TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Book Reviews 177 reform. The expertise that went into the engineering aspects of irrigation would be applied to economic, agricultural, and social planning. Yet his two California colonies at Durham and Delhi were less than successful. Kluger notes the economic reasons for failure but tells us as well that Mead’s vision was probably doomed from the outset. How, after all, could one create a hearty independent farmer by regimented, dictatorial means? This focus on social conditions, however, stayed with Mead beyond Durham and Delhi. Kluger describes Mead’s final attempt at a model community, the town of Boulder City, Nevada, built by the Bureau of Reclamation for the workers constructing Boulder Dam, now known as Hoover Dam. Elwood Mead had a love for farming, order, and efficiency, but he looked beyond the technical aspects of dam and canal building for irrigated agriculture. To him, “the reclaiming of desert lands was more than an engineering problem; it encompassed all aspects of putting the land to use and settling it with family farmers” (p. 150). Federal reclamation, in its early years, was less than successful, because while federal engineers saw the relationship between building the dams and settling the land with family farmers, they could not construct it; it did not lend itself to formulaic solutions. And yet something drove men like Mead to continue the experiment, to hold to the vision of a West populated with family farms. Kluger has given us one man’s story in that quixotic adventure to make the desert bloom as a rose. It is well written, and, while Kluger clearly is a fan of Mead, he has attempted to give us a balanced portrait. Karen L. Smith Dr. Smith, manager of Customer Accounts—Power at the Salt River Project, Phoenix, Arizona, and adjunct professor of history at Arizona State University, is the author of The Magnificent Experiment: Building the Salt River Reclamation Project, 1890-1917 (University of Arizona Press, 1986). Seeds of Change: A Quincentennial Commemoration. Edited by Herman J. Viola and Carolyn Margolis. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Insti tution Press, 1991. Pp. 278; illustrations, bibliography, index. $39.95 (cloth); $24.95 (paper). “Seeds of Change” is the name of a Smithsonian Institution exhibition prompted by the quincentenary of Christopher Colum bus’s arrival in the Caribbean in 1492. The curators selected five central “seeds,” or agents of change—maize, diseases, potatoes, horses, and sugar. Columbus did not discover an unknown world, but the consequences of his four voyages created a new world. The exhibition examines the exchange of peoples, animals, plants, and microorganisms that is still occurring. This collection offifteen essays is the trade book for 178 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE the exhibition. Although the essays lack the cohesion of an exhibition catalog, the book is profuse with color illustrations and suggested readings. The paperback edition is a steal and will remain a valuable resource long after the Columbian quincentenary is old hat. These kudos notwithstanding, this volume would have benefited from a better-defined focus. Were the editors rushed to get the work through press by the time of the exhibit opening? If so, it is a pity, for the result lacks the full impact of the diverse scholarship represented. The phrase “seeds of change” is appealing, but this volume deals with sweeping global changes rather than with the intriguing seeds of the title. Just what were those persistent agents, or seeds of change? The five mentioned above, those selected for exhibition purposes, cannot carry the full weight of the story these essays tell, and, given the level of scholarship, there are some surprising omissions. Although at least three of the essays discuss Africans and persons of African descent, the Taino are barely mentioned. Surely the first Caribbean people to see the Spaniards merit more space. On that fateful October day of 1492 it was the Taino who began the relationship of trade and exchange basic to the theme of “seeds of change.” The last five essays stand out because they voice concerns about the present as it relates to the past, and they contain tough seeds of change. Placing these essays first would have given a better...