Many of South Africa's leading antiapartheid social historians met at University of Witwatersrand History Workshop in July 1994 to reflect on democracy: popular precedents, practice, and culture in wake of first nonracial general election in South Africa. The event marked need of historians to participateeven if unspectacularly-in reinvention of a nation and to stake a claim in democratic moment. It also reflected professional soul-searching that has accompanied political transformation, focusing on nature of historical enterprise in academy and its relevance to whole of South African society. The gathering inJuly underlined eventual failure of the unique attempt by a minority to construct and impose a version of past fashioned according to dictates of Afrikaner nationalism. It also signified whatJeffrey Brian Peires, a history professor until his recent election to South African Parliament as an African National Congress (ANC) member, has called break-up of radical consensus that created the charmed circle of mutual admiration among antiapartheid intellectuals of 1980s. The breakup coincided with a shift in research agenda of socially relevant knowledge, from questions of resistance to questions of reconstruction.' Looking at responses to JAH questionnaire that was launched at eighty-sixth annual meeting of Organization of American Historians at Anaheim, California, in April 1993, I was immediately struck by similarly fractured state of American history. The search for relevance seems to be an overriding demand in both historical domains, each of which is apparently awestruck by pros-