Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the most common form of diabetes worldwide (>90%). Long-term complications of diabetes include microvascular and macrovascular damage. Life expectancy of patients with diabetes remains substantially shorter than that of individuals without diabetes, mainly because of coronary heart disease (CHD) [1]. However, CHD risk in patients with diabetes is highly variable and difficult to stratify by conventional clinical markers [2, 3]. Moreover, the early identification of CHD in diabetics is difficult due to its often silent or atypical presentation in this population. As a result, CHD in diabetics may be diagnosed several years after its onset, when the disease is in an advanced stage, frequently in the form ofmyocardial infarction (MI) or sudden cardiac death. To improve outcomes, common CHD risk factors should be assessed at least annually, along with the presence of microor macroalbuminuria, and be actively managed [4, 5]. The increasing prevalence of diabetes and the associated high CHD risk raises the question as to the need to develop noninvasive approaches to detect the patients with diabetes at the highest risk of CHD. This strategy could identify higher risk diabetics in whom coronary revascularization may improve the outcome beyond that achieved by currently recommended medical management. Stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is effective in detecting CHD and predicting adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients [6, 7]. Nevertheless, the clinical utility of MPI in diabetics is debated due to the small number of prospective and outcome studies, along with some epidemiological and cost-effectiveness data. It has been reported that routine screening of asymptomatic diabetics who have a normal ECG does not have clinical benefit and that cardiac outcomes are essentially equal (and very low) in screened and unscreened patients (despite abnormal MPI in >20% of these patients) [8]. In addition, according to the large multicentre Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D), optimal intensive medical therapy provides equal outcomes to revascularization in patients with diabetes [9]. In this randomized trial, only patients who had undergone coronary bypass surgery had significantly reduced major cardiac events, compared with those assigned in the intensive medical therapy group, but no difference in mortality was recorded. Therefore, only those diabetics with evidence of myocardial ischaemia and extensive multivessel disease would benefit from prompt surgical revascularization, mainly because of a lower rate of nonfatal MI. It is noteworthy that the majority of the patients enrolled had symptoms and all of them had stable CHD [9]. There is also some evidence that silent myocardial ischaemia may reverse over time with optimized medical treatment, adding to the controversy concerning aggressive screening strategies [10]. Finally, it has been reported that even asymptomatic diabetics with intermediate/high CHD risk have a low annual cardiac event rate (<1%), which is not affected by routine screening for inducible ischaemia [11]. Since screening for CHD in asymptomatic patients does not improve outcomes as long as CHD risk factors are treated, it is not routinely recommended by professional organizations or guidelines for appropriate use of cardiac A. Flotats Nuclear Medicine Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Read full abstract