Diabetes Self-efficacy Research Articles

Demographic, Clinical, Psychosocial, and Behavioral Predictors of Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use is increasing rapidly among people with type 2 diabetes, although little is known about predictors of CGM use beyond clinical and demographic information available in electronic medical records. Behavioral and psychosocial characteristics may also predict CGM use. We examined clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral characteristics that may predict CGM use in adults with type 2 diabetes. This longitudinal observational study comprised a secondary analysis of data collected in a larger trial. Enrollment included HbA1c tests and surveys assessing demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral characteristics. We queried participants regarding their CGM use during the study on their final self-report surveys, 15months post-enrollment. Participants were 245 community-dwelling adults with type 2 diabetes recruited from primary care. We used logistic regression to predict CGM use during the 15-month trial period from baseline characteristics. Around one-third of participants (37.1%; 91/245) started CGM. Predictors of starting CGM in bivariate models included younger age, higher socioeconomic status, insulin use, higher HbA1c, and more diabetes distress. When including all potential predictors in a single multivariable model, only younger age (aOR = 0.95, p = 0.001), insulin use (aOR = 2.33, p = 0.006), and higher socioeconomic status (aOR = 0.44, p = 0.037) were significant predictors. Despite the association between higher HbA1c and CGM use, neither diabetes self-care behaviors nor diabetes self-efficacy significantly predicted CGM use. Of participants who tried a CGM, 14.3% (13/91) had stopped, with cost being the most-cited reason. Even when including behavioral and psychological characteristics, younger age, using insulin, and higher socioeconomic status remain key predictors of CGM use. These findings emphasize the importance of access and affordability for people who may benefit from CGM. Providers should not bias their introduction of CGM towards those with (perceived or actual) optimal or sub-optimal self-care behaviors.

Digital Health Tools and Behavioral Strategies to Increase Engagement With Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Design and Feasibility of DM-BOOST.

The purpose of the study was to describe the development and feasibility of implementing the DM-BOOST program in support of an established diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program. A patient panel of 4 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) codesigned DM-BOOST. DM-BOOST is a patient-focused program that includes peer-written text messages about diabetes self-management behaviors and digital health training to improve patient portal use and initiate goal setting prior to a scheduled DSMES appointment. Adults with T2DM and A1C ≥8.0% participated in a 6-month feasibility pilot. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either DM-BOOST or usual care. Outcomes included DSMES engagement (scheduled and attended DSMES appointments) and changes in diabetes self-efficacy and treatment satisfaction. Pilot participants (n = 60) were 60.0% female with mean age 45.5 years (SD 8.3) and A1C 10.1% (SD 1.8%). All DM-BOOST participants (30/30, 100%) had DSMES appointments scheduled compared to 86.7% of usual care (26/30). DM-BOOST participants had fewer DSMES appointment no-shows/cancellations (3/30, 10%) compared to usual care (10/26, 35%). There was greater improvement in diabetes self-efficacy in the DM-BOOST group compared to usual care and no difference in treatment satisfaction. DM-BOOST, leveraging peer-written text messaging and digital health training, increased DSMES engagement. Implementation of DM-BOOST was determined to be feasible, with several system-level barriers identified, including obtaining provider referrals and scheduling appointments. An effectiveness trial of DM-BOOST is needed to evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes.

8642 Continuous glucose monitor: reclaiming type 2 diabetes self-efficacy and mitigating disparities

Abstract Disclosure: K. Ni: None. C.A. Tampe: None. K. Sol: Employee; Self; Patient accepted job with Dexcom Jan 2024. L. Cervantes: None. R.I. Pereira: None. Context: The increase in continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use has been notable for widening disparities between the least and most socially marginalized. Given access barriers, there is limited CGM patient experience information that is inclusive of those with type 2 diabetes mellitus from socially marginalized backgrounds. Objective: To understand the CGM usage experience across a U.S. Medicaid population with type 2 diabetes at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Methods: This qualitative study used semi-structured phone interviews with 28 English or Spanish speaking participants prescribed CGM who were enrolled in a U.S. Medicaid program that subsidized CGM. Audio-recordings of interviews were transcribed and analyzed by inductive thematic analysis. Results: Participants had a median age 56 (interquartile range 48-60) with varying levels of formal schooling (55% with 9 years or less) and were from diverse racial or ethnic backgrounds (57% Hispanic, 18% non-Hispanic Black, 21% non-Hispanic White). Interviews were conducted in English (68%) or Spanish (32%). We identified six major themes: initial expectations and overcoming initiation barriers (subthemes: initial expectations, overcoming initiation barriers), convenience and ease promote daily use (subthemes: benefits over fingersticks), increased knowledge leads to improved self-management (subthemes: increased understanding and knowledge, glucose level self-awareness, motivating healthy behaviors), collaboration with provider and clinical team, improved self-reported outcomes (subthemes: improved glucose and non-glucose targets, positive emotional effect, essential for management), and barriers and burdens are generally tolerated (subthemes: barriers to monitoring, burden of self-monitoring). Conclusions: CGM was experienced as easy to understand and use and viewed as a tool for diabetes self-efficacy. Expanded CGM access for socially marginalized patients with type 2 diabetes can enhance diabetes self-management to help mitigate diabetes outcome disparities. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Impact of an SMS intervention to support type 2 diabetes self-management: DiabeText clinical trial.

Complications arising from uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) pose a significant burden on individuals' well-being and healthcare resources. Digital interventions may play a key role in mitigating such complications by supporting patients to adequately self-manage their condition. To assess the impact of DiabeText, a new theory-based, patient-centered, mobile health intervention integrated with electronic health records to send tailored short text messages to support T2DM self-management. Pragmatic, Phase III, 12-month, two-arm randomized clinical trial with T2DM primary care patients in Spain. 742 participants with suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c>7.5) were randomly allocated to a control (usual care) or intervention (DiabeText) group. The DiabeText group received, in addition to usual care, 165 messages focused on healthy lifestyle and medication adherence. glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). medication possession ratio, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), diabetes self-efficacy (DSES); and self-reported adherence to medication, Mediterranean diet (MEDAS-14), and physical activity (IPAQ). Over the 12-month period, we observed no significant differences in HbA1c between the intervention and the control groups (Beta=-0.025 (-0.198 to 0.147; p=0.772)). In comparison with the control group, the DiabeText group showed significant (p<0.05) improvements in self-reported medication adherence (OR=1.4; 95%CI: 1.0 to 1.9), DSES (Cohen's d=0.35), and EQ5D-5L (Cohen's d=0.18) scores; but not in the rest of secondary outcomes. DiabeText successfully improved quality of life, diabetes self-management, and self-reported medication adherence in primary care patients with T2DM. Further research is needed to enhance its effects on physiological outcomes.

Contribution of Disease-Specific Distress, Social Support, and Self-Efficacy to Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors in Saudi Adults: A Path Analysis.

Disease-specific distress, social support, and self-efficacy have noticeable impacts on diabetes self-management. Although these three concepts are connected, their interplay and subsequent influence on diabetes self-management warrants further research. A total of 154 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited to complete a survey, which included questions related to social support, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes self-management behaviors, and disease-specific stress. The variables were examined with path analysis using Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) software. In the final model, diabetes self-efficacy was a significant predictor of increased diabetes self-management behaviors. Lower levels of disease-specific distress were associated with higher levels of self-efficacy. Path analysis indicated that the direct effect of social support on diabetes self-management behaviors was significant, and social support indirectly affected diabetes self-management behaviors through the mediating effect of diabetes self-efficacy. Overall, the study findings indicate that social support can exert an impact on diabetes self-management behaviors through the mediating effect of diabetes self-efficacy. The study's findings support the use of Individual and Family Self-Management Theory to improve diabetes self-management. Further research is needed to better understand how factors related to the family support system influence diabetes self-management behaviors.

Relationships between Religious Coping, Acceptance of Illness, and Diabetes Self-Efficacy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

This study aims to determine the relationships between religious coping, acceptance of illness, and diabetes self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 606 patients with Type 2 diabetes who applied to Family Health Centers in a province center in eastern Turkey. Positive religious coping positively affects negative religious coping (t=3.887, p=0.001 R2=0.023). Negative religious coping positively affects diabetes self-efficacy (t=2.589, p=0.010, R2=0.010). Diabetes self-efficacy positively affects the level of acceptance of illness (t=9.865, p=0.010, R2=0.137). Model fits were found to be at satisfactory levels (x²/Sd=2.529, RMSEA=0.05, CFI=0.91, GFI=0.91, AGFI=0.88, IFI=0.91). The level of positive religious coping of individuals positively affects the level of negative religious coping. Negative religious coping levels positively affect diabetes self-efficacy. Diabetes self-efficacy positively affects the level of acceptance of illness.

Profiles of knowledge, self-efficacy, psychological and physical health in type 2 diabetes and its association with outcomes

BackgroundSelf-management is impacted by knowledge, self-efficacy, psychological health (general mental health and diabetes-related distress) and physical health (KSPP), and variations in KSPP contribute to heterogeneity in diabetes self-management education (DSME) program outcomes. This study aimed to identify unique KSPP profiles, and their associations with self-management behaviors. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 518 participants with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy, diabetes-related distress, mental and physical health, self-care, medication adherence and social support were assessed. A mixed-model latent profile analysis was conducted on eight KSPP variables, and sociodemographic, self-care (diet, physical activity, and medication adherence), and glycemic levels were compared across profiles. ResultsFour unique KSPP profiles were identified: profile 1 (untroubled), profile 2 (distressed: diabetes-specific), profile 3 (distressed: global) and profile 4 (activated). Profile 3 was associated with the lowest self-care, highest glycemic and lowest social support levels. Profile 4 was associated with the highest self-care, lowest glycemic and highest social support levels. ConclusionsOur study identified novel KSPP profiles, which were associated with differential self-management behaviors and metabolic profiles. Practice ImplicationsIdentifying KSPP profiles might improve self-management support through identifying clustering of care needs, and support more targeted DSME development.

Associations between weight self-stigma and healthy diet and physical activity among adults with type 2 diabetes:Cross-sectional results from the second Diabetes MILES - Australia (MILES-2) study.

To examine associations between weight self-stigma and healthy diet or physical activity, and potential moderating effects of self-esteem, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes social support, among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes MILES-2 data were used, an Australian cross-sectional online survey. Participants with type 2 diabetes who considered themselves overweight, and reported concern about weight management (N = 726; 48% insulin-treated), completed the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ; total score and subscales: self-devaluation, fear of enacted stigma), measures of diabetes self-care (diet, exercise), and hypothesised psychosocial moderators (self-esteem, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes social support). Adjusted linear regression tested associations and interaction effects, separately by insulin treatment status. Greater weight self-stigma (WSSQ total) was associated with less optimal dietary self-care (both groups: β = -0.3), and with a lower level of exercise (non-insulin only: β = -0.2; all p < 0.001). All hypothesised moderators were negatively associated with weight self-stigma (range r = -0.2 to r = -0.5). Positive associations were identified between the hypothesised moderators and self-care behaviours (strongest between diet and diabetes self-efficacy, r = > 0.5). No significant interaction effects were observed. This study provides novel evidence of negative associations between weight self-stigma and self-care behaviours among adults with type 2 diabetes. Weight self-stigma is a demonstrated barrier to self-care behaviours in type 2 diabetes cohorts. Acknowledgement and strategies to address weight self-stigma are needed in clinical care and health programmes.

Diabetes distress profiles and health outcomes of individuals with type 2 diabetes and overweight/obesity: A cluster analysis

AimsTo determine the prevalence and patterns of diabetes distress, and evaluate the differences in health outcomes between profiles. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 330 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity. The participants completed questionnaires on diabetes distress, sleep quality, self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and positive and negative affect. A cluster analysis was performed to identify different patterns of diabetes distress and one-way ANOVA was used to investigate the differences in physical and psychological outcomes between profiles. Results30.6% of patients were identified as moderately to highly distressed, with the regimen-related distress found to be the most prominent. The Cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters: (1) “comprehensively exhausted profile”; (2) “strained profile”; (3) “high internal anguish profile”; (4) “unperturbed profile”. The measures of fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, positive and negative affect and self-efficacy differ between clusters. ConclusionsThis study identified important differences that existed in patterns of diabetes distress among people with T2DM and overweight/obesity, and this variation can be utilized to tailor intervention strategies to the particular needs of different subgroups within individuals with T2DM.

Can an Immersive Virtual Reality 360 Enhancing Students' Self-Directed Learning on Diabetes Knowledge and Self-Efficacy?

Nurses need to be competent in clinical nursing knowledge and skills via engagement in continuing education. The knowledge of nurses should be updated especially in caring for diabetes disease. The potential for immersive experience provision by 360-degree video. This study aims to design an immersive interactive learning experience based on 360° immersive videos and pilot testing on nursing students receiving diabetes education.

Relationships of Psychosocial Factors to Diabetes Self-efficacy: A Cross-sectional, Correlational Study.

Self-care in people with diabetes is poor, which could be influenced by positive and negative psychosocial factors. Self-efficacy is an important factor affecting self-care, and depressive symptoms and diabetes distress may directly and indirectly affect self-efficacy. The aim of this study was to examine the relationships of depressive symptoms, diabetes distress, age, sex, self-compassion, resilience, self-esteem, and social support to diabetes self-efficacy and the mediating roles of diabetes distress and depressive symptoms in the relationships among people with diabetes. In this cross-sectional, correlational study, data on all the psychosocial and demographic factors were collected (N = 148; 57.6 years old) through Research Electronic Data Capture in 2023. The PROCESS macro for SPSS was used to address the purpose. The mean score of diabetes self-efficacy was 28.6 (range, 8-40). In 1 model, depressive symptoms were directly and indirectly associated with diabetes self-efficacy through diabetes distress (direct effect, -3.524; t = -3.020, P = .003; indirect effect, -2.089; 95% bootstrap confidence interval, -3.494 to -0.911). In another model, diabetes distress was directly and indirectly associated with diabetes self-efficacy through depressive symptoms (direct effect, -3.778; t = -3.638, P < .001; indirect effect, -0.785; 95% bootstrap confidence interval, -1.868 to -0.089). In addition, self-esteem was associated with both depressive symptoms and diabetes distress. Resilience was associated with diabetes self-efficacy in 1 model. Negative psychological factors were directly and indirectly associated with diabetes self-efficacy. Depressive symptoms, diabetes distress, self-esteem, and resilience can be important targets of interventions to improve diabetes self-efficacy.

Effects of Cognitive Intervention and Rehabilitation Training on the Expression of miR-134-5p in Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Cognitive Impairment

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to analyze the effect and potential mechanism of cognitive intervention and rehabilitation training in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus complicated with mild cognitive impairment. Methods In this study, 128 elderly patients with diabetes mellitus complicated with mild cognitive impairment were randomly divided into the control group and the training group. The effects of the two groups were compared before and after the cognitive intervention. The expression of miR-134-5p was assessed by qRT-PCR. The relationships between miR-134-5p and Mini-Mental State Examination Scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale were evaluated. Results After 3-month management, the Mini-Mental State Examination Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, the Chinese version of the diabetes self-efficacy rating scale, and WHO quality of life brief were improved in both control group and training group, and the training group showed better improvement. Cognitive intervention and rehabilitation training restricted the expression of miR-134-5p. The levels of miR-134-5p were pertinent to cognitive function. Conclusion Cognitive intervention and rehabilitation training might prevent the development of diabetes mellitus complicated with mild cognitive impairment by inhibiting miR-134-5p.

Diabetes misconceptions, seriousness, motivation, self-efficacy and stigma: A cross-sectional comparison of eight Australian diabetes communication campaign videos.

This study examines potential intended (attitudes, motivation and self-efficacy) and unintended (stigmatisation of diabetes) consequences of past Australian National Diabetes Week campaign videos. Further, outcomes are compared by the extent to which participants perceived their allocated video as stigmatising diabetes. In this cross-sectional, ten-arm study, participants (adults with or without diabetes; 1:2 ratio) were randomly allocated to view one of eight archival diabetes campaign videos (intervention), or either an active or passive control group. Post-exposure, study-specific scales measured diabetes Misconceptions and Seriousness, General and Diabetes Risk-Reduction Motivation and Self-efficacy, and perceptions of video Stigmatisation of diabetes. Scores were compared by condition (intervention vs. control) and by campaign Stigma (highest vs. lowest tertile score), separately by cohort (with or without diabetes). The sample included n = 1023 without diabetes; and n = 510 with diabetes (79% type 2 diabetes). No significant differences in outcomes were observed between conditions (intervention vs. control), with one exception: a modest effect on General Self-efficacy among those without diabetes only. Those perceiving high campaign Stigma (15%), relative to low Stigma (60%), reported significantly greater diabetes Misconceptions, lower perceived Seriousness and (among those without diabetes only) lower General Motivation but higher Diabetes Risk Reduction Motivation. Though limited to a single-exposure, we found little meaningful positive influence of past diabetes campaign videos on diabetes attitudes, behavioural intentions or self-efficacy. Further, campaign videos were perceived as stigmatising by a minority-a potential harmful impact. This novel study has implications for the design, implementation and evaluation of future diabetes campaigns.

Diabetes Self-Efficacy on Glycemic Control and Well-Being of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

Diabetes mellitus is a major, chronic, and progressive lifestyle disease. It adversely affects patients' quality of life, effectiveness, and well-being. Self-care practices are universally recognized as imperative to keep the illness under control and prevent complications. Self-efficacy is one of the factors involved in the successful self-care of diabetic patients. The primary objective of the study was to estimate the proportion of diabetes self-efficacy and to assess the correlation ofdiabetes self-efficacy with glycemic control, and the well-being of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with diabetes self-efficacy. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among T2DM patients attending the non-communicable disease clinic in the outreach centers of Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Four hundred patients with T2DM were included in the study.Diabetes self-efficacy was assessed by the Stanford Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scaleand the WHO-5 index scale was used to assess wellbeing. Glycemic control was determinedby HbA1C estimation, with ≤7% as good control. Among 400 patients with T2DM, 51.25 % (95% CI: 46.2-56.2) had high diabetes self-efficacy. A significantly negative correlation was found between HbA1C and self-efficacy (r =- 0.208, p = 0.01), and a positive correlation was shown between well-being and self-efficacy (r = 0.418, p = 0.01). Logistic regression analysis found that factors associated with diabetes self-efficacy were upper socioeconomic status (OR = 8.53, 95% CI: 3.06-13.82), family support (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.10-3.54), participation in diabetes education classes (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.10-3.54), diet compliance (OR = 4.74, 95% CI: 2.80-8.01), glycemic control (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.01-2.84), and overall wellbeing (OR = 6.7, 95% CI: 3.84-11.64). The proportion of high diabetes self-efficacy was 51.25% (95% CI: 46.2-56.2). The factors associated with diabetes self-efficacy were family support, participation in diabetes education classes, high socioeconomic status, absence of complications, good glycemic control, and well-being. The study findings depicted that high self-efficacy was significantly correlated with good glycemic control and well-being of patients with T2DM.

Effect of Educational Guidelines on Diabetic Patients' Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy Regarding Use of Artificial Pancreas

Context: Artificial pancreas has a beneficial effect on controlling blood glucose levels. Nurses play a crucial role in helping diabetic patients through educational guidelines that increase their knowledge and improve their attitude and self-efficacy regarding the use of artificial pancreas as a new technology to help continuously control blood glucose levels. Aim: to evaluate the effect of educational guidelines on diabetic patients' knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy regarding using artificial pancreas. Methods: A quasi-experimental study design (pre/post-test) was used to achieve the aim of this study. The study was conducted in the medical department and outpatient medical clinic at Benha University Hospital. A purposive sample of 100 adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were admitted to the mentioned setting during the study period. Three tools were used. Patients' Assessment Questionnaire comprises two parts: Patients' personal data and health history of the disease and patients' knowledge assessment. Patients' attitude Rating Scale regarding the use of the artificial pancreas, and Self-Efficacy Scale. Results: The result reported a significant difference in the satisfactory knowledge level of patients from 15% pre-educational guidelines to 57% post-educational guidelines. Significant differences in the total level of positive attitude increased from 22.0% pre-educational guidelines to 63.0% post-guidelines, and significant differences between the mean self-efficacy scores of the studied patients regarding their perception and confidence in the ability to use the artificial pancreas as it increased from 1.8±0.7 pre to 3.1±0.4 post the educational guidelines implementation. Conclusion: Educational guidelines have a positive effect on improving diabetic patients' knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy regarding the use of artificial pancreas. The study recommends implementing ongoing educational programs and workshops for diabetic patients on artificial pancreas.

Continuous Glucose Monitor: Reclaiming Type 2 Diabetes Self-efficacy and Mitigating Disparities.

The rise in continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use has been characterized by widening disparities between the least and most socially marginalized. Given access barriers, there is limited CGM patient experience information that is inclusive of those with type 2 diabetes mellitus from socially marginalized backgrounds. To understand the CGM usage experience in the primary care setting across a US Medicaid population with type 2 diabetes at federally qualified health centers. This qualitative study used semi-structured phone interviews with 28 English- or Spanish-speaking participants prescribed the CGM who were enrolled in a US Medicaid program that subsidized CGMs. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed and analyzed by reflective thematic analysis. Twenty-eight participants (75% female, median age 56 years with interquartile-range 48-60 years) were interviewed. Participants were from different racial/ethnic backgrounds: 21% non-Hispanic White, 57% Hispanic, and 18% non-Hispanic Black. Participants primarily spoke English (68%) or Spanish (32%), and 53% reported 9 or fewer years of formal education. We identified 6 major themes: initial expectations and overcoming initiation barriers, convenience and ease promote daily use, increased knowledge leads to improved self-management, collaboration with provider and clinical team, improved self-reported outcomes, and barriers and burdens are generally tolerated. CGM use was experienced as easy to understand and viewed as a tool for diabetes self-efficacy. Expanded CGM access for socially marginalized patients with type 2 diabetes can enhance diabetes self-management to help mitigate diabetes outcome disparities.

Family Support and Type 2 Diabetes Self-management Behaviors in Underserved Latino/a/x Patients.

Latino/a/x families experience persistent Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disparities, including higher rates of diagnosis and mortality due to disease complications than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Though greater social support is associated with improved disease outcomes for Latino/a/x patients with diabetes, research has yet to identify the specific pathways through which social support, and specifically family support, influences self-management. This study tested a theoretical model highlighting the mechanisms and pathways linking social support and physical health. Specifically, self-efficacy and depression were tested as psychological pathways connecting family support to diabetes self-management behaviors and diabetes morbidity in Latino/a/x patients with T2DM. Data from 177 patients were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Measures included diabetes-specific family support needed and received, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy in diabetes management, diabetes self-management behaviors, health appraisal, and hemoglobin A1c. Greater diabetes-specific family support was significantly associated with more frequent engagement in diabetes self-management behaviors, both directly (p < .001) and through diabetes self-efficacy's partial mediation of this relationship (p = .013). Depression was not significantly associated with either family support (support received, p = .281; support needed, p = .428) or self-management behaviors (p = .349). Family support and diabetes self-efficacy may be important modifiable psychosocial factors to target via integrated care interventions aimed at supporting Latino/a/x patients with T2DM. Future research is needed to test empirically based, culturally adapted interventions to reduce T2DM-related health disparities in this population.

A Tailored Intervention for Improving Diabetes Self-care Among Adults With Visual Impairment: A Pilot Study

ObjectivesOur aim in this study was to develop and evaluate a tailored intervention for improving diabetes self-care among people with visual impairment (TID-VI) in South Korea. MethodsThe TID-VI program was designed around the barriers, resources, and perceptual factors to promote diabetes self-care in those with visual impairment (VI). A single-arm pilot study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of the intervention. Diabetes self-efficacy, self-care behaviours, depression, health-related quality of life, and clinical outcomes (fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin [A1C], lipids, and blood pressure) were measured before and up to 2 months after the 12-week intervention. ResultsAll 14 participants completed TID-VI. Diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes self-care behaviours, depression, and health-related quality of life showed improvement from baseline that was sustained at 2 months. Although high- and low-density lipoprotein also improved, there were no differences in blood glucose, A1C, total cholesterol, or blood pressure at 2 months. ConclusionsA theory-driven, tailored intervention specific to the needs of adults with VI can produce substantial improvements in patient-reported quality of life and health status outcomes, although the benefits are yet to be confirmed in a controlled study.

Goal change and goal achievement for emerging adults across the pilot FAMS-T1D intervention for type 1 diabetes.

Interventions for emerging adults (EAs) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) focus on goal setting, but little is known about how goal achievement relates to intervention outcomes. We examined how goals change, how goal achievement relates to diabetes outcomes, and identified barriers and facilitators to goal achievement. EAs with T1D (N=29, M age=21.6 years, 57% female) were coached monthly to set a behavioral goal across a 3-month feasibility trial. Coaching notes were qualitatively coded regarding type, complexity, and changes in goals. Goal achievement was measured via daily responses to texts. HbA1c, self-efficacy, diabetes distress, and self-care were assessed pre- and post-intervention. EAs frequently set food goals (79%) in combination with other goals. EAs overwhelmingly changed their goals (90%), with most increasing goal complexity. Goal achievement was high (79% of days) and not affected by goal change or goal complexity. Goal achievement was associated with increases in self-efficacy and self-care across time. Qualitative themes revealed that aspects of self-regulation and social-regulation were important for goal achievement. Meeting daily diabetes goals may enhance self-efficacy and self-care for diabetes. Assisting EAs to reduce self-regulation challenges and enhance social support for goals may lead to better diabetes outcomes.

Comparative Study of Diabetes Knowledge, Attitudes, Family Support, Self-efficacy, and Self-management Behaviors Between Cancer Survivors With Diabetes and Diabetes Patients Without Cancer

Background Studies have compared diabetes management quality indicators, focusing on physiological markers such as hemoglobin A1c, between cancer survivors with diabetes and general diabetes patients. However, research comparing differences in diabetes self-management behaviors and the factors influencing them between these groups is lacking. Objectives This study aimed to compare self-management behaviors, guided by the information-motivation-behavior model, between cancer survivors with diabetes and general diabetes patients. In addition, we aimed to identify differences in factors such as diabetes knowledge, attitudes, family support, and self-efficacy that may influence diabetes self-management behaviors in both groups. Methods A total of 125 cancer survivors with diabetes and 126 general diabetes patients participated in this cross-sectional study. A structured questionnaire assessed demographics, diabetes knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors. Results Regarding diabetes education, 47.0% of cancer survivors and 61.6% of general diabetes patients received education. The cancer survivors had lower diabetes knowledge scores (10.30 ± 4.15, P &lt; .001), a lower perceived value of strict blood glucose control (4.10 ± 0.56, P &lt; .001), and less family support (15.50 ± 7.50, P = .019) than the patients without cancer (13.51 ± 3.84, 4.25 ± 0.65, and 17.57 ± 6.40, respectively). Conclusion This study reveals significant differences in diabetes self-management between cancer survivors and general diabetes patients. Cancer survivors showed lower diabetes knowledge, glucose control perception, and family support. These findings highlight the need for tailored self-management programs for cancer survivors. Implications for Practice This study offers insights for developing tailored diabetes self-management programs and educational interventions for cancer survivors.