Cancer Detection Rate Research Articles

A multicentre review of the direct-access mammography programme in Ireland for women with breast pain

To assess the current use of the direct access mammography pathway for breast pain and the rate of breast cancer detection in this patient cohort. A retrospective review of general practitioner (GP)-referred mammograms performed during a 12-month period from January to December 2022 across four tertiary referral centres. With the use of medical records and GP referrals, patient demographics, presenting symptoms, family history, and clinical outcomes were recorded. The present study comprised 2,046 patients of which 21.6% did not report breast pain at the time of referral. Thirty-five per cent had a positive family history with 40% of these patients having no breast pain. Twelve per cent were recalled with 30% of these patients requiring biopsy. An overall cancer detection rate (CDR) of 7 per 1000 was determined for women with mastalgia. A CDR of 0 per 1,000 was determined for women <50 years with mastalgia alone and no additional risk factors for malignancy. Fisher's exact test showed no statistically significant association between breast pain and breast cancer. There was no statistically significant relationship found between breast pain and breast cancer. This review suggests a low cancer detection rate in women <50 years. In women <50 years with mastalgia without additional symptoms or family history, breast imaging is not required.

Cancer Detection Rate of MRI Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in 1,039 Patients and Number Needed to Biopsy in Targeted Lesion

Objective: To determine the cancer detection rate (CDR) of magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy (MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy) in Thailand. The secondary aim was to estimate the number needed to biopsy (NNB) for each prostate lesion in a targeted biopsy, classified by Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Materials and Methods: The data of 1,039 consecutive patients who underwent a MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy at Siriraj Hospital between September 2017 and February 2021 was included and retrospectively reviewed. Those included had previous negative biopsies and were biopsy naïve. The data was analyzed to find the detection rate and NNB. Results: The overall detection rate of MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy was 58.71%, whereas that of systematic biopsy was 45.72%. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score ≥ 3+4) detection rate of MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy was 51.01%. When categorized by PI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 were 12.16%, 44.98%, 85.71% respectively. NNB in targeted biopsy of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 were 8, 7, and 3 times sequentially. Positive predictive factors for prostate cancer (PCa) detection were age, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and PI-RADS, whereas prostate volume was a negative predictive factor. Conclusion: This study supports the role of MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy in PCa detection and should not avoid systematic biopsies. The higher the PI-RADS was, the greater the csPCa detection rate. NNB is helpful in guiding the least amount of biopsied cores for each lesion.

Uptake of screening MRI in high risk patients without a personal history of breast cancer.

133 Background: The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends breast MRI in addition to annual screening mammogram for women who are high risk for breast cancer starting at age 30, regardless of breast density. This includes women with a lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20% or greater, according to breast cancer risk assessment tools. In this study, we evaluated the uptake of supplemental MRI screening in patients ages 25-75 classified as high risk (Tyrer Cuzick (TC) score greater than 20%), without a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). Methods: Cancer risk assessment software was used to calculate a TC score. Data was extracted from the EMR of an academic center for patients ages 25-75 years old between 07/20/2020 and 07/29/2021 with a TC score of ≥ 20%. Factors such as age, ethnicity, race, insurance type, breast density, and whether patients had access to a High-Risk Breast Cancer (HRBC) provider were analyzed and a chi-squared test was used to determine whether there were significant differences in MRI supplemental uptake based on these subsets. Results: 1144 patients were identified as high risk, having a TC ≥ 20%. 27% (n=307) underwent supplemental MRI screening, while 73% (n=837) did not. 842 patients were classified as having dense breasts and 28% (n=237) of these patients underwent MRI. Of 635 patients with an MRI order, 36% (n=227) had access to a HRBC provider, while 64% (n=408) did not. Patients with a HRBC provider were more likely to fulfill their MRI order (88%, n=200), compared to patients without a HRBC provider (33%, n=135) (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Various factors may be influencing whether high risk patients complete supplemental screening MRI. Patients with dense breasts and those with access to HRBC were more likely to undergo supplemental MRI screening. Patients who have not completed their recommended breast MRI may be faced with various challenges, such as, not having access to a HRBC provider. Identifying barriers to screening can help increase early rates of breast cancer detection in this high risk population of women.

Efforts to increase the application of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT): A resident-led strategy to improve lung cancer screening in an urban primary care clinic.

132 Background: Lung cancer carries the highest mortality rate of all malignancies, implicated in approximately 20% of cancer-related deaths in the United States. The 2011 National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) established a 20% reduction in lung cancer-associated mortality associated with annual LDCT screening in high-risk populations compared to screening chest radiography. In 2013 the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) adopted this approach into their recommendations, with a subsequent update in 2021 establishing a recommended annual LDCT screening for those at high risk. There remains a concerning lack of access to PCP-initiated LDCT screening in medically underserved (e.g., urban, rural) areas, translating to relatively low rates of early lung cancer detection. Methods: Any patient meeting the 2021 USPSTF criteria (at least 20-pack-year history of tobacco use, who still smoke or have quit within the past 15 years) was deemed eligible. Excluded were those meeting these criteria and any patient who had received LDCT within the past 12 months. The pre-intervention stage of this study included a 15-week data collection of chart review to establish baseline rates. The intervention involved an educational flyer detailing the guidelines for lung cancer screening, placed in each clinic exam room to promote patient self-assessment of eligibility. Results: In the 15-week control group (i.e., pre-intervention), 177 patients were eligible for LDCT screening, with 65 successful LDCT orders and 112 not ordered (36.7% screened appropriately) and 27 (41.5%) LDCT orders completed. Through the 15 weeks of post-intervention data, 193 patients were eligible for LDCT screening, with 99 orders placed and 94 not (51.3% screened appropriately), and 42 (42.4%) of these LDCT orders were completed. Conclusions: The initial goal set for this project was a 50% lung cancer screening rate among eligible patients, with at least 50% of those LDCT orders performed by the patient. There was a remarkable improvement in LDCT ordering rates; however, the primary goal of these ordering improvement rates was to translate them into a higher percentage of patients completing these orders. Despite the increase in LDCT orders, the percentage completed stagnated (41.5% pre-intervention, 42.4% post-intervention). It was essential to our team that the interventions remain cost-effective. We did achieve this using printed flyers, allowing for patient-initiated involvement in the process. Using these interventions as a template, a clinic in any setting may benefit their LDCT ordering rates. However, these measures alone will not improve the percentage of patients completing the LDCT orders. As our project continues, we plan to modify the intervention to reflect constructive feedback from the resident physicians and patients involved.

Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.

There are insufficient large-scale studies comparing the performance of screening mammography in women of different races. This study aims to compare the screening performance metrics across racial and age groups in the National Mammography Database (NMD). All screening mammograms performed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021, in women aged 30-100years from 746 mammography facilities in 46 U.S. states in the NMD were included. Patients were stratified by 10-year age intervals and 5 racial groups (African American, American Indian, Asian, White, unknown). Incidence of risk factors (breast density, personal history, family history of breast cancer, age), and time since prior exams were compared. Five screening mammography metrics were calculated: recall rate (RR), cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive values for recalls (PPV1), biopsy recommended (PPV2) and biopsy performed (PPV3). 29,479,655 screening mammograms performed in 13,181,241 women between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021, from the NMD were analyzed. The overall mean performance metrics were RR 10.00% (95% CI 9.99-10.02), CDR 4.18/1000 (4.16-4.21), PPV1 4.18% (4.16-4.20), PPV2 25.84% (25.72-25.97), PPV3 25.78% (25.66-25.91). With advancing age, RR significantly decreases, while CDR, PPV1, PPV2, and PPV3 significantly increase. Incidence of personal/family history of breast cancer, breast density, age, prior mammogram availability, and time since prior mammogram were mostly similar across all races. Compared to White women, African American women had significantly higher RR, but lower CDR, PPV1, PPV2 and PPV3. Benefits of screening mammography increase with age, including for women age > 70 and across all races. Screening mammography is effective; with lower RR and higher CDR, PPV2, and PPV3 with advancing age. African American women have poorer outcomes from screening mammography (higher RR and lower CDR), compared to White and all women in the NMD. Racial disparity can be partly explained by higher rate of African American women lost to follow up.

Decreased prostate MRI cancer detection rate due to moderate to severe susceptibility artifacts from hip prosthesis.

To evaluate the impact of susceptibility artifacts from hip prosthesis on cancer detection rate (CDR) in prostate MRI. This three-center retrospective study included prostate MRI studies for patients without known prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021. Exams with hip prosthesis were searched on MRI reports. The degree of susceptibility artifact on diffusion-weighted images was retrospectively categorized into mild, moderate, and severe (> 66%, 33-66%, and < 33% of the prostate volume are evaluable) by blind reviewers. CDR was defined as the number of exams with Gleason score ≥7 detected by MRI (PI-RADS ≥3) divided by the total number of exams. For each artifact grade, control exams without hip prosthesis were matched (1:6 match), and CDR was compared. The degree of CDR reduction was evaluated with ratio, and influential factors were evaluated by expanding the equation. Hip arthroplasty was present in 548 (4.8%) of the 11,319 MRI exams. CDR of the cases and matched control exams for each artifact grade were as follows: mild (n= 238), 0.27 vs 0.25, CDR ratio = 1.09 [95% CI: 0.87-1.37]; moderate (n= 143), 0.18 vs 0.27, CDR ratio = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.46-0.96]; severe (n= 167), 0.22 vs 0.28, CDR ratio = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.59-1.08]. When moderate and severe artifact grades were combined, CDR ratio was 0.74 [95% CI: 0.58-0.93]. CDR reduction was mostly attributed to the increased frequency of PI-RADS 1-2. With moderate to severe susceptibility artifacts from hip prosthesis, CDR was decreased to 74% compared to the matched control. Moderate to severe susceptibility artifacts from hip prosthesis may cause a non-negligible CDR reduction in prostate MRI. Expanding indications for systematic prostate biopsy may be considered when PI-RADS 1-2 was assigned. • We proposed cancer detection rate as a diagnostic performance metric in prostate MRI. • With moderate to severe susceptibility artifacts secondary to hip arthroplasty, cancer detection rate decreased to 74% compared to the matched control. • Expanding indications for systematic prostate biopsy may be considered when PI-RADS 1-2 is assigned.

Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Mammography, Artificial Intelligence, and Supplementary Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND. Screening mammography has decreased performance in patients with dense breasts. Supplementary screening ultrasound is a recommended option in such patients, although it has yielded mixed results in prior investigations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the performance characteristics of screening mammography alone, standalone artificial intelligence (AI), ultrasound alone, and mammography in combination with AI and/or ultrasound in patients with dense breasts. METHODS. This retrospective study included 1325 women (mean age, 53 years) with dense breasts who underwent both screening mammography and supplementary breast ultrasound within a 1-month interval from January 2017 to December 2017; prior mammography and prior ultrasound examinations were available for comparison in 91.2% and 91.8%, respectively. Mammography and ultrasound examinations were interpreted by one of 15 radiologists (five staff; 10 fellows); clinical reports were used for the present analysis. A commercial AI tool was used to retrospectively evaluate mammographic examinations for presence of cancer. Screening performances were compared among mammography, AI, ultrasound, and test combinations, using generalized estimating equations. Benign diagnoses required 24 months or longer of imaging stability. RESULTS. Twelve cancers (six invasive ductal carcinoma; six ductal carcinoma in situ) were diagnosed. Mammography, standalone AI, and ultrasound showed cancer detection rates (per 1000 patients) of 6.0, 6.8, and 6.0 (all p > .05); recall rates of 4.4%, 11.9%, and 9.2% (all p < .05); sensitivity of 66.7%, 75.0%, and 66.7% (all p > .05); specificity of 96.2%, 88.7%, and 91.3% (all p < .05); and accuracy of 95.9%, 88.5%, and 91.1% (all p < .05). Mammography with AI, mammography with ultrasound, and mammography with both ultrasound and AI showed cancer detection rates of 7.5, 9.1, and 9.1 (all p > .05); recall rates of 14.9, 11.7, and 21.4 (all p < .05); sensitivity of 83.3%, 100.0%, and 100.0% (all p > .05); specificity of 85.8%, 89.1%, and 79.4% (all p < .05); and accuracy of 85.7%, 89.2%, and 79.5% (all p < .05). CONCLUSION. Mammography with supplementary ultrasound showed higher accuracy, higher specificity, and lower recall rate in comparison with mammography with AI and in comparison with mammography with both ultrasound and AI. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings fail to show benefit of AI with respect to screening mammography performed with supplementary breast ultrasound in patients with dense breasts.

Management of pT1 CRC detected on the colorectal cancer screening programme (Basque Country. Spain)

Abstract Background The Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) started in 2009 with faecal immunochemical test (FIT, with cut-off 20µg/g faeces) every 2 years (for 50-69 year- olds). 2.518.715 people were invited until 2021. Participation rate was 70.4% with 5.3% positive rate and 92.7% adherence to colonoscopy. Colorectal cancer (CRC) detection rate was 2.28 ‰ with 70.6% found in initial stage. The PT1 (stage I) represented 40% of the total cancer detected (4,050 in the overall period). Objectives To compare the characteristics and management of pT1 CRC. Methods Retrospective cohort study including pT1 CRC Stage I diagnosed after colonoscopy in positive FIT from 2009-2017. Variables: sex, age groups, endoscopic and surgical treatment, CRC recurrence and survival. Chi-square, Logistic Regression, SPSS v.23. Results Of the 1,523 CRC detected, 585 were detected as pT1 and I stage (38.4%). 73.4% in men and by age group 59% over 60 years-old. 48.5% were treated with surgery and 51.5% with endoscopic resection. No significant differences were found adjusted by sex and age regardless of treatment. In 57.6% of patients under surgery, CRC was not reported by pathological analysis. All cases followed up by colonoscopy with variability in the number of surveillances over time. 4.1% (24) had CRC recurrence with 87% detected in the surveillance, no significant differences regardless of the treatment. 1.5% (9) died due to CRC progression. Conclusions Apart from the high number of CRC detected in early stages by the screening Programme, an important number of cases are reported as pT1 CRC. Endoscopic resection is one of the treatments of choice without significant impact either in recurrence of neoplasia or mortality. However, surgical procedure shows overtreatment because of the high number of cases without CRC after the procedure. Therefore, endoscopic resection could be the main choice to treat pT1 CRC. Key messages • Endoscopic resection is one of the treatment of choice without impact in recurrence for the pT1 CRC detected through the BCSP. • The Basque BCSP obtains excellent participation rate, reflected in early detection and treatment of pre and malignant lesions.

Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS Category 3 Lesions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 is the most ambiguous lesion with a variable clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa) detection rate. Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) has been investigated as an adjunctive factor to improve the diagnostic efficiency of PI-RADS categories. This study aimed to investigate the utility of PSAD as an adjunctive factor in predicting CsPCA risk in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions. The patients with an initial PI-RADS 3 category lesion (n=142) scheduled for systematic and magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic and clinical variables, including PSAD, were collected. The rate of CsPCa was the primary outcome. The impact of PSAD on the CsPCa detection rate was the secondary outcome. The median age was 62 years. The rate of CsPCa was 8.5% (n=12). The patients with CsPCa have significantly lower prostate volüme and higher PSAD levels than those without CsPCa (p=0.016 and p=0.012). The cut-off values of PSAD in predicting CsPCa in all PI-RADS 3 patients and patients with CsPCa and clinically insignificant prostate cancer (n=26) were ≥0.181 ng/ml2. The sensitivity and specificity values for PSAD ≥0.181 ng/ml2 were of 75% (95% CI: 42.8%-94.5%) and 81.5% (95% CI: 73.4%-88.0%) in predicting CsPCa among PI-RADS 3 category. Conclusion: PSAD values higher than 0.181 ng/ml2 can be used as an adjunctive clinical parameter in predicting CsPCa in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions and differentiating CsPCa from clinically insignificant prostate cancer cases.

Prostagram magnetic resonance imaging in a screening population: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or Likert?

To compare biopsy recommendation rates and accuracy of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2) with the Likert scale for detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer in men screened within the Imperial Prostate 1 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial Using Imaging (IP1-PROSTAGRAM). Men aged 50-69 years were screened with Prostagram MRI. Scans were prospectively reported using both PI-RADSv2 (excluding dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence score) and 5-point Likert scores by expert uro-radiologists. Systematic and targeted transperineal biopsy was recommended if the scan was scored ≥ 3, based on either reporting system. The proportion of patients recommended for biopsy and detection rates for Grade Groups (GGs) 1 and ≥ 2 were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare performance. A total of 406 men underwent Prostagram MRI. The median (interquartile range) age and prostate-specific antigen level were 57 (53-61) years and 0.91 (0.56-1.74) ng/mL, respectively. At MRI score ≥ 3, more patients were recommended for biopsy based on Likert criteria (94/406; 23%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.2%-27.6%) compared to PI-RADSv2 (72/406; 18%, 95% CI 14.2%-21.9%; P = 0.03). For MRI scores ≥ 4, PI-RADSv2 and Likert scales led to 43/406 (11%, 95% CI 7.9%-14.1%) and 35/406 (9%, 95% CI 6.2%-11.9%) men recommended for biopsy (P = 0.40). For GG ≥ 2 detection, PIRADSv2 and Likert detected 22% (95% CI 11.4%-30.8%, 14/72) and 16% (95% CI 9.5%-25.3%, 15/94), respectively (P = 0.56). For GG1 cancers detection these were 11% (95% CI 4.3%-19.6%, seven of 72) vs 11% (95% CI 4.7%-17.8%, nine of 94; P = 1.00). The accuracy of PI-RADSv2 and Likert scale was similar (area under the ROC curve 0.64 vs 0.65, P = 0.95). In reporting non-contrast-enhanced Prostagram MRI in a screening population, the PI-RADSv2 and Likert scoring systems were equally accurate; however, Likert scale use led to more men undergoing biopsy without a subsequent increase in significant cancer detection rates. To improve reporting of Prostagram MRI, either the PI-RADSv2 or a modified Likert scale or a standalone scoring system should be developed.

Cancer Detection Rate and Abnormal Interpretation Rate of Prostate MRI in Patients With Low-Grade Cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of cancer detection rate (CDR) and abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) in prostate MRI for patients with low-grade prostate cancer (PCa). MethodsThis three-center retrospective study included patients who underwent prostate MRI from 2017 to 2021 with known low-grade PCa (Gleason score 6) without prior treatment. Patient-level highest Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS®) score and pathologic diagnosis within 1 year after MRI were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of prostate MRI in detecting clinically significant PCa (csPCa; Gleason score ≥ 7). The metrics AIR, CDR, and CDR adjusted for pathologic confirmation rate were calculated. Radiologist-level AIR-CDR plots were shown. Simulation AIR-CDR lines were created to assess the effects of different diagnostic performances of prostate MRI and the prevalence of csPCa. ResultsA total of 3,207 examinations were interpreted by 33 radiologists. Overall AIR, CDR, and CDR adjusted for pathologic confirmation rate at PI-RADS 3 to 5 (PI-RADS 4 and 5) were 51.7% (36.5%), 22.1% (18.8%), and 30.7% (24.6%), respectively. Radiologist-level AIR and CDR at PI-RADS 3 to 5 (PI-RADS 4 and 5) were in the 36.8% to 75.6% (21.9%-57.5%) range and the 16.3%-28.7% (10.9%-26.5%) range, respectively. In the simulation, changing parameters of diagnostic performance or csPCa prevalence shifted the AIR-CDR line. ConclusionsThe authors propose CDR and AIR as performance metrics in prostate MRI and report reference performance values in patients with known low-grade PCa. There was variability in radiologist-level AIR and CDR. Combined use of AIR and CDR could provide meaningful feedback for radiologists to improve their performance by showing relative performance to other radiologists.

Rethinking screening mammography in Japan: next-generation breast cancer screening through breast awareness and supplemental ultrasonography.

Breast cancer mortality has not been reduced in Japan despite more than 20years of population-based screening mammography. Screening mammography might not be suitable for Japanese women who often have dense breasts, thus decreasing mammography sensitivity because of masking. The J-START study showed that breast ultrasonography increases the sensitivity and the detection rate for early invasive cancers and lowers the rate of interval cancers for Japanese women in their 40s. Breast awareness and breast cancer survival are directly correlated; however, breast awareness is not widely known in Japan. Next-generation breast cancer screening in Japan should consist of breast awareness campaigns for improving breast cancer literacy and supplemental breast ultrasonography to address the problem of false-negative mammograms attributable to dense breasts.

Impact of operator expertise on transperineal free-hand mpMRI-fusion-targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicenter prospective learning curve

PurposeTransperineal mpMRI-targeted fusion prostate biopsies (TPFBx) are recommended for prostate cancer diagnosis, but little is known about their learning curve (LC), especially when performed under local anaesthesia (LA). We investigated how operators’ and institutions’ experience might affect biopsy results.MethodsBaseline, procedure and pathology data of consecutive TPFBx under LA were prospectively collected at two academic Institutions, from Sep 2016 to May 2019. Main inclusion criterion was a positive MRI. Endpoints were biopsy duration, clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate on targeted cores (csCDR-T), complications, pain and urinary function. Data were analysed per-centre and per-operator (with ≥ 50 procedures), comparing groups of consecutive patient, and subsequently through regression and CUSUM analyses. Learning curves were plotted using an adjusted lowess smoothing function.ResultsWe included 1014 patients, with 27.3% csCDR-T and a median duration was 15 min (IQR 12–18). A LC for biopsy duration was detected, with the steeper phase ending after around 50 procedures, in most operators. No reproducible evidence in favour of an impact of experience on csPCa detection was found at operator’s level, whilst a possible gentle LC of limited clinical relevance emerged at Institutional level; complications, pain and IPSS variations were not related to operator experience.ConclusionThe implementation of TPFBx under LA was feasible, safe and efficient since early phases with a relatively short learning curve for procedure time.

Cancer Detection Rate and Abnormal Interpretation Rate of Prostate MRI Performed for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer

PurposeTo report cancer detection rate (CDR) and abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) in prostate MRI performed for clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methodsThis retrospective single-institution, three-center study included patients who underwent MRI for clinical suspicion of PCa between 2017 and 2021. Patients with known PCa were excluded. Patient-level Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score was extracted from the radiology report. AIR was defined as number of abnormal MRI (PI-RADS score 3-5) / total number of MRIs. CDR was defined as number of clinically significant PCa (csPCa: Gleason score ≥7) detected at abnormal MRI / total number of MRI. AIR, CDR, and CDR adjusted for pathology confirmation rate were calculated for each of three centers and pre-MRI biopsy status (biopsy-naive and previous negative biopsy). ResultsA total of 9,686 examinations (8,643 unique patients) were included. AIR, CDR, and CDR adjusted for pathology confirmation rate were 45.4%, 23.8%, and 27.6% for center I; 47.2%, 20.0%, and 22.8% for center II; and 42.3%, 27.2%, and 30.1% for center III, respectively. Pathology confirmation rate ranged from 81.6% to 88.0% across three centers. AIR and CDR for biopsy-naive patients were 45.5% to 52.6% and 24.2% to 33.5% across three centers, respectively, and those for previous negative biopsy were 27.2% to 39.8% and 11.7% to 14.2% across three centers, respectively. ConclusionWe reported CDR and AIR in prostate MRI for clinical suspicion of PCa. CDR needs to be adjusted for pathology confirmation rate and pre-MRI biopsy status for interfacility comparison.

Deep Learning-Based T2-Weighted MR Image Quality Assessment and Its Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection Rates.

Image quality evaluation of prostate MRI is important for successful implementation of MRI into localized prostate cancer diagnosis. To examine the impact of image quality on prostate cancer detection using an in-house previously developed artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm. Retrospective. 615 consecutive patients (median age 67 [interquartile range [IQR]: 61-71] years) with elevated serum PSA (median PSA 6.6 [IQR: 4.6-9.8] ng/mL) prior to prostate biopsy. 3.0T/T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo MRI, high b-value echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging, and gradient recalled echo dynamic contrast-enhanced. Scans were prospectively evaluated during clinical readout using PI-RADSv2.1 by one genitourinary radiologist with 17 years of experience. For each patient, T2-weighted images (T2WIs) were classified as high-quality or low-quality based on evaluation of both general distortions (eg, motion, distortion, noise, and aliasing) and perceptual distortions (eg, obscured delineation of prostatic capsule, prostatic zones, and excess rectal gas) by a previously developed in-house AI algorithm. Patients with PI-RADS category 1 underwent 12-core ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy while those with PI-RADS category 2-5 underwent combined systematic and targeted biopsies. Patient-level cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥2) by each biopsy method and compared between high- and low-quality images in each PI-RADS category. Fisher's exact test. Bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CI). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. 385 (63%) T2WIs were classified as high-quality and 230 (37%) as low-quality by AI. Targeted biopsy with high-quality T2WIs resulted in significantly higher clinically significant CDR than low-quality images for PI-RADS category 4 lesions (52% [95% CI: 43-61] vs. 32% [95% CI: 22-42]). For combined biopsy, there was no significant difference in patient-level CDRs for PI-RADS 4 between high- and low-quality T2WIs (56% [95% CI: 47-64] vs. 44% [95% CI: 34-55]; P = 0.09). Higher quality T2WIs were associated with better targeted biopsy clinically significant cancer detection performance for PI-RADS 4 lesions. Combined biopsy might be needed when T2WI is lower quality. 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Optimizing the Pairs of Radiologists That Double Read Screening Mammograms.

Background Despite variation in performance characteristics among radiologists, the pairing of radiologists for the double reading of screening mammograms is performed randomly. It is unknown how to optimize pairing to improve screening performance. Purpose To investigate whether radiologist performance characteristics can be used to determine the optimal set of pairs of radiologists to double read screening mammograms for improved accuracy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was performed with reading outcomes from breast cancer screening programs in Sweden (2008-2015), England (2012-2014), and Norway (2004-2018). Cancer detection rates (CDRs) and abnormal interpretation rates (AIRs) were calculated, with AIR defined as either reader flagging an examination as abnormal. Individual readers were divided into performance categories based on their high and low CDR and AIR. The performance of individuals determined the classification of pairs. Random pair performance, for which any type of pair was equally represented, was compared with the performance of specific pairing strategies, which consisted of pairs of readers who were either opposite or similar in AIR and/or CDR. Results Based on a minimum number of examinations per reader and per pair, the final study sample consisted of 3 592 414 examinations (Sweden, n = 965 263; England, n = 837 048; Norway, n = 1 790 103). The overall AIRs and CDRs for all specific pairing strategies (Sweden AIR range, 45.5-56.9 per 1000 examinations and CDR range, 3.1-3.6 per 1000; England AIR range, 68.2-70.5 per 1000 and CDR range, 8.9-9.4 per 1000; Norway AIR range, 81.6-88.1 per 1000 and CDR range, 6.1-6.8 per 1000) were not significantly different from the random pairing strategy (Sweden AIR, 54.1 per 1000 examinations and CDR, 3.3 per 1000; England AIR, 69.3 per 1000 and CDR, 9.1 per 1000; Norway AIR, 84.1 per 1000 and CDR, 6.3 per 1000). Conclusion Pairing a set of readers based on different pairing strategies did not show a significant difference in screening performance when compared with random pairing. © RSNA, 2023.

S1267 Rate of Colorectal Cancer Detection Using Piecemeal Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

S1267 Rate of Colorectal Cancer Detection Using Piecemeal Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Future of Breast Radiology.

The landscape of breast imaging has transformed significantly since mammography's introduction in the 1960s, accelerated by ultrasound and imageguided biopsies in the 1990s. The emergence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the 2000s added a valuable dimension to advanced imaging. Multimodality and multiparametric imaging have firmly established breast radiology's pivotal role in managing breast disorders. A shift from conventional to digital radiology emerged in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, enabling advanced techniques like digital breast tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced mammography, and artificial intelligence (AI) integration. AI's impending integration into breast radiology may enhance diagnostics and workflows. It involves computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms, workflow support algorithms, and data processing algorithms. CAD systems, developed since the 1980s, optimize cancer detection rates by addressing false positives and negatives. Radiologists' roles will evolve into specialized clinicians collaborating with AI for efficient patient care and utilizing advanced techniques with multiparametric imaging and radiomics. Wearable technologies, non-contrast MRI, and innovative modalities like photoacoustic imaging show potential to enhance diagnostics. Imaging-guided therapy, notably cryotherapy, and theranostics, gains traction. Theranostics, integrating therapy and diagnostics, holds potential for precise treatment. Advanced imaging, AI, and novel therapies will revolutionize breast radiology, offering refined diagnostics and personalized treatments. Personalized screening, AI's role, and imaging-guided therapies will shape the future of breast radiology.

Possibilities of immunocytochemical staining for HBME-1 expression in the «diagnostic search» of differentiated thyroid cancer. Own investigation

Objective — to investigate HBME-1 expression variants on cytological material classified as doubtful (III, IV, V), according to the Bethesda categories, to evaluate the value of the HBME-1 expression test on the corresponding histological material of nodular goiter, follicular tumor with an uncertain potential for malignancy for the differential diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma (ThC). Materials and methods. The analysis was performed on the data of 14 patients with thyroid nodular lesions and cytological Bethesda categories III, IV, and V (“gray zone“). The HBME-1 expression was determined by the results of immunocytochemical (ICC) and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with the use of mouse monoclonal antibodies against human HBME-1 (1 : 500; cat № BSB 3459; «Bio SB» «Bioscince for the World» Santa Barbara USA). The HBME-1 expression grade was calculated as the sum of the score for staining intensity and cytoplasmic positive cells square, present in the IHC sample. HBME-1 positive result was considered with an IHC score &gt;6 point. Results. From 14 investigated patients, five were defined as HBME-1 positive. According to the postoperative histological conclusion for the group of HBME-1 positive patients, thyroid carcinoma was diagnosed in four subjects, including three cases of papillary ThC and one follicular ThC; in one patient follicular tumor of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMP) was reported. Importantly, immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical HBME-1 reactions in the specimens of these patients were of the same intensity. Among 9 HBME-1 preoperative negative patients, none had malignancy according to the final histological study. Nodular goiter was diagnosed in six patients, and tumor of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMP) was reported for three subjects. Histological specimens of all 9 patients were HBME-1 negative as well. The obtained results demonstrated an increase in cancer detection rates with increasing Bethesda category. Application of statistical software for biomedical research МedCalc revealed that positive predictive value (PPV) of the HBME-1 expression test was 80% (95% confidence interval CI 38.4—96.3%), and diagnostic efficiency was 92.9% (CI 66.1—99.8%). These results suggest the great potential of the test, however, due to the limited observations, the confidence intervals are too wide. Conclusions. HBME-1 can be used as an immuno­cytochemical marker for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, its use will help to reduce the number of unnecessary surgical removals of benign tumors, which will improve the quality of life of patients and reduce the burden on medical services.

Serum prostate-specific antigen trends and prostate cancer detection on follow-up in men with a prior negative biopsy: A cohort study

ABSTRACT Introduction: Elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most common trigger for a prostate biopsy. However, the range of normal PSA is poorly defined in many populations. Men with “elevated” PSA may not harbor cancer, and it is unclear if such men with a prior negative prostate biopsy should be biopsied again. We conducted a cohort study to assess the PSA trends and cancer detection rates in such men. Methods: In an Institutional Review Board-approved ambispective study, men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 2016 and December 2021 for PSA &gt; 4 ng/mL were identified. Among them, those whose biopsy was negative for malignancy were contacted either telephonically or reviewed in person, and the most recent PSA and histopathology of any repeat prostate biopsy were determined. These were evaluated to assess the PSA trend, re-biopsy rate, and cancer detection rate. Results: During the study period, prostate biopsies were performed in a total of 1260 men; out of which 444 were negative for malignancy and 241 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their median prebiopsy PSA was 9.81 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.14–15.6), and the median follow-up PSA was 5.08 (IQR: 3.18–8.4). At a median follow-up of 53 months (range: 6–77 months), PSA had decreased in 177 (73.4%) patients, was static in 48 (19.9%) patients, and increased in only 16 (6.6%) patients. Repeat biopsy was performed on 20 patients; of whom seven had cancer (35%) with an overall positivity rate of 2.9% among the 241 patients. Although the positivity rate was higher in men with increased PSA, it was not statistically different from those with lower or similar PSA. No factors could be identified to predict a positive repeat biopsy. Conclusions: PSA, the sole trigger for a prostate biopsy, declined in nearly three-quarters of men with a negative first biopsy, and &lt;3% of men were detected to have cancer on a repeat biopsy. This information could help appropriately counsel patients and allay anxiety after a negative biopsy.