Science Curriculum Development Research Articles

Stever defends NSF peer review system

A few days after the close of House hearings on the National Science Foundation's peer review system, NSF director H. Guyford Stever remarked to C&EN that when NSF is having a hard time, science is having a hard time. A parochial comment perhaps, but science in general, and NSF in particular, has been taking its lumps in the new Congress. For instance, NSF's budget has been cut. An amendment giving Congress a veto over NSF research grants passed the House only to be beaten back in a conference committee. NSF's science curriculum developments are aswirl in controversy. And peer review—a sort of sacred pillar—is being attacked in Congress as an incestuous relationship by some from within and without the science community. What's more, no end to the flogging is in sight. However, according to some highlevel NSF officials and key members of the House and Senate who have been very supportive of NSF and science ...

Science curriculum development and evaluation in Papua New Guinea—The evolution of a curriculum development model

Science curriculum development and evaluation in Papua New Guinea—The evolution of a curriculum development model

Formative evaluation in science curriculum development

Formative evaluation in science curriculum development

Instructional priorities for development of science curricula, Part 3

Instructional priorities for development of science curricula, Part 3

Review: Theory into Action... in Science Curriculum Development, by NSTA Curriculum Committee

Book Review| April 01 1966 Review: Theory into Action... in Science Curriculum Development, by NSTA Curriculum Committee Theory into Action... in Science Curriculum DevelopmentNSTA Curriculum Committee Stanley B. Brown Stanley B. Brown Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The American Biology Teacher (1966) 28 (4): 312–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/4441336 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Stanley B. Brown; Review: Theory into Action... in Science Curriculum Development, by NSTA Curriculum Committee. The American Biology Teacher 1 April 1966; 28 (4): 312–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/4441336 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe American Biology Teacher Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1966 National Association of Biology Teachers Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Editorial: A Statement on "Theory into Action... in Science Curriculum Development"

Editorial: A Statement on "Theory into Action... in Science Curriculum Development"

Book Vignettes

CLEMONS, ELIZABETH, Tide Pools & Beaches.BEISER, GERMAINE, The Story of the Earth's Magnetic Field.JEVONS, F. R., The Biochemical Approach to Life.SCHATZ, ESTHER E., AND WILSBERG, MARY E., Freeing the Learner in Primary Arithmetic.SUCKLING, E. E., The Living Battery.BARANOWSKI, RICHARD M., The Golden Bookshelf of Natural History—Insects.DARNOWSKI, VINCENT S., Computers—Theory and Uses.NSTA CURRICULUM COMMITTEE AND THE CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE CONCEPTS CALLED BY NSTA, Theory into Action…in Science Curriculum Development.RUBLOWSKY, JOHN, Life and Death of the Sun.WEST, JR., KARL H., Supplementary Geometry.DINKINES, FLORA, Elementary Concepts of Modern Mathematics.MOUSER, G. W., AND BROWN, ROBERT E., Techniques for Teaching Conservation Education.

An evaluation of the conceptual schemes approach to science curriculum development

An evaluation of the conceptual schemes approach to science curriculum development

The princeton junior high school science project

AbstractThe author of this article is well known as the person who was primarily responsible for developing the tests which accompanied the new secondary school curricula (PSSC Physics et al). He has recently returned to geology, the field in which he took his doctorate, and as a member of the Geology Department at Princeton, is presently devoting full time to science curriculum development. Dr. Ferris serves as director of the project described in this article.

Organization and Administration for Curriculum Development in Science

Organization and Administration for Curriculum Development in Science

Development of Science Curricula in Negro Schools

Development of Science Curricula in Negro Schools

Curriculum Development in Science

Curriculum Development in Science