You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized1 Apr 20111795 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREDICTIVE ACCURACY OF RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN AUSTRALIAN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS Samarth Chopra, David Tamblyn, Tina Kopsaftis, Carole Pinnock, Yu Changhong, and Michael Kattan Samarth ChopraSamarth Chopra Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author , David TamblynDavid Tamblyn Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author , Tina KopsaftisTina Kopsaftis Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author , Carole PinnockCarole Pinnock Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author , Yu ChanghongYu Changhong Cleveland, OH More articles by this author , and Michael KattanMichael Kattan Cleveland, OH More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2145AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Risk stratification of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients is an important step in treatment decision making. We compared performance of the three commonly used risk assessment tools the 1998 Kattan Nomogram with the Stephenson Nomogram (modification of Kattan 2006) and the CAPRA score in a SA patient cohort. METHODS We analysed prospectively collected data on 635 men, who had all the necessary variables required for predicting Biochemical Recurrence (BR) post Radical Prostatectomy (RP) between 1998 and May 2009. BR was defined as PSA ° Ý 0.2ng/ml or secondary treatment for a rising PSA. For calculation of BR-free probability (BRFP), patients were censored at the time of last recorded PSA. Performance of the risk assessment tools were tested using claibration plots and Harrell's concordance or c-index. RESULTS Our cohort was different from the developmental data sets used for 1998 Kattan Nomogram, Stephenson Nomogram (modification of Kattan 2006) and the CAPRA score. The Average age was 62 years and mean follow up was 2.8 years. Freedom from biochemical recurrence for the entire cohort was 84.5% and 77.3% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Harrell's C Index. For the 3 tools was Kattan Nomogram 0.744, Stephenson Nomogram 0.791 and CAPRA Score 0.787 respectively. At 3 years the agreement between predicted and observed BCR-free rates was close to ideal prediction for the earlier Kattan nomogram. However the Stephenson and CAPRA models tended to underestimate and overestimate the risk of BCR respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that all three models have reasonably comparable discrimination in our dataset, however absolute risk predictions vary. Differences in definitions of recurrence, patient selection and surgical volume may contribute to such variation. Despite the limitations described, the results of the present study are promising. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e721 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Samarth Chopra Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author David Tamblyn Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author Tina Kopsaftis Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author Carole Pinnock Adelaide, Australia More articles by this author Yu Changhong Cleveland, OH More articles by this author Michael Kattan Cleveland, OH More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...