Abstract Study question Due to the rising trend for oocyte cryopreservation and increasing demand, there is an urgency to make oocyte vitrification and warming protocols more efficient. Summary answer Oocyte vitrification and warming can be done successfully in 4 minutes, reducing the time of commonly used current protocols by up to 25 minutes. What is known already Vitrification and warming of oocytes is widely used in many IVF clinics worldwide and routinely utilized as a dominant technique for fertility preservation and freezing of donor as well as autologous oocytes in many clinical settings. Outcome data using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to fresh oocytes. However, vitrification and warming of human oocytes can be time consuming. Usually, vitrification of oocytes is done in about 11-16 minutes, and warming requires another 11 minutes. Also, it is a common practice to load not more than 2 oocytes per carrier at time of vitrification. Study design, size, duration From November 2022 to November 2023, 504 germinal vesicles (GV) and 207 metaphase I (MI) oocytes, which did not convert into mature oocytes at day of oocyte retrieval, were vitrified in Vit Kit Freeze (FujiFilm Irvine Scientific, USA), and RapidVit Oocyte (Vitrolife, Sweden). Their survival rates were compared, and as an additional viability indicator, post-warming developmental capabilities were evaluated after 24 and 48hrs of culture in Global High Protein (LifeGlobal, USA). Participants/materials, setting, methods A group of 4 GV or MI oocytes was vitrified at room temperature for 1 minute in Equilibration solution (ES) and 1 minute in Vitrification solution (VS), loaded on a S-Cryolock (Biotech, USA) and then plunged into liquid nitrogen. Warming was done at 37ºC in 0.5M sucrose for 1 minute and Wash solution (WS) for another minute. Post warming, GV and MI oocytes were cultured for developmental evaluation. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Main results and the role of chance There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rate of GV oocytes between Irvine (209/219; 95.4%), and Vitrolife media (270/285; 94.7%; P = 0.72). The survival of MI oocytes was also comparable and not significantly different between both media; Irvine: 103/106; 97.2%, vs Vitrolife: 96/101; 95.0%; P = 0.43). Because of the similar survival rates of oocytes in both groups, for the developmental potential and conversion rates, oocytes of both groups were combined. Of the 504 GV, 479 survived (95.0%) and after 24hrs of culture, 441 converted to MI (92.1%). After a culture of 48hrs, 56.5% (249/441) converted to metaphase II (MII) oocytes. Combining the vitrified and warmed MI oocytes from both groups, 96.1% (199/207) survived the warming, and after 24hrs of culture, 168 (84.4%) converted to MII oocytes. Vitrification and warming of oocytes at different developmental stages can be done with a short exposure time to hypertonic (ES/VS) and hypotonic (0.5M sucrose) solutions in a total of 4 minutes. Limitations, reasons for caution Immature oocytes were used as study material to evaluate a new protocol with significantly reduced vitrification and warming times. At this moment we cannot provide data on fertilization, embryo development, and blastocyst formation. Wider implications of the findings Oocytes are exposed to less suboptimal temperatures during dehydration and rehydration and help to maintain their developmental potential. Loading 4 oocytes per carrier combined with the decrease in time resulted in increased efficiency. Warming in 0.5M instead of 1M sucrose contributes positively to survival and allows earlier resumption of functionality. Trial registration number not applicable