ABSTRACT Extractivism has contributed to update Reason of State doctrines in Latin America since the mid-2000, translating cold-war categories – like that of the ‘internal enemy’ – into new ones better adapted to ‘reconciliation’ meta discourses. While the securitisation of extractive conflicts in Colombia builds on a well-established counterinsurgency expertise, emerging claims and mobilisations – around environmental issues, Indigenous rights and territorial autonomy – have also forced significant adaptations. This opened opportunities for extractive norm entrepreneurs to disseminate Canadian innovations for the management of the social environment surrounding extractive projects. These innovations can be summarised in two parts: 1. The subordination of law to practices of engagement and communication between companies and local communities through so-called Corporate Social Responsibility mechanisms; and 2. The projection of a moral imperative of transparency on communities and social actors. Beyond the strictly operational level, these normative innovations also articulate a specific kind of politico-legal doctrine aimed at mitigating the destabilising effects of emergent rights claims and neutralising the emancipatory potential of law. In this paper, we provide historical antecedents for the development of these innovations in Canada, analyse how norm entrepreneurs disseminate this doctrine between Canada and Colombia, and look at its implications for democratic uses of law.
Read full abstract