The aim of this investigation was to develop a quantitative gas—liquid chromatographic method of analysis for the components of nucleic acids ( i.e., purine and pyrimidine bases, nucleosides, or nucleotides), and to apply this method to the analysis of biological material. The N-methyl derivatives of the purine and pyramidine bases, prepared by thermal dissociation of their tetramethylammonium salts were found to be unsuited for quantitative analysis due to the formation of multiple chromatographic peaks for cytosine, adenine, and guanine. The trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives of the bases were found to be far superior to the N-methyl compounds. Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide(BSA) was evaluated and found to be good reagent for silylation of the bases. The optimum derivatization conditions were heating the bases in a closed tube at 150° for 45 min, with a 100 molar excess of BSA to total bases, and a 3:1 v/v acetonitrile/BSA ratio. Calibration curves for the five main bases (U, T, C, A, and G) were prepared and found to be linear over a sample weight range 25–2000 μg of base. The relative standard deviations ranged from 1.1% for uracil 3.1% for cytosine. The minimum detectable amount (MDA) using the hydrogen flame ionization detector, was determined to be 3 or 5 × 10 −9 g i or ca. 3 × 10 −11 moles of each base injected. Comparative studies were made of BSA as a silylation reagent with bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA), and reagent solutions of 0.1 v/v% TMCS in BSA, and 1.0 v/v% TMCS in BSA. There were no significant differences in regard to analytical derivatization yield with any of this reagents. Important advantages of BSTFA include “cleaner” chromatograms with fewer extraneous peaks and complete miscibility of BSTFA in the solvent. A column of 8 w/w% SE-30 on 100–120 mesh Supelcoport provided good resolution and stability for the TMS bases and was superior to all chromatographic columns investigated. Application of the developed method to the analysis of biological materials was accomplished using perchloric acid hydrolysis and anion-exchange removal of the bases from biological background prior to derivatization and GLC analysis. The combined hydrolysis and purification procedures were shown to give a recovery of the bases of ca. 82 % with the recovery of the four bases being equivalent (± 1.5 %). Base ratio analysis of purified yeast RNA showed that the method was precise giving an average relative standard deviation of 3.0 %. Experiments are in progress on the analysis of microgram amounts of RNA and DNA.