In the Indian peninsula, the Singhbhum, Bastar, and Dharwar cratons in the South India Block (SIB) constitute a contiguous mass of >2.5 Ga crystalline rocks. Did the cratons develop as a coherently evolved mass since their origin, or do these cratons constitute an assembly of disparately evolved cratons? Variably-deformed charnockites in the Karimnagar granulite belt and associated blastoporphyritic granitoids at the NE fringe of the Eastern Dharwar Craton (EDC) contain enclaves of mafic granulites, high-Al metapelites and anatectic quartzofeldspathic gneisses. The charnockites are demonstrably intrusive into the enclave suite. The enclave suite exhibits steeply-plunging reclined folds; the axial planes of the folds coincide with the N-striking tectonic fabrics in the Karimnagar charnockite/granitoids. The foliated charnockites display magmatic flow texture defined by trains of euhedral alkali feldspar, contain euhedral-subhedral pyroxene phenocrysts, and the quartz grains exhibit abundant chessboard microstructure. The weakly-strained euhedral laths of feldspars and pyroxenes phenocrysts share high-energy boundaries between themselves, and with quartz. Emplacement temperatures of the magmatic charnockites at ~900 °C are obtained from Al-in-Opx thermometry. Whole rock chemistry is consistent with an arc-related origin for most charnockites. In zircons within charnockites, variably zoned cores yield ages of 2680 ± 15 Ma and 2504 ± 12 Ma in the UPb Concordia plot. Recrystallized domains in zircon grains yielded upper intercept ages constrained between 2510 ± 4 Ma and 2509 ± 3 Ma, identical with the U-Th-Pb chemical ages (2502–2508 Ma) retrieved from monazites. The zircon εHf(t) values (− 4.85 to 1.31) suggest the ~2.5 Ga magmatic charnockites were derived from <3.0 Ga crustal sources. The late Neoarchean magmatic charnockites in the EDC margin were emplaced in a 2.7–2.5 Ga convergent tectonic setting, and the high-T magmatic charnockites formed due to delamination of a subducting (E-W shortening) oceanic crust. The subduction possibly relates to the late Neoarchean growth of the Dharwar craton involving the assembly of disparately-evolved crustal blocks, now parts of the Dharwar craton. The findings suggest that the emplacement of Karimnagar magmatic charnockites in a contractional setting is unrelated to an accretion between the Eastern Dharwar and the Bastar cratons, as suggested by earlier workers.
Read full abstract