Delta Radiomics Features Research Articles

Feature selection methodology for longitudinal cone-beam CT radiomics

Background: Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans are typically acquired daily for positioning verification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Quantitative information, derived using radiomics, can potentially contribute to (early) treatment adaptation. The aims of this study were to (1) describe and investigate a methodology for feature selection of a longitudinal radiomics approach (2) investigate which time-point during treatment is potentially useful for early treatment response assessment.Material and methods: For 90 NSCLC patients CBCT scans of the first two fractions of treatment (considered as ‘test-retest’ scans) were analyzed, as well as weekly CBCT images. One hundred and sixteen radiomic features were extracted from the GTV of all scans and subsequently absolute and relative differences were calculated between weekly CBCT images and the CBCT of the first fraction. Test-retest scans were used to determine the smallest detectable change (C = 1.96 * SD) allowing for feature selection by choosing a minimum number of patients for which a feature should change more than ‘C’ to be considered as relevant. Analysis of which features change at which moment during treatment was used to investigate which time-point is potentially relevant to extract longitudinal radiomics information for early treatment response assessment.Results: A total of six absolute delta features changed for at least ten patients at week 2 of treatment and increased to 61 at week 3, 79 at week 4 and 85 at week 5. There was 93% overlap between features selected at week 3 and the other weeks.Conclusions: This study describes a feature selection methodology for longitudinal radiomics that is able to select reproducible delta radiomics features that are informative due to their change during treatment, which can potentially be used for treatment decisions concerning adaptive radiotherapy. Nonetheless, the prognostic value of the selected delta radiomic features should be investigated in future studies.

Using Pretreatment Radiomics and Delta-Radiomics Features to Predict Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Outcomes

Using Pretreatment Radiomics and Delta-Radiomics Features to Predict Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Outcomes

Delta-radiomics features for the prediction of patient outcomes in non\u2013small cell lung cancer

Radiomics is the use of quantitative imaging features extracted from medical images to characterize tumor pathology or heterogeneity. Features measured at pretreatment have successfully predicted patient outcomes in numerous cancer sites. This project was designed to determine whether radiomics features measured from non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) change during therapy and whether those features (delta-radiomics features) can improve prognostic models. Features were calculated from pretreatment and weekly intra-treatment computed tomography images for 107 patients with stage III NSCLC. Pretreatment images were used to determine feature-specific image preprocessing. Linear mixed-effects models were used to identify features that changed significantly with dose-fraction. Multivariate models were built for overall survival, distant metastases, and local recurrence using only clinical factors, clinical factors and pretreatment radiomics features, and clinical factors, pretreatment radiomics features, and delta-radiomics features. All of the radiomics features changed significantly during radiation therapy. For overall survival and distant metastases, pretreatment compactness improved the c-index. For local recurrence, pretreatment imaging features were not prognostic, while texture-strength measured at the end of treatment significantly stratified high- and low-risk patients. These results suggest radiomics features change due to radiation therapy and their values at the end of treatment may be indicators of tumor response.

TU‐D‐207B‐01: A Prediction Model for Distinguishing Radiation Necrosis From Tumor Progression After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Based On Radiomics Features From MR Images

Purpose:To develop and validate a prediction model using radiomics features extracted from MR images to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with Gamma knife radiosurgery.Methods:The images used to develop the model were T1 post‐contrast MR scans from 71 patients who had had pathologic confirmation of necrosis or progression; 1 lesion was identified per patient (17 necrosis and 54 progression). Radiomics features were extracted from 2 images at 2 time points per patient, both obtained prior to resection. Each lesion was manually contoured on each image, and 282 radiomics features were calculated for each lesion. The correlation for each radiomics feature between two time points was calculated within each group to identify a subset of features with distinct values between two groups. The delta of this subset of radiomics features, characterizing changes from the earlier time to the later one, was included as a covariate to build a prediction model using support vector machines with a cubic polynomial kernel function. The model was evaluated with a 10‐fold cross‐validation.Results:Forty radiomics features were selected based on consistent correlation values of approximately 0 for the necrosis group and >0.2 for the progression group. In performing the 10‐fold cross‐validation, we narrowed this number down to 11 delta radiomics features for the model. This 11‐delta‐feature model showed an overall prediction accuracy of 83.1%, with a true positive rate of 58.8% in predicting necrosis and 90.7% for predicting tumor progression. The area under the curve for the prediction model was 0.79.Conclusion:These delta radiomics features extracted from MR scans showed potential for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression. This tool may be a useful, noninvasive means of determining the status of an enlarging lesion after radiosurgery, aiding decision‐making regarding surgical resection versus conservative medical management.