Studies in American Fiction251 many other major figures of the period, as well as lesser known artists, convened in her living room for weekly sessions of "contactual inspiration " or informal professional development. McHenry also notes the phenomenal affect that Terry McMillan and the popularity ofOprah Winfrey's Book Club have had on the publishing industry. In many ways, their accomplishments ironically show how a history of black literacy in which the "consumption of literature" as well as "the production of literature" was always visibly present though often ignored by the general public. Though the politics of respectability appears as a theme for most of the literary societies McHenry profiles, her thesis permeates this veneer to reveal the inclusivity of such groups rather than accentuating elitist aspirations. She creates an interesting narrative that judiciously intertwines cultural criticism with historical facts, all while remaining unbiased towards her middle- and upper-class subjects. We see how class-consciousness is overruled by common concerns for the intellectual growth of the entire black community. An added bonus for me (and possibly other regionalists ) is how McHenry at times positions members of early literary societies as dislocated regional subjects; when their northern home was just as hostile as the slave South, they became a race united. Likewise, by the turn of the century, black southern women became icons of the "Woman's Era," spreading literacy throughout the region during the birth of Jim Crow. I highly recommend Elizabeth McHenry's Forgotten Readersbecause it illuminates the innovation it took to "uplift the race" through informal basic literacy instruction. University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignSherita Johnson Ramadanovic, Petar. Forgetting Futures: On Memory, Trauma and Identity. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2001. 171 pp. Cloth: $70.00. Vickroy, Laurie. Trauma and Survival in Contemporary Fiction. Charlottesville: Univ. ofVirginia Press, 2002. 266 pp. Cloth: $49.50. Paper: $18.50. The early and mid-1990s saw an enormous amount ofscholarly analysis directed towards depictions of trauma in literature. The work of scholars such as Cathy Caruth, Dominick LaCapra, and Shoshana Felman inaugurated a field that was soon dubbed trauma theory. Since that time, trauma theory has evolved from a potentially evanescent academic vogue to a 252Reviews productive and durable interdisciplinary field of inquiry. In the wake of Bosnia, Kosovo, 9/11, and Iraq, trauma theory seems more immediately relevant than ever. Two recent books—Petar Ramadanovic's Forgetting Futures: On Memory, Trauma and Identity and Laurie Vickroy's Trauma and Survival in Contemporary Fiction—each continue the development of this field in the new century by plotting different, but fruitful, courses in investigating the subject of literary trauma. Ramadanovic, a professor at the University of New Hampshire, divides his study into two sections: "Forgetting" and "Futures." The first of these sections lays the theoretical groundwork for the second by discussing Western conceptions of memory as articulated by the likes of Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Hegel, and Nietszche. Against the Aristotelean notion of memory as a "presentation of the past in the present," Ramadanovic argues that memory "is irreducible to one temporal location . It is of the not yet, not only of the past" (3). The Platonic and Nietzschean conceptions of memory and forgetting particularly interest Ramadanovic, as he employs them to contest what he perceives to be an Aristotelean-derived conception of forgetting as the oppositional act to remembering. For Ramadanovic, forgetting is not simply the mere absence of memory but rather a distinct element of its own, a signifying interstice that marks an event as traumatic precisely because the traumatic event cannot be contained within the linear frameworks ofmemory and history. His readings of these major figures are brief but commendably insightful, and, in a genre that often considers Freud as the first intellectual to ever consider the question, it is highly refreshing to read a deeper archaeology of Western conceptions of memory. However, the study of trauma often sits uncomfortably alongside abstract theorizing, and when Ramadanovic moves from a discussion of Cicero to a review of the Bosnian conflict and the Dayton peace accords in but a few pages, the change in gears is jarringly abrupt. The strongest part ofthe book is Ramadanovic's discussion ofCicero's story of the poet...
Read full abstract