ObjectiveSecondary caries is a primary cause of early restoration failure. While primary dental caries has been extensively researched, our knowledge about the impact of secondary caries on dental restorations is relatively limited. In this study, we examined how different clinically relevant microbially-influenced environments impact the degradation of nano-filled (FIL) and micro-hybrid (AEL) dental composites. MethodsMaterial strength of two commercial dental composites was measured following incubation in aqueous media containing: i) cariogenic (Streptococcus mutans) and non-cariogenic bacteria (Streptococcus sanguinis) grown on sucrose or glucose, ii) abiotic mixtures of artificial saliva and sucrose and glucose fermentation products (volatile fatty acids and ethanol) in proportions known to be produced by these microorganisms, and iii) abiotic mixtures of artificial saliva and esterase, a common oral extracellular enzyme. ResultsNano-filled FIL composite strength decreased in all three types of incubations, while micro-hybrid AEL composite strength only decreased significantly in biotic incubations. The strength of both composites was statistically significantly decreased in all biotic incubations containing both cariogenic and non-cariogenic bacteria beyond that induced by either abiotic mixtures of fermentation products or esterase alone. Finally, there were no statistically significant differences in composite strength decrease among the tested biotic conditions. ConclusionsThe results show that conditions created during the growth of both cariogenic and non-cariogenic oral Streptococci substantially reduce commercial composite strength, and this effect warrants further study to identify the mechanism(s). Clinical SignificanceDental biofilms of oral Streptococci bacteria significantly affect the mechanical strength of dental restorations.