with a gap of width δ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 1.0 cm. At the same time, acetylene was delivered into the chamber through a spray nozzle supplied with in-pair counterflow channels with the total cross-sectional area S δ f = 2 cm 2 , situated at a distance L f = 0.1 cm downstream of the air-supply slit, and inclined at an angle of 45i . The channels are uniformly distributed over the chamber circumference. The gases were delivered from a separate receivers with volumes V rA = 79.8 l for air and V rf = 13.3 l for acetylene through electrically driven fast valves. Detonation products flew out directly into the atmosphere. The duration of the process was set within the time range τ d (0.3‐0.55) s by a control system. The flow rate of the components varied within the limits G A0 = 5.3‐2.12 kg s ‐1 and G f0 = 0.3‐0.21 kg s ‐1 . The fuel-excess factor was Φ = 0.44‐1.37 (here, the subscripts A, f, and 0 denote air, acetylene, and the initial state, respectively). The detonation was initiated by an electrical detonator with an explosive mass of 0.5 g. The entire process was photographed through the longitudinal windows of the detonation chamber on photographic film by a photochronograph with a falling drum [9]. In order to illuminate the wave structure and detonation products, a small acetylene jet was injected into the chamber beginning oppositely to the corresponding window. Using illuminated trajectories, we determined the axial component of the flow velocity v = k v pf . Here, k = 37.8 is the image-diminution factor, α is the inclination angle of a trajectory with respect the horizontal line, and v pf = 50 m s ‐1 is the speed of photographic-film motion. Pressure-sensor signals from the gas receivers, collectors, and from the detonation chamber were registered by a computer system.
Read full abstract