Department Of General Practice Research Articles

The Prevalence and Impact of Migraine Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Migraine is a primary headache disorder and one of the most common causes of disability worldwide. Prior reports showed a higher prevalence of migraine among physicians. We conducted this study to estimate the prevalence of migraine among physicians in Saudi Arabia, as well as its impact on quality of life. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated online questionnaire that was distributed among physicians in various medical and surgical specialties in Saudi Arabia from January to June 2023. The inclusion criteria involved physicians in all specialties, who worked in governmental or private hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Employed or healthcare workers other than physicians were excluded. To measure the impact of headache on a person's quality of life, the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) test was applied. Statistical analysis of the study was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results We had 387 respondents, of whom 362 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 33.02 ± 9.07 years, and genders were distributed equally. Most physicians worked in departments of internal medicine, family medicine, general practice, and general surgery. The prevalence of migraine was recorded in 17.1% (62 patients) of all the included participants, with a female predominance. MIDAS revealed a total mean score of 16.823±14.149. The severity grades were classified as moderate (37.1%), severe (35.5%), or little to no (21.0%). Stress and light were cited as the top factors that trigger or worsen migraine, while sleep, rest, and quiet and darknesswere cited as the top relieving factors. The average number of headache attacks (month) was 6.823. Most patients with migraine were board residents (27.4%), living in the western region (53.2%), and working in a governmental hospital (38.7%). Conclusion Migraine is a common disorder among physicians in Saudi Arabia, with significant moderate-to-severe disability. Stress is identified as a major trigger. Proper awareness, stress management programs, and therapeutic intervention may mitigate the untoward consequences of migraine.

Identifying psychosocial and contextual markers considered by physicians to personalize care

BackgroundThe objective of the study was to identify the psychosocial and contextual markers considered by physicians to personalize care.MethodsAn online questionnaire with one open-ended question, asking physicians to describe clinical situations in which they personalized care, was used. Physicians were recruited from March 31, 2023, to August 10, 2023, from three hospitals, five university departments of general practice and six physician organizations in France. Recruitment was conducted through email invitations, with participants encouraged to invite their colleagues via a snowball sampling method. The participants were a diverse sample of French general practitioners and other medical specialists who see patients in consultations or in hospital wards. We extracted the psychosocial and contextual markers considered by physicians to personalize care in each clinical situation. The analysis involved both manual and AI-assisted content analysis using GPT3.5-Turbo (OpenAI). Mathematical models to assess data saturation were used to ensure that a comprehensive list of markers was identified.ResultsIn total, 1340 people connected to the survey platform and 1004 (75.0%) physicians were eligible for the study (median age 39 years old, IQR 34 to 50; 60.5% women; 67.0% working in outpatient settings), among whom 290 answered the open-ended question. The participants reported 317 clinical situations during which they personalized care. Personalization was based on the consideration of 40 markers: 27 were related to patients’ psychosocial characteristics (e.g., patient capacity, psychological state, beliefs), and 13 were related to circumstances (e.g., competing activities, support network, living environment). The data saturation models showed that at least 97.0% of the potential markers were identified. Manual and AI-assisted content analysis using GPT3.5-Turbo were concordant for 89.9% of clinical situations.ConclusionsPhysicians personalize care to patients’ contexts and lives using a broad range of psychosocial and contextual markers. The effect of these markers on treatment engagement and effectiveness needs to be evaluated in clinical studies and integrated as tailoring variables in personalized interventions to build evidence-based personalization.

Exploring the User Acceptability and Feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Designed to Facilitate Timely Diagnosis of New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Children: Qualitative Interview Study Among General Practitioners.

Up to half of the children with new-onset type 1 diabetes present to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening condition that can develop because of diagnostic delay. Three-quarters of Australian children visit their general practitioner (GP) the week before presenting to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis. Our prototype, DIRECT-T1DM (Decision-Support for Integrated, Real-Time Evaluation and Clinical Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), is an electronic clinical decision support tool that promotes immediate point-of-care testing in general practice to confirm the suspicion of diabetes. This avoids laboratory testing, which has been documented internationally as a cause of diagnostic delay. In this investigation, we aimed to pilot and assess the feasibility and acceptability of our prototype to GP end users. We also explored the challenges of diagnosing type 1 diabetes in the Australian general practice context. In total, 4 GPs, a pediatric endocrinologist, and a PhD candidate were involved in conceptualizing the DIRECT-T1DM prototype, which was developed at the Department of General Practice and Primary Care at the University of Melbourne. Furthermore, 6 GPs were recruited via convenience sampling to evaluate the tool. The study involved 3 phases: a presimulation interview, simulated clinical scenarios, and a postsimulation interview. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guide. All phases of the study were video, audio, and screen recorded. Audio recordings were transcribed by the investigating team. Analysis was carried out using CFIR as the underlying framework. Major themes were identified among three domains and 7 constructs of the CFIR: (1) outer setting-time pressure, difficulty in diagnosing pediatric type 1 diabetes, and secondary care considerations influenced GPs' needs regarding DIRECT-T1DM; (2) inner setting-DIRECT-T1DM fits within existing workflows, it has a high relative priority due to its importance in patient safety, and GPs exhibited high tension for change; and (3) innovation-design recommendations included altering coloring to reflect urgency, font style and bolding, specific language, information and guidelines, and inclusion of patient information sheets. End-user acceptability of DIRECT-T1DM was high. This was largely due to its implications for patient safety and its "real-time" nature. DIRECT-T1DM may assist in appropriate management of children with new-onset diabetes, which is an uncommon event in general practice, through safety netting.

The roles and responsibilities of general practice nurses in China: a qualitative study

BackgroundGeneral hospitals in China have been establishing General Practice Departments (GPD). Although General Practice Nurses (GPNs) are an important part of this medical system, their training has not been synchronised. This study explored the working status of nurses in GPDs in general hospitals in Beijing to provide a theoretical basis for the training and development of GPNs in China.MethodsWe conducted in-depth, individual interviews with outpatient nurses at 19 hospitals in Beijing between March and April 2021. We employed a qualitative analysis to interpret participant narratives and used a codebook thematic analysis to analyse the interview data and extract themes.ResultsThe analysis revealed four themes: (i) a lack of full-time GPNs in GPDs of most tertiary hospitals, (ii) the inability of GPNs to fully express their potential and skills owing to their limited roles, (iii) insufficient standardised patient education provided by nurses in GPDs, and (iv) a lack of systematic and relevant training for nurses working in general practice settings.ConclusionsTo promote the development of GPNs, GPDs in general hospitals in China should hire full-time GPNs, define their job duties in alignment with their values, and provide standardised training to strengthen their core competencies.

Time trends in the epidemiology of food allergy in England: an observational analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink data

Estimates for the prevalence of food allergy vary widely, with a paucity of data for adults. The aim of this analysis was to report trends in the incidence and prevalence of food allergy in England, using a national primary care dataset. We analysed data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2018, with linked data to relevant hospital encounters in England. The main outcomes were incidence and prevalence of food allergy, according to three definitions of food allergy: possible food allergy, probable food allergy, and probable food allergy with adrenaline autoinjectors prescription. We also evaluated the difference in proportion of patients prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors by English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), age, and by previous food anaphylaxis, and explored differences in patient encounters (general practice vs emergency department setting). 7 627 607 individuals in the dataset were eligible for inclusion, of whom 150 018 (median age 19 years [IQR 4-34]; 82 614 [55·1%] female and 67 404 [44·9%] male) had a possible food allergy. 121 706 met diagnostic criteria for probable food allergy, of whom 38 288 were prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors. Estimated incidence of probable food allergy doubled between 2008 and 2018, from 75·8 individuals per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 73·7-77·9) in 2008 to 159·5 (156·6-162·3) individuals per 100 000 person-years in 2018. Prevalence increased from 0·4% (23 399 of 6 432 383) to 1·1% (82 262 of 7 627 607) over the same period and was highest in children under 5 years (11 951 [4·0%] of 296 406 in 2018) with lower prevalence in school-aged children (from 11 353 [2·4%] of 473 597 in 2018 for children aged 5-9 years to 6896 [1·7%] of 404 525 for those aged 15-19 years) and adults (42 848 [0·7%] of 5 992 454 in 2018). In those with previous food anaphylaxis, only 2321 (58·3%) of 3980 (975 [64·0%] of 1524 children and young people and 1346 [54·8%] of 2456 adults) had a prescription for adrenaline autoinjector. Adrenaline autoinjectors prescription was less common in those resident in more deprived areas (according to IMD). In the analysis of health-care encounters, 488 604 (97·1%) of 503 198 visits recorded for food allergy occurred in primary care, with 115 655 (88·4%) of 130 832 patients managed exclusively in primary care. These estimates indicate an important and increasing burden of food allergy in England. Our findings that most patients with food allergy are managed outside the hospital system, with low rates of adrenaline autoinjector prescription in those with previous anaphylaxis, highlight a need to better support those working in primary care to ensure optimal management of patients with food allergy. UK Food Standards Agency and UK Medical Research Council.

Comorbidity in primary care – causal or casual? A longitudinal observational study in family medicine

BackgroundComorbidity is increasingly important in the medical literature, with ever-increasing implications for diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, management and health care. The objective of this study is to measure casual versus causal comorbidity in primary care in three family practice populations.MethodsThis is a longitudinal observational study using the Transition Project datasets. Transition Project family doctors in the Netherlands, Malta and Serbia recorded details of all patient contacts in an episode of care structure using electronic medical records and the International Classification of Primary Care, collecting data on all elements of the doctor-patient encounter, including diagnoses (1,178,178 in the Netherlands, 93,606 in Malta, 405,150 in Serbia), observing 158,370 patient years in the Netherlands, 43,577 in Malta, 72,673 in Serbia. Comorbidity was measured using the odds ratio of both conditions being incident or rest-prevalent in the same patient in one-year dataframes, as against not, corrected for the prior probability of such co-occurrence, between the 41 joint most prevalent (joint top 20) episode titles in the three populations. Specific associations were explored in different age groups to observe the changes in odds ratios with increasing age as a surrogate for a temporal or biological gradient.ResultsThe high frequency of observed comorbidity with low consistency in both clinically and statistically significant odds ratios across populations indicates more casual than causal associations. A causal relationship would be expected to be manifest more consistently across populations. Even in the minority of cases where odds ratios were consistent between countries and numerically larger, those associations were observed to weaken with increasing patient age.ConclusionAfter applying accepted criteria for testing the causality of associations, most observed primary care comorbidity is due to chance, likely as a result of increasing illness diversity.Trial registrationThis study was performed on electronic patient record datasets made publicly available by the University of Amsterdam Department of General Practice, and did not involve any patient intervention.

Identifying innovations produced by primary health care centers and evaluating their scalability: the SPRINT Occitanie cross-sectional study in France

BackgroundPractice-based research is one of the levers identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) to strengthen primary health care. The scaling of health and social care innovations has the potential to reduce inequities in health and to expand the benefits of effective innovations. It is now rapidly gaining the attention of decision-makers in health and social care, particularly in high-income countries.To meet the challenge of declining numbers of primary care physicians in France, Multi-professional Healthcare Centers (MHC) were created to bring together medical and paramedical professionals. They are a source of innovation in meeting the health challenges facing our populations.Specific methodology exists to identify health innovations and assess their scalability. A working group, including end-users and specialists, has adapted this methodology to the French context and the University department of general practice of Montpellier-Nîmes (France) launched a pilot study in Occitanie, a French region.ObjectiveTo identify and evaluate the scalability of innovations produced in pluri-professional healthcare centers in the Occitanie region.MethodsA pilot, observational, cross-sectional study was carried out. The SPRINT Occitanie study was based on a questionnaire with two sections: MHC information and the modified Innovation Scalability Self-Administered Questionnaire (ISSaQ), version 2020. The study population was all 279 MHC in the Occitanie region.Results19.3% (54) of MHC in the Occitanie region, responded fully or incompletely to the questionnaire. Four out of 5 U-MHCs were represented. Five MHC presented multiple innovations. The average per MHC was 1.94 (± 2.4) innovations. 26% of them (n = 9) had high scalability, 34% (n = 12) medium scalability and 40% (n = 14) low scalability. The main innovation represented (86%) were healthcare program, service, and tool.ConclusionsIn our cross-sectional study, a quarter of the innovations were highly scalable. We were able to demonstrate the importance of MHC teams in working on primary care research through the prism of innovations. Primary-care innovations must be detected, evaluated, and extracted to improve their impact on their healthcare system.

Asking the generalist – evaluation of a General Practice rounding and consult service

BackgroundVascular surgery patients admitted to the hospital are often multimorbid. In case of questions regarding chronic medical problems different specialties are consulted, which leads to a high number of treating physicians and possibly contradicting recommendations. The General Practitioner´s (GP) view could minimize this problem. However, it is unknown for which medical problems a GP would be consulted and if regular GP-involvement during rounds would be considered helpful by the specialists. The aim of this study was to establish and describe a General Practice rounding service (GP-RS), to evaluate if the GP-RS is doable in a tertiary care hospital and beneficial to the specialists and to explore GP-consult indications.MethodsThe GP-RS was established as a pilot project. Between June-December 2020, a board-certified GP from the Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) joined the vascular surgery team (UKE) once-weekly on rounds. The project was evaluated using a multi-methods approach: semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with vascular surgery physicians that had either participated in the GP-RS (G1), had not participated (G2), other specialists usually conducting consults on the vascular surgery floor (G3) and with the involved GP (G4). Interviews were analyzed using Kuckartz’ qualitative content analysis. In addition, two sets of quantitative data were descriptively analyzed focusing on the reasons for a GP-consult: one set from the GP-RS and one from an established, conventional “as needed” GP-consult service.Results15 interviews were conducted. Physicians perceived the GP-RS as beneficial, especially for surgical patients (G1-3). Optimizing medication, avoiding unnecessary consults and a learning effect for physicians in training (G1-4) were named as other benefits. Critical voices saw an increased workload through the GP-RS (G1, G3) and some consult requests as too specific for a GP (G1-3). Based on data from 367 vascular surgery patients and 80 conventional GP-consults, the most common reasons for a GP-consult were cardiovascular diseases including hypertension and diabetes.ConclusionsA GP-RS is doable in a tertiary care hospital. Studies of GP co-management model with closer follow ups would be needed to objectively improve patient care and reduce the overall number of consults.Trial registrationNot applicable.

Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of COVID-19 of Patients Presenting to Emergency Department of a Tertiary Medical College of Central Nepal

Background Clinico-epidemiological profile of COVID-19 includes varied clinical symptoms like fever, cough, and fatigue, with a potential for rapid community spread through respiratory droplets. Understanding the clinical characteristics of patients is crucial for planning human resources and logistics support. This study aims to identify the clinical characteristics observed in patients suspected of having COVID-19 presenting to emergency department of College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital. MethodsThis is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine of College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal from April 2020 to February 2021. Ethical approval was taken from institutional review committee of College of Medical Sciences. Data was collected from record file of emergency department. Data was entered and analyzed by using descriptive statistical tools in SPSS-20.ResultsMajority (25.2%) of them were in the age group 50-60 years. Mean±SD of age was 55.2±16.5 years. Majority (54.3%) respondents were male. In presenting complaints 71.42% had cough, 69.5% had fever, 62.9% had shortness of breath. Also, 34.28% had severe symptoms, and 33.34% had moderate symptoms, 20% were asymptomatic and 12.38% had mild symptoms. Finding showed that 69.52% of patients required oxygen supplementation. The motility of COVID-19 patients during emergency stay was 6.67% while 36.19% were admitted in ward and 31.43% were admitted in ICU, 20% patients were sent for home isolation.Conclusions Young adults were the most commonly affected age group and males showed a higher incidence of COVID-19. Since many patients were symptomatic with fever and cough as the typical presentations in the emergency department. Majority of patients during presentation had moderate and severe symptoms and needed oxygen supplementation.

Enhancing End-Of-Life Care for Patients and Personnel: A Survey Exploring Personnel’s Experiences and the Potential Impact of an Acute Palliation Kit in the North Denmark Region

Background: Many patients want to die at home, but do not get their wishes fulfilled. To combat this, it is important to understand the challenges that stand in the way of healthcare professionals providing quality end-of-life care (EOL) in the patient’s own home.
 Aim: The aims of this study were to 1) determine if staff at Emergency Departments experienced significant challenges related to EOL care, 2) how often this led to unnecessary hospital admissions, and 3) if a new “Acute Palliation Kit” (APK) might alleviate some of the challenges identified above.
 Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey among doctors (n=53) and nurses (n=74) working in Departments of Emergency Medicine or General Practice in the North Denmark Region. The questionnaire covered the healthcare professionals’ backgrounds, their perceptions of current challenges in EOL care, and the potential effects of the APK.
 Results: Among the healthcare professionals, 53% of responders found the most challenging aspect of EOL care to be “Logistic Issues” and 21% “Time consumption”. Out of the responders, 64% had sometimes, often, or always felt the need to admit/maintain admission/push to admit a dying patient, because it was too challenging to start the EOL care at home. On the potential effect of APK, 74% thought it would save time. In addition, most responders thought it would give both the patient and their next of kins better EOL care.
 Conclusion: This study showed that doctors and nurses in Departments of Emergency Medicine found discharging patients to EOL care at home challenging mainly due to logistic problems leading to hospital admissions. This was often contrary to the patient’s wishes and takes time and resources from the healthcare professionals. In the future, logistics of EOL care must be simplified if fewer patients are to be admitted to die. A pre-packed EOL care kit might reduce logistics but needs evaluation in dedicated studies.

Research-to-practice conference as a component of improving knowledge and mastering professional competencies by medical students and young scientists

Aim. To evaluate the importance of certain aspects of research-to-practice conferences, organized by the Department of General Practice of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, as well as its contribution to preparing students for future professional activities within the outpatient healthcare and the impact of these events on the interest of participants and speakers for research work.Material and methods. An anonymous online survey included 37 participants in the discussed conferences regarding the respondents’ motivation to attend conferences, assessment of declared subject coverage, the practical applicability of the knowledge gained and other aspects.Results. The most important motivating factors for conference participation were interest in outpatient healthcare (52,4% for the conference "Internal diseases at the prehospital stage" and 87,5% for the conference "A multimorbid patient — continuity between hospital and clinic"), analysis of interesting cases (66,7% and 75%, respectively) and multidisciplinary focus of activities (47,6% and 68,8%). An important aspect was the coverage of current problems of practical healthcare. The most important results were considered by the majority of participants to be expanding their medical horizons (85,7% and 87,5%) and gaining new knowledge on the declared subject (90,5% and 75%). Almost half of the respondents (52,4% and 56,3%) improved their interest in scientific activities as a result of visiting the conferences.Conclusion. Conducting research-to-practice conferences for students, residents and postgraduates serves as a platform for increasing the knowledge and mastering professional competencies. The results of a survey of conference participants and speakers indicate the relevance of involving students in conferences and the numerous benefits they receive, which are discussed in detail in this article.

Expert consensus on clinical application of Lixuwang~® Xuesaitong Soft Capsules

Lixuwang~® Xuesaitong Soft Capsules(referred to as "Xuesaitong Soft Capsules") have the effects of promoting blood circulation, resolving blood stasis, and dredging meridians and collaterals. They are widely used in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in clinical practice. Through years of clinical observation, they have shown significant efficacy in ischemic stroke, coronary heart disease, and other diseases, and have been recommended by multiple guidelines, consensus statements, and monographs. Based on the summary of clinical application experience by doctors and existing evidence-based research, following the Technical Specifications for Consensus Development of Chinese Patent Medicine by Clinical Experts issued by Standardization Office of the Chinese Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine, a nominal group method was used to reach 19 recommended opinions/consensus suggestions. This document proposes the timing of medication, syndrome differentiation for medication, therapeutic effects, dosage and administration, treatment duration, economic considerations, and safety considerations in the use of Xuesaitong Soft Capsules for the treatment of ischemic stroke and angina pectoris in coronary heart disease. It is intended for doctors in internal medicine, encephalopathy(neurology), cardiovascular medicine, geriatrics, emergency medicine, general practice, and traditional Chinese medicine departments of various medical institutions, as well as pharmacists in hospitals and pharmacies, as a medication reference when using Xuesaitong Soft Capsules. It is hoped that the widespread application of this consensus can improve the clinical efficacy of Xuesaitong Soft Capsules in the treatment of ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease, promote rational drug use, and reduce medication risks. This consensus has been reviewed and published by the China Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine, with the identification number GS/CACM 323-2023.

Development and validation of a nomogram for arterial stiffness.

Even though as a gold standard for noninvasive measurementof arterial stiffness, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is not widely used in primary healthcare institutions due to time-consuming and unavailable equipment. The aim of this study was to develop a convenient and low-cost nomogram model for arterial stiffness screening. A cross-sectional study was undertaken in the department of general practice, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Arterial stiffness was defined as cfPWV≥10m/s. A total of 2717 participants were recruited to construct the nomogram using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regressions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, clinical impact curve were used to evaluate the performance of the model. The model was validated internally and externally (399 participants) by bootstrap method. Arterial stiffness was identified in 913 participants (33.60%). Age, sex, waist to hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, duration of diabetes, heart rate were selected to construct the nomogram model. Good discrimination and accuracy were exhibited with area under curve of 0.820 (95% CI 0.803-0.837) in ROC curve and mean absolute error=0.005 in calibration curve. A positive net benefit was shown in decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve. A satisfactory agreement was displayed in internal validation and external validation. The low cost and user-friendly nomogram is suitable for arterial stiffness screening in primary healthcare institutions.

Audit of observation ward supporting emergency room at tertiary care hospital: Kathmandu, Nepal

Introduction: Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital is a tertiary care hospital of Nepal. In an average, 118 cases visit TUTH emergency per day. After initial management in Emergency, patients are either admitted in specialty departments or are observed in observation ward under Department of General Practice. Method: It was audit report carried out among the patients admitted to observational ward of TUTH. It included data of one month. Result: Total of 205 patients were admitted to observation ward, 16 (7.8%) were later on transferred in various other wards of hospital and 189 (92%)patients were admitted in the observation ward. The common admitting diagnosis was seen to be Dengue fever82(40%), followed by COPD 20(9.7%). Conclusion: For those patients presenting in emergency room, observation wards is better alternative for continuing medical care after getting emergency care.

Role of General Practice Led Observation Ward to Support Emergency Ward to Improve Health Outcomes at a Major Kathmandu Hospital in Nepal

Introduction:Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH) is a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu. The emergency department sees between 130 to 140 cases per day. These patients get initial evaluation and basic investigation for acute emergency management and treatment. Those requiring further treatment are then admitted to the department of General Practice for post emergency care which acts as an observation ward. This step allows for the patients to be observed on a short-term basis and permits patient monitoring and/or treatment for an initial 24-48 hour period and up to a maximum of five days. These steps allow for focused follow up, improved efficiency and minimizes inappropriate admissions to other hospital inpatient wards. This paper evaluates functionality, admission criteria, patient categorization and subspeciality referral to specialty patient care, discharge criteria and cost effectiveness.Method:A descriptive observational study was carried out of the patients admitted to the observational ward between 2020-2021.Results:Most articles suggest these wards improve patient satisfaction and clinical care, decrease length of stay, reduce unnecessary inpatient hospital admissions and are useful in fever under evaluations, COPD, poisoning, pneumonia, mild head injuries, high sugar, hypertension, gastroenteritis etc. Around 14% of patients were sent to the observation ward after acute emergency care. 84% were discharged from observation ward with a mean stay of three days and were followed up in community care or GP OPD. Nine percent were admitted to hospital wards, and 7% transferred to yellow/red area emergencies for derange vitals.Conclusion:Observation wards seem to have advantages, excluding those who will inevitably need longer treatment, reduces cost savings and unnecessary burden of hospital admission.

Metabolic Syndrome among Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary care centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Metabolic syndrome; a constellation of obesity, hypertension, and disturbances of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism is a common phenomenon in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Systemic inflammation plays an important role in both conditions. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients visiting the outpatient Department of a tertiary care centre. A descriptive cross-sectional study was done in the outpatient Department of Pulmonology and General Practice from 1 August 2019 to 31 December 2020. Ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Review Committee [Registration number: 5/(6-11)E2/076/077]. Convenience sampling method was used. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Among 57 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 22 (38.59%) (27.48-49.70, 90% Confidence Interval). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease stages 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 6 (27.27%), 9 (40.90%), 6 (27.27%) and 1 (4.54%) respectively. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was similar to the other studies done in similar settings. The screening of metabolic syndrome is necessary and stratification for cardiovascular disease risk is important for timely intervention to prevent and decrease morbidities and mortalities. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; c-reactive protein; metabolic syndrome.

Metabolic Syndrome among Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary care centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional study.

Metabolic syndrome; a constellation of obesity, hypertension, and disturbances of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism is a common phenomenon in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Systemic inflammation plays an important role in both conditions. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients visiting the outpatient Department of a tertiary care centre. A descriptive cross-sectional study was done in the outpatient Department of Pulmonology and General Practice from 1 August 2019 to 31 December 2020. Ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Review Committee [Registration number: 5/(6-11)E2/076/077]. Convenience sampling method was used. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Among 57 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 22 (38.59%) (27.48-49.70, 90% Confidence Interval). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease stages 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 6 (27.27%), 9 (40.90%), 6 (27.27%) and 1 (4.54%) respectively. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was similar to the other studies done in similar settings. The screening of metabolic syndrome is necessary and stratification for cardiovascular disease risk is important for timely intervention to prevent and decrease morbidities and mortalities. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; c-reactive protein; metabolic syndrome.

Evaluating dermatology education in Australia: Medical students' and junior doctors' perceptions.

Despite a high frequency of dermatological general practice and emergency department presentations, including serious and potentially fatal skin conditions, evidence suggests that undergraduate dermatological education remains sparse. Given this, there exists a need to gauge dermatology-relevant knowledge and skill in our new doctors. An online survey was completed by final-phase medical students and junior doctors from Australian medical schools. The survey appraised self-perceived confidence of dermatology knowledge and skills, in addition to 5 knowledge-based multiple-choice questions. Nine hundred and forty-two eligible responses were completed. Respondents reported low confidence in identifying dermatological conditions in people with skin of colour (μ=1.69), handing over to dermatology colleagues (μ=2.00) and in diagnosing and managing acute/emergency dermatology conditions (μ=1.84). In contrast, participants felt most confident in counselling sun-protective behaviours (μ=3.95) and suturing small wounds (μ=3.43). 76.4% of respondents had not undertaken any dermatology placement, and 70.9% had never been formally assessed in dermatology. Those who received dermatology placement had a significantly higher aggregated self-reported confidence (p < 0.0001) and answered significantly more MCQs correctly (p=0.0419). Those who had been formally assessed had a significantly higher self-reported confidence (p < 0.001) and answered significantly more MCQs correctly (p=0.007). Final-phase medical students and junior doctors exhibit low confidence across many dermatology competencies. Participants believed they need more dermatology education, and seldom feel prepared when exposed to dermatologic pathologies. Introduction of a standardised curriculum, formal assessments and increased clinical exposure are possible solutions.

Patient representation in New Zealand general practice and rural health case-based teaching: a quality improvement exercise.

Introduction Healthcare inequity disproportionately affects minority populations in Aotearoa New Zealand. Healthcare providers may contribute to inequity due to their biases. Medical education can unintentionally promote biases by reinforcing stereotypes or limiting exposure to diversity. Teaching staff from the Department of General Practice and Rural Health suggested a need to review current teaching materials to ascertain if they have the potential to contribute to this bias. Aim The aim of this study was to review case-based teaching material to determine its representation of the New Zealand population, and whether there is potential to contribute to implicit bias. Methods Document analysis of 135 cases used to teach fourth- and fifth-year medical students in the Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Otago Medical School was performed. Demographic, clinical and social features of each case were recorded and analysed. Results Cases typically included patient age (129/135, 95.6%), sex (127/135, 94.1%) and occupation status (91/136, 66.9%). Ethnicity (31/135, 23.0%), living situation (55/135, 40.7%), relationship status (57/135, 42.2%) and sexual orientation (52/135, 40.0%) were less frequently defined. Cases typically represented the population majority norms. Discussion Case-based teaching materials require regular review and updating to match population demographics. There is potential to improve representation of diversity, and hence cultural safety, though review and revision of written teaching cases.

The place of digital triage in a complex healthcare system: An interview study with key stakeholders in Australia's national provider.

Digital triage tools such as telephone advice and online symptom checkers are now commonplace in health systems internationally. Research has focused on consumers' adherence to advice, health outcomes, satisfaction, and the degree to which these services manage demand for general practice or emergency departments. Such studies have had mixed findings, leaving equivocal the role of these services in healthcare. We examined stakeholders' perspectives on Healthdirect, Australia's national digital triage provider, focusing on its role in the health system, and barriers to operation, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Key stakeholders took part in semi-structured interviews conducted online in the third quarter of 2021. Transcripts were coded and thematically analysed. Participants (n = 41) were Healthdirect staff (n = 13), employees of Primary Health Networks (PHNs; n = 12), clinicians (n = 9), shareholder representatives (n = 4), consumer representatives (n = 2) and other policymakers (n = 1). Eight themes emerged from the analysis: (1) information and guidance in navigating the system, (2) efficiency through appropriate care, (3) value for consumers? (4) the difficulties in triage at a distance, (5) competition and the unfulfilled promise of integration, (6) challenges in promoting Healthdirect, (7) monitoring and evaluating digital triage services and (8) rapid change, challenge and opportunity from COVID-19. Stakeholders varied in their views of the purpose of Healthdirect's digital triage services. They identified challenges in lack of integration, competition, and the limited public profile of the services, issues largely reflective of the complexity of the policy and health system landscape. There was acknowledgement of the value of the services during the COVID-19 pandemic, and an expectation of them realising greater potential in the wake of the rapid uptake of telehealth.