Development Of Social Entrepreneurship Research Articles

On the Path to a Unified Form: Are We Entering the Era of Impact Entrepreneurship?

With the emergence and development of hybrid non-governmental organizations and social entrepreneurship, coupled with companies’ growing emphasis on social impact, the boundaries between them are increasingly blurring — a trend noted by experts. This process inevitably leads to an evolution towards a shared form — impact entrepreneurship, which merges the best aspects of social projects with business. What signifies the start of this movement, what signs are presently observable, and what can we expect in the future if this developmental stage reaches its logical conclusion?

Trends in the Study of the Development of Social Entrepreneurship: Bibliometric Analysis

In recent years, social entrepreneurship has attracted increasing attention from the academic community. The main purpose of this article is to guide researchers in creating a theoretical framework and to direct researchers who are new to social entrepreneurship research so that they know which journals and authors to turn to when studying this phenomenon. The analysis of the structure and dynamics of social entrepreneurship research was carried out based on the Scopus database using the Biblioshiny and VOSviewer programs to determine the research areas with the highest results, countries, journals in which most research is published, and the most relevant authors with publications on social entrepreneurship.

Государственное регулирование развития малого бизнеса в социальной сфере

Social entrepreneurship as a special type of business is aimed at reducing social tension in society, ensuring employment, accessibility and variety of social services. Most social entrepreneurs in Russia belong to the category of small businesses. Improving state regulation of the development of small social entrepreneurship helps to reduce the severity of social problems and strengthen interaction between the state and business on this issue. The purpose of the article is to assess trends in the development of small social entrepreneurship in the country, current measures of state regulation and develop proposals for their improvement. The study revealed trends in the development of small businesses in the social sphere in Russia, reflecting high growth rates in the number of small social entrepreneurship entities, its spread to various areas of activity with a predominance in the areas of education, social services and sports and leisure. The growth in the number of social entrepreneurs is mostly observed in large conglomerations. However, the continuing low share of social enterprises in the total number of small businesses in the country, the analysis of the implemented measures of state support for them, does not allow us to draw a conclusion about the sufficiency of the conditions created in the country for the support and promotion of social entrepreneurship. State regulation of the development of small social entrepreneurship is proposed to be carried out in the direction of improving the institutional environment, expanding the range of entities that ensure the development and promotion of small businesses in the social sphere.

SOCIODYNAMICS OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN UZBEKISTAN AND INTRODUCING THE SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT INDEX (SED Index) IN COMMUNITIES

Based on sociological researches conducted by the author this article provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of social entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan, a relatively new and evolving phenomenon within the country. Through a thorough examination of the existing landscape, the author evaluates the level of development, challenges, and opportunities for social entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan. By proposing an algorithmic framework for its future growth and development, the article offers valuable insights and recommendations to foster a flourishing social entrepreneurship ecosystem in Uzbekistan. analyzes some methodologies to quantify the level of social entrepreneurship development within regions, followed by the proposal of a potential Social Entrepreneurship Development Index (SED Index) as an exemplary measurement tool. KEYWORDS: social entrepreneurship, sociodynamics of social entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan, resources for the development of social entrepreneurship, algorithm of developing social entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan, measuring the level of social entrepreneurship development within regions, Social Entrepreneurship Development Index (SED Index)

Перспективи активізації розвитку соціального підприємництва в Україні

In modern conditions, a significant share of social entrepreneurs whose activities are actively developing are looking for new ways to increase efficiency and external support. Given the excellent opportunities offered by social entrepreneurship, its long-term relevance is evident in today’s world. The article aims to study the problems and prospects for activating the development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine in modern conditions. The role of social entrepreneurship’s development in Ukraine’s economy is clarified, proving the feasibility of its further activation. Attention is paid to the internal and external reasons for the activation of the development of social entrepreneurship, which makes it possible to identify sensitive objects of influence in the construction of public management mechanisms. Public administration can support social enterprises through regulatory policies, financial support, and the creation of a favorable legislative environment for their activities. According to the study results, the key aspects are the improvement of the efficiency of the use of resources and the support of community development. Social enterprises can contribute to these goals through innovative approaches to solving social problems, involving the local population in development processes, and creating a sustainable socio-economic environment. The types of innovations available to social entrepreneurship in modern conditions are substantiated. It has been proven that developing social entrepreneurship can strengthen territorial communities and stimulate interaction between business, civil society, and the state in solving regional social problems. Mechanisms of interaction between social entrepreneurship and business are indicated, which help to stimulate innovation, community, and interaction between different branches of business, thereby contributing to the creation of significant social and economic benefits. Keywords: social entrepreneurship, public administration mechanisms, community, development, activation, social and environmental issues, innovations.

ТЕОРЕТИКО-МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ЗАСАДИ ВИВЧЕННЯ СОЦІАЛЬНОГО ПІДПРИЄМНИЦТВА

The article examines the essence and historical development of social entrepreneurship to solve and mitigate social problems, proposes its functions, and outlines the differences between social entrepreneurship and socially responsible business. It is proposed to distinguish the following functions of social entrepreneurship: social function, economic function, innovative function, mobilizing function, and motivational function. The five components of social responsibility of business are summarized: a responsible producer, a responsible employer, a responsible participant in social relations, a responsible participant in economic and political relations with the state, and a responsible business partner, and the essence of each of them is revealed. Several advantages arising from the implementation of social responsibility are emphasized, among them: increasing the reputation of the organization as socially active, increasing the level of public trust in the activities of the organization and its products, increasing the professionalism of the company, and preserving the personnel potential; increase in the level of loyalty of the company's employees; creation of a safe environment for the operation and development of the company; compliance with global standards of business activity; formation of partnership and trusting relations with the authorities, public sector and mass media. The difference between social entrepreneurship and the social responsibility of business is substantiated. It is noted that the social responsibility of business is expressed in the implementation of the main activity of the enterprise, taking into account social and environmental aspects. In contrast, social entrepreneurship's social goal is the basis of its existence. The main goal of socially responsible enterprises is to make a profit, and for social enterprises, it is to solve social problems with the help of the obtained profit. In addition, the percentage of profit spent on social goals within the social responsibility framework can vary within individual decisions or commitments. In contrast, this percentage is clearly defined and fixed in social enterprises.

Розвиток соціального підприємництва в невизначених умовах війни

The article examines the development of social entrepreneurship in the uncertain conditions of war. The concept of social entrepreneurship is analyzed along with other forms of activity. It has been established that social entrepreneurship is located between traditional entrepreneurship and charity: it differs from “traditional” entrepreneurship by its goals aimed at social changes and systemic solutions to social problems and from charity by the entrepreneurial nature of its activity. The components of social entrepreneurship are singled out: social problem, values, self-sufficiency, social goal, innovativeness, community involvement, entrepreneurial approach, and social influence. These components help to determine the extent to which the activity is socially oriented and differs from an ordinary business or charitable foundation. There are three main directions of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine, in particular: 1) the creation of jobs for members of certain social groups; 2) the creation of a mechanism for implementing social changes or transformation; 3) the creation of a unique product or service that meets the needs of a particular social group. The main criteria of social entrepreneurship include pronounced entrepreneurial activity, reinvestment of profits, social influence, scalability and replicability, innovations, and systemic changes. It is emphasized that in the context of military operations, social entrepreneurship is one of the practical tools for solving several social problems, as it not only contributes to creating essential jobs but also provides a global impact on society through its social initiatives. In addition, it was emphasized that there is an urgent need to change the current legislation to preserve the positive dynamics of social business development. The conducted research confirmed the gradual increase in the number of social enterprises in Ukraine. In Ukraine, the trend towards social business existed until 2022. However, the full-scale war opened the eyes to the fact that this form of entrepreneurship can effectively solve the problems of those who need support the most. Therefore, today, many Ukrainian businesses have a social mission. Keywords: social entrepreneurship, charity, public organizations, social problems, vulnerable population groups.

Problems and Perspectives for Social Entrepreneurship in Higher Education

This article examines the problem of social entrepreneurship education in higher education. Along with traditional entrepreneurs, it is of particular importance to create social entrepreneurs through collaboration between academia, social enterprises and business. The development of social entrepreneurship in higher education institutions in Bulgaria faces a number of problems, as well as prospects for its development. The purpose of this article is to identify the problems and outline the prospects for social entrepreneurship in higher education in Bulgaria. By undertaking the necessary activities in the direction of increasing social awareness, sustainability and social responsibility, universities can train socially oriented entrepreneurs to contribute their knowledge and abilities to the development and well-being of our country. The main research methods involved in the development are content analysis, method of analysis and synthesis, method of observation, intuitive and systematic approach.

Trends in the development of social entrepreneurship in tourism

This article outlines the role of social entrepreneurship in the development of territories and maintaining the social infrastructure of regions and the country as a whole. The essence of social entrepreneurship in the field of tourism as a social institution is considered, within the framework of which various areas of support for people with disabilities, low-income and vulnerable segments of the population are implemented. The author has identified the main directions of development of social entrepreneurship in the field of tourism, based on general trends in the development of the field of social entrepreneurship in general and tourism in particular.

СОЦІАЛЬНЕ ПІДПРИЄМНИЦТВО У СУЧАСНІЙ УКРАЇНІ

In very unstable socio-economic relations, which have developed in the world and in Ukraine, there is a transition to a new level of management, that’s why there is a need to apply the latest tools in state social policy, which is extremely important in the conditions of a defensive war. Social entrepreneurship is a new, innovativebusiness venture that influences change. A social entrepreneur has a specific cause that they care about, and they develop a business model around making a positive impact. The main goal is to create lasting social change through business. The dualism of the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship is based on the application of principles, tools and technologies of commercial entrepreneurship, as well as the use of innovative methods of doing business. The article highlights that one of these tools is social entrepreneurship, which at the same time contributes to the development of the economy and focuses attention on solving important social problems. The fundamental difference between social and traditional entrepreneurship is clarified. Like entrepreneurs, social entrepreneurs aim to create a sustainable business with staying power. However, whereas an entrepreneur’s goal is to maximize profits, a social entrepreneur’s main concern is impact. They create economic value: by creating jobs, producing income, and nurturing an entire network of business partners-suppliers, shipping companies, lenders, and utility companies-social entrepreneurs contribute to the economic renewal of the region or country where they live and operate. Socially entrepreneurial activity takes place across all fields, from health to climate change and education, and across all sectors, from non-profit to commercial and governmental. The main problems that hinder the development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine are highlighted, in particular: no separate organizational and legal form is provided for the implementation of a social enterprise, the absence or insufficiency of knowledge and skills in managing such a business; narrow and unprepared market, low level of motivation.

The Influence of Economic Sustainability, Environmental Initiatives, and Farmers' Quality of Life on the Development of Social Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector in West Java

This study explores the relationship amongst farmers' quality of life, environmental initiatives, economic sustainability, and the growth of social entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector in West Java. The study investigates the correlations between these variables on a sample of 200 farmers using structural equation modeling. The results show a strong positive correlation between the growth of social entrepreneurship, environmental initiatives, farmers' quality of life, and economic sustainability. The study emphasizes how crucial it is to support a comprehensive and integrated strategy that takes into account farmer well-being, environmental sustainability, and economic stability in order to support the expansion of socially entrepreneurial endeavors in the agricultural sector.

THE CURRENT STATE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN KAZAKHSTAN

The article is devoted to social entrepreneurship, which in turn is an integral part of the modern economy, contributing to the solution of social and environmental problems. The importance lies in the fact that social entrepreneurship combines a business approach with a social mission, contributing to the creation of a sustainable society. The purpose of this article is to consider the need for social entrepreneurship and its important role in the modern world. To consider the formation and propose measures for the development of social entrepreneurship. To study the criteria and principles of the development of social entrepreneurship. To analyze the development of social entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan. According to statistical materials for the period 2022-2023, such a short period of data is explained by the recent inclusion of data on social entrepreneurship in the unified register of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which only determines the relevance of the direction under consideration. The article analyzes the current state of social entrepreneurship development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results of the study allow us to conclude which of these aspects affect the effective development of social entrepreneurship. The relevance of the research lies in the fact that social entrepreneurship is an important area in the modern economy, in turn, combines a business approach with social responsibility. This type of entrepreneurship is focused on solving social and environmental problems and strives for sustainable development of society.

СОЦІАЛЬНЕ ПІДПРИЄМНИЦТВО ЯК АКТУАЛЬНИЙ НАПРЯМ РОЗВИТКУ ЕКОНОМІКИ УКРАЇНИ

The article is devoted to the analysis of social entrepreneurship as a topical area of economic development in Ukraine. The purpose of the study was to define the essence, characteristics, and analyze the state of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. The article identifies the leading sectors of social enterprise activity, identifies the main problems and directions of their development. To analyze social entrepreneurship in Ukraine, the authors use the methods of scientific literature analysis, quantitative data analysis, comparative method, and expert evaluation methods. This allows us to comprehensively consider the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship, identify its key characteristics, problems and prospects. According to the analysis, the key problems are the lack of adequate funding and support from the state. On the other hand, the article reveals significant potential for the development of social entrepreneurship in the areas of employment of vulnerable groups, ecology, and financing of social services. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that social entrepreneurship in Ukraine requires a comprehensive approach for further development, which would include legislative initiatives, financial support, and broad educational activities. The practical significance of the study is that it can serve as a basis for developing strategies and policies to promote the development of social entrepreneurship at the state and local levels. The results of the analysis may be useful for organizations that finance or plan to finance social entrepreneurship projects, as well as for social entrepreneurs looking for effective business models.

Local food policy: implementation of food initiatives from the national level to the level of territorial communities of Kharkiv region

The article is devoted to the analysis of food policy in the Kharkiv region. In addition, the article examines certain aspects of the national policy aimed at preventing the food crisis in the conditions of war. The author briefly examines the main problems and challenges faced by agriculture and the food sector in wartime conditions. The article highlights the main measures aimed at ensuring equal access to food products in wartime and the steps taken for this purpose at different levels: national, regional and in individual communities of the Kharkiv region. In more detail, the article examines the role of local authorities and public initiatives in improving food policy, as they allow not only to ensure food security, but also to involve internally displaced persons in economic activities. The author states that the prospects of food policy in the Kharkiv region are dependent on many factors, in addition to the actual course of the military conflict. The article concludes about the special importance of the following factors: strengthening the defense capability and security of agricultural facilities, transport routes; increasing the efficiency and transparency of the mechanisms of state regulation of food prices, control over the quality and safety of food products, prevention of speculation and abuse; expanding the scope and variety of state support to national food producers; development of international cooperation and integration into the European and world market; support and development of public organizations, volunteer movement, social entrepreneurship, local initiatives and projects that contribute to the provision of food and support to the needy; raising the level of education, culture, awareness and responsibility of the population regarding food security.

АНАЛИЗ РАЗВИТИЯ СОЦИАЛЬНОГО ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСТВА В ИРКУТСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ

The article reveals the concept of social entrepreneurship, summarizes the criteria for classifying a business entity as a social entrepreneur, analyzes the development of social entrepreneurship in the Irkutsk region

Social Entrepreneurship Development to Achieve Sustainability Goals Using SSM Analysis

Measuring performance in social entrepreneurship is an important thing that needs to be done. This is an effort to ensure prosperity and maintain the sustainability of social entrepreneurship. This research aims to analyze the performance of social entrepreneurship and build a conceptual model of the strategy for assessing the performance of social entrepreneurship in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The SSM research method was used to develop a conceptual model to measure the performance of social entrepreneurship. The results of the study concluded that measuring the performance of social entrepreneurship can be measured using measurement tools or indicators that focus on sustainable development goals (SDGs). This study also found the need for the role of the government or policy owners as actors who have an essential role in developing social entrepreneurship performance measurement tools. This is necessary to distinguish the target of achieving success through social and commercial entrepreneurship.

The role of higher education institutions in preparing individuals for social entrepreneurship

Introduction. Social entrepreneurship is based on work with resources, including competence, and professional and personal qualities of the individual. the system of education is able to ensure their development. Aim. To analyze the relevant scientific literature and, on its basis, to determine the role of higher education institutions in preparing individuals for social entrepreneurship. Methods. Theoretical analysis, systematization and generalization of scientific literature on the problem of interest. Results. Higher education institutions play a significant role in the social entrepreneurship ecosystem. The organization of social entrepreneurship education includes educational support, level of training, field of knowledge, content of training, tools of informal education, and work of private organizations. The author describes the personal competencies, professional and personal qualities and values that should be developed after taking the "Social entrepreneurship" course. Conclusions. The study demonstrated an important role of education in preparing individuals for social entrepreneurship and building the social entrepreneurship ecosystem. A prominent place in the educational support for the development of social entrepreneurship is occupied by the strategic planning of the university's activities with regard to social needs and the implementation of the university's "third mission". The social entrepreneurship programs should be based on both formal and informal education with the focus on developing needed personal and professional competencies.

Analysis of Stakeholders in Social Entrepreneurship Development

Stakeholders have an essential role in the development of social entrepreneurship (SE), so it is necessary to understand the role and contribution of stakeholders. Stakeholders referred to in the development of SE are parties involved and interested in the success and sustainability of SE. This research was conducted with women social entrepreneurs in the Greater Jakarta and Central Java Provinces. This study aims to discover the role of actors in developing SE in the Greater Jakarta and Central Java Provinces. The MACTOR analysis method is used in this study; this method includes determining system actors, setting goals, describing power relations, and assessing attitudes and the importance of dreams for actors. The analysis results are presented through graphs and figure, providing insight into actor competitiveness, alliance patterns, possible conflicts, and actor support for developing SE in the Greater Jakarta and Central Java Provinces. The study results show that policy is the central government; in this case, KEMENKOP UKM (MINISTRY OF COOPERATIVES AND SMES), UKM (Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs), and KEMENSOS (MINISTRY OF SOCIAL AFFAIRS) (Ministry of Social Affairs) are vital in setting special SE regulations. The existence of rules issued by the central government will help social entrepreneurs get various social supports that are useful for developing SE.

Micro-hydro Power Plant-Based Social Entrepreneurship Practices in Rural West Java (A Case Study of Cintamekar Village, Subang Regency)

Cintamekar Village in Subang Regency, West Java, is a peripheral village. One of its characteristics is that residents, especially from the pre-prosperous group, have not been able to enjoy the flow of electricity even though the source of electricity through the PLN is available. To overcome this, on the initiative of the non-governmental organization Initiative of People's Business and Economy (IBEKA), a PLTMH was built in the area. The purpose of this research is to analyze factors affecting social entrepreneurship for community empowerment. The research uses a quantitative approach which is reinforced by qualitative data. The method chosen is the case study. The results showed that overall, the formation of cooperatives was able to build social entrepreneurship by creating social benefits (score 3.6), carrying out social innovation (score above 3), and making the economic activities of citizens more diverse (score 4). The results from the data processed using SEM-PLS show that the development of social entrepreneurship is influenced by the characteristics of technology and innovation by 0.281. The communication channel factor is more dominant in influencing the development of social entrepreneurship, which is equal to 0.487. These two factors explained that there was a change of 33.3 percent in social entrepreneurship. The social entrepreneurship practice of the PLTMH program in Cintamekar Village is built on the characteristics of technology, innovation, and communication channels. The characteristics of technology and innovation as well as communication channels are the driving force for residents to change their social entrepreneurship behavior. This means that the technological and innovation characteristics of the PLTMH development and the communication channels used, through cooperative institutions, have a good impact on the development of social entrepreneurship in Cintamekar Village, and as a whole, they are able to build social entrepreneurship in creating social innovation and economic activities.

THE POTENTIAL OF LOCAL BUSINESS INVOLVEMENT AS A DETERMINANT OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROCESS OF VETERANS' REINTEGRATION

The purpose of the article is to propose an approach to analysing the potential of involving local business as a determinant of social entrepreneurship development in the process of reintegration of veterans. Methodology. The survey is based on the results of an online questionnaire on the current state and needs of business in Chernihiv Oblast in the post-occupation period. The questionnaire contained questions in which respondents could describe business needs, expected support from local governments, and identify favourable and unfavourable factors for the development of the business environment at the regional level. The second part of the empirical research included personal in-depth expert interviews with key informants from business, local government, NGOs and donor initiatives to study the recovery needs of key micro-, small- and medium-sized business sectors in the de-occupied cities of Chernihiv Oblast. The survey results revealed the needs of businesses in the post-occupation period. Despite the fact that the surveyed entrepreneurs note a decrease in income, they are still optimistic about doing business in Chernihiv in the near future. According to the survey, the main factors hindering business development in Chernihiv Oblast are: low solvency of buyers; insufficient financial resources; bureaucratic obstacles; and changes in market conditions. The factors that hinder the development of Chernihiv Oblast are identified: unfavourable conditions for the development of entrepreneurship in the region; lack of external investment in the region; political situation at the local level; unemployment in the region; insufficient level of public initiative and activity of residents. Based on the results of in-depth interviews, it is possible to assess the potential of local businesses in the context of their involvement in the development of social entrepreneurship with a focus on veteran businesses. Despite all the difficulties and problems, the trend towards business recovery in the de-occupation period is positive, based on the desire of entrepreneurs to work in the Chernihiv Oblast. The city has active and influential NGOs that are ready to act in the interests of the community. Currently, donor initiatives in the region are just beginning. Practical implications. Based on a study of the reintegration needs and problems of servicemen, veterans and their family members in starting their own business and an analysis of the local business environment, recommendations are made on the role of business in the development of social entrepreneurship of veterans as a tool for their reintegration. Value/originality. The research demonstrates an approach to determining the potential of business in its involvement in the development of social entrepreneurship as a tool for reintegrating veterans at the local level.