population. PCR-positive stool samples from pediatric patients (aged 2 to 18 years old) were included in our study and tested for the presence of toxins A and B using the C. difficile Quik Chek Complete kit. For the clinical intervention, the CDI treatment rates 6 months pre- and post-intervention were compared. The use of PCR Ct value showed excellent sensitivity (100%) at a Ct value cutoff of 26.1 and 27.2 using the Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile and the Gastroenteritis PCR Panel by QIAstat-Dx, respectively, while the toxin test showed inferior sensitivity of 64% in the PCR-positive samples. In addition, CDI treatment rates were decreased by 23% post-intervention. The results of our study suggest that nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) assays supplemented by the use of PCR Ct value for positive samples can be used as standalone tests to differentiate CDI from colonization. Furthermore, the reporting of toxin production along with the PCR results can help reduce the unnecessary treatment of colonized children.

Rise to the Challenge: Master the Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant public health challenge in the developed world. Although previously CDI was primarily a health care-acquired infection, there are now rising numbers of community-acquired cases in patients without traditional risk factors, such as antibiotic exposure. The landscape for the treatment of CDI has changed significantly during the past decade, including newer diagnostic tests, novel antibiotic regimens, and strategies for microbiome restoration in the form of traditional fecal microbiota transplant and approved live biotherapeutics in an effort to address the underlying pathophysiologic process of gut microbial dysbiosis. We present a concise review for clinicians on the diagnosis and management of both primary and recurrent CDI.

Comparison of rectal swabs and fecal samples for the detection of Clostridioides difficile infections with a new in-house PCR assay.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In clinical laboratories, CDI testing is currently performed on stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea. However, the diagnosis of CDI can be delayed by the time required to collect stool samples. Barriers to sample collection could be overcome by using a rectal swab instead of a stool sample. Our study showed that CDI can be identified rapidly and reliably by a new PCR assay developed in our laboratory on both stool and rectal swab specimens. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce the time for the detection of CDI and improve the management of this infection. It should also provide a useful alternative for infection-control practitioners to better control the spread of C. difficile.

Impact of the Reverse 2-Step Algorithm for Clostridioides difficile Testing in the Microbiology Laboratory on Hospitalized Patients.

Multistep laboratory testing is recommended for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The aim of this study was to present the impact of multistep CDI diagnostic testing in an academic hospital system and evaluate the toxin B gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values of PCR-positive tests. In October 2022, our system began reflex testing all PCR-positive stool samples with the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (Techlab), an enzyme immunoassay-based test with results for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and C difficile toxin A/B. Hospital-onset (HO) CDI and CDI antibiotic use before and after testing were tracked. Ct values were obtained from the Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory. Receiver operating curve analysis was used to examine the sensitivity and specificity for identifying GDH+/toxin+ and GDH-/toxin- at various Ct thresholds. The HO-CDI rate decreased from 0.352 cases per 1000 patient-days to 0.115 cases per 1000 patient-days post-reflex testing (P < .005). Anti-CDI antibiotics use decreased, but the decrease was not commensurate with CDI rates following reflex testing. PCR+/GDH+/toxin+ samples had a lower mean Ct value than PCR+/GDH-/toxin- samples (23.3 vs 33.5, P < .0001). A Ct value of 28.65 could distinguish between those 2 groups. Fifty-four percent of PCR+/GDH+/toxin- samples had a Ct value below that cut-off, suggesting the possibility of CDI with a negative toxin test. Reflex testing for a laboratory diagnosis of CDI results in rapid, systemwide decreases in the rate of HO-CDI. Additional research is needed to distinguish CDI from C difficile colonization in patients with discordant testing.

Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes of Clostridium difficile Infection in a Tertiary Care Center in Bahrain.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant healthcare challenge associated with antibiotic use and healthcare settings. While healthcare facility-onset CDI (HO-CDI) rates have been extensively studied, the incidence and risk factors of CDI in various settings, including the community, require further investigation. Aim This study aims to examine the incidence rates of CDI in a major governmental hospital in Bahrain, identify risk factors for CDI, and assess the effectiveness of infection control measures. Method We conducted a retrospective study at the Salmaniya Medical Complex (SMC), analyzing all confirmed cases of CDI over a 30-month period from January 2021 to June 2023. CDI cases were screened using glutamine dehydrogenase antigen detection and confirmed using molecular assays like polymerase chain reaction and/or toxin assaysfor confirmation.The study categorized CDI cases based on their onset (hospital or community) and explored associated risk factors, including antibiotic use, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and patient demographics. Infection control practices were also evaluated for their role in managing CDI. Results About 57 new CDI cases were identified during the study period, with a HO-CDI incidence rate of 0.5 per 10,000 patient days. While HO-CDI rates remained stable, community-onset (CO)-CDI cases increased. The median patient age was 61.8 years, without notable differences between genders. Key risk factors for CDI were antimicrobial therapy, use of acid-reducing agents, age, and underlying comorbidities. The mortality rate stood at 35.1%. The ATLAS score (i.e., age, treatment with antibiotics, leukocyte count, albumin level, and serum creatinine) was a reliable predictor of mortality. Critical care admission and low albumin levels emerged as significant independent risk factors for mortality. Conclusions The study demonstrates a low incidence rate of HO-CDI at SMC, attributed to effective infection control and antibiotic stewardship programs. The overall CDI rate increased during the study period, driven by a rise in CO cases; further investigating the risk factors among this category in our study revealed that most patients were exposed to antibiotic therapy within the past three months of their CDI diagnosis. The rise in CO-CDI cases underscores the need for broader community-based interventions and awareness regarding antibiotic and PPI use.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection: guidelines and status of practice in Korea

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection that is expected to increase with the increases in the elderly population, immunocompromised patients treated with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive drugs, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and invasive medical technologies. Accurate diagnosis is critical for proper treatment and management of CDI. Clinical laboratories typically use four methods to diagnose CDI: C. difficile culture, toxin detection using immunoassays, detection of glutamate dehydrogenase using immunoassays, and detection of toxin A/B gene. Each CDI diagnostic test has strengths and limitations, and varies in performance. Guidelines for CDI diagnosis have been developed by organizations that include the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and American College of Gastroenterology. Certain other countries have guidelines. In Korea, surveys on CDI diagnosis performed in 2015 and 2018 revealed a shift in CDI testing in clinical laboratories in Korea. It is necessary to develop standardized diagnostic guidelines for CDI appropriate for the Korean context.

Rapid Isothermal Detection of Pathogenic Clostridioides difficile Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification.

Nosocomial-associated diarrhea due to Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is diagnosed after sample precultivation by the detection of the toxins in enzyme immunoassays or via toxin gene nucleic acid amplification. Rapid and direct diagnosis is important for targeted treatment to prevent severe cases and recurrence. We developed two singleplex and a one-pot duplex fluorescent 15 min isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assays targeting the toxin genes A and B (tcdA and tcdB). Furthermore, we adapted the singleplex RPA to a 3D-printed microreactor device. Analytical sensitivity was determined using a DNA standard and DNA extracts of 20 C. difficile strains with different toxinotypes. Nineteen clostridial and gastrointestinal bacteria strains were used to determine analytical specificity. Adaptation of singleplex assays to duplex assays in a 50 μL volume required optimized primer and probe concentrations. A volume reduction by one-fourth (12.4 μL) was established for the 3D-printed microreactor. Mixing of RPA was confirmed as essential for optimal analytical sensitivity. Detection limits (LOD) ranging from 119 to 1411 DNA molecules detected were similar in the duplex tube format and in the singleplex 3D-printed microreactor format. The duplex RPA allows the simultaneous detection of both toxins important for the timely and reliable diagnosis of CDI. The 3D-printed reaction chamber can be developed into a microfluidic lab-on-a-chip system use at the point of care.

Assessment of Knowledge and Practice of Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia Regarding Clostridioides difficile Infection Diagnosis and Management: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study.

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) depends on clinical presentation and laboratory testing. Stool diagnostic tests are essential for effective detection of toxigenic C. difficile strains. No study to date has evaluated the readability of microbiology labs in Saudi Arabia to test for CDI and evaluated the knowledge and practice of healthcare providers regarding CDI management. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia regarding CDI diagnosis and treatment. A cross-sectional, descriptive, questionnaire-based study was conducted on healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia, primarily physicians and clinical pharmacists. The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review and input from infectious diseases experts. The questionnaire was administered online. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Of 183 respondents, 27.9% had adequate knowledge on CDI diagnosis and management. The majority were internal medicine specialists (37.7%) working in governmental or semi-governmental hospitals (80.9%) in central (46.6%) or southern (30.1%) regions of Saudi Arabia. Most participants assessed laxative use (86.3%) and reported positive C. difficile specimens to infection control (67.2%). However, knowledge varied, with 57.4% supporting unnecessary retesting and 53% assuming positive PCR test indicates moderate CDI probability. Factors such as specialization, hospital accreditation status, and bed capacity influenced knowledge levels (p<0.01 for all factors). The study revealed a significant knowledge gap among Saudi healthcare providers regarding CDI diagnosis, management, and severity classification, highlighting the need for improved education and adherence to guidelines to improve patient outcomes and reduce recurrence risks.

Frailty is a predictor for worse outcomes in patients hospitalized with Clostridioides difficile infection.

Frailty has major health implications for affected patients and is widely used in the perioperative risk assessment. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a validated score that utilizes administrative billing data to identify patients at higher risk because of frailty. We investigated the utility of the HFRS in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) to determine whether they were at risk for worse outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization. Using the 2017 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adults with a primary diagnosis of CDI. We classified patients into 2 groups: those who had an HFRS <5 (NonFrailCDI) and those with a score ≥5 (FrailCDI). We assessed differences in hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization based on frailty status. We identified 93,810 hospitalizations, of which 54,300 (57.88%) were FrailCDI. FrailCDI patients were at higher risk for fulminant CDI (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3), requiring colectomy (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.2), and inpatient mortality (OR 4.5, 95%CI 2.8-7.1). Furthermore, FrailCDI patients had higher odds of requiring Intensive Care Unit admission (OR 13.7, 95%CI 6.3-29.9) or transfer to another facility on discharge (OR 2.2, 95%CI 2.0-2.4), and had longer hospital stays and higher total charges when compared with NonFrailCDI. Frailty as defined by the HFRS is an independent factor for worse outcomes and higher healthcare utilization in adults admitted for CDI. Risk stratifying patients by frailty may improve outcomes.

The combined effect of systemic antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors on Clostridioides difficile infection and recurrence.

Antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are recognized risk factors for acquisition and recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), yet combined effects remain unclear. To assess the short- and long-term effects of antibiotics and PPIs on CDI risk and recurrence. Population-based study including all 43 152 patients diagnosed with CDI in Sweden (2006-2019), and 355 172 matched population controls without CDI. The impact of antibiotics and PPIs on CDI risk and recurrence was explored for recent (0-30 days) and preceding (31-180 days) use prior to their first CDI diagnosis, using multivariable conditional logistic regression presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and other drugs. Compared to controls, the combined effect of recent PPIs and antibiotics [ORAB+PPI = 17.51 (17.48-17.53)] on CDI risk was stronger than the individual effects [ORAB = 15.37 (14.83-15.93); ORPPI = 2.65 (2.54-2.76)]. Results were less pronounced for exposure during the preceding months. Dose-response analyses showed increasing exposure correlated with CDI risk [recent use: ORAB = 6.32 (6.15-6.49); ORPPI = 1.65 (1.62-1.68) per prescription increase].Compared to individuals without recurrence (rCDI), recent [ORAB = 1.30 (1.23-1.38)] and preceding [ORAB = 1.23 (1.16-1.31); ORPPI = 1.12 (1.03-1.21)] use also affected the risk of recurrence yet without significant interaction between both. Recent macrolides/lincosamides/streptogramins; other antibacterials including nitroimidazole derivates; non-penicillin beta lactams and quinolones showed the strongest association with CDI risk and recurrence, particularly for recent use. PPI use, both recent and preceding, further increased the CDI risk associated with almost all antibiotic classes. Recent and less recent use of PPIs and systemic antibiotics was associated with an increased risk of CDI, particularly in combination.

Incubation period of Clostridioides difficile infection in hospitalized patients and long-term care facility residents: a prospective cohort study.

The incubation period for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is generally considered to be less than 1 week, but some recent studies suggest that prolonged carriage prior to disease onset may be common. To estimate the incubation period for patients developing CDI after initial negative cultures. In 3 tertiary care medical centers, we conducted a cohort study to identify hospitalized patients and long-term care facility residents with negative initial cultures for C. difficile followed by a diagnosis of CDI with or without prior detection of carriage. Cases were classified as healthcare facility-onset, community-onset, healthcare facility-associated, or community-associated and were further classified as probable, possible, or unlikely CDI. A parametric accelerated failure time model was used to estimate the distribution of the incubation period. Of 4,179 patients with negative enrollment cultures and no prior CDI diagnosis within 56 days, 107 (2.6%) were diagnosed as having CDI, including 19 (17.8%) with and 88 (82.2%) without prior detection of carriage. When the data were censored to only include participants with negative cultures collected within 14 days, the estimated median incubation period was 6 days with 25% and 75% of estimated incubation periods occurring within 3 and 12 days, respectively. The observed estimated incubation period did not differ significantly for patients classified as probable, possible, or unlikely CDI. Our findings are consistent with the previous studies that suggested the incubation period for CDI is typically less than 1 week and is less than 2 weeks in most cases.