“Women beginning hormonal contraception are often told to wait until their next menstrual cycle before starting. This starting day might be the first day or the first 5 to 7 days of their menses, or the Sunday after their menses begin. This variety of options can cause confusion. Delaying contraception until menstruation starts can also affect access for women with irregular menses. For example, clients for family planning in developing countries might be denied contraception if they are not menstruating at the time. The basis for the delay is to avoid the use of a hormonal contraceptive during an undetected pregnancy, but research has not shown an increased risk for the fetus. An alternative is to start hormonal contraceptives right away using some other form of birth control as a back up for the first week. This “immediate-start” or “quick-start” was introduced with combined oral contraceptives and has been expanded to other hormonal methods. But, before our Cochrane review, we didn't know how it compares to conventional start in terms of the effectiveness and acceptability of contraception, or the continued use by women. We examined randomized controlled trials to try to find out. We looked for published and unpublished research and found five trials. Three studies compared immediate versus conventional start of the same contraceptive method. The fourth study tested the injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, often called ‘depo’. It compared an immediate start with using a ‘bridge’ to depo, such as pills, the patch, or a vaginal ring, for 21 days before the first injection. The fifth trial compared two immediate-start methods, the vaginal ring and an oral contraceptive. Four of the trials reported information on the proportion of women who became pregnant. In the ‘depo’ study, women with immediate start had fewer pregnancies than those allocated to the ‘bridge’ method. However, lots of women were lost from this trial, which might have biased its results. In the other studies, a similar number of women got pregnant in both groups, including the largest trial of more than 1700 women. The proportion of women who stopped taking their contraceptive or had side effects was also similar for the immediate and the conventional start groups. Overall, we found little evidence that beginning hormonal contraceptives right away is better or worse than a delayed start. Immediate start appears to be one of several acceptable options for using hormonal contraceptives. More trials of immediate versus conventional start of the same hormonal contraceptive would help to be sure about this. Consistent reporting of bleeding and other side effects would also help with interpretation of the results across trials, and better follow up of the women in the studies is critical, as high losses threaten the validity of the research.” This systematic review is available in full in The Cochrane Library (http://www.thecochranelibrary.com): Lopez LM, Newmann SJ, Grimes DA, Nanda K, Schulz KF. Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006260. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006260.pub2.