Delphi Rounds Research Articles

Delphi Consensus Recommendations for the Development of the Emergency Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Curriculum in Nepal

Introduction: Emergency Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound (EM-POCUS) is a diagnostic bedside tool for quick and accurate clinical decision-making. Comprehensive training in POCUS is a mandatory part of EM training in developed countries. In Nepal, we need to build an educational curriculum based on the local medical system, available resources, and educational environment. We used the modified Delphi method to develop a EM-POCUS curriculum. Methods: We formed an EM-POCUS core working group based on expertise in key identified areas. The core working group developed criteria for expert panelist selection and synthesized the data for panelists after each Delphi round. We recruited 46 expert panelists to participate in a series of electronic surveys. The literature review and the results of the first Delphi round identified a set of competencies. Quantitative methodology was performed for subsequent surveys. Data analysis of the frequency, percentage, median, and interquartile range of the 9-point Likert scale was performed. We deemed a minimum threshold of 80% agreement to retain items across Delphi rounds. The result of every round was disseminated before subsequent rounds for the expert panelists to review responses in light of the group’s response. Results: We identified 10 specific global competency categories and 132 objectives (Round 1, response rate 85%). Rounds 2 and 3 (response rates 78% and 81% respectively) developed consensus on 45 core objectives (34%). The list of EM-POCUS competencies with the median (IQR) was finalized. Conclusion: This expert, consensus-generated EM-POCUS curriculum provides detailed guidance for EM-POCUS education and applications in clinical practice in Nepal.

Developing a quality indicator system for evaluating internet plus home care nursing services based on the SERVQUAL model: a Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study

Background In the context of global population aging and the rapid development of information technology, the demand for Internet Plus Home Care Nursing (Internet+ HCN) services have been on the rise, especially in China. Internet+ HCN services have the potential to maximize existing human resources to counter the shortage of medical healthcare services. However, at present, Internet+ HCN services are difficult to scale due to the lack of standardized service quality governance. Quality indicators for service evaluation of Internet+ HCN services are under-defined. Objective To develop a quality indicator system for evaluating Internet+ HCN services, and to shed theoretical light on assessing mHealth service quality from a user experience perspective. Methods An initial quality indicator system was established based on scenarios related to Internet+ HCN services. The Delphi Method was applied to modify the indicators according to experts’ opinions, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to calculate the indicator weight. Finally, a quality indicator system for evaluating Internet+ HCN services was developed based on the SERVQUAL model. Results Altogether, 17 experts from relevant fields such as nursing education, clinical nursing, health management, and health informatics were consulted through email surveys. The response rates in both rounds of Delphi and the AHP were 100%. The average expert authority coefficients were 0.912 and 0.925 respectively in the two rounds of Delphi. Kendall’s W, indicating variation coefficients, ranged from 0.262 to 0.265. Finally, a quality indicator system for evaluating Internet+ HCN services, comprising five primary indicators and 15 secondary indicators, was developed. Primary indicators and their AHP generated the following weights: assurance (0.245), reliability (0.240), tangibles (0.192), responsiveness (0.190), and empathy (0.132). Conclusions By measuring the services quality gap between user expectations and perceptions, the proposed SERVQUAL model-based quality indicator system shows potential in improving the quality of Internet+ HCN services through the perspective of user experiences.

Abstract 4137716: Development and Content Validation of the Heart Failure Symptom Management Motivation Questionnaire

Introduction: Adequate heart failure (HF) self-management is crucial for alleviating distressing symptoms. While disease knowledge is important, it is insufficient for sustained self-care. Patient motivation plays a key role in successful self-management interventions. However, tools assessing motivation for HF symptom self-management are lacking. Aims: To develop the Heart Failure Symptom Management Motivation (HF-SMM) questionnaire and assess its content validity with nurse experts. Methods: A cross-sectional study occurred in three phases from November 2022 to April 2024. Initially, we conducted a systematic review to identify motivation assessment instruments for cardiovascular self-care and assess their psychometric properties. We then designed the HF-SMM items based on existing tools, guidelines, and clinical expertise, focusing on four HF symptoms: anxiety, depression, edema, and fatigue. The questionnaire comprised three subscales: autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation. Nurse experts with doctoral degrees and HF experience assessed 96 items about questionnaire clarity and relevance via Delphi rounds, using a 4-point Likert scale. Items with a content validity index (I-CVI) between .80 to 1.00 were deemed acceptable. The average I-CVI of all items resulted in the scale content validity index average (S-CVI/Ave) with a cutoff point of .90. Results: We invited ten experts, with nine participating. They had an average of 17.1 ± 10.7 years of HF clinical experience and 11.6 ± 7.4 years of research experience. In the initial Delphi round, items scored I-CVI ranging from .44 to 1.00 for anxiety, depression, and fatigue, and .66 to 1.00 for edema, resulting in an S-CVI/Ave of .81. After the first round, 54 items with I-CVI >.80 were retained (56.2%), and 42 items were revised (43.8%). A second Delphi round, with 77.7% of the original experts, showed most items with excellent I-CVI scores (> .80; 84; 87.5%), with only ten items needing clarity revisions (10.4%). The overall CVI of the questionnaire was excellent with a S-CVI/ Ave of .90 after two rounds of validation. Conclusions: The HF-SMM questionnaire demonstrates excellent content validity for assessing motivation in HF self-management. Future studies should incorporate cognitive interviews to understand better patient perceptions about the items.

Consensus on maturity-related injury risks and prevention in youth soccer: A Delphi study.

The aim of this study was to achieve consensus from leading sport and exercise science practitioners in professional soccer academies surrounding (i) motivations for maturity-related data collection (ii) maturity-related injury risk factors (iii) how maturity-related data informs injury prevention practices and (iv) the use of bio-banding as an alternative injury prevention strategy. The study adopted an iterative three round online Delphi method, where a series of statements were rated by expert panellists. Consensus agreement was set at ≥70% for all statements. Nine panellists participated in all three rounds (69% response rate). Consensus was achieved for a total of sixteen statements. Panellists agreed that the period during and 12-months post peak height velocity, muscle strength/flexibility imbalances and maturity status (% predicted adult height) as the most important maturity-related injury risk factors. Panellists also agreed that maturity-related data collection is important for injury prevention as well as physical and performance-related purposes, but not for recruitment or retain/release purposes. It was also evident that variability and misunderstanding of key language terms used within the growth and maturation literature exists. It was agreed that practitioners who are responsible for conducting maturational assessments require additional training/education to enhance their application, delivery and outcomes. The findings indicate that maturity-related data collection is part of a multidisciplinary process, dedicated towards the long-term development of players. Greater training and education are required along with increased dissemination of research findings surrounding the full uses for bio-banding. This study provides guidance on maturity-related injury risks and prevention in youth soccer for practitioners.

Identifying future research priorities in the field of interpersonal violence (IV) towards athletes in sport: a Delphi study

ObjectiveOur aim was to define the priorities for future research in safeguarding athletes from interpersonal violence (IV) in sport through a Delphi consensus study of researchers in the field.MethodsAn internet-based...

Imaging of peritoneal metastases of ovarian and colorectal cancer: joint recommendations of ESGAR, ESUR, PSOGI, and EANM.

Diagnostic imaging of peritoneal metastases in ovarian and colorectal cancer remains pivotal in selecting the most appropriate treatment and balancing clinical benefit with treatment-related morbidity and mortality. To address the challenges related to diagnostic imaging and detecting and reporting peritoneal metastatic spread, a joint guideline was created by the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), and European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). A targeted literature search was performed and consensus recommendations were proposed using Delphi questionnaires and a five-point Likert scale. A total of three Delphi rounds were performed. Consensus was reached on the position of diagnostic imaging for assessment of operability, treatment response monitoring, and follow-up of peritoneal metastases, optimal imaging modality and their technical imaging requirements depending on the indication and how to optimise communication of imaging results by the report and multidisciplinary board discussion. The complete list of recommendations is provided. These expert consensus statements aim to guide appropriate indications, acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of imaging for operability assessment, treatment response monitoring, and follow-up of peritoneal metastases in ovarian and colorectal cancer patients. Question Staging peritoneal metastases (PM) helps toguide clinical decision-making for colorectal and ovarian cancer patients. How can we optimise the use of imaging techniques to assess PM? Findings Imaging plays a crucial role in the detection, operability assessment, treatment response monitoring, and follow-up of peritoneal metastases in colorectal and ovarian cancer patients. Clinical relevance These expert consensus statements aim to guide appropriate indication, acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of imaging for operability assessment, treatment response monitoring, and follow-up of peritoneal metastases in ovarian and colorectal cancer patients.

'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'.

To determine patients', nurses' and researchers' opinions on the appropriateness and completeness of the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management. A modified Delphi study. We conducted a two-round Delphi survey. The panel group consisted of patients, nurses and researchers. The conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management presented in the first Delphi round was based on previous research, including a scoping review of the literature. Data was analysed between both rounds and after the second round. Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES). In the first round all activities of the proposed conceptualization were considered appropriate to support the patients' self-management. Panel members' comments led to the textual adjustment of 19 activities, the development of 15 new activities, and three general questions related to self-management support during hospitalisation. In the second round the modified and the newly added activities were also deemed appropriate. The clarification statements raised in the first Delphi round were accepted, although questions remained about the wording of the activities and about what is and what is not self-management support. After textual adjustments and the addition of some activities, the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support in patients' self-management while hospitalised have been considered appropriate and complete. Nevertheless, questions about the scope of this concept still remains. The results provide a starting point for further discussion and the development of self-management programs aimed at the hospitalised patient. The results can be considered as a starting point for practice to discuss the concept of nurses' support for hospitalised patients' self-management and develop, implement and research self-management programs specific for their patient population. Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES). Patients were involved as expert panellist in this Delphi study. Impact statement What problem did the study address? Self-management support during hospitalisation is understudied, which undermines the development of evidence-based interventions. What were the main findings? A panel, consisting of patients, nurses and researchers, agreed on the appropriateness of a conceptualization of nurses' support of inpatients' self-management, and identified some points for discussion, mainly related to the boundaries of the concept self-management. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study is crucial for generating conceptual understanding of how nurses support patients' self-management during hospitalisation. This is necessary for policy, clinical practice, education, and research on this topic.

Managerial ethical principles and behaviours for nurse managers: A Delphi method.

Managerial ethical principles and behaviours guide the roles, duties, responsibilities, behaviours, and relationships of nurse managers in healthcare institutions. The aim of this study was to establish the managerial ethical principles and behaviours for nurse managers. What are the managerial ethical principles and behaviours for nurse managers? The Delphi method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in this study. The Delphi process consisted of two rounds. Data were collected by e-Delphi technique. 42 experts were included in the first Delphi round and 39 in the second Delphi round. These experts consisted of nurse managers, academicians studying in the field of ethics and nursing management. Participation in the study was voluntary and informed consent of the experts was obtained before the study. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the university at which the researcher worked (Approval date: 24.07.2020, Decision No: 2020/12-16). At the end of the Delphi rounds, eight managerial ethical principles and 29 ethical behaviours of these principles were identified. The distribution of these behaviours and principles were: justice (six behaviours), equality (two behaviours), honesty (two behaviours), fairness (two behaviours), responsibility (eight behaviours), confidentiality (two behaviours), clarity (two behaviours), and humanity (five behaviours). These managerial ethical principles and behaviours are intended to guide nurse managers when providing nursing services but should be updated accordingly in line with changing conditions and developments.

Assembling the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Social Care Toolkit: A Modified Delphi Study

BackgroundThe pediatric emergency department is a high-value site for screening and resource referral for health-related social needs. However, best practices for this unique environment remain unclear. This study’s objective was to introduce a consensus-based social care training toolkit for the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) setting. MethodsWe conducted a modified Delphi study to establish consensus on social care practice and develop a user-friendly toolkit. Initially, five priority areas (sections) were identified. Participants reviewed literature and shared their expertise to draft preliminary sections of the toolkit. Two rounds of the modified Delphi process were conducted, involving a ranking system, significant qualitative feedback, and a final approval stage, resulting in the finalized toolkit. ResultsSeventeen participants were included in the Delphi process, including pediatric and general EM faculty and trainees, as well as a social worker and public health professor. Forty-two content items were ranked in the first Delphi round. Based on a combination of score cut-off and extensiveness of qualitative comments, items were either minorly edited and kept (29%) or sent back to their section for review (71%). The second Delphi round integrated further suggested edits, and all participants in this final round approved the publicly available version of the toolkit. ConclusionBy utilizing diverse sources of information and a consensus-driven process of the modified Delphi, we generated best practice recommendations for the design, implementation, and training of social care programs in the PEM setting.

Integrated measure for training transfer in nursing practice: Development and validation study

BackgroundThe persistent knowledge-practice gap in nursing, where competencies gained through continuing professional development fail to integrate into practice, remains a significant challenge. Effective transfer of acquired knowledge and skills to the workplace is essential for bridging this gap. However, there is a lack of comprehensive, validated instruments to assess factors influencing training transfer in nursing practice. ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a questionnaire capable of assessing training transfer as an integrated construct, encompassing all factors influencing this process in nursing practice. DesignThe study followed a developmental, iterative approach guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Setting(s)Eight tertiary teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. ParticipantsEducational experts (n = 8) and nurses (n = 1588). MethodsThe questionnaire development consisted of three phases: Phase 1) content development, in which instruments were identified based on a literature study and translation of included instruments into Dutch, Phase 2) pilot phase: content validation and usability testing using Delphi studies with experts and nurses, Phase 3) psychometric validation: construct validation using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability and discriminant validity. The phases were completed from January 2023 till June 2024. ResultsThe literature review led to the inclusion of two key instruments: the Learning Transfer System Inventory (LTSI) and the Learning Climate Questionnaire (LCQ). Following item reduction based on Delphi rounds, nurses completed the adapted instruments. Psychometric validation demonstrated a good fit for these instruments in nursing practice. The adapted LTSI showed loadings ranging from 0.37 to 0.99, with a Normed Χ2 of 1.996, TLI of 0.908, CFI of 0.920, and RMSEA of 0.050 [CI = 0.047–0.054]. The adapted LCQ exhibited loadings from 0.64 to 0.94, with a Normed Χ2 of 3.385, TLI of 0.963, CFI of 0.974, and RMSEA of 0.069 [CI = 0.061–0.078]. The combined model demonstrated a Normed Χ2 of 2.014, TLI of 0.900, CFI of 0.907, and RMSEA of 0.051 [CI = 0.048–0.054]. ConclusionsThe adapted LTSI and LCQ, both separately and combined, are reliable and valid instruments for use in the Dutch nursing hospital context. Together, they provide a comprehensive assessment of factors influencing training transfer. They can also be used independently to examine specific components such as trainers (LCQ), context (LTSI), personal aspects (LTSI), or training (LTSI/LCQ). Furthermore, these instruments can facilitate discussions between nurses, managers, and educational experts to address barriers to training transfer in nursing practice.

An International Delphi Consensus on the Management of Pollen–Food-Allergy Syndrome: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee

Pollen-food-allergy syndrome (PFAS) is common among patients with allergic rhinitis. Treatment recommendations for patients with PFAS remain variable. To develop consensus recommendation statements for managing patients with PFAS. An international panel of allergists, researchers, and nutritionists with an interest in PFAS from 25 different institutions across 11 countries convened and a list of statements was written by 3 authors. The RAND/University of California Los Angeles methodology was adopted to establish consensus on the statements. After 2 Delphi rounds, a consensus was reached on 14 statements. The panel agreed that patients with PFAS would benefit from counseling on the nature and basis of PFAS and the rare chance of more severe systemic reactions and their recognition. The panel agreed on avoiding the raw food responsible for the index reaction, but not potentially cross-reactive fruits/vegetables based on the responsible food of the index reaction. Epinephrine autoinjectors should be recommended for patients with PFAS who experienced severe symptoms (beyond the oropharynx) or for patients considered at risk for severe reactions. The panel agreed that the benefit of allergen immunotherapy remains unclear and that PFAS should not be considered the primary indication for such intervention. We developed consensus statements regarding counselling patients about the nature and severity of PFAS, potential risk factors, dietary avoidance, epinephrine autoinjector prescription, and allergen immunotherapy consideration for patients with PFAS.

Development and validation of a proposal for a Charter of Citizens' Rights and Commitments regarding eHealth.

There is a new technological paradigm in health care which has been reinforced following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Technological innovations create both challenges and opportunities to which citizens, healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizations must adapt to this reality. Although most health services have charters of citizens' general rights and commitments, there is no specific charter concerning eHealth. To develop and validate a proposal of a minimum set of citizens' rights and commitments to e-Health. Experts in a discussion group developed a charter composed of twenty items, ten rights and ten commitments to e-Health. Two rounds of consensus were necessary to obtain a final version of the charter. The twenty items were validated for content and assessed for appropriateness, relevance, and understandability using an internet-based 2-round Delphi approach in which 134 experts, patients and healthcare professionals participated. They rated the assessed attributes for each item on a 5-point Likert scale for consensus. The content validity index was calculated with kappa statistic, a consensus measure of inter-rater agreement. In the first round, 18 items were validated, leaving only two commitments with unacceptable indices. Both were modified using the experts' contributions and entered a second round of evaluation, after which the indices met the established requirements. A proposal for a chart of patient rights and commitments to eHealth was developed and showed adequate content validity and inter-observer reliability. This chart is expected to become a starting point for the debate on the role of technology in the way patients, professionals, and health services interact in the current context.

Validation of the NEED assessment framework: an EU level Delphi study

Abstract The NEED (Needs Examination, Evaluation and Dissemination) assessment framework was developed to identify and measure health-related patient and societal unmet needs across different health conditions, supporting the creation of needs-driven healthcare policy and innovation. It includes 25 criteria of needs and 46 related indicators allowing to estimate if the needs are met. The current study aims to validate this framework on the EU level using a modified Delphi approach. The selection of national and European institutes invited to participate in the Delphi process was based on their respective roles; specifically, public health, health technology assessment (HTA), medicine authorisation, pricing and reimbursement (P&R), and patient advocacy. Through a modified Delphi approach, the experts were able to express their opinion on the framework structure (dimensions and domains), health-related needs criteria and indicators. Two Delphi rounds were performed using online questionnaires. Consensus was reached when 85% of the respondents agree or totally agree with a proposal and less than 5% of the respondents totally disagree. A panel of 27 experts participated in the first round of the study. The majority of the experts worked in HTA agencies (39%) and P&R agencies (24%), followed by national medicine authorities (9%) and umbrella patient organisations (9%). Seventeen EU Member States were represented, with a higher representation of experts from Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. Consensus was reached for 22 out of the 25 criteria and 41 out of the 46 indicators after the first round. The modified Delphi technique was an adequate approach to aid the validation of the NEED framework at the EU level. This represents an important first step in achieving consensus on how to define and identify unmet health-related needs and move towards a more needs-driven healthcare policy and innovation landscape. Key messages • Consensus on the definition and identification of unmet health-related needs is crucial to transform public health innovation. • Expert consultation by means of the Delphi technique assumed a pivotal role to reach consensus on the NEED framework.

Core set of indicators to evaluate healthcare workers support programmes: a consensus-based approach

Abstract Objectives Considering the widespread implementation of support programmes for healthcare workers (HCWs), there is an urgent need to establish a standardised set of indicators for their ongoing assessment. This study seeks to develop a consensus framework for evaluating interventions aimed at supporting HCWs affected by patient safety incidents (PSIs) or other distressing situations, commonly referred to as second victims (SVs). Having a core set of indicators it is crucial for facilitating comparative analyses across different organisations and time periods. Methods A qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. The study involved a multidisciplinary group of members part of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. The consensus-building process utilised insights from a scoping review (phase 0) and a nominal group technique (phase 1) to develop a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds (phase 2). Indicators were rated on a scale of 1-5, with consensus reached if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as both feasible and sensitive scoring above 4. A consensus conference was subsequently organised. Results From an initial pool of 91 indicators, 55 were rated online, with 35 progressing to the Delphi rounds. A total of two Delphi rounds were performed and achieved response rates exceeding 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV’ support programmes. These indicators encompass various aspects such as awareness and activation of the programmes, organisational processes and structures, institutional training provisions and assessment of the impact of the programme in the SVs. Conclusions This study endeavors to provide guidance for future SVs’ programs namely in the critical areas of programme’s awareness and activation, structural and process enhancements, and programme’s impact on SVs. Moreover, these indicators are suitable for multiple healthcare contexts and levels of implementation. Key messages • The priorities for evaluation of second victim programmes’ include their impact on healthcare workers, awareness and activation, organisational processes and structures and institutional training. • Utilizing a multidisciplinary consensus approach, we defined a set of indicators that are adaptable to diverse contexts that provide care and varying levels of second victim support implementation.

EvalDepApps: How to evaluate depression management based on evidence and end users

Abstract The use of apps is increasing in the field of mental health due to their ease of use and accessibility, although there is not enough evidence on their effectiveness and safety. EvalDepApps aims to develop an evaluation tool for depression management apps. A systematic review with meta-analysis (SRMA) was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apps for depression, and to identify the evaluation criteria used. PRISMA methodology was followed. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were consulted. The risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2 scale. An online 2 rounds Delphi was carried out to prioritize the most relevant criteria identified. 44 people (26 professionals, 18 patients) were invited. They were asked to rate the importance of each criterion on a Likert scale (1 - 6). Those that obtained a high consensus were selected; those with a medium were submitted to the 2nd round. Empathization (6) and co-design (6) sessions were held with patients (23) and professionals (33) in Catalonia, the Canary Islands and Andalusia to identify what relevant aspects the tool should have. Twenty-nine studies were included in the SRMA (67% unclear bias), finding a significant effect of mHealth interventions in reducing depressive symptoms compared to non-active control (Hedges g = −0.62, 95% CI: −0.87 to − 0.37, I2 = 87%). In Round 1 of the Delphi (59% participation) 24 criteria obtained a high consensus, 20 a medium and 7 a low. In Round 2 (52% participation), 4 criteria reached high consensus. The empathy sessions showed that the actions most requested by patients were reduce anxiety, and information about their condition; for professionals, suicide prevention. Regarding co-design, it was proposed that the tool provide ranking of the apps, recommendation systems and a very visual format. The RSMA and Delphi guarantee that the tool will be based on scientific evidence and expert judgment, while empathization and co-design that it will fit with the needs of end users. Key messages • It is relevant to evaluate the quality of health apps, especially those addressed to vulnerable populations such as people with depression. • It is crucial that the development of evaluation tools for digital health interventions will be developed based on evidence-based but also includes end users.

A Delphi method approach to consensus - based translation of ‘Second Victim’ definition into German

Abstract Background Healthcare providers involved in unanticipated adverse patient events, unintentional healthcare errors, or patient injuries, and who become negatively impacted, are defined as ‘Second Victims’. The term Second Victim has gained substantial attention since its inception around 2000, yet lacks a standardized definition in the German context. This study addresses this gap by proposing a consensus-based translation of the term into German, aiming to foster understanding and facilitate research comparability. Methods A Delphi method approach was employed, engaging a panel of German-speaking, clinically and scientifically active Second Victim experts. The study was conducted using an online survey and commenced with the reference of the consensus- and evidence-based definition from the European Researchers’ Network Working on Second Victim (ERNST) published in 2022. Results Nine out of eleven invited experts participated in the study, contributing to a robust consensus-building process. Through three Delphi rounds, a consensus rate of 90% was attained for the translation of the international definition of a Second Victim. The resulting definition provides a comprehensive understanding of the term within the German context. Conclusions This Delphi study establishes a formal consensus among recognized experts, delivering a German-language, evidence-based definition of the term Second Victim. It serves as a crucial foundation for understanding and further researching the Second Victim phenomenon within the German-speaking healthcare community. Key messages • Consensus-based German translation of Second Victim enhances clarity in healthcare discourse. • Delphi method with German experts yields unified definition, promoting the coherence of patient safety research.

Development of a framework of the skills and attributes needed by mental health professionals to provide optimal clinical care to people experiencing complex psychosis: A Delphi consensus study.

Complex psychosis is associated with high social and economic costs. The key skills and attributes needed by mental health professionals to provide optimal clinical care to people experiencing complex psychosis have not previously been defined. A framework detailing these skills and attributes is needed to support the identification of training needs for those working with this population. A modified online Delphi method was used to reach consensus on the skills and attributes essential for mental health professionals to deliver optimal clinical care to people experiencing complex psychosis. Participants were international healthcare professionals and academic researchers who self-identified as experts in complex psychosis. Participants were asked to rate their level of agreement with each item on a five-point Likert-type scale and to provide comments. Qualitative feedback was used to modify existing, or create new, items for subsequent rounds. 64 responses were received across three Delphi rounds. 167 items reached consensus and were endorsed (132 in Round 1, 31 in Round 2 and 4 in Round 3). Median score range for endorsed items was 4.5/5, with 88.6% scoring 5/5. All 167 endorsed items were included in the framework, categorised into 14 overarching domains. Multiple skills and attributes were identified as being core components required in the delivery of optimal care by mental health professionals to people experiencing complex psychosis. The resulting framework provides a benchmark for training and skill development of mental health clinicians at both individual and team levels to optimise effective working with this high-needs population.

Reflexology specific guidance for using the template for the intervention description and replication (TIDieR): A delphi study

IntroductionReflexology is a holistic, complementary therapy, carried out on the feet, hands, ears, or face. There is no single accepted definition of reflexology, as it encompasses various practices, making it important that research studies articulate exactly what the reflexology intervention entailed.This study sought to produce reflexology-specific guidance for researchers and practitioners, for use with the Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist, to improve the quality of the documentation of reflexology interventions within the research literature. MethodThis study used the TIDieR checklist as a framework for a three-round Delphi process to gain agreement on what information authors should consider including in their study report to support replication of their intervention. Following the Delphi process two online consolidation meetings were held to agree the wording and examples for the guidance document. ResultsGuidance based on the unique considerations of reflexology interventions was developed for use with the TIDieR checklist.A diverse group of 43 experts from Europe, North America, Asia, and Australasia, including 40 reflexologists, 9 of whom were also study authors, and 2 methodological specialists contributed to the guidance.Each Delphi round was completed by 39 to 42 (91 % to 98 %) of the 43 panel members, and 16 (37 %) participated in the consolidation meetings. Consensus was reached on 46 items via the Delphi rounds (36 to be included in the guidance and 10 to be excluded); 38 items failed to reach consensus. The consolidation meetings informed the final wording of the guidance document, covering all the 12 TIDieR domains. ConclusionThe reflexology-specific guidance strongly advocates for the utilisation of the TIDieR checklist, with elaboration tailored for reflexology as used in various contexts internationally. By serving as a reporting guide for reflexology intervention studies, this tool has the capacity to improve the reporting of reflexology intervention studies, thereby facilitating replicability and promoting greater transparency within the field of reflexology.

Expert consensus on the clinical application of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws: results from a modified Delphi study.

A modified Delphi study. This study sought to establish expert consensus on the use of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) for lumbar pedicle screws. The CBT technique is widely used in the treatment of various degenerative lumbar diseases because it reduces surgical time, soft tissue exposure, and blood loss; improves biomechanical stability; and allows for faster patient recovery. However, as an emerging surgical technique, CBT remains controversial in terms of preoperative evaluation methods, key surgical techniques, complication prevention and treatment, postoperative follow-up, and other aspects, resulting in unclear indications and contraindications for some doctors and posing great challenges to the steady promotion of this technique. From May 2021 to August 2021, panelists were chosen to collect expert feedback using the modified Delphi method, and 74 spine surgeons from across China agreed to participate. Four rounds were conducted: one in-person meeting and three subsequent survey rounds. Each question received at least 70.0% agreement, indicating a consensus. The grade A, B, and C recommendation were defined as having ≥90.0%, 80.0%-89.9%, and 70.0%-79.9% agreement on each question, respectively. The panelist group consisted of 74 experts, and 72, 70, and 69 questionnaires were collected in three rounds, respectively. In total, 24 questions with 59 options reached consensus after the Delphi rounds, including indications (adjacent vertebral diseases after lumbar internal fixation) and contraindications (previous surgery or bone destructive diseases lead to the destruction or absence of bone in the lamina or isthmus); advantages (intraoperative traction of paravertebral soft tissue is small) and disadvantages (not three-column fixation.); preoperative evaluation; complications; and postoperative follow-up evaluation, of CBT. The modified Delphi method achieved expert consensus on the clinical use of CBT for lumbar pedicle screws. This consensus document establishes clear guidelines for indications, contraindications, surgical techniques, and postoperative management, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making and promoting the safe and effective use of CBT. While the initial study focused on Chinese surgeons, future research will seek to validate and expand these findings from a broader international perspective.

Consensus palliative care referral criteria for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ObjectivePeople with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have substantial palliative care needs, but uncertainty exists around appropriate identification of patients for palliative care referral.We conducted a Delphi study of...