Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Research Articles

Flash glucose monitoring system help reduce the frequency of hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic fear behavior in type 1 diabetes patients

ObjectiveHypoglycemia represents a serious acute complication in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In order to more effectively identify and discriminate the occurrence of hypoglycemic events in patients with T1DM, this study aims to evaluate the impact of two distinct glucose monitoring systems—Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)—on the management of blood glucose levels and the emotional responses associated with hypoglycemic episodes in individuals with T1DM.MethodIn this study, a total of 113 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were enrolled and allocated to two groups for the implementation of Glucose Monitoring Systems (GMS). The groups consisted of the FreeStyle Libre group (FGM, n=56) and the ipro2 group (CGM, n=57). Participants in both groups utilized GMS at least biannually and completed a set of three questionnaires: the Diabetes Monitoring and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DMTSQ), the Diabetes Specific Quality of Life (DQOL), and the Chinese Version of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II (CFHSII). Clinical data, CGM metrics, and questionnaire scores were collected at the initial visit and after a one-year follow-up period.ResultsThe glucose coefficient of variation (GCV) and the standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) were independently associated with Time Below Range (TBR). Specifically, GCV could predict TBR ≥12%, with a cut-off point of 40.55. This yielded a specificity of 88.10% and a sensitivity of 68.18% in the overall patient population. For the FreeStyle Libre group and the iPro2 group, the cut-off points were 38.69 and 40.55, respectively, with specificities of 0.74 and 0.92, and sensitivities of 0.73 and 0.86, respectively. In the FreeStyle Libre group, where the frequency of use was greater than or equal to five times per year, the hypoglycemic episodes (time/month) and CHFSII-B scores were significantly reduced at follow-up compared to baseline (7.80 ± 10.25 vs 13.95 ± 14.87; 27.37 ± 11.05 vs 38.90 ± 21.61, respectively, all P <0.05).ConclusionThe utilization of multiple Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) implementations proved to be valuable in discriminating the occurrence of hypoglycemia and mitigating the fear of hypoglycemic episodes in patients with type 1 diabetes. Within the parameters of Glucose Monitoring Systems (GMS), the glucose glycemic variability (GCV) was identified as a predictive factor for the risk of severe hypoglycemia (TBR > 12%). The optimal cut-off point for GCV was determined to be 40.55.

Curalin supplement as add-on therapy for type 2 diabetes Mellitus

AimsTo examine the efficacy and safety of Curalin, as a supplement to anti-diabetic drugs (ADD). Methods135 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 109, ages 18–85 years, with HA1c 7.5–10 % under treatment with ADD were randomized 1:1 to receive Curalin supplement or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in HbA1c after 3 months. The secondary endpoint was a decrease in HbA1c by more than 0.5 % and by more than 1 %. The exploratory endpoints included the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), clinical and laboratory results. ResultsAfter 3 months, the mean reduction in HbA1c was 1.30 % (SD = 0.79) in the Curalin group compared to 0.10 % (SD = 0.70) in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). A decrease in HbA1c of ≥ 0.5 % was observed in 90.0 % of Curalin patients versus 19.0 % of placebo patients (P < 0.0001). HbA1c reduction of ≥ 1 % occurred in 64.0 % of Curalin patients and 11.9 % of placebo patients (P < 0.0001). Curalin patients reported higher satisfaction (DTSQ) with no severe adverse events. ConclusionsCuralin treatment significantly reduced HbA1c over a period of 3 months and was well-tolerated.

Digital Health Tools and Behavioral Strategies to Increase Engagement With Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Design and Feasibility of DM-BOOST.

The purpose of the study was to describe the development and feasibility of implementing the DM-BOOST program in support of an established diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program. A patient panel of 4 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) codesigned DM-BOOST. DM-BOOST is a patient-focused program that includes peer-written text messages about diabetes self-management behaviors and digital health training to improve patient portal use and initiate goal setting prior to a scheduled DSMES appointment. Adults with T2DM and A1C ≥8.0% participated in a 6-month feasibility pilot. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either DM-BOOST or usual care. Outcomes included DSMES engagement (scheduled and attended DSMES appointments) and changes in diabetes self-efficacy and treatment satisfaction. Pilot participants (n = 60) were 60.0% female with mean age 45.5 years (SD 8.3) and A1C 10.1% (SD 1.8%). All DM-BOOST participants (30/30, 100%) had DSMES appointments scheduled compared to 86.7% of usual care (26/30). DM-BOOST participants had fewer DSMES appointment no-shows/cancellations (3/30, 10%) compared to usual care (10/26, 35%). There was greater improvement in diabetes self-efficacy in the DM-BOOST group compared to usual care and no difference in treatment satisfaction. DM-BOOST, leveraging peer-written text messaging and digital health training, increased DSMES engagement. Implementation of DM-BOOST was determined to be feasible, with several system-level barriers identified, including obtaining provider referrals and scheduling appointments. An effectiveness trial of DM-BOOST is needed to evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes.

PIONEER REAL UK: A Multi-Centre, Prospective, Real-World Study of Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Use in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Oral semaglutide provides an alternative to injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The PIONEER REAL studies evaluate clinical outcomes of oral semaglutide treatment of T2D in a real-world setting. PIONEER REAL UK focused on adults living with T2D in the UK. The multi-centre, prospective and non-interventional single-arm study enrolled 333 participants and followed them for 34-44 weeks. Participants were treated as part of routine clinical practice and had not been previously treated with injectable glucose-lowering medication. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary endpoints included change in body weight, proportion of participants with HbA1C < 7% (53 mmol/mol) at EOS and proportion of participants with ≥ 1%-point HbA1C reduction and body weight reduction of ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed by Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) status and change. Of 333 participants, 299 completed the study and 227 were on treatment at EOS. People treated with oral semaglutide experienced significantly reduced HbA1C by an estimated change of - 1.1%-points (95% CI - 1.27 to - 0.96; P < 0.0001) or - 12.2 mmol/mol (CI - 13.87 to - 10.47; P < 0.0001). Estimated change in body weight was - 4.8 kg (CI - 5.47 to - 4.12; P < 0.0001). At EOS, an HbA1C level < 7% (53 mmol/mol) was recorded in 46.3% of participants. A ≥ 1%-point reduction in HbA1C combined with a ≥ 3% reduction in body weight was observed in 36.4% of participants, and 27.1% had a ≥ 1%-point reduction in HbA1C and a ≥ 5% body weight reduction. Treatment satisfaction improved significantly during the study. No new safety concerns or cases of severe hypoglycaemia were reported. People living with T2D in the UK experienced a meaningful decrease in HbA1C and body weight after initiation of oral semaglutide treatment. No new safety issues were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04862923. Graphical plain language summary available for this article.

Oral Semaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical-Metabolic Outcomes and Quality of Life in Real-World Practice.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a novel class of incretin mimetics for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study evaluated the impact of semaglutide, the first oral GLP-1RA, on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body composition and anthropometric parameters. Additionally, the effects on cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life (QoL) in T2D patients were assessed. Methods: A prospective observational study with a six-month follow-up was conducted. Clinical parameters, including HbA1c, FPG, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) responses, and Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) responses, were collected at baseline (T0) and at six months (T1). Results: Sixty-one subjects were enrolled, with there being an average T2D duration of 4.67 ± 3.93 years. Significant decreases were observed in HbA1c (µ = -1.24; SD = 1.33; p < 0.05), FPG (µ = -31.01 mg/dL; SD = 41.71; p < 0.05), body composition and anthropometric parameters (p < 0.05), and cardiovascular risk factors (p < 0.05), with an increase in DTSQ scores (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The administration of 14 mg/day oral semaglutide improved several clinical parameters after six months of treatment. These findings suggest semaglutide is effective in improving glycemic control, weight management, and some cardiovascular risk factors in T2D patients.

Diabetes treatment satisfaction among a multi-ethnic Aotearoa New Zealand population with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

To assess whether diabetes treatment satisfaction differs by ethnicity among participants with insufficient glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a clinical trial involving additional oral diabetes medications. Patient satisfaction is used as an indicator of healthcare quality. However, data on patients' diabetes treatment satisfaction in the context of insufficient glycaemic control is limited. Individuals with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of 58-110mmol/mol (7.5-12.5%) were recruited across Aotearoa New Zealand to participate in an 8-month randomised crossover study of vildagliptin and pioglitazone as add-on therapy to metformin and/or sulfonylurea. Participants completed the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) at baseline pre-randomisation. Treatment satisfaction scores were compared between ethnic groups and other characteristics using the analysis of variance and linear regression. Perceived hyper- and hypoglycaemia were summarised separately. Between February 2019 and March 2020, 346 participants (41% women, 32% Pacific peoples, 23% Māori, 26% European) completed the DTSQ. Mean (SD) age was 57.5 (10.9) years, diabetes duration was 9 (6.3) years and HbA1c was 75 (12)mmol/mol (9.0[3.2]%). At study entry, 40% were receiving monotherapy for diabetes. Treatment satisfaction was rated highly, with a score of 29(6) (interquartile range 25-33). Pacific peoples and older people reported greater treatment satisfaction than other groups (p<0.001). Diabetes treatment satisfaction was high, particularly among Pacific peoples, despite suboptimal glycaemic control and insufficient glucose-lowering therapy.

PIONEER REAL Sweden: A Multicentre, Prospective, Real-World Observational Study of Oral Semaglutide Use in Adults with Type2 Diabetes in Swedish Clinical Practice.

The study was designed to assess outcomes with once-daily oral semaglutide in adults with type2 diabetes (T2D) naïve to injectable glucose-lowering agents, in Swedish clinical practice. In this non-interventional, multicentre study, participants initiated oral semaglutide and were followed for 34-44weeks. The primary endpoint was glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary endpoints included body weight (BW) change from baseline to EOS, proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7%, and proportion achieving both a HbA1c reduction ≥ 1% and BW reduction of ≥ 3% or ≥ 5%, at EOS. Participants completed Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires (DTSQ status/change) and a dosing conditions questionnaire. A total of 187 participants (mean age 62.5years) initiated oral semaglutide. Baseline mean HbA1c and BW were 7.8% (n = 177) and 96.9kg (n = 165), respectively. Estimated mean changes in HbA1c and BW were - 0.88%-points (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.01 to - 0.75; P < 0.0001) and - 4.72% (95%CI - 5.58 to - 3.86; P < 0.0001), respectively. At EOS, 64.6% of participants had HbA1c < 7%, and 22.9% achieved HbA1c reduction of ≥ 1% and BW reduction of ≥ 5%. DTSQ status and change scores improved by 1.44 (P = 0.0260) and 12.3 points (P < 0.0001), respectively. Oral semaglutide was easy or very easy to consume for 86.4% of participants. Most common adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal disorders; nine participants (4.8%) had serious AEs; one (0.5%) experienced severe hypoglycaemia. In this real-world study population, we observed significant reductions in HbA1c and BW in people living with T2D when prescribed semaglutide tablets as part of routine clinical practice in Sweden, with improved treatment satisfaction among participants and no new safety concerns. NCT04601753.

Systematic Improvement of a Bolus Calculator That Is on the Market: A User-Centric Approach.

State-of-the-art diabetes self-management includes the usage of (software) tools, such as Bolus Calculators, to support patients with their therapeutic decisions. The development of such medical devices comes with strict obligations to ensure the safety and performance for the user; however, it is also necessary to continue to evaluate such aspects after the products are introduced into the market. In addition, such aspects cannot always be sufficiently validated by clinical trials; they need real-world evaluation to systematically improve such tools while they are on the market. The approach described here uses innovative ways of generating user-centric evidence to improve the bolus calculator, including (1) human factor engineering, (2) analysis of glycemic real-world data, (3) patient-reported outcomes, and (4) machine-generated behavioral measurements. The combination of the diverse techniques to optimize the bolus calculator triggered changes in the user experience: a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events, -0.52% (±0.05), P < .01, n=3480, an increased diabetes treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] +9.90, P < .01, n=217), as well as an increased acceptance rate of bolus calculations, +15.73 (±0.89), P < .01, n=3436, were observed. Altogether, human factor engineering and different forms of real-world data support fast and direct adaptations and improvements in products used for diabetes therapy.

Factors influencing diabetes treatment satisfaction in the INtegrating DEPrEssioN and Diabetes treatmENT randomized clinical trial: A multilevel model analysis.

Patient satisfaction is associated with positive diabetes outcomes. However, there are no identified studies that evaluate both patient- and clinic-level predictors influencing diabetes care satisfaction longitudinally. Data from the INtegrating DEPrEssioN and Diabetes treatmENT trial was used to perform the analysis. We used fixed and random effects models to assess whether and how changes in patient-level predictors (treatment assignment, depression symptom severity, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and haemoglobin A1C) from 0 to 24 months and clinic-level predictors (visit frequency, visit cost, number of specialists, wait time, time spent with healthcare provider, and receiving verbal reminders) measured at 24 months influence diabetes care satisfaction from 0 to 24 months. Model 1 (patient-level predictors) accounted for 7% of the change in diabetes satisfaction and there was a significant negative relationship between change in depressive symptoms and care satisfaction (β = -0.23, SE = 0.12, p < 0.05). Within Model 1, 2% of the variance was explained by clinic-level predictors. Model 2 included both patient- and clinic-level predictors and accounted for 18% of the change in diabetes care satisfaction. Within Model 2, 9% of the variance was attributed to clinic-level predictors. There was also a cross-level interaction where the change in depression had less of an impact on the change in satisfaction for those who received a verbal reminder (β = -0.11, SE = 0.21, p = 0.34) compared with those who did not receive a reminder (β = -0.62, SE = 0.08, p < 0.01). Increased burden of depressive symptoms influences diabetes care satisfaction. Clinic-level predictors also significantly influence diabetes care satisfaction and can reduce dissatisfaction in primary care, specifically, reminder calls from clinic staff.

Changes in body weight and composition, metabolic parameters, and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with subcutaneous semaglutide in real-world clinical practice.

Subcutaneous once-weekly (ow) semaglutide is a recent treatment option for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, but real-world data on weight loss and associated changes in body composition, nutrients intake, and quality of life are still scarce. This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022. Clinical information was collected after 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) from semaglutide initiation (T0). Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) was performed to measure changes in body composition. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the 36 - items Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Changes in continuous endpoints (weight, body composition, nutrients intake, other clinical parameters, and PROs) were assessed using mixed models for repeated measurements. Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study. After 6 months from semaglutide initiation, body weight significantly decrease by -4.69 Kg (95%CI -6.19;-3.19) (primary endpoint). After 12 months, body weight was further reduced (-5.38 Kg; 95%CI -7.79;-2.97). At BIA, fat mass was significantly reduced by 2.1 Kg after 6 months but only slightly reduced after 12 months vs. baseline; lean mass was also significantly reduced by over 3 Kg both at 6 and 12 months. Intake of all nutrients declined in the first 6 months of therapy, although only lipids reduction reached the statistical significance (-6.73g; p=0.02). Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented. Satisfaction with treatment (DTSQ questionnaire) and mental health (MCS score of SF-36 questionnaire) significantly increased during the follow-up. The study documented real-world benefits of semaglutide for treating obesity in T2D subjects, with important changes on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Loss of lean mass associated with weight loss warrants attention; parallel strategies to preserve skeletal muscle and improve physical function, i.e. nutritional education and structured exercise, are of great importance.

Wearable monitoring device based on an internet management platform improves metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetes patients: a prospective pilot study

ABSTRACT Objectives This pilot study aimed to prospectively investigate the effects of a wearable monitoring device, based on an Internet management platform, on the comprehensive management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods A total of 120 hospitalized patients with T2DM were enrolled and randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group. Patients in the control group only received conventional diabetes treatments, while patients in the intervention group were provided with a wearable monitoring device in addition to conventional diabetes treatments. Moreover, the wearable device could connect to an Internet platform for diabetes management and upload self-monitoring data. All patients were followed for 3 months. The changes in parameters representing glucose metabolism, blood lipids, renal function, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. All results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results One hundred twenty subjects met all criteria and agreed to participate in this study. During the follow-up period, 5 and 4 subjects were lost to follow-up in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Compared with the control group, the blood glucose of the intervention group decreased significantly after 3 months (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis found that females, those younger than 60 years, with baseline glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of 8% or greater, and patients with good adherence showed significant improvements in HbA1c (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in blood lipid and renal function. The intervention group showed a better adherence rate to blood glucose, comprehensive adherence rate, and diabetes treatment satisfaction (p < 0.05). One subject in the intervention group and two subjects in the control group reported mild hypoglycemia. No other adverse events such as infections and skin allergies occurred in the two groups. Conclusion The intervention of a wearable monitoring device based on an Internet management platform significantly improved blood glucose control in T2DM patients, as well as the overall adherence rate and patient satisfaction with treatment. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04973644.

Real-World Use of Oral Semaglutide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the PIONEER REAL Netherlands Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study.

In this phase 4, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional PIONEER REAL Netherlands study, we assessed clinical outcomes associated with once-daily oral semaglutide use in real-world clinical practice in adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) naïve to injectable glucose-lowering medication. Participants initiated on oral semaglutide were followed for 34-44weeks. Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (BL) to end of study (EOS) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW) from BL to EOS, the proportion of participants with HbA1c<7.0% at EOS and the composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction≥1.0%-points with BW reduction≥3% or≥5% at EOS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ status/change). Safety was evaluated in all participants who initiated oral semaglutide treatment. Oral semaglutide was initiated in 187 participants; 94.1% completed the study and 78.6% remained on treatment at EOS. At BL, 54.0% of participants were male, mean age was 58.8years, mean duration of T2D was 8.7years and mean body mass index was 35.1kg/m2; mean HbA1c was 8.6% and mean BW was 103.1kg. Significant improvements from BL to EOS were observed for HbA1c and BW (estimated change [95% confidence interval]:-1.16%-points [-1.48 to-0.85]; p<0.0001, and-5.84kg [-6.88 to-4.80]; p<0.0001, respectively). At EOS, 47.5% of participants had an HbA1c level<7.0%; 41.8% and 35.5% of participants achieved composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction≥1.0%-points plus BW reduction≥3% or≥5%, respectively. DTSQ status and change scores improved by 2.1 (p=0.0003) and 10.8 points (p<0.0001), respectively. Oral semaglutide was easy or very easy to consume for 81.5% of participants. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. In this real-world population, we reported clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, improved treatment satisfaction and no new safety concerns. A graphical abstract is available with this article. NCT04601740.

Psychometric Properties of the Automated Insulin Delivery: Benefits and Burdens Scale for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome measure, the Automated Insulin Delivery-Benefits and Burdens Scale (AID-BBS), which was designed to assess benefits and burdens of AID use in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The measure was hypothesized to have validity, reliability, and clinical utility for predicting likelihood of continued use of an AID system. Research Design and Methods: A total of 217 adults with T1D (ages from 18 to 82 years) who were enrolled in an AID system research trial completed AID-BBS items at study midpoint (6 weeks) and at the end of the trial (13 weeks). Data were collected on pre-post glycemic outcomes. Participants completed other patient-reported psychosocial outcome measures (e.g., emotional well-being, diabetes distress, attitudes toward diabetes technology, diabetes treatment satisfaction) at Week 13. Likelihood of continued device use was assessed with three items at 13 weeks. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor structure for each subscale (15-item benefit and 9-item burden subscale) when evaluated separately. Convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were supported. Benefit and burden subscales at week 6 predicted usage intention above and beyond device impact on glycemic outcomes, also controlling for baseline glycemic outcomes. Conclusion: Findings support the AID-BBS as a psychometrically valid, reliable, and useful instrument for assessing burdens and benefits associated with AID system use in adults with T1D. The measure can be used to help health care providers set realistic expectations and proactively address modifiable burdens. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04200313.

Sex-driven factors associated with anxiety and depression in autoimmune diabetes.

To analyze the prevalence of anxiety and depression in a large cohort of adults with autoimmune diabetes, identifying sex-driven associated factors. In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 553 consecutive adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults who came to the Division of Endocrinology of the S.Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna (Italy),to receive their second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We administered the questionnaires: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Diabetes Distress Scale, Diabetes-related Quality of Life, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. We collected clinical and biochemical data and 14 days glucose metrics in patients with sensor use > 70% in a time span of ± 4months from the questionnaires' administration. We excluded 119 patients from our analyses with missing data (final cohort n = 434: 79% of those enrolled). Anxiety and depression prevalence was respectively 30.4% and 10.8%. According to the multivariate analysis, higher diabete-related emotional burden, lower treatment satisfaction, but not physician-related distress, were risk factors for anxiety and depression; female sex was associated with anxiety (OR 0.51, 95% 0.31-0.81; p = 0.005); in women, depression was associated with increasing age (males vs. females OR 0.96 per 1year increase, 95% CI 0.92-1.00; p = 0.036), whilst in men with HbA1c (OR 1.08 per 1mmol/mol increase, 95% CI 1.03-1.13; p = 0.002). Nearly 1/3 of patients with autoimmune diabetes suffers from anxiety and 1/10 from depression. These conditions are associated with independent modifiable and non-modifiable characteristics. For depression, these characteristics differ between males and females.

Effects, Safety, and Treatment Experience of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems in Clinical Practice Among Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes.

There are few studies providing a more comprehensive picture of advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) systems in clinical practice. The aim was to evaluate the effects of the AHCL systems, Tandem® t: slim X2™ with Control IQ™, and MiniMed™ 780G, on glucose control, safety, treatment satisfaction, and practical barriers for individuals with type 1 diabetes. One hundred forty-two randomly selected adults with type 1 diabetes at six diabetes outpatient clinics in Sweden at any time treated with either the Tandem Control IQ (TCIQ) or the MiniMed 780G system were included. Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose metrics were evaluated. Treatment satisfaction and practical barriers were examined via questionnaires. Mean age was 42 years, median follow-up was 1.7 years, 58 (40.8%) were females, 65% used the TCIQ system. Glycated hemoglobin A1c was reduced by 0.6% (6.8 mmol/mol; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5-0.8% [5.3-8.2 mmol/mol]; P < .001), from 7.3% to 6.7% (57-50 mmol/mol). Time in range (TIR) increased with 14.5% from 57.0% to 71.5% (95% CI = 12.2%-16.9%; P < .001). Time below range (TBR) (<70 mg/dL, <3.9 mmol/L) decreased from 3.8% to 1.6% (P < .001). The standard deviation of glucose values was reduced from 61 to 51 mg/dL (3.4-2.9 mmol/L, P < .001) and the coefficient of variation from 35% to 33% (P < .001). Treatment satisfaction increased, score 14.8 on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) (change version ranging from -18 to 18, P < .001). Four severe hypoglycemia events were detected and no cases of ketoacidosis. Skin problems were experienced by 32.4% of the study population. Advanced hybrid closed-loop systems improve glucose control with a reasonable safety profile and high treatment satisfaction. Skin problems are common adverse events.

Pragmatic Study Design to Assess the Effect of a mHealth Application on Empowerment of Noninsulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes People in a Low- and Middle-income Setup

Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as India, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) faces many barriers. mHealth applications that combine blood glucose (BG) assessment and the provision of actionable information can help overcome current challenges. Pragmatic study protocols assessing the medical value of mobile SMBG applications to deal with LMIC-specific challenges are missing. Aims and Objectives: This study will assess the impact of a mHealth application on diabetes empowerment using the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form questionnaire in noninsulin-treated people with T2DM in India. Methods: An observational, single-arm, prospective study will be conducted among adults (n = 100) with T2DM who have not been using a BG meter before and were on diet, exercise, or noninsulin antidiabetic therapy. After enrollment (baseline) and an 8-week control phase, the people participating in the study will receive the mobile phone-based BG assessment devices and will receive a training for the application. During the observational period of 12 weeks (20 weeks after baseline), the subjects will monitor their BG ranges with the devices and the mobile application. At baseline and weeks 8, 14, and 20, diabetes empowerment will be assessed as primary outcome. Health literacy, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and user experience, among others, will be examined as secondary outcomes. Discussion: Mobile applications have the potential to improve diabetes care due to their higher reach, but pragmatic study designs are needed to evaluate the effectiveness. Conclusions: The results of this pragmatic study will provide more patient-reported insights on the impact of mobile applications on diabetes self-management in LMIC.

Using person reported outcomes: Psychometric properties of the German diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) for teens and parents

AimsTo examine psychometric properties including the factor structure of the German versions of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for teens and parents (DTSQ-T/-P). MethodsLinguistically validated questionnaires were completed by 363 adolescents with type 1 diabetes and 655 parent-caregivers in a multicenter study. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability, and correlations were examined. ResultsCFA confirmed the 2-factor model of treatment satisfaction (TS) &perceived diabetes control (PDC) with an adjustment of removing the “medical support” item from the TS and examining it as a single item in this study. Cronbach's α of TS for DTSQ-T/-P was 0.82 & 0.83, respectively, and α of the two-item PDC factor was 0.70 & 0.60, respectively. The DTSQ scale scores positively correlated with time in range and inversely correlated with HbA1c. Scale scores of DTSQ-T/-P showed significantly positive relations to the KIDSCREEN-10 Index and negative associations with the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID). The TS of the parents was correlated with depressive symptoms measured in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. ConclusionsThe DTSQ-T/-P produced psychometrically sound scores in measuring diabetes treatment satisfaction in German teens with type 1 diabetes and their parents. German DTSQ versions for teens and parents are recommended in research and clinical practice.

Neonatal Birth Weight With Daily Compared With Every-Other-Day Glucose Monitoring in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To assess whether universal use of every-other-day glucose monitoring in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) resulted in similar birth weights and medication use and was preferred by the patient compared with traditional daily glucose monitoring. This was a noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted at a single New York City hospital between April 2021 and May 2022. Patients with singleton pregnancies who were diagnosed with GDM after 20 weeks of gestation and had a minimum of 7 days of previous daily blood glucose testing were randomly assigned to test blood glucose values daily or every other day. The primary outcome was neonatal birth weight. We calculated a total sample size of 196 participants needed for noninferiority to be tested, assuming the mean birth weight in the every-other-day group, compared with the daily group, was no higher than the predefined noninferiority margin of 200 g (80% power and one-sided alpha of 0.05). Postrandomization characteristics, including blood glucose values and medication initiation and timing, were recorded. Satisfaction with treatment group was assessed using the validated Oxford Maternity Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. A total of 197 patients were randomized: 98 in the daily group and 99 in the every-other-day group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The mean neonatal birth weight was similar between groups (mean±SD 3,090±418 g among newborns in the daily group compared with 3,181±482 g among newborns in the every-other-day group). For the primary outcome, the every-other-day group was found to be noninferior to the daily group with an upper confidence limit for the mean difference in mean birth weight of 197 g, which was below the noninferiority margin of 200 g ( P =.046). Postrandomization, there were no significant differences in the number of patients who required medication, the gestational age at which medication was started, or the type of medication used. Average fasting and postprandial glucose values were similar between groups. There was an increase in adherence to treatment group in those randomized to every-other-day blood sugars, but no difference in patient satisfaction. In patients with GDM, testing blood glucose values every other day was as effective as testing daily, without apparent effects on birth weight, medication initiation, or glucose control. Reduced frequency of blood glucose monitoring might help decrease the emotional, physical, and financial burden experienced by patients with GDM. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04857073.

Impact of personalized diabetes care on distress and treatment satisfaction in people with breast cancer.

In patients with breast cancer (BCa) and diabetes (DM), diabetes distress (DD) and treatment satisfaction (DTS) can influence BCa management and outcomes. We assessed the impact of implementing a personalized diabetes care model in patients with BCa. Patients in active treatment or surveillance for BCa with an HbA1c > 53 mmol/mol (7%) or random blood glucose >11.1 mmol/L were included. Participants were offered continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), virtual care and a dedicated diabetes provider for 6 months. Primary outcomes included DD measured by the Diabetes Distress Survey (DDS) and DTS measured by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Questionnaires were conducted at 0, 3 and 6 months. Thirty-one women were enrolled (median age 61, IQR 49.0-69.0). Compared to baseline, the mean DDS score was lower at both 3 months (2.2 vs. 1.8 [n = 27], p = 0.004, SD = 0.70) and 6 months (2.3 vs. 1.8 [n = 23], p = 0.002, SD = 0.70). The mean DTSQ score was higher at 3 months (baseline: 20.5 vs. 3 months: 28.7 [n = 28], p < 0.001, SD = 9.2) and 6 months (baseline: 20.4 vs. 6 months: 30.0 [n = 26], p < 0.001, SD = 9.7). Personalized diabetes care models that emphasize remote management and optimize access for those with BCa may lower DD and improve DTS.

Effects of Digitization of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Records Using a Mobile App and the Cloud System on Outpatient Management of Diabetes: Single-Armed Prospective Study.

In recent years, technologies promoting the digitization of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) records including app-cloud cooperation systems have emerged. Studies combining these technological interventions with support from remote health care professionals have reported improvements in glycemic control. To assess the use of an app-cloud cooperation system linked with SMBG devices in clinical settings, we evaluated its effects on outpatient management of diabetes without remote health care professional support. In this multicenter, open-label, and single-armed prospective study, 48 patients with diabetes (including type 1 and type 2) at 3 hospitals in Japan treated with insulin or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and performing SMBG used the app-cloud cooperation system for 24 weeks. The SMBG data were automatically uploaded to the cloud via the app. The patients could check their data, and their attending physicians reviewed the data through the cloud prior to the patients' regular visits. The primary outcome was changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Although HbA1c levels did not significantly change in all patients, the frequency of daily SMBG following applying the system was significantly increased before induction at 12 (0.60 per day, 95% CI 0.19-1.00; P=.002) and 24 weeks (0.43 per day, 95% CI 0.02-0.84; P=.04). In the subset of 21 patients whose antidiabetic medication had not been adjusted during the intervention period, a decrease in HbA1c level was observed at 12weeks (P=.02); however, this significant change disappeared at 24 weeks (P=.49). The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire total score and "Q4: convenience" and "Q5: flexibility" scores significantly improved after using the system (all P<.05), and 72% (33/46) patients and 76% (35/46) physicians reported that the app-cloud cooperation system helped them adjust insulin doses. The digitization of SMBG records and sharing of the data by patients and attending physicians during face-to-face visits improved self-management in patients with diabetes. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) jRCTs042190057; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs042190057.