Development Of Cardiovascular Disease In Type Research Articles

A Significant Increase of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate After Switching From Fenofibrate to Pemafibrate in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.

BackgroundDyslipidemia is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), along with hypertension, diabetes, smoking and obesity. Approximately 70% of CVD risk remains even after treatment of elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) by statins. High triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level are potential therapeutic targets to prevent CVD. Fibrates were associated with a greater reduction in TG, and a greater increase in HDL-C. Fibrates activate specific transcription factors belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, termed peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Fibrates improve atherogenic dyslipidemia by mediating PPARα. Pemafibrate is a novel member of the selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) family that was designed to have a higher PPARα agonistic activity and selectivity than previous fibrates. Here, we aimed to study the influences of the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate on metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetic patients.MethodsWe retrospectively picked up type 2 diabetic patients who had undergone the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate, and compared metabolic parameters before the switching with the data at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switching.ResultsWe found 15 patients with type 2 diabetes. Serum alanine aminotransferase significantly decreased at 6 months after the switching as compared with baseline. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) significantly increased at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate as compared with baseline. Serum uric acid (UA) levels significantly increased at 3 and 6 months after the switching as compared with baseline. We did not observe changes in other metabolic parameters after the switching.ConclusionWe observed a significant increase of eGFR and serum UA after the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate in type 2 diabetic patients. Recent evidences suggest that the improvement of eGFR is beneficially associated with the development of CVD in type 2 diabetic patients. Considering the impact on eGFR, pemafibrate may effectively reduce CVD as compared with fenofibrate.

A Significant Increase of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate After Switching From Fenofibrate to Pemafibrate in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Background: Dyslipidemia is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), along with hypertension, diabetes, smoking and obesity. Approximately 70% of CVD risk remains even after treatment of elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) by statins. High triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level are potential therapeutic targets to prevent CVD. Fibrates were associated with a greater reduction in TG, and a greater increase in HDL-C. Fibrates activate specific transcription factors belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, termed peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Fibrates improve atherogenic dyslipidemia by mediating PPARalpha. Pemafibrate is a novel member of the selective PPARalpha modulator (SPPARMalpha) family that was designed to have a higher PPARalpha agonistic activity and selectivity than previous fibrates. Here, we aimed to study the influences of the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate on metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods: We retrospectively picked up type 2 diabetic patients who had undergone the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate, and compared metabolic parameters before the switching with the data at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switching. Results: We found 15 patients with type 2 diabetes. Serum alanine aminotransferase significantly decreased at 6 months after the switching as compared with baseline. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) significantly increased at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate as compared with baseline. Serum uric acid (UA) levels significantly increased at 3 and 6 months after the switching as compared with baseline. We did not observe changes in other metabolic parameters after the switching. Conclusion: We observed a significant increase of eGFR and serum UA after the switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate in type 2 diabetic patients. Recent evidences suggest that the improvement of eGFR is beneficially associated with the development of CVD in type 2 diabetic patients. Considering the impact on eGFR, pemafibrate may effectively reduce CVD as compared with fenofibrate. Cardiol Res. 2021;000(000):000-000 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1333

Uric Acid and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes

Background: Serum uric acid (UA) is associated with the pathogenesis of diabetes complications, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and kidney injury. Current epidemiological evidence is limited regarding the association between UA and the development of CVD in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Objective: To examine associations of serum UA with CVD and major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACE) in T1DM. Methods: UA was measured in sera (1997-2000) from a subset of participants (n=973; males=540, females=433) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. Subsequent CVD events were adjudicated by a review committee masked to DCCT assignment and HbA1c levels, and defined as the time to the first of any of the following: non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, CVD death, silent MI on annual ECG, angina confirmed by ischemic changes with exercise tolerance testing, congestive heart failure, or revascularization; MACE were defined as a composite of CVD death, nonfatal MI, or stroke. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prospectively the effect of UA as a fixed covariate on CVD and MACE, separately by gender, and adjusted for age and HbA1c. Results: Over 15 years follow-up, there were 201 adjudicated CVD events among 110 participants (HR=1.10 per 1 mg/dl change in UA, 95% CI 0.93-1.30); 61 males experienced 96 events (HR=1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.46) and 49 females, 105 events (HR=1.17, 95% CI 0.88-1.56). There were 62 adjudicated MACE among 53 participants (HR=1.18, 95% CI 0.93-1.49); 29 males experienced 31 events (HR=1.10, 95% CI 0.77-1.58) and 24 females, 31 events (HR=1.47, 95% CI 1.01-2.14). No significant associations between quartiles of UA and either CVD or MACE were observed in either sex. Conclusions: Our results show UA may not serve as a predictive biomarker for CVD events in T1DM adults. Sex-specific associations with MACE deserve further investigation. Disclosure A. Basu: None. B. Braffett: None. A. Jenkins: Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Mylan, Sanofi-Aventis. I. Bebu: None. R.L. Klein: None. M.F. Lopes-Virella: None. S. Dagogo-Jack: None. T.J. Orchard: None. A. Wallia: Research Support; Self; UnitedHealth Group. Consultant; Self; Glytec Systems, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. J. Lachin: Board Member; Self; AbbVie Inc., Celgene Corporation. W. Garvey: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Merck & Co., Inc.. Research Support; Self; Sanofi, Pfizer Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., Inc., Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eisai Inc.. T. Lyons: None.