Sir: Surgeons who treat patients with cleft lip deformities face a wide array of challenges, both in the initial repair of the distorted anatomy and in the frequent “touch-up” procedures to improve secondary deformities. Common local techniques include V-Y vermilion advancement, Z-plasties, elliptical excision, Abbé flaps, and Kapetansky flaps.1,2 When local tissues are inadequate for volumetric correction, a wide range of grafting material is frequently used with variable results.3,4 Eight patients underwent cleft lip revision performed by a single surgeon using our dermal fat grafting technique at our facility between 1997 and 2001. The defect was outlined with a surgical marker, and the vertical incision placed on the posterior (oral) aspect of the marking. A subcutaneous pocket was dissected while staying within the markings of the defect, and the dermal graft was harvested. The size and shape of the graft were slightly larger than those of the outlined lip defect, to allow for trimming and slight overcorrection of the defect, since 10 to 15 percent resorption is expected (Fig. 1). The skin to be used was de-epithelialized in situ and excised full thickness with a thin layer of fat on the undersurface of the dermis. The graft was placed on the lip externally and trimmed to fit the defect optimally (Fig. 2). The graft was then drawn inside the pocket using two U stitches of 5-0 chromic gut suture, with the dermis side inward and the mucosal incision closed.Fig. 1.: Defect outlined on lip.Fig. 2.: Dermal fat graft overlying defect, trimmed to fit defect optimally with slight overcorrection.The charts were reviewed along with the standardized preoperative and postoperative photographs. Of the eight patients who underwent cleft lip revision, five had unilateral cleft deformities and three had bilateral deformities. All but one of the patients had a concomitant cleft palate. The average follow-up was 22 months. The average age at the time of operation was 12 years. Two of the patients, both with unilateral deformities, were noted to have a “slight excess fullness” on the grafted side but did not require a repeated operation. The initial patient in the series developed a palpable nodule of fat necrosis that required removal in addition to excision of excess vermilion. No other patients required repeated procedures for their cleft lip deformities (Table 1).Table 1: Patient DataThe method we have described has yielded consistent and durable results. The technical aspect of harvesting and placing the graft is straightforward and has a shallow learning curve. Our method differs from that reported in another recently published article5 and features a precisely dissected pocket to define the deficit to be augmented. We prefer to place our grafts with the dermis side down, believing the outwardly placed fat has a softer feel and graft take is better with the dermis adjacent to the labial muscle layer. Grafting can be combined with other procedures, such as V-Y advancement. In addition, the majority of these patients do not require the creation of any other scars, due to the harvest of tissue in the iliac region from bone-graft-harvest donor sites. In the event of incomplete correction, the procedure can be easily repeated for further focused augmentation. Craig Staebel, M.D. Charles N. Verheyden, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Surgery Division of Plastic Surgery Scott & White Memorial Hospital and Clinic The Scott, Sherwood, and Brindley Foundation The Texas A & M Health Science Center College of Medicine Temple, Texas DISCLOSURES There were no sources of funding supporting the work, and there is no financial interest to declare on behalf of either author.
Read full abstract