Background and aimsTraction-assisted ESD (TA-ESD) is a proposed technique to improve the efficiency and efficacy of ESD. Multiple studies primarily from Asian centers yielded mixed results in terms of procedure time, en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate in comparison to conventional ESD (C-ESD). We performed the first comparison of TA-ESD and C-ESD at a high-volume North American center. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort matched study of all patients who underwent colonic ESD at a single center in the United States by a single operator. The study group were patients who underwent TA-ESD and were matched with a C-ESD case on a 1:1 basis based upon location within the colon, lesion size, and scope stabilization device usage. The baseline characteristics and procedure-related outcomes were compared between the groups. Results138 colonic ESD cases were included (69 TA-ESD, 69 C-ESD). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Mean procedure time was 91.0 min (SD 32.5) for TA-ESD and 85.4 min (SD 39.3) for C-ESD (p=0.36). En bloc resection was achieved in 69 (100%) of the TA-ESDs and 67 (97.1%) of the C-ESDs (p=0.15). R0 resection was achieved in 52 (75.4%) of the TA-ESDs and 48 (69.6%) of the C-ESDs (p=0.45). ConclusionWe did not show a significant difference in procedure time, en bloc resection, R0 resection, or adverse events. Further randomized prospective studies that are sufficiently powered and stratified by operator experience level are needed to further elucidate the utility of the technique.