Deprived Areas Research Articles

Demographic Disparities and Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy

Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of social deprivation on preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes following hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Methods: Patients undergoing primary HA for FAIS were identified, and their social deprivation index (SDI) score was assigned on the basis of the provided ZIP code. Quartiles (Q1 to Q4) were established using national percentiles, with Q4 representing patients from the areas of greatest deprivation. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Achievement rates for clinically meaningful outcomes, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB), were determined. The incidences of revision HA and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were recorded. SDI groups were compared with respect to preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcome measures. Predictors of MCID, PASS, and SCB achievement; revision HA; and conversion to THA were identified with use of multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 2,060 hips were included, which had the following SDI distribution: Q1 = 955, Q2 = 580, Q3 = 281, and Q4 = 244. The composition of the included patients with respect to race and/or ethnicity was 85.3% Caucasian, 3.8% African American, 3.7% Hispanic, 1.7% Asian, and 5.4% “other.” Patients with more social deprivation presented at a later age and with a higher body mass index (BMI), a longer duration of preoperative hip pain, and greater joint degeneration (p ≤ 0.035 for all). The most socially deprived groups had higher proportions of African American and Hispanic individuals, less participation in physical activity, and greater prevalences of smoking, lower back pain, and Workers’ Compensation (p ≤ 0.018 for all). PRO scores and achievement of the PASS and SCB were worse among patients from areas of greater social deprivation (p ≤ 0.017 for all). Age, BMI, activity status, race and/or ethnicity classified as “other,” SDI quartile, Workers’ Compensation, preoperative back pain, duration of preoperative hip pain, and Tönnis grade were independent predictors of clinically meaningful outcome achievement, revision arthroscopy, and/or THA conversion (p ≤ 0.049 for all). Conclusions: Individuals with more social deprivation demonstrated inferior postoperative outcome measures. This was driven primarily by preoperative characteristics such as SDI, hip pain duration, joint degeneration, and overall health at presentation. Despite differential outcomes, patients still showed clinical improvement regardless of SDI quartile. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Residential relocation and changes in patterns of environmental exposures by health determinants among children and adolescents in Catalonia, Spain

Residential relocation leads to environmental changes, besides being likely to be influenced by sociodemographic characteristics. The relationship between them is, however, still not well described. We aimed to investigate changes in patterns of urban, natural and physical environmental exposures due to relocation and related sociodemographic determinants in a population-based cohort study of children and adolescents. We included individuals between 0 and 17 years of age, registered in primary healthcare records in Catalonia, Spain from 2006 to 2018 and categorized them as non-movers and movers (first residential change). Hierarchical clustering identified groups of individuals based on their exposure to air pollution, green spaces and built environment. Low, medium and high environmental hazard exposure clusters were identified, which were used to identify changes in environmental exposure patterns due to relocation, namely same, worse, and better environment. Multinomial logistic regression determined whether sex, age, nationality and area-level deprivation influenced these changes. From 1,316,138 individuals, 221,058 were movers. Compared to non-movers, movers were more frequently with foreign nationality (12.1% vs. 21.3%, respectively) and more likely to live in the most deprived areas at baseline (19.2% vs. 24.4%). Younger children had higher risk of moving to better or worse environments. Individuals living in areas with the highest levels of deprivation were least likely to move within the same environments (i.e., either moving to better (Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] 1.39[1.34–1.44]) or worse environment (1.56[1.49–1.63])). Compared to people from Spain, those from Africa moved to similar environments (OR of moving to a better environment 0.90 (0.87–0.94) with respect to move to the same environment, and OR of moving to a worse environment 0.82 (0.78–0.85)), those from America tended to move to other environments (1.17 (1.12–1.23) better and 1.09 (1.03–1.15) worse), while those from Asia and Europe moved to better environments (1.22 (1.12–1.33) and 1.20 (1.14–1.27) respectively). No associations were found for sex. Changes in patterns of environmental exposures due to residential mobility are complex and may be determined by age, deprivation and nationality.

Spatial disparity in household indebtedness across the UK

PurposeThis paper assesses the lending risks associated with the level of total household indebtedness at the local authority level across the UK.Design/methodology/approachUsing GIS-based Exploratory Data Analysis and mapping, the paper identifies local concentrations of household borrowing, both secured and unsecured, which is referenced against regional Gross Added Value.FindingsSignificant local differences are revealed which are tracked over the period 2013–2019. Total debt relative to the size of economy is larger in London and local authorities around London. A positive correlation was revealed between areas of multiple deprivation in England and those local authorities with proportionally high unsecured lending, confirming that the less well-off require access to debt facilities and in the absence of availability of secured loans, resort to unsecured borrowing.Originality/valueUnderstanding where the additional lending risks are located across the UK is relevant when evaluating the robustness of the economy to recession, with its uneven effects on different sectors and households and the impact of monetary policy changes, particularly sharp rises in interest rates. The mapping of these risks is illuminating and aids understanding.

Factors affecting prostate cancer detection through asymptomatic PSA testing in primary care in England: Evidence from the 2018 National Cancer Diagnosis Audit.

Background Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is used in primary care for prostate cancer detection, either for symptomatic assessment or asymptomatic testing following an informed decision. Aim To estimate the proportion of prostate cancer cases diagnosed following asymptomatic PSA testing, and patient and practice factors influencing this route. Design and setting 2018 English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit (NCDA) data were analysed, with linkage to the national cancer registry, practice-level Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF), and General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) data. All 2018 NCDA patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer were included (n = 9,837). Method Patients with recorded biomarker testing and no recorded symptoms prior to diagnosis were classified as asymptomatic PSA detected prostate cancer. Patient (age, ethnicity, deprivation, co-morbidities) and GP practice (geographical location, area deprivation, list size, urgent suspected cancer referral rate, QOF outcomes, GPPS results) factors were analysed for association with asymptomatic PSA testing using mixed effects logistic regression models. Results 1,884 out of 9,837 (19%) prostate cancer cases were detected following asymptomatic PSA testing, 982 (52.1%) of whom were patients aged 50-69 years. Younger age, non-White ethnicity, lower deprivation, and lower co-morbidity count were associated with an increased likelihood of diagnosis following asymptomatic PSA testing. There was a 13-fold variation between practices in the odds of asymptomatic PSA-detected cases, without clear explanatory GP practice-level factors. Conclusion One in five patients with prostate cancer in England are diagnosed after asymptomatic PSA testing in primary care, with large variation in asymptomatic PSA detection between GP practices.

Implementing creative dance activities for primary school children to improve health and wellbeing: a qualitative study in the North East England.

Evidence suggests that group arts activities with children build resilience and positive mental wellbeing. However, insufficient attention has been paid to how such activities can be implemented in practice across different contexts, particularly in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. Therefore, we explored the implementation of a dance-based intervention in two primary schools situated in an area of high economic deprivation in North East England. Our study explored Year 1 (age 5-6) and Year 5 (age 9-10) children, their parents, teachers and dance artists' views of a creative dance intervention (South Tees Arts project; STAR) in two schools in North East England, using interviews and focus groups, combined with innovative data capture activities (i.e. movement activities, graffiti walls, songs and Vox Pops). Children felt that STAR contributed positively to their emotional wellbeing and physical health. Teachers noticed improved confidence, engagement, literacy, and social and motor skills and less disruptive behaviour in class. Benefits continued beyond school, with children exercising at home to practice their dance moves. Several implementation barriers were identified ranging from limited time, large classes, dealing with challenging behaviours, the impact of COVID-19, stigma and anxiety. In response to these challenges, several solutions were developed during project delivery, such as artists and children working in pairs and role modelling by teachers and dance artists. We found three underlying mechanisms for successful implementation: (1) constant communication between teachers, dance artists and parents was essential to managing challenging behaviours, building personal relationships with children, and helping parents to get involved and support their children at home. (2) Linking dance activities to the school curriculum (using narratives from existing reading schemes) helped to support skill gaps. (3) A strong ethos of partnership between school, dance and arts providers and researchers ensured the adaptability and flexibility of projects.

High caregiver adverse childhood experiences are associated with increased pediatric infection-related healthcare utilization and antibiotic use

Abstract Background Higher caregiver adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been associated with a range of pediatric outcomes, including hospitalizations. We recently found that higher caregiver ACEs are associated with higher rates of influenza vaccine uptake. However, to our knowledge, no studies have examined links between caregiver ACEs and specific infections or infection-related outcomes, such as antibiotics prescribed. We sought to evaluate associations between caregiver ACEs and pediatric infection-related outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of two pediatric primary care sites, each serving a predominantly non-Hispanic Black, publicly insured population. At one primary care site (Clinic A), routine screenings for caregiver ACEs began in 2019 at the 1-month well-child check and were retrieved from the electronic health record. For the other primary care site (Clinic B), a prior research study surveyed caregiver ACEs of 283 children. Focusing on children 0-4 years of age in both primary care sites, we retrieved data from the electronic health record, including patient infection-related outcomes, demographic characteristics, and social risk screen results for those who had caregiver ACEs systematically recorded. The number of reported caregiver ACEs was our exposure variable, dichotomized as high (≥4) or low (≤3). Patient demographic characteristics, results of the overall social risk and maternal depression screen, and area deprivation index scores linked to patients’ geocoded home addresses were also collected. Bivariate analyses were pursued using chi square test statistics. Results A total of 1,442 children 0-4 years of age were included in the study, and 50.0% were female, 74.7% Black, and 2.6% Hispanic. Fifteen percent of caregivers had high (≥4) ACEs. Differences in infection-related outcomes, and relevant covariates, based on high and low caregiver ACEs are depicted in Table 1. Children of caregivers with high ACEs had more outpatient infection-related visits (80% versus 72.6%, p = 0.03), including more diagnoses of streptococcal pharyngitis (10.1% versus 4.1%, p = 0.0004). They also had more prescriptions for any oral antibiotic (30.9% versus 23.2%, p = 0.02). In bivariate analyses, high caregiver ACEs (31.3% versus 23.7%, p = 0.03), lower area deprivation index score (mean (SD) of 0.47 (0.16) versus 0.50 (0.16), p < 0.01), older patient age (mean (SD) of 2.73 (1.10) versus 1.73 (1.00) years, p < 0.0001), and any outpatient (35.9% versus 2.2%, p < 0.0001), emergent (40.0% versus 10.9%, p < 0.0001), or inpatient visit (42.7% versus 23.0%, p < 0.0001) were each associated with the presence of antibiotic use. Race, ethnicity, a positive social risk screen, and positive depression screen were not associated with antibiotic use. Conclusion High caregiver ACEs appear to be associated with some types of pediatric infectious diagnoses, antibiotic use and increased infection-related outpatient healthcare utilization. Future adjusted analyses assessing for potential links between ACEs and infection-related outcomes, independent of variables like insurance status, social risk, and area-level deprivation, are warranted and planned.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Acute Care Utilization in Washington State Medicaid: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Neighborhood disadvantage has been associated with potentially preventable acute care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries, but this association has not been studied in a Medicaid population, which is important for informing more equitable care and policies for this population. To describe the association between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and acute care utilization (including potentially preventable utilization) among Medicaid beneficiaries in Washington State. Retrospective cohort study of 100% Medicaid claims. Mixed effects logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between state-level ADI decile and acute care utilization, adjusting for age, sex, self-identified race and ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, primary spoken language, individual Federal Poverty Level, homelessness, and rurality. Standard errors were clustered at the Census block group level. 1.5 million unique adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled for at least 11months of a calendar year during the period 2017-2021. Binary measures denoting receipt of ED visits, low-acuity ED visits, hospitalizations in a calendar year. Increasing levels of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (by ADI decile) were associated with greater odds of any ED visits (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.07), low-acuity ED visits (aOR 1.08, CI 1.08-1.08), and any hospitalizations (aOR 1.02, CI 1.02-1.02). Among Medicaid beneficiaries, greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with increased acute care utilization, including potentially preventable utilization. These findings signal potential barriers to outpatient care access that could be amenable to future intervention by health systems and payers.

Access to National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers Among Native American Cancer Patients

Introduction/Purpose Native Americans (NAs) are subject to high cancer mortality rates in the USA. Despite that, they face significant geographic barriers to access to cancer care. This study aims to estimate the travel distance to a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer center for NA patients in Utah and the continental USA. Methods This IRB-approved study utilized retrospective data on genitourinary cancer patients from both NAs and white populations from February 2013 to January 2023. The distance of their geographical location to the Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) at the University of Utah was calculated using their home zip code and a GeoData ZIP Code Distance Calculations Matrix Template. A shapefile containing NCI-designated cancer centers was used alongside the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), matched to block groups from the 2020 census, to serve as a national control group. All geographic data was visualized in ArcGIS 10.7 by using the coordinates and a 5-digit zip code tabulation area to map locations. Results A total of 468 NA patients were eligible and included. The median travel distance for NA patients vs. white patients to HCI was 190.6 miles (range: 1.1-596.4 miles) vs. 21.6 miles (range: 1.1-269 miles, p<0.0001). In the continental US, the median travel distance from NA reservations vs. ADI-matched block groups to the nearest NCI-designated cancer centers was 186.5 miles (range 77.8-629 miles) vs. 159 miles (range 1.9-671.3 miles, p<0.01). Conclusion The travel distance to NCI-designated cancer center for NA cancer patients in Utah was around nine times longer than that of white cancer patients. This study highlights the significant disparity in cancer care accessibility faced by NA communities.

Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010–2019)

BackgroundWe aimed to characterise the variation in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery for people in England.MethodsWe included people >18 years of age with hospital admission for ischaemic heart...

Neighborhood disadvantage and general anesthesia utilization in cesarean delivery: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundNeighborhood disadvantage, a social driver of health (SDOH), has been associated with adverse perinatal outcomes; yet little is known about its association with anesthetic choice. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to assess the association of neighborhood disadvantage and anesthetic choice for cesarean deliveries. We hypothesize that people from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods are more likely to receive general anesthesia for cesarean deliveries compared to those from the most advantaged neighborhoods. Study designThis single-center retrospective cohort study identified index cesarean deliveries performed between 2008 and 2017. People were categorized into no, low, moderate, and high disadvantage neighborhood using the area deprivation index. The odds of receiving general anesthesia versus neuraxial anesthesia (epidural, spinal, or combined spinal-epidural) were compared using logistic regression models. ResultsOf the 16,351 people with cesarean deliveries, 96.0% received neuraxial versus 4.0% general anesthesia. The rates of general anesthesia were 6.3%, 4.2%, 3.1%, and 2.4% for the high, moderate, low, and no disadvantage groups (P<.001), respectively. Indications for general anesthesia by obstetric indication were different by neighborhood disadvantage (P<.001), but no differences were observed by contraindications of neuraxial anesthesia (P=.091). Compared to the no disadvantage group, the high disadvantage group had higher odds of general anesthesia (aOR 2.0, 95% CI (1.5 to 2.7), P<.001). Results were unchanged after evaluating people in labor only. ConclusionsPeople from disadvantaged neighborhoods are more likely to receive general anesthesia for cesarean deliveries, even after considering clinical features. The general anesthesia rate is a meaningful benchmark in obstetric anesthesia that may contribute to disparities.

The influence of socioeconomic status on management and outcomes in major trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Major trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in younger individuals and poses a significant public health concern. There is a growing interest in understanding the complex relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and major trauma. Anecdotal evidence suggests that deprivation is associated with more violent and debilitating injuries. There remains a paucity in literature evaluating major trauma outcomes in relation to socioeconomic deprivation. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify studies from 1947 to March 2024. The primary outcome was to establish the distribution of injuries based on deprivation, with secondary outcomes evaluating surgical intervention rates, length of stay, and mortality. Quantitative pooling of data was based on the random-effects model. Fourteen studies and 878,872 trauma patients were included. A substantial proportion (28%) of trauma incidents occurred in the most deprived group. Patients from the lowest socioeconomic group were considerably younger (weighted mean difference [WMD] -9.85years and 95% confidence intervals [CI] -9.99 to -9.70) and more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] 1.36 and 95% CI 1.14-1.63). There were no differences in surgical intervention (OR 1.74 and 95% CI 0.97-3.13), length of stay (WMD 1.15days and 95% CI -0.32-2.62), and mortality (OR 1.04 and 95% CI 0.95-1.14) regardless of background. Major trauma is prevalent in deprived areas and in younger individuals, with an increasing trend of deprivation in male patients. Although the rates of surgery, length of stay, and mortality did not differ between groups, planning of public health interventions should target areas of higher deprivation.

General practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France

BackgroundVulnerable social groups have greater difficulty in accessing care and a lower quality of care. Health systems focused on primary care appear to be more effective, efficient and equitable. However, difficulties in accessing primary care are persisting. We focused on primary care screening for cervical cancer through Cervico-Uterine Smear (CUS), which has been shown to be effective in reducing disease incidence and mortality. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of women who undergo CUS according to the category of health professionals (general practitioners or gynaecologists) performing CUS and to analyse potential differences in access to care in terms of socioeconomic and geographical characteristics.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study based on data from the main health insurance schemes in France, allowing analysis of health care consumption according to socioeconomic levels and proximity to health care services. We included women aged 25 to 64 years in 2012 for whom CUS would be a relevant procedure (695,694). The sociodemographic and territorial indicators were age, geographical area deprivation, and the availability of gynaecological care. The analysis was performed using multinomial logistic regression.ResultsA total of 202,271 (29%) patients underwent CUS; of whom 68% underwent CUS administered by gynaecologists and 28% were administered by general practitioners (GPs). However, inequalities in CUS screening rates were observed, with a decrease in the number of CUSs performed with increased age, a rural location, deprivation, and sparse health care provisions. Deprived people seemed less penalised by GPs.ConclusionsInvolvement of General Practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France. The organisation of health systems around primary care may allow a better access to care and to account for the specific needs of deprived populations.

Deprivation and NHS General Ophthalmic Service sight testing activity in England in 2022-2023.

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with an increased incidence of sight-loss. To inform potential developments in eyecare, General Ophthalmic Service (GOS) sight-testing activity was explored in relation to deprivation for GOS contractors submitting National Health Service (NHS) claims in England. Data on NHS sight-test claims for the financial year 2022-2023 were sought from NHS England (NHSE), including number of sight-tests by GOS contractors, their unique Organisation Data Service codes and postcodes and age-bands of patients accessing sight-testing. Deprivation scores were assigned to contractor practices using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) and the average number of sight-tests for all contractors within each IMD decile calculated, allowing rate of sight-testing per 1000 population per decile of deprivation to be estimated using Office of National Statistics (ONS) Lower Layer Super Output Area mid-year population estimates. Inequality was examined using the Odds Ratio (OR) and slope and relative index of inequality measures (SSI and RII). Overall, 12.94 million NHS sight-tests were provided by 5622 GOS contractors in England in 2022-2023. Most affluent decile GOS contractors undertook an average ~2200 NHS sight-tests, while in the most deprived decile, average NHS sight-tests per contractor was ~1100. Rate of sight-testing per 1000 population in the most deprived decile was one quarter of that in the most affluent, with an OR of 5.29 (95% CI 5.27-5.30), indicating those in the most affluent areas were ~five times more likely to access NHS sight-tests. Overall, SII and RII were 333.5 (95% CI 333.52-333.53) and 6.4 (95% CI 6.39-6.40), respectively, findings reflective of substantial inequality in uptake. There remains substantial unwarranted variation in uptake of NHS sight-testing, with those in more affluent areas accessing sight-testing substantially more than those in more deprived areas. Strategies are required to facilitate primary care optometry to provide more equitable access to eyecare.

Primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability: a probability sample survey.

Background Adults with learning disability face multiple adversities, but evidence on their needs and primary care experiences is limited. Aim To compare the characteristics and primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not. Design and setting An analysis of the 2022 General Practice Patient Survey, a national probability sample survey conducted in 2022 with people registered with NHS primary care in England. Method This analysis reports descriptive profiles, weighted and with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression models adjusting for gender, age, ethnicity, and area-level deprivation compared experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not. Results Survey participants comprised 623,157 people aged 16 or older, including 6,711 reporting learning disability. Adults reporting learning disability were more likely to be male, younger, of mixed or multiple ethnicities, and live in more deprived areas. All chronic conditions included in the survey were more common in adults reporting learning disability, especially reported sensory, neurodevelopmental, neurological, and mental health conditions. Adults reporting learning disability were twice as likely to have a preferred GP, and less likely to find their practice's website easy to navigate. They were also less likely to have confidence and trust in their healthcare professional, or feel their needs were met. Conclusion Adults reporting a learning disability had a higher likelihood of chronic health conditions. Their reported experiences of primary care indicate that despite recent initiatives to improve services offered, further adaptations to the consistency and ease of access to primary care is needed.

Social Determinants of Health and Risk-Adjusted Sepsis Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Traditional risk prediction and risk adjustment models have focused on clinical characteristics, but accounting for social determinants of health (SDOH) and complex health conditions could improve understanding of sepsis outcomes and our ability to predict outcomes, treat patients, and assess quality of care. To evaluate the impact of SDOH and health scales in sepsis mortality risk prediction and hospital performance assessment. Observational cohort study. One hundred twenty-nine hospitals in the nationwide Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System between 2017 and 2021. Veterans admitted through emergency departments with community-acquired sepsis. Individual- and community-level SDOH (race, housing instability, marital status, Area Deprivation Index [ADI], and rural residence) and two health scales (the Care Assessment Need [CAN] score and Claims-Based Frailty Index [CFI]). The primary outcome was 90-day mortality from emergency department arrival; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Among 144,889 patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired sepsis, 139,080 were men (96.0%), median (IQR) age was 71 (64-77) years, and median (IQR) ADI was 60 (38-81). Multivariable regression models had good calibration and discrimination across models that adjusted for different sets of variables (e.g., AUROC, 0.782; Brier score, 1.33; and standardized mortality rate, 1.00). Risk-adjusted hospital performance was similar across all models. Among 129 VA hospitals, three hospitals shifted from the lowest or highest quintile of performance when comparing models that excluded SDOH to models that adjusted for all variables. Models that adjusted for ADI reported odds ratios (CI) of 1.00 (1.00-1.00), indicating that ADI does not significantly predict sepsis mortality in this cohort of patients. In patients with community-acquired sepsis, adjusting for community SDOH variables such as ADI did not improve 90-day sepsis mortality predictions in mortality models and did not substantively alter hospital performance within the VA Healthcare System. Understanding the role of SDOH in risk prediction and risk adjustment models is vital because it could prevent hospitals from being negatively evaluated for treating less advantaged patients. However, we found that in VA hospitals, the potential impact of SDOH on 90-day sepsis mortality was minimal.

12566 Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency, Replacement Therapy Use, and IGF1 Levels in Association with Physical, Psychosocial, and Neurocognitive Outcomes Among Childhood Cancer Survivors

Abstract Disclosure: T. Yoshida: None. J.L. Baedke: None. H. Wang: None. C.H. Yu: None. C.L. Wilson: None. D.A. Mulrooney: None. S.B. Dixon: None. I. Huang: None. T.M. Brinkman: None. K.R. Krull: None. S. Mostoufi-Moab: None. J. Miguel Martínez: None. K.K. Ness: None. M.M. Hudson: None. Y. Yasui: None. A. Delaney: None. Background: Adult growth hormone deficiency (aGHD) is a common and often untreated late effect among childhood cancer survivors. Untreated aGHD likely adds to the burden of health outcomes in survivors already experiencing cancer treatment related late toxicities. As comprehensive data on the consequences of untreated aGHD in survivors are scarce, we assessed the clinical impact of untreated aGHD among survivors, together with socioeconomic factors as potential contributing factors, utilizing a large, clinically characterized cohort of childhood cancer survivors. Methods: 3902 five-year survivors ≥ 18 years old [median (25th-75th percentile) age, 31.7y (25.2-40.0); age at cancer diagnosis 8.1y (3.5-13.6); 47.5% female] were examined. We assessed the: 1) proportion of survivors with aGHD on GH therapy (GHT); 2) association between GHT and socioeconomic factors (e.g., household income, area deprivation index) by multivariable logistic regression; and 3) associations between age- and sex-adjusted insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) z-score and prevalence of clinically-assessed (i.e., body composition, metabolic/cardiovascular factors, neurocognitive function) and self-reported [i.e., quality of life (QoL), emotional symptom] outcomes by multivariable logistic regression with trend test, adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., radiation to the hypothalamic-pituitary region). Results: aGHD was observed in 9.1% (354/3902) of survivors; among them, 9.0% (32/354) were on GHT. Survivors on GHT were more likely to have higher household income, hold health insurance, and reside in less socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods, compared to survivors with untreated aGHD. Socioeconomic factors had significant independent associations with GHT use in multivariable analysis [e.g., annual household income &amp;lt;$40,000 vs. ≥$80,000, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of GHT use, 0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.86]. Lower IGF1 z-score (IGF1 z-score ≤ -2, vs. IGF1 z-score &amp;gt;0) was associated with a higher prevalence of various outcomes (aOR, 95% CI), such as abdominal obesity (2.56, 1.98-5.26), weak handgrip strength (2.49, 1.65-3.73), hypertension (1.47, 1.06-2.04), abnormal glucose metabolism (2.07, 1.49-2.86), impaired health-related QoL (e.g., physical functioning, 1.97, 1.35-2.86), depression (1.58, 1.06-2.33), and impairment in multiple neurocognitive functions (e.g., verbal reasoning, a global measure of intelligence, 2.22, 1.49-3.30) with a dose-response relationship. Conclusions: Our data support a negative impact of untreated aGHD on physical, psychosocial, and neurocognitive outcomes among survivors and suggest the potential of GHT to improve QoL of survivors with aGHD. As lower socioeconomic status may affect survivors’ access to GHT, this disparity should be considered in interventions evaluating GHT for survivors with aGHD. Presentation: 6/3/2024

12441 Factors Affecting The Evaluation Of Adrenal Incidentalomas

Abstract Disclosure: A. Poloju: None. S.K. Pabich: None. S. Syed: None. A. Krueger: None. A. Chiu: None. Introduction: Adrenal incidentalomas are increasingly being detected, owing to the increasing number of high-resolution radiologic studies performed. While most of the nodules are non-functional, 10-15% are hormonally active and hence merit workup. We assessed the rates of, and factors associated with appropriate workup of these nodules. Methods: A retrospective analysis of CT chest and abdominal scans between Jan 1, 2021, and June 1, 2022, in adults ≥18 years at a single tertiary care center was performed. Reports were screened with key phrases to identify adrenal nodules. A chart review was conducted to confirm the reported nodule, obtain demographic data, obtain data on co-morbid conditions, and evaluate for biochemical and radiologic workup. Exclusion criteria included: patients deceased at the time of our review, previously diagnosed nodules, sub-centimeter lesions, and adrenal hemorrhage. Patients were categorized as being from high or low disadvantaged neighborhoods based on their Area Deprivation Index (ADI) score. ADI above the 50th percentile was categorized as more disadvantaged. Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI), a 10-year survival predictor based on the presence of common diseases was abstracted. Patients with any biochemical workup were compared to patients with no workup. Bivariate analysis was performed using chi-squared and Student’s t-test analysis. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with biochemical workup. Results: A total of 533 records were reviewed. After applying the above exclusion criteria, a total of 245 patients were included in our analysis. Baseline characteristics included: 58.7% female and 41.2% male. 67.3% had hypertension diagnosis, 22% had sleep apnea diagnosis, and 30.6% had diabetes diagnosis. 86% were White, 5.7% Black, 3.2% Hispanic, 3.2% Asian, and 1.6% Other. 71% of the patients had no biochemical workup, 18% had partial workup, and 11% had full workup. Factors associated with having either partial or full workup compared to no workup included female sex (OR 2.33, CI 1.23-4.41), internal medicine/family medicine provider ordering the scan compared to Emergency Department providers (OR 3.84, CI 1.61-9.14), and ADI scores below the 50th percentile (OR 1.98, CI 1.04-3.78). There was no statistically significant difference based on age, race, ethnicity, and CCI. There was no significant difference in the workup for hypercortisolism based on the presence of co-morbid conditions like diabetes, sleep apnea, and overweight/obesity. Conclusions: In our study population, the rates of guideline-based biochemical workup of adrenal incidentalomas were very low at 11%. Factors associated with having at least partial biochemical workup included less socioeconomic disadvantage, female sex, and studies ordered by primary care providers. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Socioeconomic inequalities in waiting times for breast cancer surgery.

Prompt access to cancer care is a policy priority in several OECD countries, because delayed access can exacerbate deleterious health outcomes. Access to care based on need remains a key pillar of publicly-funded health systems. This study tests for the presence of inequalities in waiting times by socioeconomic status for patients receiving breast cancer surgery (mastectomy or breast conserving surgery) in England using the Hospital Episode Statistics. We investigate separately the pre-COVID-19 period (April 2015-January 2020), and the COVID-19 period (February 2020-March 2022). We use linear regression models to study the association between waiting times and income deprivation measured at the patient's area of residence. We control for demographic factors, type and number of comorbidities, past emergency admissions and Healthcare Resource Groups, and supply-level factors through hospital fixed effects. In the pre-COVID-19 period, we do not find statistically significant associations between income deprivation in the patient's area of residence and waiting times for surgery. In the COVID-19 period, we find that patients living in the most deprived areas have longer waiting times by 0.7days (given a mean waiting time of 20.6days).

Exploring the equity of distribution of general medical services funding allocations in Wales: a time-series analysis.

Good access to quality primary care in high-income countries can improve population health. Access to primary care is however often not equal among socioeconomic groups; our analysis sought to explore whether funding, a determinant of service supply, is equitably distributed among GP practices in Wales. We sought to explore the relationship between funding and deprivation among GP practices in Wales, to understand the equity of current funding policies. We obtained funding data for general practices in Wales between 2014 and 2022 and explored the equity of distribution using the percentage of practice patients living in the 20% most deprived small areas in Wales. We generated a linear regression model exploring the relationship between practice funding and deprivation, with an interaction term with time in years. Practice funding rose for all practices between 2014 and 2022. Practice deprivation and time in years were both associated with practice funding, with increases in practice deprivation associated with reduced funding allocations, and time being associated with a small increase in funding over the study period. Over the period of analysis of 2004-2022, for every 10% increase in patients living in the most deprived LSOAs, funding per patient decreases on average by 1%. Primary cares in Wales in more deprived areas receive discernibly less funding per patient than those in less deprived areas. Given the potential and likelihood primary care can affect population health outcomes, this underinvestment may be contributing to existing health inequalities and requires urgent further analysis and action.

A cross-sectional study of the relative availability and prominence of shelf space allocated to healthy and unhealthy foods in supermarkets in urban Ireland, by area-level deprivation

BackgroundDiet-related noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are a leading cause of ill-health and death across Europe. In Ireland, dietary intakes of saturated fat, free sugar and salt exceed World Health Organization recommendations, and excess consumption follows a social gradient increasing population risk of diet-related NCDs. The retail food environment can influence consumer food choice and subsequent dietary intakes. In high income countries, supermarkets are an increasingly influential actor in consumer food availability, choice, purchase, and subsequent food intake. This study aims to assess the relative availability and prominence of healthy and unhealthy foods in Irish supermarkets, by area-level deprivation.MethodsThis study used a cross-sectional study design, and applied a validated measure, as described in the INFORMAS Protocol: Food Retail – Food availability in supermarkets. Between October 2021 and February 2022, shelf space (m2) (height or depth (cm) × length (cm)) and prominence (visibility), of foods, classified as healthy and unhealthy and represented by a proxy indicator, were collected in supermarkets (n = 36) in County Dublin, Ireland. Overall the proportion of mean relative shelf space (m2), allocated to healthy and unhealthy foods, and its prominence, by area-level deprivation, and retailer, were determined. We used t-tests and one-way ANOVA to analyse possible differences between the proportion of relative shelf space available to healthy and unhealthy foods, and its prominence, by area-level deprivation and retailer.ResultsThe study found the proportion of shelf space measured allocated to unhealthy food was 68.0% (SD 10.6). Unhealthy foods were more likely to be in areas of high prominence. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of relative shelf space available to unhealthy foods in areas of high and low deprivation. A statistically significant difference in the proportion of relative shelf space allocated to healthy and unhealthy food by area level deprivation was found in one retailer.ConclusionUnhealthy foods had a higher proportion of shelf space and were more prominent than healthy foods in supermarkets in County Dublin, Ireland. The current availability and prominence of foods in supermarkets does not align with Food Based Dietary Guideline recommendations and does not support consumers to make healthier food choices. There is a need for supermarkets in Ireland to improve the availability and prominence of healthy foods to support consumers to make healthier food choices.