October 2013 San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science: Science & Policy for the Delta Leading Change: The Collaborative Science and Adaptive Management Program and the Delta Science Plan Valerie Connor State and Federal Contractors Water Agency Sacramento, CA 95814 USA vconnor@sfcwa.org The opinions expressed in this essay are my own and not the policies or positions of the SFCWA or CSAMP member agencies or the Delta Science Program. In the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, “adaptive management” and “best available science” have become catch phrases describing how we will address the restoration of a highly altered ecosystem and improve the reliability of the water supply. The Delta Reform Act (2009) mandates the use of both as we work towards the co-equal goals. The Delta Stewardship Council has released a Delta Plan (DSC 2013) that calls for its Delta Science Program to draft a Delta Science Plan (DSP 2013) by December 2013. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BCDP) is nearing completion, and, as an eventual part of the Delta Plan, it too relies heavily on the two concepts. But, will adaptive management and best available science help us achieve the co-equal goals? The draft Delta Science Plan recognizes both concepts are necessary, but not sufficient. Success will require collaboration 1 , integration, time, and a sustained commitment from all of us who conduct science in the Delta and all of us who rely upon it. Introduction 1 Collaboration is a mutually beneficial and well-defined relationship entered into by two or more parties to achieve shared goals. This essay recognizes that success will require a conscious effort to actively “lead change” in how we approach and support scientific endeavors. The assessment of our collective ability to lead change is not a critique of scientists or science, but is criti- cal of how scientific information for policy is generated and used. The process that resolves controversial policy decisions needs improvement. Delta scientists will need to work together in new ways, but they will only succeed if policymakers, managers, and stakeholders create the environment necessary for scientists to excel; this is the more difficult challenge. This essay suggests that for the Delta Science Plan to be suc- cessful, we must consciously lead the changes required for implementation.