Adenoma Detection Rate Research Articles

S534 Effect of Computer-Aided Detection Device on the Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Detection Rate Among Trainee Fellows

S534 Effect of Computer-Aided Detection Device on the Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Detection Rate Among Trainee Fellows

S549 Disconnect Between Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Adenoma Detection Rate at a Tertiary Center: Survey and Retrospective

S549 Disconnect Between Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Adenoma Detection Rate at a Tertiary Center: Survey and Retrospective

S895 Time and Experience Do Not Lead to Improved Adenoma Detection Rate With Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy: An 11-Month Implementation Trial

S895 Time and Experience Do Not Lead to Improved Adenoma Detection Rate With Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy: An 11-Month Implementation Trial

S445 Uncovering Hidden Risks: Exploring Adenoma Detection Rates in Adult Colonoscopy Patients Within a Large Community Setting

S445 Uncovering Hidden Risks: Exploring Adenoma Detection Rates in Adult Colonoscopy Patients Within a Large Community Setting

S924 A Comparison of Distal Attachment Devices, Artificial Intelligence, and Standard Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection Rate and Withdrawal Times: Advantage or Hindrance

S924 A Comparison of Distal Attachment Devices, Artificial Intelligence, and Standard Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection Rate and Withdrawal Times: Advantage or Hindrance

S422 AI in Action: Augmenting Adenoma Detection Rates in a Community-Based Gastroenterology Practice

S422 AI in Action: Augmenting Adenoma Detection Rates in a Community-Based Gastroenterology Practice

Overview of a national endoscopy database: The Trans.IT database and its impact on data registration quality.

The Trans.IT database is a national gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy database developed in 2012. It automatically collects anonymous data from GI endoscopy procedures in a centralized database. All endoscopists use a structured reporting tool for uniform data collection. In this study, we aim to provide an overview of the database and to evaluate its impact on data registration quality. We used all ERCPs, colonoscopies and colorectal cancer (CRC)-screening colonoscopies performed between 2016 and 2020. We excluded centers joining after 2016 and patients below age 18. Data registration quality for ERCPs included completeness of data for: intention of ERCP, Schutz score, ASA classification, papillary status (virgin or previous sphincterotomy), cannulation (success or failure to cannulate the desired duct) and procedural success. For colonoscopies: indication, ASA-classification, Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS), cecal intubation, polyp detection rate (PDR). For CRC-screening colonoscopies, ASA-classification, BBPS, cecal intubation, PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR). A total of 14,156 ERCPs, 150,962 colonoscopies and 37,199 colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies were included in our analysis. For ERCPs, registration of procedural intention, Schutz score, ASA classification, papillary status, cannulation and procedural success improved from 34.9%, 32.7%, 72.6%, 36.5%, 34.6%, 27.2% in 2016, to 86.4%, 84.6%, 97.4%, 86.4%, 82.1%, 84.0%, respectively, in 2020. For non-screening colonoscopies, registration of indication, ASA classification, BBPS, cecal intubation and PDR improved from 40.4%, 60.5%, 47.6%, 69.8% and 32.3% in 2016 to 90.3%, 88.9%, 59.8%, 79.1% and 39.1%, respectively, in 2020. For CRC-cancer screening colonoscopy registration equaled outcome, PDR and ADR changed from 74.7% to 63.6% in 2016 to 66.3% and 53.8% in 2020, respectively. The quality of endoscopy data registration has consistently improved over the years by using the Trans.IT database. This is most likely the result of feedback to performing endoscopists to review performance in real-time online and progressive awareness of quality of data registration.

Efficacy of colonoscopic re-examination across the entire colon: a randomized controlled trial.

In standard colonoscopic examinations, some polyps may be missed during the withdrawal phase. Re-examination of the right colon can improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the effectiveness of applying this re-examination strategy to the entire colon remains unknown. We investigated whether re-examination could increase the detection rate of polyps and adenomas throughout the colon. A randomized, controlled, single-center trial (NCT03268200) was conducted in a university hospital. Patients aged 45-75years were randomly assigned to either the study or control group. For patients in the control group, observation and polypectomy were performed once using the standard colonoscopy method. For patients in the study group, polypectomy was repeated twice during the withdrawal phase after the initial insertion of the colonoscope. These examinations were performed in the right transverse and left colons. The primary endpoints were the polyp detection rate (PDR) and ADR, defined as the proportion of patients with ≥ 1 polyp and ≥ 1 adenoma, respectively. Overall, 406 patients were enrolled (study group, n = 210; control group, n = 196) and analyzed. Generally, PDRs and ADRs were similar between the study (withdrawal 1 + 2) and control groups (withdrawal 1), except for the right colon. However, the second withdrawal review increased number of polyps and adenomas in the overall, right, mid, and left colon, respectively. The results of this trial indicated that re-examination of the entire colon during colonoscopy could be beneficial for detecting concealed polyps in patients at risk of interval cancer.

Retrospective study evaluating association of colorectal tumors and hepatitis C virus.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been associated with hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies. Limited studies have shown an association between colorectal adenomas and HCV populations. To study the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in patients with HCV compared to the general population and to evaluate if it is an independent risk factor for colorectal adenomas. Patients were divided into HCV and non-HCV based on their HCV RNA titers. Patients with alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B infection, and inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables using χ 2 with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The significant covariates (independent variables) were matched in both groups by propensity score matching, followed by multivariate regression analysis. Of the 415 patients screened, 109 HCV patients and 97 non-HCV patients with colonoscopy results were included in the study. HCV patients were older, had a smoking history, had less frequent aspirin use, and had a lower body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05). The HCV cohort had a significantly increased number of patients with adenomas (adenoma detection rate of 53.2% vs 34%. P = 0.006). We performed a propensity-matched multivariate analysis where HCV infection was significantly associated with colorectal adenoma (OR: 2.070, P = 0.019). Our study shows a significantly higher rate of adenomas in HCV patients compared to the general population. Prospective studies would help determine if the increase in adenoma detection lowers the risk for colorectal cancer.

Real-life experience of colonic polyps’ detection rate and adenoma detection rate with their characteristics in a cohort of Egyptian patients

BackgroundData on the prevalence of colonic polyps and adenomas in the Egyptian population are scarce. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of colonic polyps among Egyptian patients aged 50 years and older who underwent colonoscopy for a variety of reasons.Patients and methodsThis study is a retrospective one that was conducted with the use of an endoscopic reporting database of patients presenting at Cairo University Hospital. The considered variables were age, gender, clinical presentation, polyps’ characteristics, and diagnosis. Polyps were retrieved and sent for histopathological examination.ResultsAmong 4861 patients whose clinical presentation necessitated colonoscopic examination between 2012 and 2019, 850 consecutive patients aged 50 years and older were enrolled in this study. The median age was 65 ± 9 SD. The male gender was slightly predominant (50.8%). The polyp detection rate was 23.1%, while the adenoma detection rate was 14.7%, and they were mostly encountered on the left side of the colon. By regression analysis, the most important predictors of adenoma were age ≥ 65 years, diabetes, and the presence of a polyp in the right colon. Diabetics and older people (≥ 65 years) had two times increased risk for adenoma, while patients with polyps in the right side of the colon had 30 times increased risk of adenoma.ConclusionPDR and ADR among the Egyptian population are matched to the target ADR set by the ASGE. We recommend ADR and PDR as key quality indicators of colonoscopy quality.

Evaluation of the efficacy of polyethylene glycol in combination with different doses of linaclotide in a fractionated bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Background and aimThe ideal bowel cleansing program still needs to be explored. The aim was to compare the bowel cleansing effect and patient tolerance of low-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) combined with different doses of linaclotide in fractionated bowel preparation.MethodsThe subjects were randomly assigned to the 3LPEG group, 2LPEG + 2L group, or 2LPEG + L group. The primary outcome was to use the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) to evaluate the efficacy of bowel cleansing, and the secondary outcomes were the detection rate of adenomas and polyps, adverse reactions, tolerance, and defecation dynamics; subsets of patients with chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome were also analyzed.ResultsA total of 753 patients were randomly assigned. In ITT analysis, the success of preparation of the 2LPEG + 2L group was better than that of the 2LPEG + L group or the 3LPEG group (92.0% vs. 82.3% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.002). Compared with the 3LPEG group, the 2LPEG + L group showed similar but non-inferior results (82.3% vs. 82.1%, P > 0.05). The 2LPEG + 2L group was similar to the 2LPEG + L group in terms of adverse reaction, tolerance, willingness to reuse, and sleep quality, but both were superior to the 3LPEG group. In a subgroup analysis of chronic constipation, the 2LPEG + 2L group had the best cleansing effect on the right colon and mid colon, while in the subgroup analysis of irritable bowel syndrome, the tolerance was better in the 2LPEG + 2L group and the 2LPEG + L group than the 3LPEG group.Conclusions2LPEG + 2L is a feasible bowel preparation regimen.

Usefulness and safety of new ultrasmall-diameter colonoscope for cases with difficult insertion: a retrospective study

Colonoscopies are widely available, but there are cases where insertion can be difficult, even for experienced endoscopists. EC-760XP/L, a new ultrasmall-diameter long scope, may be useful in such cases. This single-center retrospective study included 39 cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult even when previously conducted by an experienced endoscopist. The primary outcome was the cecal intubation time using EC-760XP/L compared to the time used in a previous examination with a standard scope. The secondary outcomes were the cecum intubation rate, intestinal cleanliness level, adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, sedative use rate, occurrence of adverse events, and pain experience. A comparison of cecal intubation times between EC-760XP/L and the standard scope showed that insertion times were significantly lower with EC-760XP/L (9.5 min) compared to the standard scope (19 min) (p < 0.01). The standard scope achieved cecal intubation in 30 cases (76.9%), whereas EC-760XP/L reached the cecum in all cases (p < 0.01). Pain was observed in 3 cases (8.3%) with the EC-760XP/L, which was significantly lower than the 22 cases (56.4%) with the standard scope (p < 0.01). In conclusion, EC-760XP/L proved to be useful in cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult.

Application of linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective randomized controlled study.

Colonoscopy plays a crucial role in the early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for clear visualization of the colonic mucosa and lesion detection. However, inadequate bowel preparation is common in patients with constipation, and there is no standardized preparation protocol for these patients. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and tolerability of a pre-colonoscopy combination regimen of linaclotide and polyethylene glycol (PEG). In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, 322 participants were divided into two groups: a 3-L PEG+870-μg linaclotide group (administered as a single dose for 3days) and a 4-L PEG group. The primary endpoints were the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score and the rate of adequate and excellent bowel preparation. Secondary endpoints were the rates of detection of colonic adenomas and polyps, cecal intubation rates, colonoscopy time, adverse reactions, patient satisfaction, and physician satisfaction. The study included 319 patients. The 3-L PEG+linaclotide group showed significantly higher rates of adequate and excellent bowel preparation than the 4-L PEG group (89.4% vs 73.6% and 37.5% vs 25.3%, respectively; P<0.05). The mean BBPS score for the right colon in the 3-L PEG+linaclotide group was significantly higher than that in the 4-L PEG group. There were no significant between-group differences regarding the detection rates of colonic polyps and adenomas (44.4% vs 37.7% and 23.1% vs 20.1%, respectively; P>0.05). There were no significant between-group differences regarding cecal intubation rates, colonoscopy operation, and withdrawal times. However, patient tolerance and sleep quality were better in the 3-L PEG+linaclotide group. The combination of 3-L PEG and 870-μg linaclotide, because of its lower volume of intake, can be considered as an alternative bowel preparation regimen for constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy, especially for the elderly.

Optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

There is robust evidence to indicate a strong correlation between the bowel preparation status and adenoma detection rate (ADR), which directly impacts the incidence and mortality rate of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Therefore, improving bowel preparation has been of increasing interest. In Japan, commercially available bowel preparation agents include polyethylene glycol, oral sodium sulfate, sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate, magnesium citrate, and oral sodium phosphate; each has its own strengths and limitations. The timing of administration can also influence the efficacy of bowel preparation and patient tolerability. Furthermore, meta-analyses have suggested predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation. A detailed understanding of these factors could contribute to reducing the need for repeat colonoscopy within 1 year, as recommended for patients with inadequate bowel preparation. Recent advancements, such as oral sulfate tablets, present promising alternatives with higher patient satisfaction and ADRs than traditional methods. Achieving optimal bowel preparation requires enhanced instructions, individualized regimens, and a comprehensive understanding of patient backgrounds and the characteristics of various bowel preparation agents. This article provides a concise overview of the current status and advancements in bowel preparation for enhancing the quality and safety of colonoscopy.

Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) observation in the detection of colorectal lesions (deTXIon study).

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for detecting and resecting adenomas or early stage cancers to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer. In a recent observational study, texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) was reported to improve polyp detection during colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial involving six Japanese institutions aims to confirm the superiority of TXI over standard white-light imaging (WLI) in detecting colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. During the 1-year study period, 960 patients will be enrolled, with 480 patients in the TXI and WLI groups. The primary endpoint is the mean number of adenomas detected per procedure. The secondary endpoints include adenoma detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, flat polyp detection rate, depressed lesion detection rate, mean polyps detected per procedure, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, mean SSLs detected per procedure and adverse events.

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality indicator set at a minimum of 25% in unselected populations by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Nevertheless, a lack of pooled observational data resembling real-world practice limits support for this threshold. We aimed to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled rates for conventional adenoma detection, polyp detection (PDR), cecal intubation, bowel preparation, and complications in population-based studies. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until May 2023 for populational-based studies reporting overall ADR in unselected individuals. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. 31 studies were included, comprising 3 644 561 subjects. A high quality of procedures was noticeable, with a high cecal intubation rate and low complication rate. The overall pooled ADR, PDR, and rate of cancer detection were 26.5% (95%CI 23.3% to 29.7%), 38.3% (95%CI 32.5% to 44.1%), and 2.7% (95%CI 1.5% to 3.9%), respectively. ADR varied according to indication: screening 33.3% (95%CI 24.5% to 42.2%), surveillance 42.9% (95%CI 36.9% to 49.0%), and diagnostic 24.7% (95%CI 19.5% to 29.9%), with subgroup analysis revealing rates of 34.4% (95%CI 22.0% to 40.5%) for post-fecal occult blood test and 26.6% (95%CI 22.6% to 30.5%) for primary colonoscopy screening. Diminutive conventional adenomas yielded a pooled rate of 59.9% (95%CI 43.4% to 76.3%). The pooled rate for overall serrated lesion detection was 12.4% (95%CI 8.8% to 16.0%). Male sex and higher age were significantly associated with an ADR above the benchmark. This first meta-analysis relying on real-world observational studies supports the ESGE benchmark for ADR, while suggesting that different benchmarks might be used according to indication, sex, and age.

Effect of computer aided detection device on the adenoma detection rate and serrated detection rate among trainee fellows.

The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) with computer-aided detection (CADe) has the potential to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by up to 30% in expert settings and specialized centers. The impact of CADe on serrated polyp detection rates (SDR) and academic trainees ADR & SDR remains underexplored. We aim to investigate the effect of CADe on ADR and SDR at an academic center with various levels of providers' experience. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on asymptomatic patients between the ages of 45 and 75 who underwent screening colonoscopy. Colonoscopy reports were reviewed for 3 months prior to the introduction of GI Genius™ (Medtronic, USA) and 3 months after its implementation. The primary outcome was ADR and SDR with and without CADe. Totally 658 colonoscopies were eligible for analysis. CADe resulted in statistically significant improvement in SDR from 8.92% to 14.1% (P = 0.037). The (ADR + SDR) with CADe and without CADe was 58% and 55.1%, respectively (P = 0.46). Average colonoscopy (CSC) withdrawal time was 17.33 min (SD 10) with the device compared with 17.35 min (SD 9) without the device (P = 0.98). In this study, GI Genius™ was associated with a statistically significant increase in SDR alone, but not in ADR or (ADR + SDR), likely secondary to the more elusive nature of serrated polyps compared to adenomatous polyps. The use of CADe did not affect withdrawal time.

Effect of a novel artificial intelligence–based cecum recognition system on adenoma detection metrics in a screening colonoscopy setting

Cecal intubation in colonoscopy relies on self-reporting. We developed an artificial intelligence-based cecum recognition system (AI-CRS) for post-hoc verification of cecal intubation and explored its impact on adenoma metrics. Quality metrics, including cecal intubation rate (CIR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and other ADR-related metrics, were compared both before (2015-2018) and after (2019-2022) the implementation of the AI-CRS. Although the CIR did not change significantly after the implementation of the AI-CRS, the ADR and advanced ADR significantly increased. Although the ADR significantly increased in all segments, the most significant increase in advanced ADR was observed in the proximal colon. Implementation of the AI-CRS was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting adenoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.45) and advanced adenoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.41), respectively. Implementation of a post-hoc verification of cecal intubation using an AI-CRS significantly improved various adenoma metrics in screening colonoscopy.

1567P Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study

1567P Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study

Optimal visual gaze pattern of endoscopists for improving adenoma detection during colonoscopy (with video)

Background and aimsVisual gaze pattern (VGP) analysis quantifies endoscopists’ specific eye movements. VGP during colonoscopy may be associated with polyp detection. However, the optimal VGP to maximize detection performance remains unclear. This study evaluated the optimal endoscopic VGP that enabled the highest colorectal adenoma detection. MethodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted between July and December 2023. We developed an eye-tracking and feedback (ETF) system that instructed endoscopists to correct their gaze toward the periphery of an endoscope screen with an audible alert. Patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomly assigned to four groups: three intervention groups in which the endoscopist’s gaze was instructed to a different level of the peripheral screen area using the ETF system (the periphery of 4×4, 5×5, and 6×6 divisions of the screen) and a control group in which the endoscopist did not receive instructions. The primary outcome was the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC). ResultsIn total, 189 patients were enrolled. APC and adenoma detection rate were significantly higher in the 6×6 group than in the control group (1.82±2.41 vs. 0.59±1.17, P=0.002; 68.9% vs. 30.8%, P=0.002). The APC and the number of screen divisions were positively correlated (R=0.985, P=0.0152). The rate at which the endoscopist gazed at the periphery of the screen was positively correlated with the number of divisions (R=0.964, P=0.0363). ConclusionsColorectal adenoma detection was improved by correcting the endoscopist’s gaze to the periphery of the screen, especially by dividing the screen into 6×6 segments.