ABSTRACT A study of land use and land cover (LULC) mapping using satellite data was conducted in the Congo Basin rainforest in the Sangha area of the northern Congo Republic, which is crucial for sustainable land management. However, the heterogeneous nature of LULC features makes data classification difficult in this area because persistent cloud cover is challenging for observing the land surface and tropical humid conditions characterizing the study area. This study compares and evaluates the potential of two of the most widely used and popular satellite image sources, the recently launched Landsat 9 and Sentinel-2, to generate land-use land cover (LULC) maps in the Sangha area using pixel-based supervised machine learning algorithms, Random Forest (RF), for classification. All procedures were performed using ArcGIS Pro. The potential to improve Landsat 9 performance was tested using the nearest resampling technique, and different bands were resampled from 30 × 30 to 10 × 10 m. Owing to the heterogeneous characteristics of the Sangha study area, six classes were defined: dense forest, open forest, wetland forest, water bodies, urban areas, and bare soils. To classify and compare Sentinel-2 and Landsat 9, the shortwave infrared (SWIR), Near Infrared (NIR), and Red, Green, Blue (RGB) bands were used. These two satellite images were compared to test the quality of their results, particularly for assessing the accuracy of the LULC classifications and identifying which dataset had the highest accuracy. Results show that overall accuracy was 93.80% for Sentinel-2 while it was 91.60% for Landsat 9, similarly, the Kappa coefficient was calculated 0.89 and 0.85 for Sentinel-2 and Landsat 9, respectively. Therefore, Sentinel-2 exhibits significant classification ability compared to the nearest resample technique Landsat 9, despite the improved resolution of the latter, which offers a scientific basis for choosing the appropriate satellite imagery to create accurate LULC maps.
Read full abstract