Diabetes Self-management Behaviors Research Articles

A Theory of Transitions Influencing Diabetes Self-management Among Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Emerging adults with type 1 diabetes are experiencing numerous transitions, potentially affecting diabetes self-management. For example, when transitioning to college, these emerging adults may experience changes in their daily routines and usual reminders or triggers for habitual behavior such as checking blood glucose levels. In turn, these emerging adults may omit checking glucose levels, impacting decisional and adaptational diabetes self-management behavior associated with their insulin dose or bolus. Thus, we propose a theory on transitions influencing daily routines, diabetes self-management habitual behavior triggers, and, in turn, diabetes self-management habitual and decisional/adaptational behaviors for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes.

Comparative Study of Diabetes Knowledge, Attitudes, Family Support, Self-efficacy, and Self-management Behaviors Between Cancer Survivors With Diabetes and Diabetes Patients Without Cancer

Background Studies have compared diabetes management quality indicators, focusing on physiological markers such as hemoglobin A1c, between cancer survivors with diabetes and general diabetes patients. However, research comparing differences in diabetes self-management behaviors and the factors influencing them between these groups is lacking. Objectives This study aimed to compare self-management behaviors, guided by the information-motivation-behavior model, between cancer survivors with diabetes and general diabetes patients. In addition, we aimed to identify differences in factors such as diabetes knowledge, attitudes, family support, and self-efficacy that may influence diabetes self-management behaviors in both groups. Methods A total of 125 cancer survivors with diabetes and 126 general diabetes patients participated in this cross-sectional study. A structured questionnaire assessed demographics, diabetes knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors. Results Regarding diabetes education, 47.0% of cancer survivors and 61.6% of general diabetes patients received education. The cancer survivors had lower diabetes knowledge scores (10.30 ± 4.15, P < .001), a lower perceived value of strict blood glucose control (4.10 ± 0.56, P < .001), and less family support (15.50 ± 7.50, P = .019) than the patients without cancer (13.51 ± 3.84, 4.25 ± 0.65, and 17.57 ± 6.40, respectively). Conclusion This study reveals significant differences in diabetes self-management between cancer survivors and general diabetes patients. Cancer survivors showed lower diabetes knowledge, glucose control perception, and family support. These findings highlight the need for tailored self-management programs for cancer survivors. Implications for Practice This study offers insights for developing tailored diabetes self-management programs and educational interventions for cancer survivors.

Simplified integration of optimal self-management behaviors is associated with improved HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Living with type 1 diabetes requires burdensome and complex daily diabetes self-management behaviors. This study aimed to determine the association between integrated behavior performance and HbA1c, while identifying the behavior with the most significant impact on HbA1c. A simple and feasible questionnaire was used to collect diabetes self-management behavior in patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 904). We assessed six dimensions of behavior performance: continuous glucose monitor (CGM) usage, frequent glucose testing, insulin pump usage, carbohydrate counting application, adjustment of insulin doses, and usage of apps for diabetes management. We evaluated the association between these behaviors and HbA1c. In total, 21.3% of patients performed none of the allotted behavior, while 28.5% of patients had a total behavior score of 3 or more. 63.6% of patients with a behavior score ≥ 3 achieved HbA1c goal, contrasting with only 30.4% of patients with a behavior score of 0-1. There was a mean 0.54% ± 0.05% decrease in HbA1c for each 1-unit increase in total behavior score after adjustment for age, family education and diabetes duration. Each behavior was independently correlated with a lower HbA1c level, with CGM having the most significant effect on HbA1c levels. Six optimal self-management behaviors, especially CGM usage, were associated with improved glycemic control, emphasizing the feasibility of implementing a simplified version of DSMES in the routine clinical care. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03610984.

The effectiveness of diabetes self-management education intervention on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk in adults with type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) poses a significant challenge to public health. Effective diabetes self-management education (DSME) interventions may play a pivotal role in the care of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A specific up-to-date systematic review is needed to assess the effect of DSME interventions on glycaemic control, cardiometabolic risk, self-management behaviours, and psychosocial well-being among T2DM across LMICs. The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, and Cochrane databases were searched on 02 August 2022 and then updated on 10 November 2023 for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. The quality of the studies was assessed, and a random-effect model was used to estimate the pooled effect of diabetes DSME intervention. Heterogeneity (I2) was tested, and subgroup analyses were performed. Egger's regression test and funnel plots were used to examine publication bias. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trial (RoB 2). The overall assessment of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. A total of 5893 articles were retrieved, and 44 studies (n = 11838) from 21 LMICs met the inclusion criteria. Compared with standard care, pooled analysis showed that DSME effectively reduced the HbA1c level by 0.64% (95% CI: 0.45% to 0.83%) and 1.27% (95% CI: -0.63% to 3.17%) for RCTs and quasi-experimental design studies, respectively. Further, the findings showed an improvement in cardiometabolic risk reduction, diabetes self-management behaviours, and psychosocial well-being. This review suggests that ongoing support alongside individualised face-to-face intervention delivery is favourable for improving overall T2DM management in LMICs, with a special emphasis on countries in the lowest income group.

The Influence of Nurse-Led Interventions on Diseases Management in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

The global prevalence of people with diabetes mellitus (PWD) is rapidly increasing. Nurses can provide diabetes care for PWD in several areas. Interventions led by nurses can support PWD for effective management of diabetes, which can positively improve clinical outcomes. Nurse-led diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an effective strategy to manage diabetes mellitus (DM) since it improves self-care practice and knowledge regarding diabetes. PWD often need to stay in hospitals longer, which involves poorer patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Nurse-led clinics for DM management are a new strategy to possibly ameliorate the disease management. Diabetes specialist nurses can play an important role in improving diabetes care in inpatient settings. Various studies have revealed that nurses can independently provide care to PWD in collaboration with various other healthcare providers. Studies also demonstrated that the nurse-led education-receiving group showed a significantly reduced level of average glycosylated haemoglobin A1c level. Moreover, nurse-led interventions often result in significant improvements in diabetes knowledge, psychological outcomes, self-management behaviours, and physiological outcomes. The purpose of this literature review was to identify the impact of nurse-led interventions on diabetes management. Moreover, in this review, a number of nursing interventions and the nurses’ roles as educators, motivators as well as caregivers in DM management have been extensively discussed. This article also summarises the outcomes that are measured to evaluate the impact of nursing interventions and the strategies to overcome the existing and emerging challenges for nurses in diabetes care.

The Effect of Diabetes Management Shared Care Clinic on Glycated Hemoglobin A1c Compliance and Self-Management Abilities in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

We aim to evaluate the impact of diabetes management shared care clinic (DMSCC) on glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compliance and self-management abilities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study was a prospective cohort study of patients with T2DM participating in the DMSCC. At baseline and after management, the HbA1c levels were measured, the HbA1c compliance rate were calculated, and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities-6 (SDSCA-6), Diabetes Empowerment Scale-DAWN Short Form (DES-DSF), and Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale-Five-item Short Form (PAID-5) were completed. These pre- and post-management data were compared. A total of 124 eligible patients were enrolled. After the diabetes management of DMSCC, the average HbA1c decreased and the HbA1c compliance rate increased significantly (P < 0.01). SDSCA-6 showed significant improvement in physical activity, glycemic monitoring, smoking (P < 0.01), and taking medication (P < 0.05). DES-DSF suggested a greater willingness to try to effectively treat diabetes (P < 0.05). PAID-5 indicated significant improvement in diabetes-related emotional distress. DMSCC can help patients with T2DM reduce HbA1c, increase HbA1c compliance, improve diabetes self-management behaviors, empowerment, and diabetes-related emotional distress and serve as an effective exploration and practice of diabetes self-management education and support.

Association of dietary intake and nutrition knowledge with diabetes self-management behavior among Bangladeshi type 2 diabetes mellitus adults: A multi-center cross-sectional study

Diabetes self-management behavior is important for patients to lessen disease-related complications, obtain optimum glycemic control and achieve a better quality of life. The study aimed to determine the relationship between dietary intake, nutrition knowledge, and self-management behaviors in Bangladeshi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with a focus on achieving optimal glycemic control, improving their quality of life. A cross-sectional study was conducted among T2DM patients from seven districts throughout Bangladesh. Data were collected using a validated semi-structured questionnaire for evaluating diabetes-related self-management behavior and existing nutrition knowledge. Dietary intakes were obtained using 24 h 3-days diet recall. Logistic regression analysis, Pearson's correlation and independent t-test were used to observe correlation and association among variables. A total of 411 patients with T2DM participated in the study, 59.4 % of patients achieved good dietary control, while 14.4 % were physically active, 49.4 % adhered well to medication, 44.0 % practiced effective self-monitoring, and 27.0 % possessed good diabetic nutrition knowledge. In fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients with a better glycemic control showed 14 times more control in their dietary intake [AOR: 14.21; 95 % CI: 5.62–35.94], and performing a good physical exercise 5 times more than the patients with high blood glucose level [AOR: 5.671; 95 % CI: 1.55–20.686]. Adherence toward medication prescription was also significantly higher among these patients. Glucose level was significantly higher among patients who had moderate [AOR: 3.367; 95 % CI: 1.29–8.73] and poor [AOR: 9.87; 95 % CI: 3.19–30.57] diabetes related nutritional knowledge. Patients with poor glycemic control consumed significantly more carbohydrates (251 ± 62 g vs 213 ± 47 g) and less dietary fiber (16.7 ± 4.5 g vs 20.5 ± 6.1 g) compared to the patients with optimum glycemic control. Our study findings suggest that, an improved level of nutrition knowledge may be beneficial to ensure optimum dietary intake, thus aid in an effective diabetes self-management behavior among Bangladeshi T2DM patients. Efforts should be made to help patient achieve optimum glycemic control, thus reduce their health-related complications and contribute to overall well-being.

A PILOT FAMILY COACHING INTERVENTION FOR PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND A FAMILY MEMBER

Abstract Type 2 diabetes is a common chronic condition in later life that requires substantial lifestyle changes. Most diabetes management occurs at home with the help – and sometimes hindrance – of family members. Although coaching has become a common strategy in healthcare to supplement diabetes education, few interventions have prepared family members to be coaches, despite the documented benefit of including family members in chronic disease management interventions. The overall goal of our pilot intervention was to develop and test a family coaching approach to enhance patients’ diabetes self-management while preserving relationship quality and both individuals’ well-being. Participants were recruited from local diabetes education classes and through provider referrals, and included 20 dyads in the intervention group (patient Mage=59.12) and 20 dyads in the control group (patient Mage=57.06). The intervention, involving 5 interactive group sessions (in-person or virtual) led by a facilitator, covered evidence-based material developed by the investigators on diabetes education and coaching strategies. Behavioral, clinical, emotional, and relational metrics were assessed via a survey at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months later; intervention participants also completed a program evaluation survey and participated in a focus group. Survey findings revealed some positive effects for diabetes self-management behaviors, no effects for short-term clinical markers, negative effects for emotional well-being, and both positive and negative effects for relational well-being. Participants reported being satisfied with the program overall; they indicated learning a lot and having a positive experience. A translation and cultural adaptation of this program for Spanish-speaking populations is currently underway.

Daily Functioning of Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for an Ambulatory Assessment Study.

Diabetes impacts nearly 25% of veterans. Many veterans do not engage in recommended physical activity and other diabetes self-management behaviors. Type 2 diabetes is generally asymptomatic; as such, the long-term consequences of inadequate self-management and benefits of consistent self-management are not salient in the short term. Furthermore, self-management behaviors typically take place outside of medical visits; however, self-management-related factors are only assessed during medical visits, likely missing large amounts of variability. Thus, ambulatory assessment methods such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA), accelerometry, and continuous glucose monitoring are needed to understand the dynamics of daily self-management and identify potential intervention targets. The overarching goal of this study is to understand daily, time-varying factors (comorbid affective symptoms and social context) that influence physical activity, diabetes self-management, glycemic management, daily functioning, and quality of life in participants' natural environments. We are recruiting veterans with type 2 diabetes (target N=100). Participants are required to complete a battery of baseline assessments related to mental health, psychosocial factors, and self-management behaviors. Participants then receive 5 momentary EMA surveys and 1 daily EMA survey per day, in which veterans report comorbid affective symptoms (mood, stress, and pain), social support, social interactions, physical activity, and other self-management behaviors. Momentary surveys are delivered randomly during daily preprogrammed intervals over a 14-day sampling period. Accelerometry and continuous glucose monitoring are also used to assess physical activity and blood glucose, respectively. The first 6 participants also completed interviews assessing their experience in the study and barriers to participation. These test participants informed modifications to the protocol for the remaining participants. The project received funding in April of 2023. Enrollment began in March of 2023 and is planned to be completed in April 2025. Among the 6 test participants, the overall EMA response rate was 87% (range 74%-95%). The response rate for the EMA survey including daily items (67%, range 21%-93%) was lower than the earlier shorter EMA surveys (89%, range 81%-96%). The mean rate of valid accelerometer wear of at least 20 hours per day was 93% (SD 11%), and continuous glucose monitoring data were available for 91% (SD 17%) of days on average. Participants reported few barriers to completing EMA surveys but noted the random timing of questions made it difficult to plan around, and the end-of-day survey was long. Two participants reported survey items reminded or motivated them to engage in diabetes self-management behaviors. Assessment tools developed from this study can inform clinical decision-making by considering barriers to self-management that occur in daily life. Clinical applications include tailored, adaptive technology-supported interventions to improve self-management that provide the right type and amount of support at the right time by adapting to an individual's changing internal and contextual state. DERR1-10.2196/53874.

Positive Psychology Interventions for Improving Self-management Behaviors in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: a Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

Interests have been emerging in using positive psychology interventions (PPIs) to improve diabetes self-management (DSM) behaviors (e.g., blood glucose monitoring, physical activity). To explore the impact of those interventions on DSM behaviors, we summarized the evidence of PPIs on self-management behaviors among both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients between 2012 and 2022. Among the eight studies identified, different study designs and types of PPIs were apparent. Typical PPIs (e.g., activities enhancing positive affect/gratitude/self-affirmation/optimism) were usually applied to T1D patients (N = 5); PPIs were usually combined with motivational interviewing for T2D patients (N = 3). Contrary to expectations, PPIs did not consistently demonstrate positive effects on self-management behaviors' change regardless of the types of diabetes patients, compared to the control groups. Improvements in diabetes patients' self-management behaviors from PPIs are still unclear. Future studies should more rigorously evaluate and identify the active ingredients of PPIs for behavioral changes among diabetes patients.

Habit Formation Intervention to Improve Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors: A Feasibility Study.

Self-management of lifestyle behaviors is the recommended focus for interventions to address Type 2 diabetes. Habit formation is an effective approach to changing personal behaviors, but evidence of success for Type 2 diabetes is limited. To examine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of occupation-based habit formation interventions for improving diabetes self-management behaviors. Single-subject design with multiple participants providing 4 wk of baseline data followed by 10 wk of intervention data. Individual telehealth sessions. Eight adults (ages 29-75 yr) with Type 2 diabetes, who had access to a telephone and who were not involved in other diabetes-related education or interventions voluntarily, enrolled into the study. Participants engaged in 10 wk of habit formation intervention focused on four diabetes self-management domains: nutrition, blood glucose monitoring, medication management, and physical activity. Data gathered included findings on measures of diabetes self-care behaviors and habit formation. There was a significant change in self-care behaviors for 6 of the 8 participants (p < .05 for 1 participant, and p < .01 for 5 participants). Group changes were statistically significant (p < .001). Habit strength significantly improved for all areas of diabetes self-management (p < .001 for nutrition, blood glucose monitoring, and medication management and p = .001 for physical activity). Findings suggest that the occupation-based intervention was feasible and showed promise for developing self-management behaviors. What This Article Adds: Habits are considered foundational to occupations, yet application of the science of habit formation is often not well understood by occupational therapists. This study considered the theoretical components of habit formation that have been neglected by prior studies and demonstrates the feasibility and preliminary effect estimates of a habit formation intervention when used with people with Type 2 diabetes.

The Role of Family in Diabetes Management for Mexican American Adults.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to characterize how family influences diabetes self-management in Mexican American adults. Methods: Data were analyzed from previously collected data that included 34 semi-structured interviews with Hispanic adults with diabetes and six focus groups with 37 adults with diabetes and family members. Themes related to family and diabetes management were identified and analyzed using a modified template approach. Results: Family-related facilitators to T2DM self-management were (1) provides support, (2) provides motivation, and (3) desire to protect family from diabetes. Family-related challenges were (1) lack of support, (2) family responsibilities, and (3) stress related to family. Diabetes education was shared with family members. Family member perspectives on T2DM included (1) not knowing how to help, (2) effect on emotional wellbeing, (3) diabetes affects the whole family, and (4) family provides support. Conclusion: Most participants with T2DM felt supported by family, but many desired more social support and support surrounding dietary changes from family. Many felt family did not understand what living with diabetes meant for them. Most family members wished to learn more about how to help. Future interventions should include family members and teach them supportive strategies to support beneficial diabetes self-management behaviors.

FRI084 The Impact Of COVID-19 On Comorbid Beliefs And Adherence To Self-Management Behaviors Among Breast Cancer Survivors With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract Disclosure: S. Lambert: None. J.E. Itty: None. L. Guerra: None. M. Goel: None. J.J. Lin: None. Y.T. Harris: None. Introduction: During the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, anxiety and depression rates increased substantially worldwide. Anxiety and depression can affect self-efficacy and health-related beliefs as well as diabetes self-management behaviors (DSMBs) such as diet, exercise, and medication adherence, which are crucial for glycemic control and preventing complications. Both Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and breast cancer pose an increased risk of complications from Covid, which could exacerbate pandemic-related distress in patients with T2DM and a history of breast cancer. We compared diabetes beliefs and adherence to DSMBs in breast cancer survivors with T2DM, before Covid-19 versus during the first Covid-19 surge. Hypothesis: Patients will experience a change in diabetes beliefs and adherence to DSMBs in the setting of the Covid-19 pandemic. Methods: Eligible patients included women ≥ 55 years, diagnosed with Stage 0-IIIA breast cancer in the past 15 years, who had completed chemotherapy and/or were prescribed hormonal therapy, had pre-existing T2DM treated with ≥ 1 oral medication, and had been enrolled in an ongoing study of disease beliefs and cognition in breast cancer survivors with comorbid T2DM. We included patients with a baseline visit prior to Covid and a six-month follow up visit between March - September 2020. We assessed diabetes beliefs with the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) and DSMB adherence with the Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities (SDSCA) questionnaire. Self-reported adherence to diabetes medication was assessed with the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS). Signed rank tests were used to compare disease beliefs and DSMB adherence before versus during the first Covid-19 wave. Results: 26 patients completed baseline interviews prior to Covid and a six-month follow up visit during the first Covid-19 surge (mean age: 65 years; 27% White, 35% Black, 11% Asian/Pacific Islander, 27% unanswered). Diabetes beliefs did not differ significantly before versus during Covid (p &amp;gt; 0.05 for all IPQ scales), nor did adherence to DSMBs including diet (days/week following a healthful eating plan: p = 0.87), exercise (days participating in a specific exercise: p = 0.40), and glucose monitoring (days checking blood sugar the number of times recommended: p = 0.84). No significant differences were seen in medication adherence (p = 0.698). Conclusion: In this small sample of breast cancer survivors with T2DM there appears to be no change in diabetes beliefs or DSMB adherence during the first Covid surge compared to baseline. These findings raise the possibility that individual patient factors play a greater role in adherence and disease beliefs than pandemic-related distress. Future analyses will expand the sample size and explore whether the extent to which the Covid-19 pandemic impacted patients moderates their disease beliefs and self-management. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Exploring Disease Management Experiences of Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 infection on disease management among individuals with type 2 diabetes and to explore their perspectives on COVID-19. This descriptive qualitative study included patients with diabetes, with a sample of 15 patients meeting the study criteria. The data were analyzed using code groups, which were then further categorized into main themes and subthemes. The main themes were: initial contact with the SARS-CoV-2 that is associated with COVID-19 illness changes in diabetes self-management behaviors; attempt at maintaining diabetes selfmanagement behaviors; and problems with accessing diabetes care. The study findings revealed several significant insights. Individuals with diabetes exhibited a fear of contracting SARS-CoV-2, which led to reduced levels of exercise and difficulties in managing blood sugar levels and insulin adjustments. Moreover, due to anxiety about COVID-19 infection, they postponed health check-ups, resulting in experiencing diabetes-related complications.

The impact of veteran support and resources for diabetes (iNSPiRED) on diabetes distress: Results from a randomized, parallel-group trial

ObjectiveThe primary objective of this research was to assess the impact of a novel, peer-directed intervention (iNSPiRED) on diabetes distress (DD) among veterans with type 2 diabetes and DD. Secondary objectives were to assess iNSPiRED's impact on anxiety, depression, and diabetes self-management behaviors. MethodA single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group trial was conducted. Participants (n = 218) were recruited through a Veterans Affairs medical center and community agencies in a major metropolitan area from September 2019 through January 2022. Certified mental health peer specialists delivered iNSPiRED, a three-month goal-setting and resource navigation intervention. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and month six. Multilevel random-intercept linear regression models with treatment x time interaction terms were used to assess treatment effects. ResultsFrequency of following a healthy eating plan was higher for iNSPiRED vs usual care at month three relative to baseline (B = 0.58; p = 0.03) after adjusting for race and socioeconomic status. No other treatment effects differed significantly from zero (ps ≥ 0.05). ConclusionPeer-directed interventions have the potential to deliver low-cost, highly scalable care. However, based on the largely negative findings of the current study, it is likely that more intense, multimodal interventions are needed to address DD.

Underlying mechanisms of diabetes knowledge influencing diabetes self-management behaviors among patients with type II diabetes in rural China: Based on health belief model

To investigate the association between diabetes knowledge and diabetes self-management (DSM) behaviors and to explore the influence mechanism between them among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on health belief model in rural China. This cross-sectional study included 483 participants with T2DM from 8 villages of 3 townships in Jiangsu Province. All participants completed a structured questionnaire, including demographic information, diabetes knowledge, DSM behaviors, health beliefs, and cognitive function. Multiple linear regression and mediation analysis were performed to analyze the association between diabetes knowledge and DSM behaviors, furthermore the mechanism between them. Diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy positively influenced DSM behaviors. Health beliefs multiply mediated the association between diabetes knowledge and DSM behaviors. Perceived behavioral barriers mediated the relationship between diabetes knowledge and DSM behaviors, where a suppression effect existed. A chain-mediated effect was found: diabetes knowledge affected perceived benefits, followed by self-efficacy, and finally DSM behaviors. Diabetes knowledge acquisition played an important role in improving DSM behaviors, and health beliefs multiply mediated the relationship between them. When designing interventions, health systems and health providers should refocus on diabetes knowledge, emphasize the benefits of self-management, and consider the barriers that patients may encounter.

Telemedicine-assisted structured self-monitoring of blood glucose in management of T2DM results of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThis prospective study aimed to compare telemedicine-assisted structured self-monitoring of blood glucose(SMBG) with a traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) in adults of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsAdult participants with T2DM were assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The patients in the intervention group received a connected BGM with real-time data submission as well as individual needs-based tele-coaching to address and improve motivation and daily diabetes self-management. The patients in the control group received a traditional BGM. Changes in glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c), low blood glucose index(LBGI), and diabetes self-management behaviors were analyzed.ResultsThe study demonstrated the superiority of the telemedicine-assisted structured SMBG versus the traditional BGM for improving HbA1c. Additionally, the telemedicine-assisted SMBG reduced the risk of hypoglycemia and enhanced diabetes self-management behaviors, as differences in the LBGI and the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire(DSMQ) results between the groups after 6 months were found to be significant.ConclusionsTelemedicine-assisted structured SMBG helps physicians and patients to achieve a specific level of glycemic control and reduce hypoglycemia. The use of coaching applications and telemedicine-assisted SMBG indicated beneficial effects for T2DM self-management, which may help limit disease progression.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trail Registry No: ChiCTR2300072356 on 12/06/2023. Retrospectively registered.

Impact of a Combined Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Digital Health Solution on Glucose Metrics and Self-Management Behavior for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World, Observational Study.

The BlueStar (Welldoc) digital health solution for people with diabetes incorporates data from multiple devices and generates coaching messages using artificial intelligence. The BlueStar app syncs glucose data from the G6 (Dexcom) real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) system, which provides a glucose measurement every 5 minutes. The objective of this real-world study of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using the digital health solution and RT-CGM was to evaluate change in glycemic control and engagement with the program over 3 months. Participants were current or former enrollees in an employer-sponsored health plan, were aged 18 years or older, had a T2D diagnosis, and were not using prandial insulin. Outcomes included CGM-based glycemic metrics and engagement with the BlueStar app, including logging medications taken, exercise, food details, blood pressure, weight, and hours of sleep. Participants in the program that met our analysis criteria (n=52) were aged a mean of 53 (SD 9) years; 37% (19/52) were female and approximately 50% (25/52) were taking diabetes medications. The RT-CGM system was worn 90% (SD 8%) of the time over 3 months. Among individuals with suboptimal glycemic control at baseline, defined as mean glucose >180 mg/dL, clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control were observed, including reductions in a glucose management indicator (-0.8 percentage points), time above range 181-250 mg/dL (-4.4 percentage points) and time above range >250 mg/dL (-14 percentage points; all P<.05). Time in range 70-180 mg/dL also increased by 15 percentage points (P=.016) in this population, which corresponds to an increase of approximately 3.5 hours per day in the target range. Over the 3-month study, 29% (15/52) of participants completed at least one engagement activity per week. Medication logging was completed most often by participants (23/52, 44%) at a rate of 12.1 (SD 0.8) events/week, and this was closely followed by exercise and food logging. The combination of an artificial intelligence-powered digital health solution and RT-CGM helped people with T2D improve their glycemic outcomes and diabetes self-management behaviors.

Effect of Health Literacy Intervention on Glycemic Control and Renal Function Among Thai Older Adults at Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Diabetes patients with low health literacy often have poor health and clinical outcomes. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a health literacy intervention on glycemic control and renal function among Thai older adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A quasi-experimental study was carried out in rural areas of Phayao Province in northern Thailand. The participants were older adults with T2DM who recorded blood glucose levels ranging from 140 to 180 mg/dL and who were not receiving prescribed medication. The intervention lasted 12 weeks, and data were collected at three points: baseline, post-intervention, and at 3 months' follow-up. The study outcomes included the measurement of fasting blood sugar (FBS), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels after the intervention. A linear mixed model and generalized estimating equations model were used to assess the intervention effect for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. From baseline to post-intervention, FBS and HbA1c decreased more in the intervention group than in the control group by 8.2 mg/dL (p < 0.001) and 0.1% (p = 0.029), respectively, whereas eGFR increased by 8.0 mL/min/1.73m2 (p < 0.001). The absolute effect of the intervention at follow-up was -9.8 units for FBS, -0.4 units for HbA1c, and 14.0 units for eGFR. Abnormal HbA1c level (≥6.5%) of the intervention group was reported as 70.3% at baseline, 31.3% at post-intervention, and 9.4% at follow-up. Compared to baseline levels, the T2DM patients who received the intervention were 0.31 times less likely to have abnormal HbA1c levels than the control subjects at follow-up (p = 0.003) who received no intervention. Our findings suggest that this intervention may potentially improve diabetes self-management and prevention behaviors, thereby reducing the diabetes burden in rural communities in northern Thailand.

The Development of a New Tool to Help Patients and Their Providers Evaluate Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Diabetes self-management or self-care activity related to diet, physical activity, and glucose monitoring, among other things, is recognized as important to effectively managing this condition. The aim of this study was to create an assessment tool for evaluating knowledge and self-management behavior in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) for patients and their providers. The study utilized an online survey with a cross-sectional design of adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. The survey consisted of 8 sections and a total of 56 questions, which were designed to measure the participants' current knowledge and behavior regarding diabetes self-management. The total sample size was 306 participants, and the results revealed a significant association between performance on diabetes knowledge questions and self-management behavior (β = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.58; p < 0.001). Furthermore, education had a significant impact on diabetes self-management behavior (β = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.14, 1.03; p = 0.01). Overall, the data indicated that participants who performed well on knowledge-based questions exhibited higher scores in desired diabetes management behaviors. Increasing awareness of this work in the diabetic community could facilitate the clinical encounters between diabetic patients and their healthcare providers, with an emphasis on each individual's needs being taken into consideration.