Detection Rate Of Neoplasia Research Articles

OP13 Higher neoplasia detection rate and lower number of targeted biopsies associated with virtual chromoendoscopy in IBD surveillance: a real-world, multicentre UK study

Abstract Background Dye chromoendoscopy (DCE) with targeted biopsies has traditionally been considered the gold standard for optimal detection of dysplasia in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surveillance. Randomised trials have challenged this with both virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) and high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE) appearing to have comparable yield. This multicentre UK study aims to test the hypothesis that neoplasia detection rate (NDR) in IBD surveillance as part of routine clinical care is not affected by the modality used. Methods IBD surveillance colonoscopy procedures for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and colonic Crohn’s disease (CD) performed in five UK centres between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. For procedures with polypectomy or missing data, median withdrawal times for each modality from non-polypectomy cases were imputed. Significant variables in a univariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model to adjust NDR in the three modalities. Results A total of 2,673 IBD surveillance colonoscopies in 2,050 patients were included: 1,275 (48%) WLE, 1,032 (38%) DCE, 366 (14%) VCE. Disease breakdown included 74% UC and 26% CD, and 25% of patients had concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis. The majority (67%) were performed by endoscopists with expertise in IBD surveillance. Median (IQR) withdrawal time in minutes without polypectomy was DCE: 17 (13, 22), VCE: 14 (12, 20), WLE: 11 (8, 14). Neoplasia was detected in 305 (11%) procedures. The NDR (95% CI) were VCE: 19% (15.3, 23.6), DCE: 12% (9.9, 13.9) and WLE: 9% (7.5, 10.7), p<0.001 (figure 1A). In a univariate analysis, 8 variables were significantly associated with NDR. A logistic regression model including these variables (figure 2) showed that VCE significantly increased dysplasia detection (p<0.001). Older age, previous dysplasia, and longer withdrawal time also significantly increased NDR (p<0.001), with active disease having the opposite effect (p=0.035). Adjustment for these variables did not change modality related NDR substantially (figure 1B). A higher number of targeted biopsies per procedure were taken with DCE 0.52 (SD 1.68) compared to VCE 0.33 (SD 1.59) or WLE 0.13 (SD0.78), p <0.001. However, this did not improve dysplasia yield within these biopsies: DCE 3.2%, VCE 5.7%, WLE 5.0%, (p=0.248). Conclusion In this study of IBD surveillance in routine clinical practice VCE has higher NDR than DCE and WLE. DCE was associated with more targeted biopsies without greater dysplasia detection.

P0395 Endoscopic Approaches for Colorectal Neoplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased risk of colorectal cancer than the general population, making colonoscopy surveillance for neoplastic lesions critically significant. Dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) has traditionally been considered the preferred image enhanced endoscopy for colonoscopy surveillance. However, clinical adherence to DCE is low, with white light endoscopy (WLE) frequently used for surveillance instead. With advancements in endoscopy, various virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) techniques have emerged as alternatives for colonoscopy surveillance. Therefore, this network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the superior endoscopy techniques for IBD patient surveillance. Methods Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 2,514 patients were included in the analysis, comparing different endoscopy techniques in IBD patient colonoscopy surveillance: DCE, high-definition WLE (HD-WLE), standard-definition WLE (SD-WLE), i-scan, NBI, flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and AFI. We assessed the per patient neoplasia detection rate (NDR), positive predictive value (PPV), and withdrawal time between different endoscopy techniques. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the NDR of DCE, VCE, and HD-WLE with either target or random biopsy protocols. Results Comparing NDRs revealed that only DCE (odds ratio [OR]: 2.56 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–5.59]) significantly increased the NDR compared with SD-WLE. The subsequent rankings were HD-WLE, NBI, FICE, i-scan, and AFI. Moreover, the PPVs of DCE, VCE, and HD-WLE showed no significant difference compared with that of SD-WLE. However, DCE required a significantly longer withdrawal time. Subgroup analysis showed that DCE with random biopsy (OR: 4.42 [95% CI: 2.26–8.65]) or target biopsy (OR: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.12–3.61]) and HD-WLE with target biopsy (OR: 3.33 [95% CI: 1.51–7.31]) had superior NDRs than SD-WLE with random biopsy. Conclusion DCE has a significant advantage over SD-WLE in NDRs, where random biopsy may offer substantial benefits. While, DCE has similar PPVs compared with other techniques, it requires more withdrawal time. If performing DCE for surveillance colonoscopy is challenging, using HD-WLE with target biopsy also shows a trend of benefit, while other VCE techniques do not offer significant advantages.

Surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: white light endoscopy with segmental re-inspection versus dye-based chromoendoscopy – a multi-arm randomised controlled trial (HELIOS)

BackgroundIt remains unclear if the increased colorectal neoplasia detection rate in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by high-definition (HD) dye-based chromoendoscopy compared with HD white-light endoscopy is due to enhanced contrast...

Colorectal Neoplasia Detection Rates in Lynch Syndrome.

The expected and optimal adenoma detection rate (ADR) is not well characterized in Lynch syndrome (LS). The aim of this study is to determine the ADR, the overall colorectal neoplasia detection rate (CNDR), proximal serrated detection rate (PSDR), and CRC detection rate (CRCDR) in an LS cohort. A retrospective study was performed of individuals with LS who were evaluated at a single tertiary care center from May 2001 to September 2023 (n = 542). Data from procedure and pathology reports were collected along with relevant demographic, clinical history, and family history data. Fisher's exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to assess factors associated with colorectal neoplasia. Amongst 542 individuals with LS, 352 met the inclusion criteria, and their 1296 colonoscopies/sigmoidoscopies were used for analysis. The cohort was primarily female (64.5%), white (87.5%), and privately insured (76.1%), with a near even distribution across genotypes. CNDR was 27.9%, ADR was 21.4%, PSDR was 7.7%, and CRCDR was 1.5%. Advanced age, Medicare insurance, prior colonic resection, and prior history of non-CRC were significantly associated with an increased CNDR and ADR (p < 0.05). PSDR remained constant with age. There was no association with genotype, biological sex, race, smoking, BMI, aspirin use, nor family history. Despite frequent colonoscopies/sigmoidoscopies, individuals with LS maintain a high rate of colorectal neoplasia, primarily driven by increased detection of adenomas with advancing age. Neoplasia rates may serve as helpful "ballpark rates" for endoscopists performing colonoscopies/sigmoidoscopies in LS. However, further studies need to determine whether neoplasia rates are predictive of CRC risk and outcomes in LS.

Dye-based chromoendoscopy versus i-scan virtual chromoendoscopy in long-standing ulcerative colitis: Multicenter prospective RCT.

Background and study aims Long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. Both dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) and virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) increase detection of neoplastic lesions. In this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), we compared the neoplasia detection rate between DCE and i-scan VCE in patients with long-standing UC. Patient and methods In four European hospitals, 131 patients with long-standing UC (disease duration > 8 years) were randomized to either DCE with methylene blue 0.1% (n = 66) or i-scan VCE (n = 65). All procedures were performed by trained endoscopists. Biopsies were taken from all visible lesions and the surrounding mucosa. Results The mean number of neoplastic lesions detected per colonoscopy was not significantly different between DCE (0.27) and i-scan VCE (0.37) ( P = 0.41). Similarly, there was no significant difference in neoplasia detection rate between DCE (19.7%) and VCE (27.7%) (odds ratio0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.50, P = 0.31). However, the per lesion neoplasia detection rate was significantly higher with i-scan VCE compared to DCE (27.6% vs 15.3%, P = 0.036). Both withdrawal and total procedure time were on average 10.0 and 9.9 minutes shorter using i-scan VCE (both P < 0.001). Conclusions This multicenter, prospective RCT showed no significant difference in neoplasia detection between DCE and i-scan VCE in long-standing UC. However, use of i-scan VCE was associated with a lower false-positive rate and a significantly shorter procedure time compared with DCE. I-scan VCE, therefore, could be a valid replacement for DCE in UC surveillance colonoscopies.

Dye-based chromoendoscopy detects more neoplasia than white light endoscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD.

Background and study aims Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of colorectal cancer. There is no agreement on the best technique for surveillance for colorectal neoplasia. We aimed to assess whether chromoendoscopy and/or high-definition endoscopy is associated with increased detection of neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing surveillance compared with when they were not used. Patients and methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study designed to analyze differences in the detection of neoplasia (adenomatous and serrated) among patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD who underwent annual surveillance between 2010 and 2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Results Ninety-one patients were identified, resulting in 359 colonoscopies with 360 person-years of follow up. Over the study period, 22 of 91 patients (24%) had at least one neoplastic lesion identified; however, the mean neoplastic lesion rate was 0.87 (54/63) for the primary sclerosing cholangitis-ulcerative colitis subgroup compared with 0.24 (4/17) for the primary sclerosing cholangitis-Crohn's disease subgroup. Chromoendoscopy was associated with a significantly higher detection rate for neoplasia (odds ratio [OR] 5.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-14.9, P =0.001), and this association remained after adjusting for confounders, including high-definition endoscopy. High-definition endoscopes had a higher rate of neoplasia detection, but the significance was lost after adjustment for confounders, including chromoendoscopy (OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.69-5.40, P =0.21). Conclusions Chromoendoscopy is associated with a higher detection rate for neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD even with high-definition colonoscopes.

Risk of colorectal cancer among fecal immunochemical test-positive individuals by timing of previous colonoscopy: A multicenter analysis.

The risk of colorectal cancer among fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals who had undergone previous colonoscopies remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the differences in the risk of colorectal cancer among fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals according to the timing of their previous colonoscopies. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in Japan as a subgroup analysis of the J-SCOUT study (UMIN000040690), which integrated and analyzed a database comprising all colonoscopies performed at participating Japanese institutions between 2010 and 2020. This study used colonoscopy data of fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals aged ≥20years from three facilities that entered the timing of previous colonoscopies into the endoscopy database. Histologically confirmed advanced neoplasia was the study's primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for each variable. In total, 11,143 fecal immunochemistry test-positive patients underwent colonoscopy during the study period. Of these, 10,160 patients were included in the analysis after excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. The overall advanced neoplasia detection rate was 9.38% (953/10,160; 95% confidence interval: 8.82-9.96%). Compared with the first colonoscopy, the odds ratios for advanced neoplasia in individuals who underwent colonoscopies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, >5, and ≥10years previously were 0.27, 0.15, 0.06, 0.10, 0.29, 0.31, and 0.31, respectively. The detection rates of advanced neoplasia were low among the fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals who had undergone colonoscopy, particularly in the past 5years.

Colorectal tumor comorbidity is common in patients with duodenal tumors: Exploratory cross-sectional study.

Background and study aims The duodenum and colorectum are target organs for familial colorectal adenomatous polyposis, however, the association of duodenal epithelial tumors (DETs) and colorectal tumors is still controversial. The aim of our study was to elucidate the association between DET and colorectal tumor. Patients and methods This was an exploratory cross-sectional study of patients with DETs treated by endoscopic resection at our hospital, between November 2018 and October 2022. Individuals who underwent colonoscopy as part of the health screening comprised the reference control group for comparison. In both groups, lesions suspected of being tumors were resected. The main outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Other outcomes were the detection rate for advanced neoplasia (AN) and risk factors for colorectal adenoma and AN, evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. Results Analyses were based on data from 163 individuals in the DET group and 177 in the control group. ADR was higher in the DET (63.2%) than in the control (23.6%) group ( P < 0.001). AN and invasive cancer rates were also significantly higher in the DET than in the control group (AN: 20.9% vs 3.4%, respectively, P < 0.001; invasive cancer: 3.1% vs 0%, respectively, P < 0.001). On logistic regression analysis, DET was found to be associated with a 5-fold increase in the detection rate of adenoma and 6-fold increase in AN detection. Conclusions The study revealed significant association between DET and high ADR and a higher frequency of AN and invasive cancer. Screening colonoscopy is suggested for patients with DETs.

Is annual screening by fecal immunochemical test necessary after a recent colonoscopy?

The population-based colorectal cancer screening guidelines in Japan recommend an annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT). However, there is no consensus on the need for annual FIT screening for patients who recently performed a total colonoscopy (TCS). Therefore, we evaluated the repeated TCS results for patients with positive FIT after a recent TCS to assess the necessity of an annual FIT. We reviewed patients with positive FIT in opportunistic screening from April 2017 to March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: those who had undergone TCS within the previous 5 years (previous TCS group) and those who had not (non-previous TCS group). We compared the detection rates of advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer between the two groups. Of 671 patients, 151 had received TCS within 5 years and 520 had not. The detection rates of advanced neoplasia in the previous TCS and non-previous TCS groups were 4.6% and 12.1%, respectively (p < 0.01), and the colorectal cancer detection rates were 0.7% and 1.5%, respectively (no significant difference). The adenoma detection rates were 33.8% in the previous TCS group and 40.0% in the non-previous TCS group (no significant difference). Only a few patients were diagnosed with advanced neoplasia among the patients with FIT positive after a recent TCS. For patients with adenomatous lesions on previous TCS, repeated TCS should be performed according to the surveillance program without an annual FIT. The need for an annual FIT for patients without adenomatous lesions on previous TCS should be prospectively assessed in the future.

OP15 High-definition white light endoscopy with segmental re-inspection is non-inferior compared to dye-based chromoendoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the randomized controlled HELIOS trial

Abstract Background Patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergo endoscopic surveillance to detect and remove colorectal neoplasia (CRN). Although high-definition dye-based chromo-endoscopy (HD-CE) is the recommended modality in guidelines, high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) with matched procedural time may yield similar neoplasia detection rates. We designed a non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in four academic hospitals aiming to compare three endoscopic surveillance techniques in IBD patients for the outcome of CRN detection rate. Methods Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years and scheduled for colitis-associated CRN surveillance according to Dutch IBD surveillance guidelines. Patients were excluded in case of insufficient bowel cleansing, active colitis, or if &amp;gt;50% of the colon was resected. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to undergo HD-WLE with segmental re-inspection (SR), HD-CE, or single pass HD-WLE. The primary outcome was CRN detection rate, defined as the proportion of procedures in which macroscopic CRN was detected. Secondary outcomes included the number of CRN and withdrawal time. To demonstrate non-inferiority of HD-WLE with SR compared to HD-CE (one-sided testing, α=0.05, 1−β=0.8, non-inferiority (NI) margin -10%), and superiority compared to single-pass HD-WLE (two-sided testing, estimated CRN detection rate of 24% and 12%, respectively1) with Mantel-Haenszel analyses, a total of 566 patients were needed. Results In total, 666 patients were randomized, 563 fulfilled all study criteria and were analysed per protocol (table 1). Of these, 51.8% were male, with a median age of 51 years (interquartile range 35-63). CRN detection rates were 9.8% for HD-WLE with SR, 13.1% for HD-CE, and 6.1% for single pass HD-WLE. HD-WLE with SR was non-inferior compared to HD-CE (Δ-3.1%, lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.1 not exceeding the NI margin of -10%, p&amp;lt;.05). HD-WLE with SR was not superior compared to single-pass HD-WLE (Δ3.7%, 95% CI -2.5:9.1%, p=0.31). A significant difference was found between arms for the number of detected CRN (n=29 vs n=36 vs n=8 for HD-WLE with SR, HD-CE and single-pass HD-WLE, respectively (p=.04)) and withdrawal time (p=.03, table 1). One advanced lesion was detected (high-grade dysplasia in the HD-CE arm). Conclusion In this large, randomized controlled trial, HD-WLE with SR was non-inferior compared to HD-CE for CRN detection in IBD patients. HD-WLE with SR was not superior to single-pass HD-WLE, although this may have resulted from lower than expected neoplasia yields and subsequent lower power. These results suggest that HD-WLE with SR may provide a feasible alternative to HD-CE in clinical practice (NCT04291976). 1Imperatore et al. JCC 2019;13(6):714-24

The diagnostic yield of colonoscopic surveillance following resection of early age onset colorectal cancer.

The primary benefit of post-colorectal cancer (CRC) colonoscopic surveillance is to detect and remove premalignant lesions to prevent metachronous CRC. Current guidelines for long-term colonoscopic surveillance post early age onset CRC (EOCRC) resection are based on limited evidence. The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic yield of colonoscopic surveillance post-EOCRC resection and identify molecular and clinicopathological risk factors associated with advanced neoplasia. A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data was conducted at St Mark's hospital, London, United Kingdom, for patients diagnosed with EOCRC who underwent at least one episode of post-CRC colonoscopic surveillance between 1978 and 2022. We collected clinicopathological data including tumour molecular status and neoplasia detection rates. In total, 908 colonoscopic surveillance procedures were performed in 195 patients over 2581.3 person-years of follow-up. The diagnostic yields of metachronous CRC, advanced adenomas and non-advanced adenomas were 1.76%, 3.41% and 22.69% respectively. Sixteen patients (8.21%) developed metachronous CRC, and the majority (87.5%) were detected more than 3years post index EOCRC diagnosis. Detection of advanced neoplasia was significantly higher in EOCRC patients with Lynch syndrome (26.15%) compared with those in whom Lynch syndrome was excluded (13.13%) (OR, 2.343; 95% CI, 1.014-5.256; p=0.0349). During colonoscopic surveillance post-EOCRC resection, the long-term risk of developing metachronous advanced neoplasia remains high in the context of Lynch syndrome, but this trend is not as clearly evident when Lynch syndrome has been excluded.

Colorectal cancer screening based on fecal immunochemical test and risk assessment: a population-based study including two million participants in China

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet the practical performance of FIT combined with questionnaire-based risk assessment (QRA) remains undetermined. Moreover, risk factors for distinct CRC precursors identified in screening have been rarely compared. This study was based on a population-based CRC screening in China, with 2,120,340 participants completing both FIT and QRA. Those with positive FIT or high QRA scores were recommended for colonoscopy. We reported the compliance, detection rate, and colonoscopy workload according to FIT and QRA results. We also explored risk factors for conventional adenomas and serrated polyps. The compliance rate of colonoscopy in the subgroup of FIT (+) and QRA (+) was 41.4%, higher than the rates in FIT (+) and QRA (-), as well as FIT (-) and QRA (+), which were 38.7% (P<0.001) and 16.4% (P<0.001), respectively. The corresponding detection rates of advanced neoplasia were 18.2%, 13.2%, and 9.3% (all P <0.001), respectively. Moreover, the required numbers of colonoscopies to detect one advanced neoplasia in the three subgroups were 5.5, 7.6, and 10.8, respectively. Increased body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat intake, and type 2 diabetes were associated with higher risk of advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps, whereas vegetable intake was inversely associated advanced adenomas. FIT and QRA can synergistically identify individuals at high risk of colorectal advanced neoplasia, with those testing positive for both deserving immediate attention. Modifiable factors were identified to complement screening for preventing CRC precursors.

Optimal withdrawal time in initial surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery: comparison between anterior/low anterior resection and right hemicolectomy.

This study aimed to investigate the optimal withdrawal time (WT) for initial surveillance colonoscopy after curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) by comparing anterior/low anterior resection (AR/LAR) and right hemicolectomy (RHC) groups. This retrospective study analyzed 1,212 patients who underwent initial surveillance colonoscopy after CRC resection between 2015 and 2022. The patients were divided into the AR/LAR (n = 846) and RHC (n = 366) groups. The optimal WT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and validated using logistic regression models. The adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates (ADR/ANDR) were evaluated based on the optimal WT. The optimal WT was 7 and 6 minutes in the AR/LAR and RHC groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, WT ≥7 and ≥6 minutes in the AR/LAR (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-3.24; P < 0.001) and RHC (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.59-4.39; P = 0.001) groups, respectively, were significant factors for adenoma detection. In the AR/LAR group, ADR was 41.5% for WT ≥7 minutes compared to 21.9% for WT <7 minutes (P < 0.001). In the RHC group, ADR for WT ≥6 minutes was 33.9% compared to 15.8% for WT <6 minutes (P < 0.001). The ANDR also significantly improved with longer WTs in both groups. This study suggests that a minimum WT of 7 and 6 minutes for AR/LAR and RHC patients, respectively, during the initial surveillance colonoscopy after CRC resection is optimal for maintaining a satisfactory ADR and ANDR. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring colonoscopic procedures according to the type of surgical resection.

Age- and sex-stratified detection rates and associated factors of colorectal neoplasia in the Tianjin colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2020

PurposeColorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been implemented in Tianjin, China since 2012. The objective was to estimate the neoplasia detection rate in a high-risk population by age and sex and to investigate the potential factors associated with colorectal neoplasia.Patients and methodsThis study is based on data of the Tianjin CRC screening program from 2012 to 2020. Residents with a positive high-risk factors questionnaire (HRFQ) or a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) were identified as high-risk participants and were subsequently recommended for a free colonoscopy.ResultsA total of 4,117,897 eligible participants aged 40–74 years completed both a HRFQ and FIT, and 217,164 (5.3%) of them were identified as high-risk participants. Positive rates of preliminary screening increased with age and were higher in females than in males. For 57,971 participants undertaking colonoscopy, the detection rates of nonadvanced adenoma, advanced adenoma and CRC were 37.8%, 5.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Detection rates of advanced neoplasia increased from the age of 50 and were higher in males. For nonadvanced neoplasia, a strong increase was observed in males from the age of 40 and in females from the age of 50. Male sex had a greater impact on individuals aged 40–49 than on older individuals. Several factors including current smoking, drinking, and higher body mass index (BMI) were significantly associated with the presence of neoplasia, whereas, these associations were mainly restricted to individuals aged above 50 but not those aged 40–49 years.ConclusionsThese findings support that age-specific risk stratification and sex-specific initiating ages for CRC screening should be recommended to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of current screening strategy.

Screening uptake of colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in first-degree relatives of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial (ParCoFit study).

Colonoscopy screening is underused by first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer (CRC) with screening completion rates below 50%. Studies conducted in FDR referred for screening suggest that fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) was not inferior to colonoscopy in terms of diagnostic yield and tumor staging, but screening uptake of FIT has not yet been tested in this population. In this study, we investigated whether the uptake of FIT screening is superior to the uptake of colonoscopy screening in the familial-risk population, with an equivalent effect on CRC detection. This open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial was conducted in 12 Spanish centers between February 2016 and December 2021. Eligible individuals included asymptomatic FDR of index cases <60 years, siblings or ≥2 FDR with CRC. The primary outcome was to compare screening uptake between colonoscopy and FIT. The secondary outcome was to determine the efficacy of each strategy to detect advanced colorectal neoplasia (adenoma or serrated polyps ≥10 mm, polyps with tubulovillous architecture, high-grade dysplasia, and/or CRC). Screening-naïve FDR were randomized (1:1) to one-time colonoscopy versus annual FIT during 3 consecutive years followed by a work-up colonoscopy in the case of a positive test. Randomization was performed before signing the informed consent using computer-generated allocation algorithm based on stratified block randomization. Multivariable regression analysis was performed by intention-to-screen. On December 31, 2019, when 81% of the estimated sample size was reached, the trial was terminated prematurely after an interim analysis for futility. Study outcomes were further analyzed through 2-year follow-up. The main limitation of this study was the impossibility of collecting information on eligible individuals who declined to participate. A total of 1,790 FDR of 460 index cases were evaluated for inclusion, of whom 870 were assigned to undergo one-time colonoscopy (n = 431) or FIT (n = 439). Of them, 383 (44.0%) attended the appointment and signed the informed consent: 147/431 (34.1%) FDR received colonoscopy-based screening and 158/439 (35.9%) underwent FIT-based screening (odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.82, 1.44], p = 0.564). The detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia was significantly higher in the colonoscopy group than in the FIT group (OR 3.64, 95% CI [1.55, 8.53], p = 0.003). Study outcomes did not change throughout follow-up. In this study, compared to colonoscopy, FIT screening did not improve screening uptake by individuals at high risk of CRC, resulting in less detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Further studies are needed to assess how screening uptake could be improved in this high-risk group, including by inclusion in population-based screening programs. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02567045).

Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy, detection rates or the association of endoscopy or endoscopist-related factors with UGI cancer or dysplasia detection were included. AMSTAR2 and JBI checklists were used to assess systematic review and primary study quality. Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and findings are summarized narratively. Results Eight systematic reviews and nine primary studies were included. Image enhancement, especially narrow band imaging, had high diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia and early gastric cancer (pooled sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89) and specificity 0.97 (0.97-0.98)). Higher detection rates with longer endoscopy examination times were reported in three studies, but no difference was observed in one study. Endoscopist biopsy rate was associated with increased gastric cancer detection (odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-2.9). Early esophageal cancer (0.17% vs 0.14%, P =0.04) and gastric cancer (0.16% vs 0.12%, P =0.02) detection rates were higher with propofol sedation compared to no sedation. Endoscopies performed by trained endoscopists on dedicated Barrett's surveillance lists had higher detection rates (8% vs 3%, P <0.001). The neoplasia detection rate during diagnostic endoscopies for Barrett's esophagus was 7% (95% CI 4%-10%). Conclusions Image enhancement use, longer examination times, biopsy rate and propofol sedation are potential quality indicators for UGI endoscopy. Neoplasia detection rate and dedicated endoscopy lists are additional potential quality indicators for Barrett's esophagus.

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias : A Randomized Trial.

The role of computer-aided detection in identifying advanced colorectal neoplasia is unknown. To evaluate the contribution of computer-aided detection to colonoscopic detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias as well as adenomas, serrated polyps, and nonpolypoid and right-sided lesions. Multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04673136). Spanish colorectal cancer screening program. 3213 persons with a positive fecal immunochemical test. Enrollees were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with or without computer-aided detection. Advanced colorectal neoplasia was defined as advanced adenoma and/or advanced serrated polyp. The 2 comparison groups showed no significant difference in advanced colorectal neoplasia detection rate (34.8% with intervention vs. 34.6% for controls; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]) or the mean number of advanced colorectal neoplasias detected per colonoscopy (0.54 [SD, 0.95] with intervention vs. 0.52 [SD, 0.95] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.04 [99.9% CI, 0.88 to 1.22]). Adenoma detection rate also did not differ (64.2% with intervention vs. 62.0% for controls; aRR, 1.06 [99.9% CI, 0.91 to 1.23]). Computer-aided detection increased the mean number of nonpolypoid lesions (0.56 [SD, 1.25] vs. 0.47 [SD, 1.18] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.19 [99.9% CI, 1.01 to 1.41]), proximal adenomas (0.94 [SD, 1.62] vs. 0.81 [SD, 1.52] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.17 [99.9% CI, 1.03 to 1.33]), and lesions of 5 mm or smaller (polyps in general and adenomas and serrated lesions in particular) detected per colonoscopy. The high adenoma detection rate in the control group may limit the generalizability of the findings to endoscopists with low detection rates. Computer-aided detection did not improve colonoscopic identification of advanced colorectal neoplasias. Medtronic.

Quality indicators in Barrett's endoscopy: Best is yet to come.

There is growing interest in establishing quality indicators (QIs) for endoscopic screening and surveillance in Barrett's esophagus (BE). QIs are objective, measurable, and evidence-based metrics that are applicable in a health-care setting to monitor a process and identify key performance indicators (KPIs) to achieve defined goals. In the Barrett's endoscopy setting, QIs can offer a standardized approach to monitor and maintain high-quality endoscopy for BE screening and surveillance that will allow measuring performance of an endoscopist as an individual, a group, or a facility. Since BE is an endoscopically identifiable premalignant condition with histological corroboration, adherence to QIs is paramount for the early and accurate detection of dysplasia and neoplasia. It is the holy grail for BE screening and surveillance. Although several suggested QIs for Barrett's endoscopy exist, issues remain in determining the most appropriate ones. These issues include inconsistent use of terminology, unclear definitions, and a scarcity of studies linking these QIs with relevant patient outcomes, making it difficult for clinicians to understand the concept and clinical importance. Hence, there is an urgent need to determine what should constitute appropriate QIs for Barrett's endoscopy, clearly define items used in the QIs, and identify ways to measure these KPIs. Ultimately, well-defined and validated QIs will contribute to clinically effective, safe, timely, and patient-focused care. In this review, we summarize recent literature and discuss four proposed QIs: (i) neoplasia detection rate; (ii) postendoscopy Barrett's neoplasia; (iii) Barrett's inspection time; and (iv) adherence to the Seattle biopsy protocol.

Neoplasia Diagnosis After Multi-target Stool DNA Is Enhanced Among Lowest Baseline Detectors.

Variation in colorectal neoplasia detection limits the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. By evaluating neoplasia detection rates of individual colonoscopists, we aimed to quantify the effects of pre-procedural knowledge of a positive (+) multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) on colonoscopy quality metrics. We retrospectively identified physicians who performed a high volume of + mt-sDNA colonoscopies; colorectal neoplasia at post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy was recorded. These colonoscopists were stratified into quartiles based on baseline adenoma detection rates. Baseline colonoscopy adenoma detection rates and sessile serrated lesion detection rates were compared to post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy neoplasia diagnosis rates among each quartile. Withdrawal times were measured from negative exams. During the study period (2014-17) the highest quartile of physicians by volume of post-mt-sDNA colonoscopies were evaluated. Among thirty-five gastroenterologists, their median screening colonoscopy adenoma detection rate was 32% (IQR, 28-39%) and serrated lesion detection rate was 13% (8-15%). After + mt-sDNA, adenoma diagnosis increased to 47% (36-56%) and serrated lesion diagnosis increased to 31% (17-42%) (both p < 0.0001). Median withdrawal time increased from 10 (7-13) to 12 (10-17) minutes (p < 0.0001) and was proportionate across quartiles. After + mt-sDNA, lower baseline detectors had disproportionately higher rates of adenoma diagnosis in female versus male patients (p = 0.048) and higher serrated neoplasia diagnosis rates among all patients (p = 0.0092). Knowledge of + mt-sDNA enriches neoplasia diagnosis compared to average risk screening exams. Adenomatous and serrated lesion diagnosis was magnified among those with lower adenoma detection rates. Awareness of the mt-sDNA result may increase physician attention during colonoscopy. Pre-procedure knowledge of a positive mt-sDNA test improves neoplasia diagnosis rates among colonoscopists with lower baseline adenoma detection rates, independent of withdrawal time.

Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Population-based esophageal cancer (EC) screening trials and programs have been conducted in China for decades; however, screening strategies have been adopted in different regions and screening profiles are unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to profile EC screening in China by positivity rate, compliance rate, and endoscopy findings, aiming to provide explicit evidence and recommendations for EC screening programs. English (PubMed, Embase) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang) language databases were systematically searched for population-based EC screening studies in the Chinese population until December 31, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed by standard methodology using a random-effects model. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated for three groups: high-risk areas with a universal endoscopy strategy, rural China with a risk-stratified endoscopic screening (RSES) strategy, and urban China with an RSES strategy. Positive cases included lesions of severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, intramucosal carcinoma, submucosal carcinoma, and invasive carcinoma. The pooled positivity rate of the high-risk population was higher in rural China (44.12%) than in urban China (23.11%). The compliance rate of endoscopic examinations was the highest in rural China (52.40%), followed by high-risk areas (50.11%), and was the lowest in urban China (23.67%). The pooled detection rate of positive cases decreased from 1.03% (95% CI 0.82%-1.30%) in high-risk areas to 0.48% (95% CI 0.25%-0.93%) in rural China and 0.12% (95% CI 0.07%-0.21%) in urban China. The pooled detection rate of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) was also in the same order, being the highest in high-risk areas (3.99%, 95% CI 2.78%-5.69%), followed by rural China (2.55%, 95% CI 1.03%-6.19%) and urban China (0.34%, 95% CI 0.14%-0.81%). Higher detection rates of positive cases and LGIN were observed among males than among females and at older ages. The pooled early detection rate was 81.90% (95% CI 75.58%-86.88%), which was similar to the rates in high-risk areas (82.09%), in rural China (80.76%), and in urban China (80.08%). Under the current screening framework, a higher screening benefit was observed in high-risk areas than in other regions. To promote EC screening and reduce the current inequality of screening in China, more focus should be given to optimizing strategies of high-risk individual assessment and surveillance management to improve compliance with endoscopic examination. PROSPERO CRD42022375720; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=375720.