Dental Epithelium Research Articles

Transcriptional regulation of the basichelix-loop-helix factor AmeloD during tooth development.

The epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are essential for the initiation and regulation of the development of teeth. Following the initiation of tooth development, numerous growth factors are secreted by the dental epithelium and mesenchyme that play critical roles in cellular differentiation. During tooth morphogenesis, the dental epithelial stem cells differentiate into several cell types, including inner enamel epithelial cells, which then differentiate into enamel matrix-secreting ameloblasts. Recently, we reported that the novel basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factor, AmeloD, is actively engaged in the development of teeth as a regulator of dental epithelial cell motility. However, the gene regulation mechanism of AmeloD is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to uncover the mechanisms regulating AmeloD expression during tooth development. By screening growth factors that are important in the early stages of tooth formation, we found that TGF-β1 induced AmeloD expression and ameloblast differentiation in the dental epithelial cell line, SF2. TGF-β1 phosphorylated ERK1/2 and Smad2/3 to induce AmeloD expression, whereas treatment with the MEK inhibitor, U0126, inhibited AmeloD induction. Promoter analysis of AmeloD revealed that the proximal promoter of AmeloD showed high activity in dental epithelial cell lines, which was enhanced following TGF-β1 stimulation. These results suggested that TGF-β1 activates AmeloD transcription via ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms that govern tooth development.

Rodent incisor and molar dental follicles show distinct characteristics in tooth eruption

ObjectiveRodent incisors and molars show different eruption patterns. Dental follicles and their interaction with dental epithelia play key roles in tooth eruption. However, little is known about the differences between incisor dental follicle (IF) and molar dental follicle (MF) during tooth eruption of rodents. This study aimed to investigate the differences between IF and MF during tooth eruption under induction with cervical-loop cells (CLC) and Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath (HERS) cells of rats. Materials and methodsCLC, HERS, IF, MF cells were isolated from 10 postnatal day 7 rats and identified by immunofluorescence staining. CLC or HERS cells-derived conditioned medium (CM) was obtained to induce IF and MF cells. Cell proliferation, mineralization, gene and protein expression related to tooth eruption were detected, and histological analysis was also performed. ResultsThe osteogenic differentiation and mineralization abilities of IF cells were stronger than those of MF cells. Both CLC and HERS cells-derived CM enhanced these abilities of IF cells, whereas they showed the opposite effect on MF cells. At 7, 10, and 15 d after birth, IF cells expressed more OPG and less RANKL than MF cells. ConclusionsIF and MF cells present distinct characteristics in tooth eruption, CLC and HERS cells have significant inductive effects on them.

Distinct tooth regeneration systems deploy a conserved battery of genes

BackgroundVertebrate teeth exhibit a wide range of regenerative systems. Many species, including most mammals, reptiles, and amphibians, form replacement teeth at a histologically distinct location called the successional dental lamina, while other species do not employ such a system. Notably, a ‘lamina-less’ tooth replacement condition is found in a paraphyletic array of ray-finned fishes, such as stickleback, trout, cod, medaka, and bichir. Furthermore, the position, renewal potential, and latency times appear to vary drastically across different vertebrate tooth regeneration systems. The progenitor cells underlying tooth regeneration thus present highly divergent arrangements and potentials. Given the spectrum of regeneration systems present in vertebrates, it is unclear if morphologically divergent tooth regeneration systems deploy an overlapping battery of genes in their naïve dental tissues.ResultsIn the present work, we aimed to determine whether or not tooth progenitor epithelia could be composed of a conserved cell type between vertebrate dentitions with divergent regeneration systems. To address this question, we compared the pharyngeal tooth regeneration processes in two ray-finned fishes: zebrafish (Danio rerio) and threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). These two teleost species diverged approximately 250 million years ago and demonstrate some stark differences in dental morphology and regeneration. Here, we find that the naïve successional dental lamina in zebrafish expresses a battery of nine genes (bmpr1aa, bmp6, cd34, gli1, igfbp5a, lgr4, lgr6, nfatc1, and pitx2), while active Wnt signaling and Lef1 expression occur during early morphogenesis stages of tooth development. We also find that, despite the absence of a histologically distinct successional dental lamina in stickleback tooth fields, the same battery of nine genes (Bmpr1a, Bmp6, CD34, Gli1, Igfbp5a, Lgr4, Lgr6, Nfatc1, and Pitx2) are expressed in the basalmost endodermal cell layer, which is the region most closely associated with replacement tooth germs. Like zebrafish, stickleback replacement tooth germs additionally express Lef1 and exhibit active Wnt signaling. Thus, two fish systems that either have an organized successional dental lamina (zebrafish) or lack a morphologically distinct successional dental lamina (sticklebacks) deploy similar genetic programs during tooth regeneration.ConclusionsWe propose that the expression domains described here delineate a highly conserved “successional dental epithelium” (SDE). Furthermore, a set of orthologous genes is known to mark hair follicle epithelial stem cells in mice, suggesting that regenerative systems in other epithelial appendages may utilize a related epithelial progenitor cell type, despite the highly derived nature of the resulting functional organs.

Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space.

For humans and other mammals to eat effectively, teeth must develop properly inside the jaw. Deciphering craniodental integration is central to explaining the timely formation of permanent molars, including third molars which are often impacted in humans, and to clarifying how teeth and jaws fit, function and evolve together. A factor long-posited to influence molar onset time is the jaw space available for each molar organ to form within. Here, we tested whether each successive molar initiates only after a minimum threshold of space is created via jaw growth. We used synchrotron-based micro-CT scanning to assess developing molars in situ within jaws of C57BL/6J mice aged E10 to P32, encompassing molar onset to emergence. We compared total jaw, retromolar and molar lengths, and molar onset times, between upper and lower jaws. Initiation time and developmental duration were comparable between molar upper and lower counterparts despite shorter, slower-growing retromolar space in the upper jaw, and despite size differences between upper and lower molars. Timing of molar formation appears unmoved by jaw length including space. Conditions within the dental lamina likely influence molar onset much more than surrounding jaw tissues. We theorize that molar initiation is contingent on sufficient surface area for the physical reorganization of dental epithelium and its invagination of underlying mesenchyme.

The miR-200 family is required for ectodermal organ development through the regulation of the epithelial stem cell niche.

The murine lower incisor ectodermal organ contains a single epithelial stem cell (SC) niche that provides epithelial progenitor cells to the continuously growing rodent incisor. The dental stem cell niche gives rise to several cell types and we demonstrate that the miR‐200 family regulates these cell fates. The miR‐200 family is highly enriched in the differentiated dental epithelium and absent in the stem cell niche. In this study, we inhibited the miR‐200 family in developing murine embryos using new technology, resulting in an expanded epithelial stem cell niche and lack of cell differentiation. Inhibition of individual miRs within the miR‐200 cluster resulted in differential developmental and cell morphology defects. miR‐200 inhibition increased the expression of dental epithelial stem cell markers, expanded the stem cell niche and decreased progenitor cell differentiation. RNA‐seq. identified miR‐200 regulatory pathways involved in cell differentiation and compartmentalization of the stem cell niche. The miR‐200 family regulates signaling pathways required for cell differentiation and cell cycle progression. The inhibition of miR‐200 decreased the size of the lower incisor due to increased autophagy and cell death. New miR‐200 targets demonstrate gene networks and pathways controlling cell differentiation and maintenance of the stem cell niche. This is the first report demonstrating how the miR‐200 family is required for in vivo progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation.

Deep orofacial phenotyping of population-based infants with isolated cleft lip and isolated cleft palate

Isolated orofacial clefts (OFC) are common with poorly understood aetiology. Heterogeneous phenotypes and subphenotypes confound aetiological variant findings. To improve OFC phenome understanding, population-based, consecutive, pre-treatment infants with isolated unilateral cleft lip (UCL, n = 183) and isolated cleft palate (CP, n = 83) of similar ancestry were grouped for deep phenotyping. Subphenotypes stratified by gender and cleft severity were evaluated for primary dental malformations and maturation using radiographs. We found that cleft severity and tooth agenesis were inadequate to distinguish heterogeneity in infants with UCL and CP. Both groups featured slow dental maturity, significantly slower in males and the UCL phenotype. In 32.8% of infants with UCL, supernumerary maxillary lateral incisors were present on the cleft lip side, but not in infants with CP, suggesting a cleft dental epithelium and forme fruste cleft dentoalveolus of the UCL subphenotype. The findings underscored the importance of deep phenotyping to disclose occult OFC subphenotypes.

The Development of Dentin Microstructure Is Controlled by the Type of Adjacent Epithelium.

ABSTRACTConsiderable amount of research has been focused on dentin mineralization, odontoblast differentiation, and their application in dental tissue engineering. However, very little is known about the differential role of functionally and spatially distinct types of dental epithelium during odontoblast development. Here we show morphological and functional differences in dentin located in the crown and roots of mouse molar and analogous parts of continuously growing incisors. Using a reporter (DSPP‐cerulean/DMP1‐cherry) mouse strain and mice with ectopic enamel (Spry2+/−;Spry4−/−), we show that the different microstructure of dentin is initiated in the very beginning of dentin matrix production and is maintained throughout the whole duration of dentin growth. This phenomenon is regulated by the different inductive role of the adjacent epithelium. Thus, based on the type of interacting epithelium, we introduce more generalized terms for two distinct types of dentins: cementum versus enamel‐facing dentin. In the odontoblasts, which produce enamel‐facing dentin, we identified uniquely expressed genes (Dkk1, Wisp1, and Sall1) that were either absent or downregulated in odontoblasts, which form cementum‐facing dentin. This suggests the potential role of Wnt signalling on the dentin structure patterning. Finally, we show the distribution of calcium and magnesium composition in the two developmentally different types of dentins by utilizing spatial element composition analysis (LIBS). Therefore, variations in dentin inner structure and element composition are the outcome of different developmental history initiated from the very beginning of tooth development. Taken together, our results elucidate the different effects of dental epithelium, during crown and root formation on adjacent odontoblasts and the possible role of Wnt signalling which together results in formation of dentin of different quality. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Transcriptional Regulation of Dental Epithelial Cell Fate.

Dental enamel is hardest tissue in the body and is produced by dental epithelial cells residing in the tooth. Their cell fates are tightly controlled by transcriptional programs that are facilitated by fate determining transcription factors and chromatin regulators. Understanding the transcriptional program controlling dental cell fate is critical for our efforts to build and repair teeth. In this review, we describe the current understanding of these regulators essential for regeneration of dental epithelial stem cells and progeny, which are identified through transgenic mouse models. We first describe the development and morphogenesis of mouse dental epithelium in which different subpopulations of epithelia such as ameloblasts contribute to enamel formation. Then, we describe the function of critical factors in stem cells or progeny to drive enamel lineages. We also show that gene mutations of these factors are associated with dental anomalies in craniofacial diseases in humans. We also describe the function of the master regulators to govern dental lineages, in which the genetic removal of each factor switches dental cell fate to that generating hair. The distinct and related mechanisms responsible for the lineage plasticity are discussed. This knowledge will lead us to develop a potential tool for bioengineering new teeth.

Dual roles of TGF-β signaling in the regulation of dental epithelial cell proliferation.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the molecular mechanisms and biological function of TGF-β-activated Smad1/5 in dental epithelium. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expressions of TGF-β signaling-related gene in mice molar germ. Primary dental epithelial cells were cultured and treated with TGF-β1 at a concentration of 0.5 or 5ng/mL. Small molecular inhibitors, SB431542 and ML347, was used to inhibite ALK5 and ALK1/2, respectively. Small interfering RNA was used to knock down Smad1/5 or Smad2/3. The proliferation rate of cells was evaluated by EdU assay. In the basal layer of dental epithelial bud TGF-β1 and p-Smad1/5 were highly expressed, and in the interior of the epithelial bud TGF-β1 was lowly expressed, whereas p-Smad2/3 was highly expressed. In primary cultured dental epithelial cells, low concentration of TGF-β1 activated Smad2/3 but not Smad1/5, while high concentration of TGF-β1 was able to activate both Smad2/3 and Smad1/5. SB431542 but not ML347 was able to block the phosphorylation of Smad2/3 by TGF-β1. Either SB431542 or ML347 was able to block the phosphorylation of Smad1/5 by TGF-β1. EdU staining showed that high concentration of TGF-β1 promoted dental epithelial cell proliferation, which was reversed by silencing Smad1/5, whereas low concentration of TGF-β1 inhibited cell proliferation, which was reversed by silencing Smad2/3. In conclusions, TGF-β exhibits dual roles in the regulation of dental epithelial cell proliferation through two pathways. On the one hand, TGF-β activates canonical Smad2/3 signaling through ALK5, inhibiting the proliferation of internal dental epithelial cells. On the other hand, TGF-β activates noncanonical Smad1/5 signaling through ALK1/2-ALK5, promoting the proliferation of basal cells in the dental epithelial bud.

Lrp6 Dynamic Expression in Tooth Development and Mutations in Oligodontia

Genes associated with the WNT pathway play an important role in the etiology of tooth agenesis. Low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 6 encoding gene (LRP6) is a recently defined gene that is associated with autosomal dominant inherited tooth agenesis. Here, we aimed to identify novel LRP6 mutations in patients with tooth agenesis and investigate the significance of Lrp6 during tooth development. Using whole-exome sequencing, we identified 4 novel LRP6 heterozygous mutations (c.2292G>A, c.195dup, c.1095dup, and c.1681C>T) in 4 of 77 oligodontia patients. Notably, a patient who carried a nonsense LRP6 mutation (c.2292G>A; p.W764*) presented a hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia phenotype. Preliminary functional studies, including bioinformatics analysis and TOP-/FOP-flash reporter assays, demonstrated that the activation of WNT/β-catenin signaling was compromised as a consequence of LRP6 mutations. RNAscope in situ hybridization revealed dynamic and special changes of Lrp6 expression during murine tooth development from E11.5 to E16.5. It was noteworthy that Lrp6 was specifically expressed in the epithelium at E11.5 to E13.5 but was expressed in both dental epithelium and dental papilla from E14.5 and persisted in both tissues at later stages. Our study broadens the mutation spectrum of human tooth agenesis and is the first to identify a LRP6 mutation in patients with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and reveal the dynamic expression pattern of Lrp6 during tooth development. Information from this study is conducive to understanding the functional significance of Lrp6 on the biological process of tooth development.

Melnick-Needles syndrome associated molecule, Filamin-A regulates dental epithelial cell migration and root formation

Abstract Background Filamin-A (FLNA) is one of the adaptor proteins binding to both integrin beta chain and actin filament. Several kind of mutation in human FLNA gene were observed in Melnick-Needles syndrome (MNS). However, the role of FLNA in tooth formation is still unknown. Matrials and methods We analyzed the tissue expression of FLNA during tooth development using immunostaining. The role of FLNA in cell migration was analyzed using a scratch assay. In addition, we analyzed the phenotype of teeth in patients with Mernick-Needles syndrome caused by FLNA gene abnormalities. Results FLNA expressed in inner and outer enamel epithelium in mouse tooth germ and also expressed in cervical region of dental epithelium. In postnatal stage, FLNA expressed in ameloblast and odontoblast layers. In rat dental epithelium cell line SF2, FLNA is localized at the boundary between cells and co-localized with the terminal region of F-actin filament. shRNA-FLNA transfected cells showed delayed cell migration and scratch closure compared with control cells. Analysis of actin fiber movement by time-lapse confocal microscopy showed slower fiber movement in shRNA-FLNA over expressing SF2 cells. Novel mutation in FLNA gene was observed in MNS with tooth anormaly. This patient showed tooth agenesis and short root in both primary and permanent dentition with thin enamel. Conclusion Taken together, these results suggest that filamin-A is play a key role for dental epithelium migration and root formation.

Identification and function analysis of ameloblast differentiation-related molecules using mouse incisors

Recently, various amelogenesis imperfecta such as molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) have been reported in pediatric dentistry . The cause has been studied extensively but is not yet clear. Therefore, dentists focus on prevention to avoid becoming serious. In order to find a new approach, we also need to understand the mechanism of enamel formation . The immature dental epithelial cells exist on the posterior side of the mouse incisor, while differentiated cells such as ameloblasts occur on the anterior side, since mouse incisors grow continuously. All ameloblast differentiation can be observed on the mouse incisor. Thus, the dental epithelium of the mouse incisor was analyzed to identify molecules that affect ameloblast differentiation in enamel formation. Tgf superfamily genes, cell adhesion molecules , Wnt -related genes, and transcription factors such as homeobox genes were expressed in the dental epithelium of the mouse incisor. Furthermore, the expression levels of these molecules increased depending on the differentiation of the molar tooth germ . Site-specifically-expressed molecules were also observed in the frontal section of the incisor, concentrated at the enamel border. These may contribute to the morphology or play a role in crown-root determination. β1 integrin , fibronectin , Gdf5 , and Sox2 were also analyzed to determine their function. These molecules were found to play important roles in ameloblast differentiation and tooth development. Various molecules were intricately involved in tooth development and morphogenesis in this study. Mouse incisors are a useful model system for the analysis of not only ameloblast differentiation, but also that of all epithelial tissues.

MTOR plays a pivotal role in multiple processes of enamel organ development principally through the mTORC1 pathway and in part via regulating cytoskeleton dynamics

We herein report that deletion of mTOR in dental epithelia caused defective development of multiple cell layers of the enamel organ, which culminated in tooth malformation and cystogenesis. Specifically, cells of the stellate reticulum and stratum intermedium were poorly formed, resulting in cystic changes. The pre-ameloblasts failed to elongate along the apical-basal axis and persisted vigorous expression of Sox2 and P63, which are normally downregulated during cytodifferentiation. Expression of amelogenic markers was also attenuated in mutants. Cell proliferation and cell sizes in mutants were significantly reduced over time. Importantly, we found reduced amounts and aberrant aggregations of cytoskeletal components in mutants, along with attenuated expression of cytoskeleton regulator Cdc42, whose epithelial deletion causes a similar phenotype. Moreover, disruption of actin assembly in an organ culture system affected cell proliferation and cytodifferentiation of tooth germs, supporting a causative role of mTOR-regulated cytoskeleton dynamics for the observed phenotype of mTOR mutant mice. In further support of this view, we showed that mTOR overactivation caused increased cytoskeletal component synthesis and assembly, along with accelerated cytodifferentiation in the enamel organ. Finally, we demonstrated that mTOR regulated enamel organ development principally through the mTORC1 pathway.

Sox2 Controls Periderm and Rugae Development to Inhibit Oral Adhesions

In humans, ankyloglossia and cleft palate are common congenital craniofacial anomalies, and these are regulated by a complex gene regulatory network. Understanding the genetic underpinnings of ankyloglossia and cleft palate will be an important step toward rational treatment of these complex anomalies. We inactivated the Sry (sex-determining region Y)–box 2 (Sox2) gene in the developing oral epithelium, including the periderm, a transient structure that prevents abnormal oral adhesions during development. This resulted in ankyloglossia and cleft palate with 100% penetrance in embryos examined after embryonic day 14.5. In Sox2 conditional knockout embryos, the oral epithelium failed to differentiate, as demonstrated by the lack of keratin 6, a marker of the periderm. Further examination revealed that the adhesion of the tongue and mandible expressed the epithelial markers E-Cad and P63. The expanded epithelia are Sox9-, Pitx2-, and Tbx1-positive cells, which are markers of the dental epithelium; thus, the dental epithelium contributes to the development of oral adhesions. Furthermore, we found that Sox2 is required for palatal shelf extension, as well as for the formation of palatal rugae, which are signaling centers that regulate palatogenesis. In conclusion, the deletion of Sox2 in oral epithelium disrupts palatal shelf extension, palatal rugae formation, tooth development, and periderm formation. The periderm is required to inhibit oral adhesions and ankyloglossia, which is regulated by Sox2. In addition, oral adhesions occur through an expanded dental epithelial layer that inhibits epithelial invagination and incisor development. This process may contribute to dental anomalies due to ankyloglossia.

Ectodermal Organ Development Is Regulated by a microRNA-26b-Lef-1-Wnt Signaling Axis.

The developmental role of Lef-1 in ectodermal organs has been characterized using Lef-1 murine knockout models. We generated a Lef-1 conditional over-expression (COEL) mouse to determine the role of Lef-1 expression in epithelial structures at later stages of development after endogenous expression switches to the mesenchyme. Lef-1 over expression (OE) in the oral epithelium creates a new dental epithelial stem cell niche that significantly increases incisor growth. These data indicate that Lef-1 expression is switched off in the dental epithelial at early stages to maintain the stem cell niche and regulate incisor growth. Bioinformatics analyses indicated that miR-26b expression increased coinciding with decreased Lef-1 expression in the dental epithelium. We generated a murine model over-expressing miR-26b that targets endogenous Lef-1 expression and Lef-1-related developmental mechanisms. miR-26b OE mice have ectodermal organ defects including a lack of incisors, molars, and hair similar to the Lef-1 null mice. miR-26b OE rescues the Lef-1 OE phenotype demonstrating a critical genetic and developmental role for miR-26b in the temporal and spatial expression of Lef-1 in epithelial tissues. Lef-1 expression regulates Wnt signaling and Wnt target genes as well as cell proliferation mechanisms, while miR-26b OE reduced the levels of Wnt target gene expression. The extra stem cell compartment in the COEL mice expressed Lef-1 suggesting that Lef-1 is a stem cell factor, which was absent in the miR-26b OE/COEL rescue mice. This is the first demonstration of a microRNA OE mouse model that has ectodermal organ defects. These findings demonstrate that the levels of Lef-1 are critical for development and establish a role for miR-26b in the regulation of ectodermal organ development through the control of Lef-1 expression and an endogenous stem cell niche.

FAM20B-catalyzed glycosaminoglycans control murine tooth number by restricting FGFR2b signaling

BackgroundThe formation of supernumerary teeth is an excellent model for studying the molecular mechanisms that control stem/progenitor cell homeostasis needed to generate a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues. Although multiple growth factors and transcriptional factors have been associated with supernumerary tooth formation, the regulatory inputs of extracellular matrix in this regenerative process remains poorly understood.ResultsIn this study, we present evidence that disrupting glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in the dental epithelium of mice by inactivating FAM20B, a xylose kinase essential for GAG assembly, leads to supernumerary tooth formation in a pattern reminiscent of replacement teeth. The dental epithelial GAGs confine murine tooth number by restricting the homeostasis of Sox2(+) dental epithelial stem/progenitor cells in a non-autonomous manner. FAM20B-catalyzed GAGs regulate the cell fate of dental lamina by restricting FGFR2b signaling at the initial stage of tooth development to maintain a subtle balance between the renewal and differentiation of Sox2(+) cells. At the later cap stage, WNT signaling functions as a relay cue to facilitate the supernumerary tooth formation.ConclusionsThe novel mechanism we have characterized through which GAGs control the tooth number in mice may also be more broadly relevant for potentiating signaling interactions in other tissues during development and tissue homeostasis.

Sox21 Regulates Anapc10 Expression and Determines the Fate of Ectodermal Organ.

SummaryThe transcription factor Sox21 is expressed in the epithelium of developing teeth. The present study aimed to determine the role of Sox21 in tooth development. We found that disruption of Sox21 caused severe enamel hypoplasia, regional osteoporosis, and ectopic hair formation in the gingiva in Sox21 knockout incisors. Differentiation markers were lost in ameloblasts, which formed hair follicles expressing hair keratins. Molecular analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing indicated that Sox21 regulated Anapc10, which recognizes substrates for ubiquitination-mediated degradation, and determined dental-epithelial versus hair follicle cell fate. Disruption of either Sox21 or Anapc10 induced Smad3 expression, accelerated TGF-β1-induced promotion of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and resulted in E-cadherin degradation via Skp2. We conclude that Sox21 disruption in the dental epithelium leads to the formation of a unique microenvironment promoting hair formation and that Sox21 controls dental epithelial differentiation and enamel formation by inhibiting EMT via Anapc10.

Bobby sox homolog regulates tooth root formation through modulation of dentin sialophosphoprotein.

Tooth root development occurs through the interaction of multiple growth factors and transcription factors expressed in Hertwig's epithelial root sheath (HERS) and dental mesenchyme. Previously, we demonstrated that bobby sox homolog (Bbx) regulates odontoblast differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. Here, we generated Bbx knockout (Bbx-/- ) mice to address the functional role of Bbx in tooth formation. During tooth development, Bbx was expressed in both dental epithelium and mesenchyme. However, molar and incisor morphology in Bbx-/- mice at postnatal Day 0 (P0) exhibited no prominent abnormalities compared with their wild-type (Bbx+/+ ) littermates. Until P28, the crown morphology in Bbx-/- mice was not distinctively different from Bbx+/+ littermates. Meanwhile, the length of the mandibular base in Bbx-/- mice was notably less at P28. Compared with Bbx+/+ mice, the mesial and distal root lengths of the first molar were reduced by 21.33% and 16.28% at P14 and 16.28% and 16.24% at P28, respectively, in Bbx-/- mice. The second molar of Bbx-/- mice also showed 10.16% and 6.4% reductions at P28 in the mesial and distal lengths, compared with Bbx+/+ mice, respectively. The gene expression analysis during early tooth root formation (P13) showed that the expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein (Dspp) was significantly decreased in Bbx-/- mice. Collectively, our data suggest that Bbx participates in tooth root formation and might be associated with the regulation of Dspp expression.

Pitx2-Sox2-Lef1 interactions specify progenitor oral/dental epithelial cell signaling centers.

Epithelial signaling centers control epithelial invagination and organ development, but how these centers are specified remains unclear. We report that Pitx2 (the first transcriptional marker for tooth development) controls the embryonic formation and patterning of epithelial signaling centers during incisor development. We demonstrate using Krt14Cre /Pitx2flox/flox (Pitx2cKO ) and Rosa26CreERT/Pitx2flox/flox mice that loss of Pitx2 delays epithelial invagination, and decreases progenitor cell proliferation and dental epithelium cell differentiation. Developmentally, Pitx2 regulates formation of the Sox2+ labial cervical loop (LaCL) stem cell niche in concert with two signaling centers: the initiation knot and enamel knot. The loss of Pitx2 disrupted the patterning of these two signaling centers, resulting in tooth arrest at E14.5. Mechanistically, Pitx2 transcriptional activity and DNA binding is inhibited by Sox2, and this interaction controls gene expression in specific Sox2 and Pitx2 co-expression progenitor cell domains. We demonstrate new transcriptional mechanisms regulating signaling centers by Pitx2, Sox2, Lef1 and Irx1.

Holocephalan (Chondrichthyes) dental plates with hypermineralized dentine as a substitute for missing teeth through developmental plasticity.

All extant holocephalans (Chimaeroidei) have lost the ability to make individual teeth, as tooth germs are not part of the embryonic development of the dental plates or of their continuous growth. Instead, a hypermineralized dentine with a unique mineral, whitlockin, is specifically distributed within a dentine framework into structures that give the dental plates their distinctive, species-specific morphology. Control of the regulation of this distribution must be cellular, with a dental epithelium initiating the first outer dentine, and via contact with ectomesenchymal tissue as the only embryonic cell type that can make dentine. Chimaeroids have three pairs of dental plates within their mouth, two in the upper jaw and one in the lower. In the genera Chimaera, Hydrolagus and Harriotta, the morphology and distribution of this whitlockin within each dental plate differs both between different plates in the same species and between species. Whitlockin structures include ovoids, rods and tritoral pads, with substantial developmental changes between these. For example, rods appear before the ovoids and result from a change in the surrounding trabecular dentine. In Harriotta, ovoids form separately from the tritoral pads, but also contribute to tritor development, while in Chimaera and Hydrolagus, tritoral pads develop from rods that later are perforated to accommodate the vasculature. Nevertheless, the position of these structures, secreted by the specialized odontoblasts (whitloblasts), appears highly regulated in all three species. These distinct morphologies are established at the aboral margin of the dental plate, with proposed involvement of the outer dentine. We observe that this outer layer forms into serially added lingual ridges, occurring on the anterior plate only. We propose that positional, structural specificity must be contained within the ectomesenchymal populations, as stem cells below the dental epithelium, and a coincidental occurrence of each lingual, serial ridge with the whitlockin structures that contribute to the wear-resistant oral surface.