Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery Research Articles

Intraocular Lens Exchange 1 Week After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To report a case of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange performed 1 week after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Describe the clinical findings and outcome of IOL exchange in an 80-year-old man with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and retained Artisan (Ophtec BV, Groningen, the Netherlands) iris-fixated IOL after uneventful DSAEK. The patient presented on the third postoperative day after DSAEK with disenclavation of the nasal iris claw and inferior dislocation of the IOL. The dislocated IOL was removed and exchanged with an angle-supported open-loop anterior chamber lens 7 days after the initial DSAEK procedure. Despite the relatively traumatic intraocular manipulation, the donor tissue was unaffected in its position and clarity. This case demonstrates that successful DSAEK surgery is compatible with additional surgical procedures, even if they are performed in the early postoperative period.

Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Using Corneal Donor Tissue Not Acceptable for Use in Penetrating Keratoplasty as a Result of Anterior Stromal Scars, Pterygia, and Previous Corneal Refractive Surgical Procedures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using anterior stromal flawed (ASF) donor corneas that were unsuitable for use in full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty as a result of stromal scars, pterygia, or previous corneal refractive surgery and to compare results with DSAEK using standard tissue. We conducted a review of our initial 42 (19 with 6-month follow up) consecutive DSAEK surgeries using ASF tissue compared with 357 (199 with 6-month follow up) time-matched controls using standard tissue. Intraoperative and perioperative complications, including dislocations and primary graft failures, were compared. Six-month best spectacle-corrected vision, incidence of rejection episodes, postoperative refractive astigmatism, keratometric values, pre- and postoperative topography-derived surface asymmetry index, and surface regularity index were compared. One surgeon-cut ASF tissue was perforated before surgery and was discarded. No surgeon-cut standard tissue was perforated. No intraoperative complications and no episodes of primary graft failure or pupillary block glaucoma occurred in either group. One (2.4%) postoperative graft dislocation and one (5.2%) graft rejection episode occurred in the study group. There were 10 (2.8%) dislocations and 8 (2.2%) graft rejection in the controls. A statistically similar significant improvement in best spectacle-corrected vision occurred in both groups. Corneal topography, pachymetry, and manifest astigmatism were not significantly different between groups. Postoperative results of DSAEK using donor tissue excluded from use in penetrating keratoplasty as a result of stromal flaws are equivalent to results using standard donor tissue. Central corneal thickness measurements should be performed before cutting to avoid tissue perforation. The use of ASF tissue for DSAEK will expand the cornea donor pool.

Donor-Related Candida Keratitis After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To report 2 cases of donor-to-host transmission of Candida albicans interface keratitis after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). We performed clinical and microbiologic examinations on 2 patients who underwent DSAEK for pseudophakic corneal edema. Two patients underwent uneventful DSAEK surgery using corneal tissue from the same donor. The donor corneoscleral rims were cultured at the time of surgery and both rims subsequently grew C. albicans and Candida glabrata. Approximately 5 weeks after surgery, infiltrates were noted in the DSAEK interface in both of these patients. Despite treatment with antifungal therapy, the Candida keratitis was unable to be controlled medically and required surgical intervention in each case, after which there was no recurrence of infection. Candida interface keratitis can occur after DSAEK. These 2 cases emphasize the importance of donor corneoscleral rim cultures, especially with the increase in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasty, which can make such interface infections more difficult to diagnose and treat. Patients with fungal positive donor corneal rim cultures should be prophylactically treated with antifungal therapy.

Retrospective Contralateral Study Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty With Penetrating Keratoplasty

To compare the visual outcomes and complications rate after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), in the fellow eye of the same subjects, and to evaluate the patient's perspective on these operations. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in the Cornea Clinic at the Toronto Western Hospital. We reviewed the records of 12 patients (24 eyes) who underwent PKP in one eye and DSAEK surgery in their fellow eye. Patient's satisfaction for both procedures was evaluated using a subjective questionnaire. These techniques were compared for intraoperative and postoperative complications and visual and refractive outcomes including contrast acuity, contrast threshold, and high-order ocular aberrations (HOA). All the patients in this study preferred the DSAEK operation. They reported faster recovery time [1.5 week in the DSAEK vs 5.3 weeks in the PKP operation (P = 0.01)], significantly less pain, and better visual outcomes with the DSAEK operation. Uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity were significantly better in the DSAEK operated eyes. The DSAEK surgery was associated with significantly less astigmatism (P = 0.0003) and ametropia. Contrast acuity was significantly better in the eye that underwent DSAEK procedure (P < 0.05), whereas contrast threshold was better in the PKP eye. The PKP operated eyes demonstrated increased level of HOA. Patients preferred the DSAEK operation compared with PKP. Better uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, and contrast acuity together with avoidance of surgery-induced astigmatism and HOA are the main benefits of the DSAEK technique.

Air Bubble-Associated Endothelial Trauma in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To evaluate endothelial cell trauma by anterior chamber (AC) air bubbles in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Laboratory investigation. Twelve human donor corneas (6 pairs) were sectioned using an automated microkeratome system (Moria ALTK System, Antony, France). One cornea of each pair was mounted on a Moria artificial AC, and an air bubble was injected to fill 40% of the AC. The apparatus was rotated 180 degrees for a total of 50 times to simulate air bubble trauma. The fellow corneas were used as controls. Each endothelial graft was stained with 0.25% Trypan blue for 90 seconds followed by 0.2% alizarin red for 2 minutes, and digital photomicrographs were obtained. Abnormally staining areas indicative of graft injury were removed digitally from the total graft area. The proportion of uninjured corneal endothelium was calculated, and differences were analyzed. In this ex vivo model of air bubble trauma, the proportion of viable graft endothelium after air bubble injury was 79.8 +/- 0.04% (n = 6). The proportion of viable endothelium in the control group was 89.9 +/- 0.02% (n = 6). The statistically significant mean difference of 10.1% (P = .03) is indicative of greater endothelial injury after air bubble trauma. Using this model, a moderate but significant amount of endothelial cell damage was associated with air bubble trauma compared with the control group. Air bubble trauma may account partially for the loss of endothelial cell density after DSAEK surgery and may impact graft survival.

Retention of Host Embryonic Descemet Membrane in Endothelial Keratoplasty

To describe a case of retained host embryonic Descemet membrane (DM) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Review of clinical findings in a case of DSAEK with retention of host embryonic DM. A geographic and patchy haze in the interface involving the visual axis was noted postoperatively as soon as 1 week after DSAEK surgery. This was noted on clinical exam and thought to be retained embryonic DM. Review of pathology on the explanted DM confirmed delamination of DM with absence of the anterior embryonic layer and only patchy areas of full-thickness DM. The haze was followed over time and did not regress over the first 6 months after surgery. It did not seem to affect vision significantly, and the patient achieved best spectacle-corrected vision of 20/30 by 6 months. Endothelial keratoplasty is a relatively new technique for posterior corneal transplantation. Variations in operative technique continue to be described. Delamination of DM during stripping can occur; however, retention of host embryonic DM in DSAEK surgery seems to be compatible with good vision.

The Use of Postoperative Slit-Lamp Optical Coherence Tomography to Predict Primary Failure in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To determine if central donor lenticle thickness as measured by slit-lamp optical coherence tomography (SL OCT; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) is predictive of primary donor failure in patients undergoing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Retrospective cross-sectional study. Eighty-four patients who underwent DSAEK surgery by 2 surgeons (D.C.R. and J.A.S.) were enrolled. At each postoperative visit (postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 2), an SL OCT scan was obtained. Statistical differences in SL OCT measurements of successful and failed DSAEK procedures were measured using the Student t test. A successful DSAEK surgery was defined as having an anatomically attached, clear recipient corneal stroma and donor lenticle compatible with good vision 2 months after surgery. A failed DSAEK surgery was defined as an attached donor lenticle with SL evidence of corneal edema and thickening visible at 2 months or more. Ninety-three eyes of 84 consecutive patients who underwent DSAEK surgery also underwent postoperative SL OCT. After 2 months of follow-up, 82 (88%) procedures were successful and 11 (12%) procedures were failures. The average donor lenticle thickness in successful DSAEK eyes was 314 +/- 128 microm on postoperative day 1 as compared with failed DSAEK eyes, which averaged 532 +/- 259 microm (P = .0013). This was independent regardless of whether the lenticle was attached on the first postoperative visit. Seventy-nine (98%) successful DSAEK eyes had a lenticle thickness of < or = 350 microm at the 1-week visit. All of the failed DSAEK eyes (11 eyes) had a lenticle thickness > or = 350 microm at the 1-week postoperative visit. Statistically significant differences in SL OCT thickness measurements were seen between successful and failed DSAEK cases at all examinations after postoperative week 1. Corneal thickness measurements made with SL OCT are an important predictor of DSAEK failure in both attached and detached lenticles within the first week of surgery. DSAEK lenticle thickness of 350 microm or less at 1 week had a predictability of success of more than 98%.

Cytomegalovirus Endotheliitis in Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

To report 4 cases of undiagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) endotheliitis in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Retrospective interventional case series. Four eyes of 4 patients diagnosed with active CMV endotheliitis after DSAEK. Retrospective review of the medical records of 4 patients with DSAEK who had an aqueous tap that was positive for CMV DNA but negative for herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus. Clinical features and management. Four immunocompetent Chinese male patients with a mean age of 67 years underwent DSAEK for posterior polymorphous dystrophy (1), Fuchs' heterochromic cyclitis (1), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (1), and herpetic keratouveitis (1). Clinical findings seen in all patients were localized corneal edema, increased intraocular pressure, pigmented keratic precipitates (KPs), and no/minimal anterior chamber (AC) activity. An unexplained sudden decrease in endothelial cell count (ECC) in the absence of rejection or significant inflammation was seen in 3 patients, whereas 1 patient also developed concomitant retinitis. CMV DNA was positive in all aqueous specimens and from the vitreous of the patient with retinitis. All patients were treated with oral valganciclovir with resolution of inflammation; 2 patients had recurrences; 1 patient developed recurrent retinitis; and 1 patient developed recurrent CMV endotheliitis and is currently receiving maintenance therapy with oral valganciclovir. CMV endotheliitis with corneal edema masqueraded as a variety of other endothelial conditions, which resulted in DSAEK surgery being performed in these patients who may have responded to antiviral treatment without the need for endothelial transplantation. A heightened awareness is required to exclude CMV endotheliitis as the cause for endothelial decompensation or unexplained, sudden reduction in ECCs post-DSAEK in the absence of other complications, and it should be differentiated from allograft rejection in view of the critical difference in treatment.

Refractive Change After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery and Its Correlation With Graft Thickness and Diameter

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the refractive change after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery and its correlation with graft thickness and diameter. We retrospectively analyzed the refractive outcomes of 45 cases of DSAEK surgery that were performed at Duke University Eye Center between August 2005 and December 2006. We divided our study groups into DSAEK triple cases and pseudophakic DSAEK cases. We measured manifest refraction preoperatively and postoperatively in each group and compared the difference between the preoperative and the postoperative spherical equivalent. We evaluated the correlation of the refractive change with graft thickness and diameter. Forty-five DSAEK cases in 44 patients (27 women and 17 men) were evaluated and analyzed. Mean age of the patients at surgery was 67.6 years (15-81 years, SD 10.7 years). Forty cases were treated for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and 5 for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy/bullous keratopathy. Seventeen cases were DSAEK triple cases and 28 pseudophakic DSAEK cases. In the DSAEK triple group, the mean change in refraction at an average of 4 months postoperatively was +1.15 D (range -0.02 to 2.87, SD 1.15). In the pseudophakic DSAEK group, the mean change in refraction at an average of 5 months postoperatively was +0.71 D (range -1.75 to 3.0, SD 1.11). The overall refractive change was +0.88 D (range -1.75 to 3.0, SD 1.02). Correlation of refractive change with graft diameter was modest (r = 0.29, P = 0.05), and a small correlation was found with respect to graft thickness (r = -0.16, P = 0.31). Our study of DSAEK grafts demonstrated a hyperopic refractive shift after DSAEK surgery. This observation should be taken into consideration when deciding on the appropriate intraocular lens power in DSAEK triple surgery and may also aid in anticipating refractive outcomes after pseudophakic DSAEK surgery. Further studies to follow these refractive changes over a longer follow-up period and to investigate the mechanism of this refractive change after DSAEK surgery are warranted.

Epithelial downgrowth after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

A 66-year-old man presented with decreased vision and corneal edema after 2 failed Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft procedures in the left eye. An uneventful third DSAEK procedure combined with anterior vitrectomy through the previous limbal wound was performed. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Histopathology of the excised failed graft revealed conjunctival epithelium on the posterior surface of the tissue. At 1 year, the endothelial cell count was 1997 cells/mm(2) and the uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20(-2). At 18 months, the graft remained clear with no signs of epithelial downgrowth. Clinicians should be aware that epithelial downgrowth can occur following DSAEK surgery. Fortunately, excision of the prior DSAEK graft with removal of the active epithelial membrane appears to have been a successful treatment in this patient.

Precut Tissue for Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Vision, Astigmatism, and Endothelial Survival

To report 6 and 12 month results using precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and correlate donor characteristics with clinical outcomes. Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. We reviewed 100 donor corneas precut for 100 eyes of 90 DSAEK patients. Our first 100 consecutive cases of DSAEK with precut tissue were entered into a prospective protocol. Donor characteristics and the visual, refractive, topographic, and specular microscopy results at 6 and 12 months were analyzed. Correlation analysis comparing donor characteristics with clinical outcomes was performed. Six- and 12-month postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive astigmatism, topographic keratometry (K), and specular endothelial cell densities (ECD) were measured prospectively and then compared with preoperative values. Donor characteristics analyzed included death to preservation time, death to surgery time, precutting resection to surgery time, and graft thickness. Six months after DSAEK surgery, BSCVA improved from 20/83 to 20/38. (P<0.01). In eyes with no known comorbidity (n = 60), 92% had a vision of >/=20/40 at 6 months and 20% obtained > or =20/20. Astigmatism changed an average of 0.09 diopters (D) and K changed by +0.09 D, both of which were not significant and were stable to 12 months. The postoperative mean ECD (n = 65) was 1918 cells/mm(2) at 6 months, and represented a 31% cell loss from preoperatively (P<0.001). The mean ECD (n = 61) was 1990 cells/mm(2) at 12 months, and represented a 29% cell loss from preoperatively (P<0.001) with no significant change from 6 to 12 months (P = 0.172). Improvement of visual acuity from preoperative to postoperative in eyes without comorbidity was not correlated with any donor characteristic. Greater endothelial cell loss correlated with higher preoperative ECD levels (P<0.001) and with a trend toward longer precut resection to surgery times at both 6 months (P = 0.049) and 12 months (P = 0.051). Precut tissue by Eye Banks for use in DSAEK surgery provides an improvement in vision with no significant change in astigmatism. Donor endothelial cell loss from 6 to 12 months is stable and is comparable with reports involving tissue that is cut intraoperatively. Proprietary or commercial disclosures may be found after the references.

Endothelial Keratoplasty: The Influence of Preoperative Donor Endothelial Cell Densities on Dislocation, Primary Graft Failure, and 1-Year Cell Counts

The purpose of this study was to determine if an association exists between preoperative donor central endothelial cell density (ECD) and the complications of donor dislocation, iatrogenic primary graft failure (IPGF), and endothelial survival at 1 year after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) surgery. A prospective, nonrandomized, interventional case study was conducted evaluating 629 consecutive EK procedures. The preoperative donor ECD was recorded for each case. The mean preoperative ECD of the group of EK cases with postoperative donor dislocation was compared with the mean ECD of the group of EK cases that did not suffer donor dislocation. The subset of eyes that underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) was also evaluated for dislocation, IPGF, and ECD at 1 year. There were 31 eyes that suffered a dislocation in the overall group of 629 eyes (4.9% dislocation rate). The mean preoperative ECD of the donor tissue in this dislocation group was 2769 cells per square millimeter (range = 2147-3454 cells/mm). The mean preoperative ECD of the donor tissue in the group that did not dislocate (n = 598) was 2818 cells per square millimeter (range = 2110-4209 cells/mm). There was no significant difference in preoperative ECD between these groups (P = 0.428). There was a subset of 350 cases of DSAEK, of which 9 cases dislocated (2.6% dislocation rate). The mean preoperative ECD of the donor tissue in this dislocation group was 2604 cells per square millimeter (range = 2323-3175 cells/mm), with 5 of the 9 dislocation donors with a preoperative ECD above 2500 cells per square millimeter. The mean preoperative ECD of the donor tissue in the group that did not dislocate (n = 341) was 2825 cells per square millimeter (range = 2110-4209 cells/mm). There was no significant difference in preoperative ECD between these groups (P = 0.069). There was no significant correlation between preoperative ECD and the ECD at 1 year after DSAEK (n = 90; Pearson correlation = 0.184; P = 0.082). There were no IPGFs in the entire series of 350 consecutive DSAEK cases, and therefore, no statistical analysis is possible for IPGF. Preoperative donor ECD was not associated with donor dislocation for any form of EK surgery. Tissue with donor cell counts below 2500 cells per square millimeter can attach, and tissue with donor cell counts above 2500 cells per square millimeter can detach. Higher preoperative donor ECD was not correlated with higher ECD at 1 year postoperatively. Surgeons' requests for donor tissue with an ECD above 2500 cells per square millimeter for DSAEK surgery for the purpose of avoiding dislocations, IPGF, or improving 1-year ECD are not supported by this data.

Posterior lamellar keratoplasty—comparison of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the same patients: a patient’s perspective

Aim:To evaluate patients’ perspectives on endothelial keratoplasty and to compare the outcomes of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), performed in the same patients.Methods:A...

Confocal microscopy after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK): morphological findings in short term follow up

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the clinical findings, visual outcomes, and confocal microscopic corneal features after DSAEK in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Methods A 70‐year‐woman patient with pseudophakia and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent small‐incision DSAEK surgery. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 1.30 (20/400) logMAR (Snellen) before treatment. Confocal scanning microscope (ConfoScan 4, Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy) was performed before surgery procedure, after 7 days, at 1 and 6 months after DSAEK. Images of corneal structures, including endothelium, donor and recipient stroma were obtained. Endothelium density was evaluated using manual count and 40x probe. Results BSCVA improved at 0.3 (20/40) log MAR (Snellen) at 6 months. No astigmatism change was recorded at the end of follow‐up. Endothelial cell density was about 850 cells/mm2 after 6 months surgery procedure. Interface and donor stroma reflectivity were highest at 7 days showing progressive decrease over time. Conclusion The DSAEK procedure represents a promising alternative to conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for patients with Fuchs’ dystrophy. Confocal microscopy is able to detect precise evaluation of corneal features, interface morphologic characteristics and reflectivity to improve therapeutic choice and to understand the pathophysiology of visual recovery.

Donor dislocation after DSAEK for a failed corneal graft

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is gradually becoming a preferred technique of corneal transplantation in cases with endothelial dysfunction due to its advantages of early visual rehabilitation, absence of...

Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To report 6-month results in a large, prospective study of Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). A 5-mm scleral-limbal tunnel approach was created for placement of an automated microkeratome-prepared 8.0-mm endothelial graft after DSAEK in 150 consecutive cases between September 2005 and October 2006. Six-month follow-up data were available on 100 eyes. Intraoperative peripheral scraping was performed to promote adherence of the donor. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity with and without spectacle correction (BSCVA and UCVA), refractive astigmatism, average topographic keratometry, surface asymmetry index, surface regularity index, and pachymetry were measured prospectively. After DSAEK surgery, average BSCVA improved from 20/86 to 20/38, and average UCVA improved from 20/155 to 20/73, which were both statistically significant (P < 0.05). Excluding 26 eyes with known retinal pathology: 97% of the 74 eyes had a vision of 20/40 or better at 6 months and 14% obtained 20/20 or better. Refractive astigmatism changed an average 0.06 D, and average topographic keratometry changed an average -0.13 D, which were not statistically significant. Surface regularity index and surface asymmetry index improved to normal levels of 0.67 and 1.03, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). Pachymetry decreased significantly from 0.70 to 0.66 mm (P = .001). This large prospective study of DSAEK shows that this surgery provides a significant improvement in vision, corneal thickness, and surface regularity. It does not change refractive astigmatism or average topographic keratometry significantly. This newer technique of endothelial keratoplasty yields many of the benefits of its predecessors, deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and posterior lamellar keratoplasty, while improving the visual results.

Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Techniques to Penetrating Keratoplasty

To describe the visual outcomes and intraoperative and postoperative complications after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and to compare the results with those of previously reported series. Prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. One hundred seventy-seven eyes of 161 consecutive patients who had corneal edema resulting from Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, aphakic bullous keratopathy, failed graft or iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. All patients underwent either PK, DLEK, DSEK, or DSAEK at the Cornea Service of the Toronto Western Hospital. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, corneal endothelial counts, and postoperative complications. The average 12-month postoperative BSCVA was 20/53 in the PK group, 20/80 in the DLEK group, 20/56 in the DSEK group, and 20/44 in the DSAEK group. The mean spherical equivalent was similar between groups, but tended toward hyperopia in the DSEK and DSAEK groups. The average refractive astigmatism was 3.78+/-1.91 diopters (D) in the PK group and 1.61+/-1.26 D, 1.86+/-1.1 D, and 1.36+/-0.92 D in the DLEK, DSEK, and DSAEK groups, respectively (P<0.0001). Early postoperative donor disc dislocations occurred in 6 (8.8%) patients in the DLEK group, 2 (12.5%) in the DSEK group, and 7 (15.6%) in the DSAEK group (P = 0.0004). Detached grafts were reattached and repositioned by injecting an air bubble to press the donor against the recipient cornea. Primary graft failure occurred in 1 (2.1%) of the PK cases, 2 (2.9%) of the DLEK cases, and 1 (2.2%) of the DSAEK cases; all underwent the same procedure successfully. Average cell loss at 1 year after surgery was 40.11% and was similar in the 4 groups. The DSAEK surgery enabled rapid and better UCVA and BSCVA when compared with PK, DLEK, and DSEK, with significantly lower astigmatism. Endothelial cell loss was similar, but the dislocation rate was significantly higher in the DSAEK group.

HIV Incidence Among Men Diagnosed With Early Syphilis in Atlanta, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, 2004 to 2005

To assess surgeon satisfaction with precut corneal tissue from 1 eye bank for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Surgical techniques and predictors of procedural success were also examined. A 19-question survey was completed by 53 surgeons around the United States for 197 DSAEK cases using prepared corneal allograft tissue from the Iowa Lions Eye Bank. Surgeries were performed between April 1 and December 31, 2006; surveys were completed retrospectively within a few weeks of surgery. Tissue was found to be acceptable in 98% of DSAEK cases reported. Difficulties with precut tissue (eg, lack of anterior cap adherence to the posterior lamella, not visible or decentered central dot, anterior edge undermining) were reported in approximately 10% of cases. A rebubbling procedure was performed in 23% of cases for donor dislocations. The donor lenticule adhered, with resulting corneal deturgescence, in 86% of cases. Surgeons declared a successful procedure in 92% of cases. Of the 14 unsuccessful cases, donor tissue quality was the underlying etiology in only 1 case. Procedural success rates were related to surgeon experience (P = 0.002), lenticule adherence after only 1 anterior chamber air bubble (P = 0.005), no small perforations to release fluid (P = 0.005), and the presence of corneal deturgescence (P = 0.002). The use of precut tissue for DSAEK is not associated with increased risk of complications related to tissue preparation. With standardization of precutting donor tissue, safety of DSAEK surgery may be improved while increasing surgeon efficiency.

Precut Tissue in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Donor Characteristics and Early Postoperative Complications

To describe donor characteristics of eye bank-prepared precut tissue used in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and report any increase in immediate postoperative complications associated with its use. Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. One hundred donor corneas deemed appropriate for transplant and 100 eyes undergoing DSAEK for endothelial dysfunction. Precut donor tissue was evaluated in a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases of DSAEK surgery. Donor characteristics and the immediate postoperative complications of donor tissue dislocation and graft failure with the use of precut tissue were recorded and analyzed. Preoperative donor characteristics (age, time from death to preservation, time from death to implantation, time from cut to implantation, residual stromal bed thickness, pre- and postcut endothelial density), rate of dislocation, and rate of primary graft failure. Average donor age was 57.6+/-10.8 years, average time from death to preservation was 9.8+/-3.2 hours, average time from death to implantation was 94.5+/-33.5 hours, and average time from cut to implantation was 26.0+/-17.4 hours. The average residual stromal bed thickness was 169+/-36 microns. The average endothelial cell density (ECD) after cutting was 2709+/-292 cells/mm(2) (n = 100). In the subgroup of donors in whom pre-resection and postresection endothelial cell densities were available (n = 80), the average ECD before cutting was 2743+/-253 cells/mm(2) and the average ECD after cutting was 2644+/-257 cells/mm(2). This average cell loss of 3.7% was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was only 1 dislocation in this entire series of 100 eyes. There were no primary graft failures. The use of precut tissue in DSAEK had a low rate of early postoperative complications such as graft dislocation (1%) and primary graft failure (0%). A wide range of donor characteristics such as donor age, death to transplantation time, precutting to transplantation time, and donor lenticule thickness resulted in excellent adhesion of the tissue and clear grafts.

Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To evaluate the speed of visual recovery in 16 consecutive patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction who received Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). This is a retrospective study of a novel method for small-incision endothelial transplantation (DSAEK). Endothelial replacement was accomplished with Descemet stripping of the recipient and insertion of a posterior donor tissue that had been prepared with a microkeratome. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) by manifest refraction, endothelial counts, and dislocation rates were measured up to 12 months after DSAEK. Sixteen consecutive patients underwent uncomplicated DSAEK. Three patients had known optic nerve or macular disease precluding vision better than 20/200. Of the remaining 14 patients, 11 had BSCVA of 20/40 by postoperative week 12 (7 by week 6). The remaining 2 were 20/50 by weeks 6 and 12. All 14 patients were 20/40 or better at 1 year. One patient had a primary graft failure, and surgery was repeated with 20/40 BSCVA at 1 year. The dislocation rate was 25%. The average cell count between 7 and 10 months was 1714. The average pachymetry was 682. DSAEK surgery allows rapid, excellent BSCVA visual recovery. The rate of visual recovery is more rapid than usually found with penetrating keratoplasty.