Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Level Research Articles

Changes in Retinal Vessel Diameter and Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy

To describe the relationship of change in retinal vessel diameters to the subsequent 6-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and macular edema (ME) in persons with diabetes mellitus. A total of 1098 persons with diabetes who had DR graded from fundus photographs and had computer-assisted measurements of the central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal venular equivalent(CRVE) participated in examinations in 1980-1982, 1984-1986, and 1990-1992. During the first 4-year period, the mean change in CRAE and CRVE was −0.37 and 2.54 μm, respectively.The 6-year incidence and progression of DR and the incidence of PDR and ME from 1984-1986 to 1990-1992 were 56%, 39%, 15%, and 11%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, while controlling for duration, diabetes type, and other factors, an increase of 10 μm in CRVE from 1980-1982 to 1984-1986 was associated with increases in the 6-year incidence of DR (odds ratio [OR],1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43), progression of DR (OR, 1.21;95% CI, 1.12-1.30), incidence of PDR (OR, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.07-1.32), and incidence of ME (OR, 1.16; 95% CI,1.03-1.31). No interactions of these associations by diabetes type were found (data not shown). Change in CRAE was unrelated to the incidence or progression of DR (data not shown). Independent of DR severity level, glycemic control, and other factors, widening of the retinal venular but not arteriolar diameter was associated with subsequent incidence and progression of DR. The CRVE may provide additional information regarding the risk of incidence and progression of DR beyond traditional risk factors.

An automated decision-support system for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy disease based on MAs and HAs detection

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) has become a serious threat in our society, which causes 45% of the legal blindness in diabetes patients. Early detection as well as the periodic screening of DR helps in reducing the progress of this disease and in preventing the subsequent loss of visual capability. This paper provides an automated diagnosis system for DR integrated with a user-friendly interface. The grading of the severity level of DR is based on detecting and analyzing the early clinical signs associated with the disease, such as microaneurysms (MAs) and hemorrhages (HAs). The system extracts some retinal features, such as optic disc, fovea, and retinal tissue for easier segmentation of dark spot lesions in the fundus images. That is followed by the classification of the correctly segmented spots into MAs and HAs. Based on the number and location of MAs and HAs, the system quantifies the severity level of DR. A database of 98 color images is used in order to evaluate the performance of the developed system. From the experimental results, it is found that the proposed system achieves 84.31% and 87.53% values in terms of sensitivity for the detection of MAs and HAs respectively. In terms of specificity, the system achieves 93.63% and 95.08% values for the detection of MAs and HAs respectively. Also, the proposed system achieves 68.98% and 74.91% values in terms of kappa coefficient for the detection of MAs and HAs respectively. Moreover, the system yields sensitivity and specificity values of 89.47% and 95.65% for the classification of DR versus normal.

QALY Weights for Diabetic Retinopathy—A Comparison of Health State Valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO

ObjectiveTo estimate quality-adjusted life-year weights for patients with diabetic retinopathy by using various methods and to investigate the empirical validity of the different measures. MethodsThe study population comprised 152 patients with diabetes in Östergötland County, Sweden. Participants were interviewed by telephone by using the time trade-off (TTO) method and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) (direct valuations) as well as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the health utilities index mark 3 (HUI-3) (indirect valuations). The quality-adjusted life-year weights were adjusted for potential confounders by using analysis of covariance. The empirical validity of the measures was examined by testing their ability to detect hypothetical differences between severity levels of diabetic retinopathy and by investigating the correlation between the measures and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). ResultsAll measures detected significant differences in scores between patient groups classified according to visual impairment in the better eye (analysis of covariance, P < 0.05), but only HUI-3 and EQ-VAS detected significant differences between patient groups classified according to visual impairment or pathological progression in the worse eye. HUI-3 recorded a difference of 0.43 in values between normal vision and blindness in the better eye, which was more than twice the differences captured by the other measures (0.15–0.20). In addition, HUI-3 showed the highest correlation with NEI VFQ-25 (r = 0.54; P < 0.001). ConclusionsIn cost-utility analyses, the choice of quality-adjusted life-year measure may affect whether an intervention is considered cost-effective. Furthermore, if decisions are to be based on values from the general public, HUI-3 can be recommended for cost-utility analyses of interventions directed at diabetic retinopathy.

Comparison of Film and Digital Fundus Photographs in Eyes of Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus

To compare grading of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) from stereoscopic film versus stereoscopic digital photographs obtained from a subset of Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) participants. In this photographic media comparison study, digital and film images were obtained at a single study visit from some of the subjects enrolled in active DRCR.net clinical study protocols. Digital camera systems and digital and film photographers were certified to obtain images according to standard procedures. Images were graded for DR severity and DME in a masked fashion by Fundus Photograph Reading Center (Madison, WI) graders. Agreement between gradings was assessed by calculating the percentage of agreement and κ statistics. Images obtained with both film and digital media were submitted for 155 eyes of 96 study participants. On a nine-step Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy study DR severity scale, grading agreed exactly in 74%, and was within one step of agreement in 93%, with a weighted κ statistic of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.92). On a nine-step DME severity scale and three-step clinically significant macular edema (CSME) scale, grading agreed exactly in 39% and 88%, respectively, and within one step in 70% and 92% (weighted κ statistic, 0.44 [95% Cl, 0.34-0.54] and 0.72 [95% Cl, 0.55-0.90], respectively). Among clinical sites participating in the DRCR.net, agreement between film and digital images was substantial to almost perfect for DR severity level and moderate to substantial for DME and CSME severity levels, respectively. Replacement of film fundus images with digital images for DR severity level should not adversely affect clinical trial quality. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00367133, NCT00369486, NCT00444600, NCT00445003, NCT00709319.)

Erectile Dysfunction is Associated With Severe Retinopathy in Diabetic Men

Erectile dysfunction (ED) and retinopathy are prevalent in diabetic men. However, the association between ED and diabetic retinopathy (DR) with relation to DR severity levels has never been studied. For this cross-sectional study, data were obtained prospectively at the retina clinic of a tertiary medical center. The study group included men with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). The control group included diabetic men without retinopathy or with mild NPDR. All men had type 2 diabetes mellitus. All men filled in the Sexual Health Inventory for Males questionnaire (SHIM) to detect significant ED. Significant ED was defined as SHIM questionnaire score <17. The cohort included 102 diabetic men: 64 (62.7%) men in the study group and 38 (37.3%) men in the control group. Mean age for the entire cohort was 64.0 ± 8.2 years, and mean diabetes duration was 14.5 ± 8.9 years. Mean SHIM score for the entire cohort was 11.4 ± 6.5, and 75 (73.5%) men had significant ED. Men in the study group had higher prevalence of significant ED compared with men in the control group (87.5% vs 50.0%; P <.0001), as well as lower mean SHIM questionnaire scores (9.5 ± 5.4 vs 14.7 ± 6.9; P <.0001). Binary logistic regression analysis and linear regression analysis showed that significant ED and SHIM scores, respectively, were associated with DR severity (P = .001 for both), independent of age, diabetes duration, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. Significant ED is associated with DR severity independent of age, diabetes duration, macrovascular comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors.

GRADING DIABETIC RETINOPATHY SEVERITY FROM COMPRESSED DIGITAL RETINAL IMAGES COMPARED WITH UNCOMPRESSED IMAGES AND FILM

To compare research grading of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity level from compressed digital images versus uncompressed images and film. Compressed (JPEG2000, 37:1) digital images (C) were compared with uncompressed digital (U) and film (F) stereoscopic photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading. Classification of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity levels from C images agreed substantially with results from F images (κ = 0.60, κ(w) [linear weighted] = 0.86) and uncompressed digital images (κ = 0.76, κ(w) = 0.92). For agreement of uncompressed digital versus F images, κ = 0.62 and κ(w) = 0.86. Distribution of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study levels was not significantly different between C and F images (P = 0.09, Bhapkar's test for marginal homogeneity). For presence/absence of DR at 8 ascending severity thresholds, agreement between C and F was "almost perfect" (κ ≥ 0.8). Agreement on severity level between readers with C images was at least as good as that with uncompressed digital image or F. Repeatability of severity threshold grading between readers was similar using C or F images. For identifying individual DR lesions, agreement between C and F ranged from "moderate" to "perfect." Agreement of grading venous beading from C was slightly lower than from F. Full Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale DR severity level grading using C images is comparable to that using U images or film.

Digital versus Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity

To assess agreement between digital and film photography for research classification of diabetic retinopathy severity. Digital and film photographs from a 152-eye cohort with a full spectrum of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels were assessed for repeatability of grading within each image medium and for agreement on ETDRS discrete severity levels, ascending severity thresholds, and presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy index lesions, between digital and 35-mm slides (film). Digital photographs were color balanced to match film. There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.61, κ(w) [linear weighted] = 0.87) in classification of ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity levels between digital images and film. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference in frequency distributions on the severity scale (P = 0.21, Bhapkar test). The κ results ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 for presence or absence of eight ascending diabetic retinopathy severity thresholds. Repeatability of grading between readers viewing digital images was equal to or better than that obtained with film (pair-wise interreader κ for digital images ranged from 0.47 to 0.57 and for film from 0.43 to 0.57. The κ results for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. Moderate agreement of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and venous beading between digital images and film accounted for slightly lower concordance for severity thresholds ≥47 and for slightly lower interreader agreement within digital and film images at severity thresholds ≥43 and ≥47. Under controlled circumstances, digital photography can equal the reliability of 35-mm slides for research classification of ETDRS severity level.

Metabolic control and diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes type 2

AIM: To evaluate the correlation between metabolic control and the presence and severity level of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes type 2. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 80 patients divided into four groups according to the duration of the disease: de novo; up to 10 years; from 11 to 20 years; and over 20 years. In order to evaluate the metabolic control each patient was tested for: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG). According to eye fundus changes patients were classified following the American Academy of Ophthalmology classification. RESULTS: The patients with DR had significantly increased values of HbA1c. (9.5 ± 1.83%) and decreased values of HDL-C (1.1 ± 0.21 mmol/L) compared to patients without DR (6.9 ± 1.29%, t = 5.088; p < 0,001) and (1.3 ± 0.25 mmol/L, t = 3.022; p < 0.01) respectively. The presence and severity level of DR correlated positively with HbA1c values (p < 0.001) and poor glycaemic control (p < 0.001) while HDL-C values correlated inversely with the presence (p < 0.01) and severity level of DR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Poor metabolic control determined by the increased values of HbA1c and decreased values of HDL-C correlates with the presence and severity of DR.

Monoscopic versus Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity

To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading. There was substantial agreement classifying ETDRS DR severity levels between MD and SF (kappa = 0.65, kappa(w) [linear weighted] = 0.87), MD and SD (kappa = 0.66, kappa(w) = 0.87), and SD and SF (kappa = 0.62, kappa(w) = 0.86) images. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference between MD and SF images (P = 0.53, Bhapkar test). The kappa agreement between MD and SF ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for the presence or absence of eight ascending DR severity thresholds. Repeatability between the readers of the MD images was equal to or better than that of the readers of SD or SF images. Severity threshold grading repeatability between readers was similar with the MD and SF images. The kappa agreement between MD and SF for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. The kappa comparisons showed that performance of grading new vessels on the disc in MD images was slightly lower than that with the SF images. Monoscopic photography can equal the reliability of stereo photography for full ETDRS DR severity scale grading.

Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy on Vision-Specific Function

To assess the influence of the spectrum of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on vision-specific function in an Asian population. Population-based cross-sectional study. Persons aged 40 to 80 years of Malay ethnicity in Singapore. The Singapore Malay Eye Study was a population-based, cross-sectional study of 3280 Asian Malays (78.7% response rate). Five end points were considered: (1) any DR, (2) macular edema (ME), (3) clinically significant macular edema (CSME), (4) vision-threatening DR (VTDR), and (5) DR severity levels ranging from none to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Vision function was assessed using the Vision-Specific Functioning Scale validated using Rasch analysis. Vision-specific functioning score. Of 357 diabetic participants in the study, 23.2% had any DR, 5.6% had ME, 5.0% had CSME, 10.6% had VTDR, and 6.2% had PDR. In linear regression models adjusting for age, gender, stroke, diabetic risk factors, and socioeconomic factors, poorer vision-specific function was associated independently with any DR (beta, -0.21; P<0.05), ME (beta, -0.48; P<0.05), CSME (beta, -0.42; P<0.05), VTDR (beta, -0.64; P<0.05), and PDR (beta, -0.92; P<0.001). When controlling further for presenting visual acuity, VTDR (beta, -0.37; P = 0.01) and PDR (beta, -0.61; P = 0.002) were the only 2 DR categories independently associated with poorer vision-specific function and PDR. Persons with VTDR and PDR were 6 to 12 times more likely to report lower participation in daily living activities than those without these DR levels. People with VTDR and PDR have substantial difficulty undertaking vision-specific daily activities. These findings reinforce the importance of preventative efforts targeted at the earliest DR stages to prevent progression to later stages of DR. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

A comparison between one- and two-field 60° fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy

To compare the severity level of diabetic retinopathy obtained when assessed from two versus only one 60 degrees photographic field using colour transparencies and red-free, black-and-white photographs. To compare the areal coverage of these two photographic strategies to that of seven-field 30 degrees photography. Two ophthalmologists graded photographs of 74 eyes of 74 type I and II diabetes patients. Inter-method agreement was expressed in percentages and using kappa statistics and scatter-diagrams. The comparison of the approximate photographic areal coverage was done from diagrams using planimetry. The severity level of retinopathy when judged from two photographic fields was more severe in 13.5% (Grader 1) and in 16.2% (Grader 2) from colour transparencies and in 13.5% (Grader 1) and in 14.9% (Grader 2) from red-free black-and-white prints, as compared to assessments from only one field. Kappa values (0.84-0.86) for inter-method agreement for five pooled retinopathy levels revealed good agreement. Neither grader missed retinopathy requiring clinical assessment or treatment (levels > or = 47) when minimal retinopathy (levels 14-20) was detected using only one 60 degrees colour slide or red-free photograph. A second optic disc-centred field provided valuable additional information when more severe retinopathy lesions (levels > or = 30) were detected in the macula-centred field. One macula-centred 60 degrees photograph covered 60% and two 60 degrees photographs 80% of the area covered by seven-field 30 degrees photography. Two-field 60 degrees photography covers areas left outside seven-field 30 degrees photography. We propose the use of one macula-centred 60 degrees photograph when screening for the first lesions of diabetic retinopathy. After they have been found two-field 60 degrees photography is recommended.

Risk factors for severity of diabetic polyneuropathy: intensive longitudinal assessment of the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort.

Chronic hyperglycemia relates to the occurrence of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), but has not yet been shown to relate to its overall severity In addition, the degree and duration of hyperglycemia, which measure of chronic hyperglycemia is most predictive of defined levels of severity of DPN, and which other putative risk factors are involved remain unknown. In a longitudinal study of 264 diabetic individuals in Rochester, MN, risk factors and other diabetic complications assessed at regular intervals during an average of approximately 7 years were tested for their association with a composite score of severity of DPN at the last examination. In multivariate analysis, diabetic retinopathy severity level (at last examination), mean ln(24-h proteinuria x duration of diabetes), and mean GHb were the main covariates for severity of DPN (R2 = 0.33). Excluding markers of microvessel and macrovessel disease, the independent risk factors were mean In(GHb x duration of diabetes), GHb, and type of diabetes (R2 = 0.23). We found that diabetic microvessel disease, chronic hyperglycemia exposure, and type of diabetes are associated with severity of DPN, and we believe these factors are implicated in its cause. Each of the five markers of microvessel disease was a strong covariate for severity of DPN. Mean GHb predicts severity of DPN better than duration of diabetes, and the latter predicts severity of DPN better than mean fasting plasma glucose. Knowing the severity of microvessel disease, the degree of chronic hyperglycemia exposure, and the type of diabetes provides useful information to evaluate whether a coexisting polyneuropathy and its severity is probably due to diabetes.