Longitudinal joint quality is critical to the service life of asphalt pavements. Maintaining failed joints of asphalt pavements is a challenge for many highway agencies. Long-term performance issues of flexible pavements may result from a poorly constructed joint; the low-density joint can prematurely deteriorate an otherwise sound pavement. The longitudinal joint is built using different geometries, rolling patterns, and construction techniques, all involving risk in achieving a well-compacted joint. Conventional quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) testing (using cores or density gauges) provide limited coverage due to their spot-test nature. Using conventional QC/QA methods involves the risk of accepting a poorly constructed longitudinal joint at the time of construction. This study used continuous data from the non-destructive dielectric profiling system (DPS) to identify compaction ability differences between the various joint types and construction techniques. The analysis suggests avoiding constructing an unconfined joint when possible. Percent within limits (PWL) analysis shows that any joint geometry could produce minimal compaction differences between the joint and the mat. However, if an unconfined joint needs to be constructed, a portion of the unconfined joint should be cut back before paving the adjacent lane. Such a cutback technique can result in better unconfined joint compaction. Further, PWL results showed that using a smaller subsection/sublot can isolate local compaction issues; a 100 ft sublot length is preferable for PWL analysis when utilizing DPS for compaction evaluation.