Diabetes Self-management Education Intervention Research Articles

The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project Randomized Clinical Control Trial: A Pilot/Feasibility Study of a Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management and Support Intervention for Black Men With Type 2 Diabetes.

Black men are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D) and experience higher diabetes-related complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the complex barriers in diabetes self-management for Black men, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) intervention in Metro Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were randomized to the intervention group (n=12)-10 hr of DSME and 9 hr of DSMS-or enhanced usual care (EUC) group (n=13)-10 hr of DSME. Peer leaders (n = 3) were trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs) to cofacilitate the support sessions. Outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. In the intervention and EUC groups, mean HbA1c decreased by 0.20% (p = .52, SD = 0.99) and 0.13% (p = .68), respectively. General diet (p = .03, M change: 1.32, SD = 1.71) and blood glucose monitoring (p < .05, M change: 0.50, SD = 0.74) scores improved among those in the intervention group. General diet scores also improved in the EUC group: mean change: 1.77, p = .08, although changes were not statistically significant. Changes in diabetes distress scores differed based on the number of sessions attended, with a significant decrease in those attending 7 to 12 sessions (n = 7), >50%, (p = .003, M change: -5.71, SD = 3.20). Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the intervention and assessing sustainability is warranted.

Effect of diabetes self-management education on health-related quality of life of Tunisian children with type1 diabetes mellitus and their parents: A randomized controlled trial.

To assess the effect of diabetes self-management education (DSME) on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of Tunisian children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents. This monocentral study used a randomized controlled trial design, during five-month intervention and five-month follow-up and including 110 patients (54 in the DSME intervention group and 56 in the Individual Education by Pediatrician (IEP) control group) and their parents. Pediatric Generic Core Quality-of-Life Inventory 4.0-Scale (PedsQL4.0) evaluated HRQoL. At baseline, both groups had similar clinical features and PedsQL4.0 scores (p>0.05). In DSME, clinical outcomes were significantly improved from baseline to follow-up (p<0.001), while in the IEP group, which received no intervention, these outcomes remained unchanged. During follow-up, DSME showed higher PedsQL4.0 scores in parents' proxy-report and children/adolescents self-report (p<0.001). According to parents' proxy-report, PedsQL4.0 scores were significantly higher during follow-up compared to baseline in DSME (p<0.001) while they remained the same in IEP (p>0.05). DSME had higher percentage of change in the PedsQL4.0 scores than IEP (p<0.01). The median change varied from -5.01% to 0% vs 5.41% to 36.36% in IEP and DSME, respectively. Encouraging healthcare professionals to incorporate these interventions could enhance the HRQoL of diabetic children and bolster their self-esteem.

The effectiveness of diabetes self-management education intervention on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk in adults with type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) poses a significant challenge to public health. Effective diabetes self-management education (DSME) interventions may play a pivotal role in the care of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A specific up-to-date systematic review is needed to assess the effect of DSME interventions on glycaemic control, cardiometabolic risk, self-management behaviours, and psychosocial well-being among T2DM across LMICs. The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, and Cochrane databases were searched on 02 August 2022 and then updated on 10 November 2023 for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. The quality of the studies was assessed, and a random-effect model was used to estimate the pooled effect of diabetes DSME intervention. Heterogeneity (I2) was tested, and subgroup analyses were performed. Egger's regression test and funnel plots were used to examine publication bias. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trial (RoB 2). The overall assessment of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. A total of 5893 articles were retrieved, and 44 studies (n = 11838) from 21 LMICs met the inclusion criteria. Compared with standard care, pooled analysis showed that DSME effectively reduced the HbA1c level by 0.64% (95% CI: 0.45% to 0.83%) and 1.27% (95% CI: -0.63% to 3.17%) for RCTs and quasi-experimental design studies, respectively. Further, the findings showed an improvement in cardiometabolic risk reduction, diabetes self-management behaviours, and psychosocial well-being. This review suggests that ongoing support alongside individualised face-to-face intervention delivery is favourable for improving overall T2DM management in LMICs, with a special emphasis on countries in the lowest income group.

Improving Self-care Behavior and Removing Barriers by Structured Diabetes Education Program in Primary Health-care Settings of Puducherry: Evidence from a Mixed-method Intervention Study

Context: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves patients’ clinical outcomes and quality of life by encouraging self-care behavior. Aims: This study aimed to find out the effectiveness of a DSME by comparing changes in stages of self-care behavior and to explore perceived barriers in diet, exercise, and foot care among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an urban primary health center (PHC) of Puducherry. Settings and Design: A mixed-method intervention study was conducted among 314 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in two urban PHCs randomly allocated to intervention and control arm. Subjects and Methods: The stages of behavior change and barriers perceived in the domains of diet, physical activity, and foot care were captured using a pretested questionnaire. Intervention consisted of DSME along with information leaflets and self-care kits for the intervention group. At the end of 6 months, end-line assessment and in-depth interviews were conducted. Statistical Analysis Used: Quantitative data were analyzed in STATA while manual coding and deductive thematic analysis were done for qualitative data. Results: Footcare showed an improvement of 31%, while diet and exercise domains saw an improvement of 5% each from preaction to action stage when compared with control arm. The main barriers perceived in dietary modification and foot care were lack of awareness. For exercise, the main barriers were lack of perceived need and being physically unfit. Foot-care barriers witnessed maximum resolution (27%) following the intervention. Conclusions: DSME intervention helps in improving stages of behavior change while resolving self-care barriers. Culturally-oriented DSME and patient-tailored interventions are key to empower people living with diabetes by improving self-care.

Feasibility of a food-based diabetes self-management education intervention for food insecure patients with type 2 diabetes: a convergent mixed methods study.

To assess the feasibility of a food-based diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) intervention delivered to persons with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and food insecurity. This single arm pre-/post convergent mixed methods study tested the feasibility of a 3-month intervention using food boxes, recipes, DSMES and dietitian visits. Feasibility benchmarks assessed were acceptability (> 50 % participants satisfied), demand (> 50 % used program components) and implementation (75 % adherence, 80 % retention). Assessments included: self-reported food security, health-related quality of life, diabetes self-efficacy, socio-demographic and dietary intake, height, weight, and HbA1c and one in-depth interview with participants and key staff. Enrollment, recruitment and retention rates were summarised; qualitative data were analysed using structured thematic analysis (participant interviews) and key point summaries (staff interviews). Quantitative/qualitative data integration was conducted using a joint display. Food bank and Federally Qualified Health Center in the Southwestern U.S. English- or Spanish-speaking adults with T2DM and food insecurity. In total, 247 patients with T2DM and food insecurity were recruited, seventy-one expressed interest and twenty-five consented. Twenty-one participants completed study measurements. 71 % (n 15) received six home food deliveries and ≥ 1 dietitian visit. A priori benchmarks were approached or met within each feasibility criterion - most participants found the intervention to be acceptable, used most or all intervention components, and reported some challenges within intervention implementation (e.g. timing of food deliveries). Data integration provided deeper understanding of reported intervention implementation challenges, yet high adherence to the intervention. The intervention was feasible. Next steps include a clinical trial to establish intervention efficacy.

MHealth Intervention for Vietnamese Living With Diabetes: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Pilot Study.

Evidence indicates participation in a diabetes self-management education and support program improves self-care behaviors and hemoglobin A1c. Language and cultural differences may be barriers to program participation resulting in ineffective self-management, but these factors can be addressed with appropriate interventions. Given the high health care costs associated with diabetes complications, we developed a multicomponent, culturally tailored Self-Management Mobile Health Intervention for US Vietnamese With Diabetes (SMart-D). This study aims to evaluate the SMart-D intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness with intentions to scale up the intervention in the future. This mixed methods study incorporates the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework to evaluate the intervention. This stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot study will be conducted over 2 years in collaboration with primary care clinics. Eligible participants are patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving health care from participating clinics. Clinics will be randomly assigned to an implementation date and will begin with patients enrolling in the control period while receiving standard care, then cross over to the intervention period where patients receive standard care plus the SMart-D intervention for over 12 weeks. Focus groups or interviews will be conducted with clinicians and patients after study completion. Qualitative data will be analyzed using NVivo. Outcomes on self-care behavior changes will be measured with the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities scale and clinical changes will be measured using laboratory tests. A generalized linear mixed-effect model will be used to compute time effect, clustering effect, and the interaction of the control and intervention periods using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute). We hypothesize that (1) at least 50% (n=5) of eligible clinics and 50% (n=40) of eligible patients who are invited will participate, and at least 70% (n=56) of patients will complete the program, and (2) patients who receive the intervention will have improved self-care behaviors and clinical test results with at least 75% (n=60) of the patients maintaining improved outcomes at follow-up visits compared with baseline, and participants will verbalize that the intervention is feasible and acceptable. As of August 2023, we enrolled 10 clinics and 60 patients. Baseline data results will be available by the end of 2023 and outcome data will be published in 2025. This is the first Vietnamese diabetes self-management education and support intervention that leverages mobile health technology to address the barriers of language and culture differences through collaboration with primary care clinics. This study will provide a better understanding of the implementation process, demonstrate the potential effectiveness of the intervention, accelerate the pace of moving evidence-based interventions to practice among the US Vietnamese population, and potentially provide a replicable implementation model that can be culturally adapted to other non-English speaking ethnic minorities. DERR1-10.2196/48585.

Development and Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Clinic Focused on the Care of Adolescents with Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes self-management education and lifestyle interventions are the cornerstones of type 2 diabetes (T2D) care; however, the higher risk of comorbidities among youth with T2D requires a comprehensive care model. Traditionally, sub-specialty care relies on a referral model placing the burden on patients/families. In response, we developed a pediatric T2D multidisciplinary clinic (MDC)-A single physical location where patients can access various sub-specialists. The goals of the MDC are to aid with lifestyle modifications and provide referral/access to sub-specialists within the MDC, as determined through screening labs and assessment tools. We conducted a retrospective chart review of youth seen in the T2D MDC clinic at Cincinnati Children's Hospital from 1/2020 to 12/2021. We evaluated the frequency that youth met with each specialist and completion rates of annual screening labs. The cohort consisted of 227 youth with T2D (mean age 17.6 years, mean BMI 40.9kg/m2, 64% female, 50% Black or African American, 65% public insurance). All patients met with a diabetes provider and 81.2% met with a registered dietitian/certified diabetes education specialist. Exercise physiology met with 51.5% of patients, gastroenterology met with 34.8% of patients, social work met with 44.1% of patients, clinical psychology met with 27.3% of patients, and bariatric surgery met with 9.7% of patients. Percent completion of annual labs were: 98.2% for HbA1c, 84.6% for urine microalbumin, 83.7% for lipids, 90% for liver function, 59.5% for retinopathy, and 45.4% for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The majority of patients received diabetes and nutrition education and annual screening labs. Exercise counseling and sub-specialty care remain below 60% in part due to services not being available at every MDC. Our goals are to increase access to subspecialty care within the MDC's and consider additional care delivery methods to provide comprehensive care to youth with T2D.

Digital Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent chronic disease with an increasing mortality rate over the last decade. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programs have been reported as essential to improve survival; however, patient adherence rates are very low. Therefore, digital devices have been created to deliver DSME at a distance and enhance program attendance. This study aims to assess the effects of digitally delivered DSME programs on the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) of patients with prediabetes and T2DM. Methods: We researched PUBMED databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies (OS) published between 2012-2022 in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. The selected articles tested digital DSME interventions against treatment as usual (TAU) on adults (&gt;18 years) previously diagnosed with T2DM or prediabetes. The result was measured by determining the HbA1c levels. Results: Out of 261 articles, 14 RCTs were selected based on eligibility criteria. Digital DSME technologies have different objectives, including monitoring glycemic fluctuation, insulin titration, nutritional guidance, sleeping assessment, enhancement of physical activity, control of comorbidities, relevant task notifications, personalized treatment recommendations, educational content, and patient/medical staff remote interaction. Some of the technologies combined machine learning techniques for different functions, including detecting adverse glycemic events, physical activity, and blood pressure, among others. Although the level of adherence varied among the various trials, 4 of the 14 RCTs analyzed reported a significant reduction of HbA1c levels using these digital devices compared to TAU. Discussion: Programs providing digital DSME education is a potentially cost-effective tool to improve diabetes care worldwide by overcoming distance barriers, facilitating physician-patient communication, and reducing HbA1c levels. Future improvements in implementing these technologies could enhance user compliance and contribute effectively to diabetes management.

Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) effectiveness in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)- A Systematic review

Diabetes is a serious chronic disease affecting more than 77 million belong to India. The prevalence of diabetes in the population is 8.9%, according to the IDF. Individuals with diabetes are at risk for developing serious complications, including renal failure, vision impairment, blindness, lower extremity amputations, myocardial infarction, and stroke. So the Self-management and education are crucial for controlling diabetes and its associated complications. The purpose of this study to assess the effectiveness diabetes self-management education among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The keywords diabetes mellitus, management education, self-care, diabetes self-management education, DSME, and T2DM were used to search for relevant articles on Google Scholar, PubMed, ProQuest, and Science Direct. Following that, the articles were chosen based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition, the data was extracted, grouped, and concluded. According to 15 studies, diabetes self-management education intervention has a significant impact on T2DM patients' lifestyle changes and self-care. Finally, diabetes self-management education has been shown to be effective in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, DSME has a positive effect on T2DM patients' lifestyle changes and self-care.

Diabetes self-management education interventions and self-management in low-resource settings; a mixed methods study.

Diabetes is largely a self-managed disease; thus, care outcomes are closely linked to self-management behaviours. Structured self-management education (DSME) interventions are, however, largely unavailable in Africa. We sought to characterise DSME interventions in two urban low-resource primary settings; and to explore diabetes self-management knowledge and behaviours, of persons living with diabetes (PLD). A convergent parallel mixed-methods study was conducted between January and February 2021 in Accra, Ghana. The sampling methods used for selecting participants were total enumeration, consecutive sampling, purposive and judgemental sampling. Multivariable regression models were used to study the association between diabetes self-management knowledge and behaviours. We employed inductive content analysis of informants' experiences and context, to complement the quantitative findings. In total, 425 PLD (70.1% (n = 298) females, mean age 58 years (SD 12), with a mean blood glucose of 9.4 mmol/l (SD 6.4)) participated in the quantitative study. Two managers, five professionals, two diabetes experts and 16 PLD participated in in-depth interviews. Finally, 24 PLD were involved in four focus group discussions. The median diabetes self-management knowledge score was 40% ((IQR 20-60). For every one unit increase in diabetes self-management knowledge, there were corresponding increases in the diet (5%;[95% CI: 2%-9%, p<0.05]), exercise (5%; [95% CI:2%-8%, p<0.05]) and glucose monitoring (4%;[95% CI:2%-5%, p<0.05]) domains of the diabetes self-care activities scale respectively. The DSME interventions studied, were unstructured and limited by resources. Financial constraints, conflicting messages, beliefs, and stigma were the themes underpinning self-management behaviour. The DSME interventions studied were under-resourced, and unstructured. Diabetes self-management knowledge though limited, was associated with self-management behaviour. DSME interventions in low resource settings should be culturally tailored and should incorporate sessions on mitigating financial constraints. Future studies should focus on creating structured DSME interventions suited to resource-constrained settings.

115-OR: Improving Glycemic Outcomes through Virtual Diabetes Self-Management Education Pathway

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement and evaluate if a virtual diabetes self-management education (DSME) pathway is a cost-effective intervention in improving glycemic control for adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A one group pre and post-test design was utilized. Total of 41 participants completed the 4-week diabetes self-management pathway. The virtual curriculum integrated spaced education through a mobile health app called Calcium©. Primary outcome measure was change in HbA1c levels three months after intervention. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the difference before and after the DSME intervention. There was a 1.6% mean reduction of HbA1c levels (P=&amp;lt;0.001). There was also statistically significant improvement of other metabolic markers including blood sugar averages, body weight, BMI and systolic blood pressure (P=&amp;lt;0.005). Mean comparison of HbA1c shows that those who significantly utilized the virtual pathway were found to have greater improvement in glycemic control (-2.55% vs -0.43%). This quality improvement project implemented evidence-based interventions to improve patient outcomes, lower healthcare cost and hopefully influence health care policy. Moving this body of knowledge forward with attention to developing and implementing DSME initiatives and exploring novel practice models open doors for building this body of evidence further. Disclosure E.P.Soliman: None.

543-P: A Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) Intervention for Black Men with Type 2 Diabetes—Results of a Three-Month Pilot Randomized Clinical Control Trial

Black men are disproportionately impacted by Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and are more likely to die from diabetes complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the unique challenges this group faces in diabetes self-management, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based DSME/S intervention in metro-Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were recruited and randomized to either the intervention group (n=12) − 10 hours of DSME and 9 hours of DSMS, or to an enhanced usual care (EUC) group (n=13) − 10 hours of DSME. Peer leaders (n=3), trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCES) who used training materials related to Black men with diabetes, led the sessions (mean age: 59.7 years; 100% Black, male, and with at least some college education). Changes in A1C levels, diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress levels were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. In the intervention group, the mean A1C at baseline was 7.73%, SD 2.16, and at follow-up, 7.06%, SD 1.39. The EUC group experienced a 0.13% decrease in A1C levels (p = 0.68). Within the intervention group, differences in average diet and blood-glucose testing scores, both measured using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure, from baseline were statistically significant [(p = 0.03, mean change: 1.32, SD 1.71) and (p &amp;lt; 0.05, mean change: 0.50, SD 0.74), respectively]; EUC group general diet scores were: p = 0.08, mean change: 1.77. Diabetes distress scores among those who attended 1-6 sessions, ≤ 50%, (n=4): p = 0.92, mean change: −0.75, SD 14.06. Of those who attended 7-12 sessions, &amp;gt; 50%, (n=7), the decrease in score was statistically significant: p = 0.003, mean change: −5.71, SD 3.20. Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the program is warranted to measure sustainability. Disclosure A.Ewen: None. K.A.Kloss: None. R.Nwankwo: None. M.M.Funnell: None. G.Piatt: None. J.M.Hawkins: None. Funding National Institute on Aging (2P30AG024824–16); Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Michigan (003063.MG)

1105-P: Development and Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Clinic Focused on Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes self-management education and lifestyle interventions are the cornerstone of type 2 diabetes (T2D) care; however, the higher risk of comorbidities, including depression, among youth with T2D requires a comprehensive care model. Traditionally sub-specialty care relies on a referral model placing the burden on the patient. In response, we developed a pediatric T2D multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) - a single physical location where patients have access to various sub-specialists. The goals of the MDC are to provide access to lifestyle modifications, identify patients who need access to sub-specialty care through screening labs, and improve health care access. We conducted a retrospective chart review of youth seen in the T2D MDC clinic at Cincinnati Children's Hospital from 1/2020 - 12/2021. We evaluated the frequency that youth met with each specialist and completion rates of annual screening labs. The cohort consisted of 227 youth with T2D (mean age 17.6 years, mean BMI 40.9%, 64% female, 50% Black or African American, 65% public insurance). All patients met with a diabetes provider and 81.2% met with a registered dietitian/certified diabetes education specialist. Gastroenterology met with 55.8% of the patients who had elevated liver enzymes, exercise physiology met with 51.6% of patients, social work met with 44.1% of patients, clinical psychology met with 27.3% of patients, and bariatric surgery met with 9.7% of patients. Percent completion of annual labs were: 98.2% for HbA1c, 84.6% for urine microalbumin, 83.7% for lipids, 89.9% for liver function, and 59.5% for retinopathy. The majority of patients received diabetes and nutrition education and annual screening labs. Exercise counseling and sub-specialty care remain below 60% in part because these services are not available at every MDC clinic. Our goals are to increase access to subspecialty care within the MDC's and consider additional care delivery methods to provide comprehensive care to youth with T2D. Disclosure L.R.Schaaf: None. F.Tariq: None. A.S.Shah: None. J.Crail: None. S.Xanthakos: None. J.Sizemore: None. N.A.Crimmins: None. M.Helmrath: None. S.Ley: None. N.Morwessel: None. A.Riegler: None.

Process evaluation of Dulce Digital-Me: an adaptive mobile health (mHealth) intervention for underserved Hispanics with diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes disproportionately impacts ethnic minorities and individuals from low socioeconomic status. Diabetes self-management education and support has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in these populations, and mobile health (mHealth) interventions can reduce barriers to access. Dulce Digital-Me (DD-Me) was developed to integrate adaptive mHealth technologies to enhance self-management and reduce disparities in the high-risk, underserved Hispanic population. The objective of the present study was to evaluate reach, adoption, and implementation of an mHealth diabetes self-management education and support intervention in this underrepresented population. The present analysis is a multimethod process evaluation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. The study was effective in reaching a sample that was representative of the intended population; only modest but significant differences were observed in sex and age. The DD-Me health coach (HC) cited several important facilitators of intervention adoption, including outreach frequency and personalization, and the automated HC report. Implementation fidelity was high, with participants receiving >90% of intended interventions. Participants who received DD-Me with support from a HC were most engaged, suggesting utility and acceptability of integrating HCs with mHealth interventions. Perceptions of implementation among study participants were positive and consistent across study arms. This evaluation revealed the target population was successfully reached and engaged in the digital health interventions, which was implemented with high fidelity. Further studies should evaluate the efficacy and maintenance of the study following the RE-AIM model to determine whether this intervention warrants expansion to additional settings and populations.

Outcomes of Cooking Matters for Diabetes: A 6-week Randomized, Controlled Cooking and Diabetes Self-Management Education Intervention.

Diabetes self-management education and support is the cornerstone of diabetes care, yet only 1 in 2 adults with diabetes attain hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets. Food insecurity makes diabetes management and HbA1c control more difficult. Our aim was to test whether a cooking intervention with food provision and diabetes self-management education and support improves HbA1c and diabetes management. This was a waitlist-controlled, randomized trial. Participants were 48 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Cooking Matters for Diabetes was adapted from Cooking Matters and the American Diabetes Association diabetes self-management education and support intervention into a 6-week program with weekly food provision (4 servings). Surveys (ie, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities; Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey, version 1; Diet History Questionnaire III; 10-item US Adult Food Security Survey Module; and Stanford Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale) were administered and HbA1c was measured at baseline, post intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Mixed-effects linear regression models controlling for sex and study wave were used. Mean (SD) age of participants was 57 (12) years; 65% identified as female, 52% identified as White, 40% identified as Black, and 19 (40%) were food insecure at baseline. Intervention participants improved Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities general diet score (0 to 7 scale) immediately post intervention (+1.51; P= .015) and 3 months post intervention (+1.23; P= .05), and improved Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey, version 1, mental component score (+6.7 points; P= .025) compared with controls. Healthy Eating Index 2015 total vegetable component score improved at 3 months (+0.917; P= .023) compared with controls. At baseline, food insecure participants had lower self-efficacy (5.6 vs 6.9 Stanford Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale; P= .002) and higher HbA1c (+0.77; P= .025), and demonstrated greater improvements in both post intervention (+1.2 vs+0.4 Stanford Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale score; P= .002, and -0.12 vs+0.39 HbA1c; P= .25) compared with food secure participants. Cooking Matters for Diabetes may be an effective method of improving diet-related self-care and health-related quality of life, especially among food insecure patients, and should be tested in larger randomized controlled trials.

Improving Health and Diabetes Self-Management in Immigrants with Type 2 Diabetes Through a Co-Created Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention

To examine the impact of a co-created culturally sensitive diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) intervention on the physical and mental health of immigrants with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Pre- and post-test among people with T2D whose primary language was Urdu, Arabic or Turkish (n = 97). Participants were offered a six-week intervention based on a person-centred approach using research-based dialogue tools to facilitate learning and reflection, which was developed in co-creation with immigrants and healthcare professionals. Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention and after 6 months and analysed using paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, chi-square tests and regression models when appropriate. Several clinical outcomes were improved post-intervention, including HbA1c (P < 0.001), body fat percentage (P = 0.002), self-rated general health (P = 0.05), well-being (P = 0.004) and several self-management behaviours, e.g., physical activity (P < 0.001). Most outcomes remained improved after 6 months, but the effect on HbA1c was no longer statistically significant. Some outcomes were improved only at 6 months, including waist circumference (P < 0.001) and diabetes-related emotional distress (P < 0.001). Fatigue did not change. Attendance at more programme sessions was associated with better outcomes. The DSMES intervention developed in a co-creation process was highly effective in improving the health of immigrants with T2D.

Exploring the Effects of Tailored Phone Call Diabetes Self-management Education Interventions During COVID-19 Pandemic

Limited evidence is available for the effectiveness of delivering virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to explore the effects of delivering tailored phone call diabetes self-management education (DSME) interventions for people with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Equity in the Provision of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) interventions must be accessible to all people with diabetes. To address equity in the delivery of DSMES, interventions should consider the unique needs of various populations. This article outlines the needs of a wide range of populations, including people with diabetes who are racially or ethnically diverse; have limited English proficiency or literacy; are deaf or hard of hearing; are blind or have low vision; are neurodiverse; live with learning disabilities or intellectual or developmental disabilities; have dementia or cognitive impairment; or are of sexual and/or gender minority. The authors discuss how best to tailor DSMES to meet the needs of these diverse groups.

Informing a Randomized Control Trial in Rural Populations: Adaptation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention.

BackgroundOver 34 million people in the United States have diabetes, with 1.5 million diagnosed every year. Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is a crucial component of treatment to delay or prevent complications. Rural communities face many unique challenges in accessing DSMES, including geographic barriers and availability of DSMES programs that are culturally adapted to rural context.ObjectiveBoot Camp Translation (BCT) is an established approach to community-based participatory research used to translate complex clinical and scientific information into concepts, messages, and materials that are understandable, meaningful, and relevant to community members and patients. This study aimed to utilize BCT to adapt an existing DSMES program for delivery in rural primary care for English- and Spanish-speaking people with diabetes.MethodsThe High Plains Research Network (HPRN) Community Advisory Council (C.A.C.) partnered with researchers at the University of Colorado and University of Utah to use BCT to aid in translating medical jargon and materials from an existing DSMES program, called “Diabetes One Day (D1D).” BCT consisted of 10 virtual meetings over a 6-month period among the C.A.C., which included 15 diverse community stakeholders. Both English-speaking and bilingual Spanish-English–speaking C.A.C. members were recruited to reflect the diversity of the rural communities in which the adapted program would be delivered.ResultsThe BCT process guided adaptations to D1D for use in rural settings (R-D1D). R-D1D adaptations reflect both content and delivery to assure that the intervention is appropriate and likely to be accepted by rural English- and Spanish-speaking people with diabetes. Additionally, BCT informed the design of recruitment and program materials and identification of recruitment venues. During the BCT process, the importance of tailoring materials to reflect culture differences in English- and Spanish-speaking patients was identified.ConclusionsBCT was an effective strategy for academic researchers to partner with rural community members to adapt an existing DSMES intervention for delivery in rural areas to both English- and Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes. Through BCT, adaptations to recruitment materials and methods, program content and delivery, and supplemental materials were developed. The need to culturally adapt Spanish materials with input from stakeholders rather than simply translate materials into Spanish was highlighted. The importance of increasing awareness of the connection between diabetes and depression or diabetes distress, adaptations to include local foods, and the importance of the relationship between people with diabetes and their primary care practices were identified.

Care Partner Support Following a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention.

The purpose of the study was to understand care partner (CP) perceptions of an interdisciplinary diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) intervention and explore how the interdisciplinary DSMES intervention influences diabetes-specific day-to-day interactions from the CP's perspective. A multiple-methods research design comprised of an online survey including demographics and supportive behaviors and a semistructured interview was conducted. The survey was completed by 16 CPs. Of the 16 CPs, 11 participated in semistructured interviews. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was conducted. CPs provided support in 3 primary areas: (1) meal planning and preparation (87.5%), (2) participating in physical activity (56.3%), and (3) assisting with technology (43.8%). The main themes described by CPs include (1) the importance of diabetes education for caregivers, including the information they retained from the program, the acquisition of tools to support the person with diabetes, and the desire for more and ongoing education; (2) diabetes education enhances the CP's ability to provide social support and the challenges associated with support; and (3) partners described collaborative diabetes management such as finding middle ground and making changes together. CPs play a significant role in patient diabetes self-management by providing social support and partnership. DSMES programs should seek to include CPs to enhance patient support.