Detection Of Mediastinal Metastases Research Articles

The Value of a Systematic Protocol Using Endobronchial Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound in Staging of Lung Cancer for Patients with Imaging iN0–N1 Disease

Introduction: We hypothesize that systematic, combined, and multidisciplinary study of the mediastinum (endobronchial ultrasound [EBUS] and endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]) in patients with NSCLC with radiologically normal mediastinum improves the results of mediastinal staging obtained with EBUS alone. Material and Methods: A retrospective study of the prospective database collected on the patients with NSCLC with a radiologically normal mediastinum and an indication for systematic staging with EBUS and EUS. EBUS staging was followed by EUS in patients in which the results from the pathological analysis of EBUS were negative. Results: Forty-five patients were included in the analysis. The combination of EBUS followed by EUS provided better results than EBUS alone: sensitivity (S) 95% versus 80%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96.15% versus 86.21%, negative likelihood ratio 0.05 versus 0.20, and post-test probability 3.8% versus 13.8%. This represents an increase in S (15%), the validity index (6.6%), and NPV (9.9%) compared to EBUS alone. There were 4 false negatives (FNs) (8.8%) with the EBUS test alone. After adding EUS, 3 more cases were positive (6.6%) and only 1 FN (2.2%). Conclusions: In patients with NSCLC and a radiographically normal mediastinum, a systematic and combined staging with EBUS and EUS show higher sensitivity in the detection of mediastinal metastasis than with the use of EBUS alone. The high accuracy of the test means that the use of mediastinoscopy is not necessary to confirm the results in these patients. Since the availability of EUS is low, it may be advisable for the interventional pulmonologist to receive training in EUS-b.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancies.

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy is common in extrathoracic malignancies and should not always be considered a metastatic lesion. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with extrathoracic malignancies. This study included 54 consecutive patients with extrathoracic malignancies who had suspected mediastinal metastases and had undergone EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis. Using EBUS-TBNA, 27 of 54 patients (50%) were diagnosed with mediastinal metastases. Among patients with mediastinal metastases, 2 (3.7%) had a sarcoid-like reaction, 5 (9.3%) had tuberculosis, and 17 (31.5%) had reactive lymph nodes. In 3 cases (5.5%), a specific diagnosis could not be determined following EBUS-TBNA. Two patients underwent surgical staging of their mediastinal lymphadenopathy, which allowed the detection of mediastinal metastases in 1 patient and that of reactive lymph nodes in the other. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of extrathoracic malignancies were calculated as 93%, 100%, 92.6%, and 96.3%, respectively. EBUS-TBNA is a safe and effective procedure. We should consider whether EBUS-TBNA should be the primary diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancies.

The role of tumor SUVmax/lymph node SUVmax ratio viewed on PET-CT in the detection of mediastinal metastasis in patients with lung cancer

The role of tumor SUVmax/lymph node SUVmax ratio viewed on PET-CT in the detection of mediastinal metastasis in patients with lung cancer

Efficacy of Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound (CP-EBUS) Assisted Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Mediastinal Staging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cases with Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a sampling method for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that have enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes that are detected with computed tomography (CT). We aimed to investigate the value of EBUS-TBNA in sampling enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes in the patient with NSCLC. From January 2007 to May 2009, patients were diagnosed NSCLC with CT scans showing enlarged lymph nodes (node >1 cm) or a positron emission tomography (PET/CT) finding of the mediastinum underwent EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TBNA was successfully performed in all 52 patients (mean age, 52 years; 45 men) from 93 mediastinal lymph nodes. EBUS detected lymph node metastasis in 40 patients (77%). 12 patients (23%) with negative lymph node samples were underwent mediastinoscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the detection of mediastinal metastasis were 95 %, 100%, 100%, 83%, and 96%, respectively. EBUS-TBNA was uneventful, and there were no complications. EBUS-TBNA is an effective, safe and minimally invasive procedure following PET/CT or CT scanning in the mediastinal staging of potentially operable NSCLC.

Transbronchial and Transesophageal Fine-Needle Aspiration Using an Ultrasound Bronchoscope in Mediastinal Staging of Potentially Operable Lung Cancer

We performed this study to evaluate the role of transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) following endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the mediastinal staging of lung cancer. In this prospective study, we applied transbronchial and transesophageal ultrasonography using an ultrasound bronchoscope on patients with confirmed or strongly suspected potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. Following EBUS-TBNA, EUS-B-FNA was used for mediastinal nodes that were inaccessible or difficult to access by EBUS-TBNA. The accessibility by EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA to mediastinal nodal stations having at least one node ≥ 5 mm was also checked. In 150 patients, we performed EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA on 299 and 64 mediastinal nodal stations, respectively. Among 143 evaluable patients, EBUS-TBNA diagnosed mediastinal metastasis in 38 patients. EUS-B-FNA identified mediastinal metastasis in three additional patients. Surgery diagnosed mediastinal metastasis in four more patients. The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the detection of mediastinal metastasis were 84.4%, 93.3%, and 95.1%, respectively. These values for the combined approach of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA increased to 91.1%, 96.1%, and 97.2%, respectively, although the differences were not statistically significant (P = .332, P = .379, and P = .360, respectively). Among 473 mediastinal nodal stations having at least one node ≥ 5 mm that were evaluated, the proportion of accessible mediastinal nodal stations by EBUS-TBNA was 78.6%, and the proportion increased to 84.8% by combining EUS-B-FNA with EBUS-TBNA (P = .015). Following EBUS-TBNA in the mediastinal staging of potentially operable lung cancer, the accessibility to mediastinal nodal stations increased by adding EUS-B-FNA and an additional diagnostic gain might be obtained by EUS-B-FNA. clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00741247.

Application of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Following Integrated PET/CT in Mediastinal Staging of Potentially Operable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) following integrated PET/CT scanning in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been assessed. We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic values of PET/CT scanning and EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging in 117 patients with potentially operable NSCLC with accessible mediastinal lymph nodes (diameter range, 5 to 20 mm) by EBUS-TBNA. Subgroup analysis according to histologic type was performed. Of 30 cases of mediastinal metastasis, 27 were confirmed by EBUS-TBNA and 3 were confirmed by surgery. EBUS-TBNA results confirmed all cases with true-positive PET/CT scan findings and six of nine cases with false-negative PET/CT scan findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the detection of mediastinal metastasis were 90.0%, 100%, 100%, 96.7%, and 97.4%, respectively. For PET/CT scans, the values were 70.0%, 59.8%, 37.5%, 85.2%, and 62.4%, respectively (p = 0.052; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.011; p < 0.001, respectively). In adenocarcinoma (n = 55), EBUS-TBNA detected four of six cases with false-negative PET/CT scan findings, and the NPV was higher for EBUS-TBNA than for PET/CT scans (94.6% vs 77.8%, respectively; p = 0.044). In squamous cell carcinoma (n = 53), the NPV of EBUS-TBNA and PET/CT scans were similarly high (97.9% vs 96.3%, respectively; p = 0.689). EBUS-TBNA was an effective invasive method following PET/CT scanning in the mediastinal staging of potentially operable NSCLC. In mediastinal PET/CT scan-positive cases, EBUS-TBNA was an excellent tool for detecting mediastinal metastasis. Even in mediastinal PET/CT scan-negative cases, EBUS-TBNA can be useful for confirming mediastinal metastases, especially in adenocarcinoma.

Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography.

To determine the usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (PET-FDG) in assessing mediastinal disease in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare its yield to that of computed tomography (CT), we performed a prospective consecutive sample investigation in a university hospital and its related clinics. In 30 patients with NSCLC with clinical stage I (T1-2, NO, MO) disease, we compared the results of chest CT and PET-FDG with the findings at surgical exploration of the mediastinum. Seven (77%) of nine patients with surgically proven mediastinal metastasis were identified by the PET-FDG results, with four false-positives in 21 patients with negative lymph node dissections (p = 0.004). Using the results of pathologic examination of mediastinal lymph nodes as the criterion standard, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for PET-FDG imaging of mediastinal metastases were 78%, 81%, 80%, 64%, and 89%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for chest CT in the detection of mediastinal metastasis were 56%, 86%, 77%, 63%, and 87%, respectively. CT and PET-FDG results agreed in 21 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined imaging modalities was 90%. We concluded that mediastinal uptake of FDG correlates with the extent of mediastinal involvement of NSCLC and may contribute to preoperative staging. PET-FDG imaging complements chest CT in the noninvasive evaluation of NSCLC, and strategies for its use merit further investigation.

Mediastinal nodes in bronchogenic carcinoma: comparison between CT and mediastinoscopy.

Computed tomography (CT) and mediastinoscopy were compared in 151 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. In all patients in whom findings at mediastinoscopy were negative, all accessible nodes were either removed or sampled at thoracotomy. Several size criteria for identifying nodes as enlarged on CT scans were compared. The long axis greater than or equal to 15 mm and short axis greater than 10 mm had very low sensitivity (61%), and the long axis greater than 5 mm had a low specificity (23%). CT (long axis greater than 10 mm) allowed sensitivity equal to that of mediastinoscopy (79%) in the detection of mediastinal metastases, but the specificity with CT was lower (65% vs. 100%). In seven of 44 patients with nodes greater than 10 mm on CT scans and with positive findings at mediastinoscopy, tumor was present not in the enlarged nodes but rather in normal-sized nodes in a different nodal station. The sensitivity of CT for actual nodal stations involved with tumor was only 66%. Eighty-three percent of patients with false-negative findings at mediastinoscopy but only 33% of patients with false-negative findings at CT had surgically resectable stage IIIa disease.

Role of computed tomography and mediastinoscopy in preoperative staging of lung carcinoma

One hundred fifty-three patients with bronchogenic carcinoma were evaluated prospectively by CT and mediastinoscopy. Nodes larger than 5 mm were considered potentially metastatic. All results were correlated with surgical findings. Computed tomography is more sensitive (89%) in the detection of mediastinal metastases than mediastinoscopy (67%). Computed tomography has a poor predictive value (47%); however, a negative examination is highly accurate (89%). Within a group of 100 node sites, 72% of the nodes involved by tumor were larger than 1 cm in diameter. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma have the highest percentages of sensitivity by CT. The very low incidence of metastatic involvement in nodes under 5 mm allows one to forego mediastinoscopy in the presence of a negative CT.