Delivery Of Surgical Services Research Articles

Deficiencies in the availability of essential musculoskeletal surgical services at 883 health facilities in 24 low- and lower-middle-income countries.

The sequelae of acute musculoskeletal conditions, especially injuries and infections, are responsible for significant disability in low- and middle-income countries. This study characterizes the availability of selected musculoskeletal surgical services at different tiers of the health system in a convenience sample of 883 health facilities from 24 low- and lower-middle-income countries. Selected data points from the World Health Organization's (WHO) tool of situational analysis of surgical availability were extracted from the WHO's database in December, 2013. These included infrastructure, physical resources and supplies, interventions, and human resources. For a descriptive analysis, facilities were divided into two groups based on number of beds (<100, 100-300, and >300) and level of facility (primary referral, secondary/tertiary, and Private/NGO/Mission). Statistical comparison was made between public and Private/NGO/Mission facilities based on number of beds (≤100, 100-300, and >300) using a Chi-Square analysis, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Significant deficiencies were noted in infrastructure, physical resources and supplies, and human resources for the provision of essential orthopedic surgical services at all tiers of the health system. Availability was significantly lower in public versus Private/NGO/Mission facilities for nearly all categories in facilities with ≤100 beds, and in a subset of measures in facilities with between 100 and 300 beds. Deficiencies in the availability of orthopedic surgical services were observed at all levels of health facility and were most pronounced at facilities with ≤100 beds in the public sector. Strengthening the delivery of essential surgical services, including orthopedics, at the primary referral level must be prioritized if we are to reduce the burden of death and disability from a variety of emergent health conditions. There were no sources of funding.

Moving from data collection to application: a systematic literature review of surgical capacity assessments and their applications.

Over the past decade, assessments of surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have contributed to our understanding of barriers to the delivery of surgical services in a number of countries. It is yet unclear, however, how the findings of these assessments have been applied and built upon within the published literature. A systematic literature review of surgical capacity assessments in LMICs was performed to evaluate current levels of understanding of global surgical capacity and to identify areas for future study. A reverse snowballing method was then used to follow-up citations of the identified studies to assess how this research has been applied and built upon in the literature. Twenty-one papers reporting the findings of surgical capacity assessments conducted in 17 different LMICs in South Asia, East Asia and Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa were identified. These studies documented substantial deficits in human resources, infrastructure, equipment, and supplies. Only seven additional papers were identified which applied or built upon the studies. Among these, capacity assessment findings were most commonly used to develop novel tools and intervention strategies, but they were also used as baseline measurements against which updated capacity assessments were compared. While the global surgery community has made tremendous progress in establishing baseline values of surgical capacity in LMICs around the world, further work is necessary to build upon and apply the foundational knowledge established through these efforts. Capacity assessment data should be coordinated and used in ongoing research efforts to monitor and evaluate progress in global surgery and to develop targeted intervention strategies. Intervention strategy development may also be further incorporated into the evaluation process itself.

Surgical Care and Health Systems.

While surgical care impacts a wide variety of diseases and conditions with non-operative and operative services, both preventive and curative, there has been little discussion concerning how surgery might be integrated within the health system of a low and middle-income country (LMIC), nor how strengthening surgical services may improve health systems and population health. We reviewed reports from several meetings of the working group on health systems strengthening of the Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, and also performed a review of the literature including the search terms "surgery," "health system," "developing country," "health systems strengthening," "health information system," "financing," "governance," and "integration." The literature search revealed no reports which focused on the integration of surgical services within a health system or as a component of health system strengthening. A conceptual model of how surgical care might be integrated within a health system is proposed, based on the discussions of our working group, combined with sources from the medical literature, and utilizing the World Health Organization's conceptual model of a health system. Strengthening the delivery of surgical services in LMICs will require inputs at multiple levels within a health system, and this effort will require the coalescence of committed individuals and organizations, supported by civil society.

Equitable access to comprehensive surgical care: the potential of indigenous private philanthropy in low-income settings.

Equitable access to surgical care is necessary for improving global health. We report on the performance, financial sustainability, and policy impact of a free-of-cost multispecialty surgical delivery program in Karachi, Pakistan built upon local private philanthropy. We evaluated trends in surgical service delivery, expenditures, and philanthropic donations from Indus Hospital's first 5 years of operation (2007-2012), projected these over the hospital's current expansion phase, compared these to publicly accessible records of other philanthropic hospitals providing surgical care, and documented the government's evolving policies toward this model. Between 2007 and 2012, Indus Hospital treated 40,012 in-patients free of cost, 33,606 (84 %) of them for surgical procedures. Surgical procedures increased fivefold to 9,478 during 2011-2012 from 1,838 during 2007-2008. Bed occupancy increased to 91 % from 65 % over the same period. External surgical missions accounted for less than 0.5 % of patients served. Ninety-eight percent (98 %) of all philanthropic donations--totaling USD 26.6 million over 2007-2012--were locally generated. Zakat (obligatory annual religious alms in the Islamic faith) constituted 34 % of all donations, followed by unrestricted funds (24 %) and donations-in-kind (24 %), buildings (12 %), grants (5 %), and return on investments (1 %). Overall, donations received between 2007 and 2012 increased sevenfold, with Zakat increasing 12-fold. During 2013-2014, the Government of Pakistan provided land lease and annual operational grants totaling USD 9 million. Local philanthropy can sustain and grow the provision of free, high-quality surgical care in low-income settings, and encourage the development of hybrid government-philanthropic models of surgical care.

Emergency general surgery admission proformas: The value of repeated audit to deliver sustained improvements

s / International Journal of Surgery 12 (2014) S13eS117 S95 1097: EMERGENCY GENERAL SURGERY ADMISSION PROFORMAS: THE VALUE OF REPEATED AUDIT TO DELIVER SUSTAINED IMPROVEMENTS Sarah Wheatstone , Brenda Stacey, Kothandaraman Murali. Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, Kent, UK. Introduction: Clear, accurate and legible medical records are essential elements of good medical practice and prevent medical errors. The assessment and prescription of venous thrombosis (VTE) prophylaxis is a CQUIN target. We reviewed documentation standards before and after introduction of a dedicated emergency general surgery admissions proforma. After further adjustments we twice re-audited improved proformas. Methods: We audited 50 consecutive emergency admission case notes at four different times: April 2011, October 2011, November 2012 and January 2014. Notes were inspected for patient demographics, team contact details, clinical documentation and management plans. Drug charts and handover sheets were also reviewed. Inpatient referrals were excluded. Results: At final audit, significant improvements were found for patient identifying details (71%-100%, p<0.001), VTE risk assessment (2-86%, p<0.001), allergy documentation (87%-100%, p<0.01), and differential diagnosis (87-98%, p<0.05). There were sustained improvements in the recording of admitting doctor, investigations, and prescription of analgesia, anti-emetics and intra-venous fluids. Despite a prompt box, decision to operate and capacity assessment were rarely recorded. Conclusions: A printed proforma can prompt admitting surgeons to capture more information. Re-audit followed by proforma refinement and team education can improve results further. General surgical teams should be engaged in these changes in the documentation process. 1099: SOFTLY SPREADING? THE INCIDENCE OF SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS IN AN IRISH REGIONAL HOSPITAL David Kennedy , Sarah Phelan, Helen Mohan, Caoimhe Byrne, Niamh Bambury, Ken Mealy. Wexford General Hospital, Co. Wexford, Ireland. Introduction: Soft-tissue infections are a major cause of morbidity and a burden on hospital resources. Internationally, their incidence is rising.1 The main aim of this study was to examine trends in soft-tissue infection at an Irish regional hospital. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained surgical audit database (based on the Lothian surgical audit system) from January 2000 until December 2012 was performed. Information collected included baseline demographics, number of admissions, length of stay, and rates of surgical intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism 6. Results: In total, therewere 1388 admissions for cellulitis from 2000-2012. Therewas a significant increase in themean number of admissions per year over the study period, with a 53.4% increase from 2000-2003 compared with 2009-2012 (p1⁄40.0286 Mann-Whitney U test). However, the mean length of stay remained unchanged (7.6 days versus 6.5 days, p1⁄4ns). Conclusions: The incidence of soft-tissue infections is rising. This has implications for planning delivery of acute surgical services. Potential approaches include community based care for a suitable subset, and a focus on primary prevention.[1] Lautz TB, Raval MV, Barsness KA. Increasing national burden of hospitalizations for skin and soft tissue infections in children. J Pediatr Surg 2011 Oct; 46(10):1935-41. 1101: IS BILIRUBIN A USEFUL MARKER IN DIAGNOSING APPENDICITIS? Umar Sharif, David Mathews, Ahmed Karim , Michaela Janks, Hannah Boyd-Carson, Tiramula Raju. Heart of England Trust, Birmingham,

Surgeon-specific mortality data disguise wider failings in delivery of safe surgical services.

Feedback of clinical outcome data to clinicians can promote and enhance patient safety. Surgeon-specific mortality data (SSMD) have been released to the public for a number of specialties. This implies that one individual is culpable for all deaths. Debate continues about SSMD because of risk-averse behaviour. In the USA, improved outcome measures derived from phase of care mortality analysis (POCMA) and the failure to rescue (FTR) are replacing SSMD, but they have not been tested in Europe. Using POCMA and FTR analysis, we studied hospital deaths in 1558 cardiac surgical patients between 2009 and 2013. Comorbidity and urgency status were used to calculate modified logistic EuroSCORE (MLE). The circumstances of death were critically reviewed by a panel of four experienced surgeons. Death certificate information and autopsy were taken into account. Deaths were then classified: Class 1 surgeon dependent, Class 2 FTR or Class 3 where multiple factors conspired to cause death. There were 51 deaths providing 3.3% mortality, as predicted by MLE. In the 86% who underwent autopsy, no surgical error was identified. Most deaths in each group were related to high-risk status, age, frailty, comorbidity and urgency. FTR was the predominant factor occurring in 45%. Though difficult operations were implicated in 37%, no deaths occurred in the operating theatre. Some FTR deaths occurred in low-risk patients. Scrutiny of FTR deaths provided important information that could be used for quality improvement. The study showed that most deaths cannot be prevented by the operating surgeon. They occurred through issues of patient comorbidity, lack of process or infrastructure. This casts doubt on SSMD publication alone as a tool for quality improvement. In contrast, POCMA and FTR highlight problems of process, and are more likely to promote advances in surgical care.

Orthognathic surgery in the office setting.

The delivery of care by oral and maxillofacial surgeons is becoming more challenging because of escalating health care costs and limited reimbursement from insurance providers. The changing health care landscape forces surgical practices to be flexible and adaptive to change in order to remain viable. The delivery of surgical services continues to evolve as care traditionally performed in a hospital environment is now routinely achieved in an outpatient setting. Outpatient facilities can aid in controlling the perioperative costs associated with orthognathic surgery. Safe and efficient orthognathic surgery completed in the office can aid in controlling the escalation of health care costs.

A qualitative analysis of health professionals’ job descriptions for surgical service delivery in Uganda

BackgroundThe ever increasing demand for surgical services in sub-Saharan Africa is creating a need to increase the number of health workers able to provide surgical care. This calls for the optimisation of all available human resources to provide universal access to essential and emergency surgical services. One way of optimising already scarce human resources for health is by clarifying job descriptions to guide the scope of practice, measuring rewards/benefits for the health workers providing surgical care, and informing education and training for health professionals. This study set out to determine the scope of the mandate to perform surgical procedures in current job descriptions of surgical care health professionals in Uganda.MethodsA document review was conducted of job descriptions for the health professionals responsible for surgical service delivery in the Ugandan Health care system. The job descriptions were extracted and subjected to a qualitative content data analysis approach using a text based RQDA package of the open source R statistical computing software.ResultsIt was observed that there was no explicit mention of assignment of delivery of surgical services to a particular cadre. Instead the bulk of direct patient related care, including surgical attention, was assigned to the lower cadres, in particular the medical officer. Senior cadres were assigned to perform predominantly advisory and managerial roles in the health care system. In addition, a no cost opportunity to task shift surgical service delivery to the senior clinical officers was identified.ConclusionsThere is a need to specifically assign the mandate to provide surgical care tasks, according to degree of complexity, to adequately trained cadres of health workers. Health professionals’ current job descriptions are not explicit, and therefore do not adequately support proper training, deployment, defined scope of practice, and remuneration for equitable surgical service delivery in Uganda. Such deliberate assignment of mandates will provide a means of increasing surgical service delivery through further optimisation of the available human resources for health.

Patient and Physician Perceptions of Medicare Reimbursement Policy for Blepharoplasty and Blepharoptosis Surgery

To describe patient preferences regarding payment for blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair and physician practices before and after the 2009 change in reimbursement for these 2 procedures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Cross-sectional study. Fifty patients presenting for functional blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair at an academic oculoplastic practice and 198 members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. A 5-question paper survey was administered to patients, and a 5-question web-based survey was distributed to 510 unique physician e-mail addresses obtained from the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery mailing list server in 2010. The surveys elicited patient knowledge and attitudes regarding the reimbursement policy of the CMS and physician knowledge and behaviors before and after the reimbursement policy change. Ninety-one percent of patients would be opposed to having to pay out of pocket for blepharoplasty or having to wait at least 3 months after ptosis repair to have a blepharoplasty. When asked to choose between these options, 62% of the patients would rather have the 2 surgeries performed separately than pay out-of-pocket. Before the reimbursement policy change by the CMS, 77% of oculoplastic surgeons performed blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair in the same sitting, whereas 37% did so after the policy change (P<0.001). Compared with before the policy change by the CMS, more surgeons performed the 2 procedures at least 3 months apart (4% before vs. 29% after, P<0.001) and more often billed patients for a cosmetic blepharoplasty (5% before vs. 12% after, P = 0.009). Our study suggests that oculoplastic surgeons have made a change in the delivery of ptosis and blepharoplasty surgical services after the reimbursement policy change for these procedures by the CMS in 2009. This change, in which patients undergo separate surgical visits for ptosis repair and blepharoplasty, is not desirable to most patients.

Moral dilemmas faced by hospitals in time of war: the Rambam Medical Center during the Second Lebanon War

Rambam Medical Center, the only tertiary care center and largest hospital in northern Israel, was subjected to continuous rocket attacks in 2006. This extreme situation posed serious and unprecedented ethical dilemmas to the hospital management. An ambiguous situation arose that required routine patient care in a tertiary modern hospital together with implementation of emergency measures while under direct fire. The physicians responsible for hospital management at that time share some of the moral dilemmas faced, the policy they chose to follow, and offer a retrospective critical reflection in this paper. The hospital's first priority was defined as delivery of emergency surgical and medical services to the wounded from the battlefields and home front, while concomitantly providing the civilian population with all elective medical and surgical services. The need for acute medical service was even more apparent as the situation of conflict led to closure of many ambulatory clinics, while urgent or planned medical care such as open heart surgery and chemotherapy continued. The hospital management took actions to minimize risks to patients, staff, and visitors during the ongoing attacks. Wards were relocated to unused underground spaces and corridors. However due to the shortage of shielded spaces, not all wards and patients could be relocated to safer areas. Modern warfare will most likely continue to involve civilian populations and institutes, blurring the division between peaceful high-tech medicine and the rough battlefront. Hospitals in high war-risk areas must be prepared to function and deliver treatment while under fire or facing similar threats.

Evaluating the value and impact of the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality

Since the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality (VASM) commenced in 2007, 95% of Victorian Fellows have agreed to participate and have provided data on the deaths of patients receiving surgical care. All public, and the majority of private, hospitals involved in the delivery of surgical services in Victoria have been submitting data on deaths associated with surgery. De-identified reports on this data are distributed in regular annual reports and case note review booklets. Although informal feedback on the perceived value of the audit was encouraging, a formal review of all aspects of the audit was felt necessary. An independent formal review of VASM governance, documentation, datasets and data analysis was performed, in addition to a survey of 257 individuals (surgeons and other stakeholders) on the perceived impact of VASM. The review confirmed increasing participation and acceptance by surgeons since the inception of the project. Governance mechanisms were found to be effective and acknowledged by stakeholders and collaborators. Robust participation rates have been achieved, and stakeholders were generally satisfied with the quality of feedback. Suggestions for improvement were provided by some surgeons and hospitals. External review of VASM processes and procedures confirmed that the audit was operating effectively, with robust quality control and achieving the trust of stakeholders. The educational value of the audit to the surgical community was acknowledged and areas for future improvement have been identified.

How the Practicing Physician Encounters Human Rights in Daily Clinical Situations

Our study shows the awareness and application of the concept of human rights (understood as patient rights) in a hospital environment. We sought to determine whether such rights are respected, soliciting the opinion of patients and as to how it acts as a measure for whether service delivery is wholly effective in the conext of the clinician-patient relation. Our research was undertaken to signal a contemporary need in service delivery: health personnel involved in the delivery of surgical services have much to learn from the practical applications of human rights principles and the essential role they must fulfill in research and advocacy in order to improve the availability of surgical care globally. Human rights, medical ethics and empathy are parallel mechanisms working at the level of the patient-clinician relationship. This, in general, can influence the quality of care and communication for the better. Our study was conducted in 2011 and lasted 6 months. The research sites were the public hospitals located in the Kujavian-Pomeranian region of Poland. There were two classes of hospitals: the first, had more than 400 beds (Group I) and the second one: above 400 beds (Group II). We solicted the opinion of 180 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The main planned outcome (hypothesis zero) of the study was that there were no differences between the two Groups of hospitals, and therefore no substantial variance in service delivery. The Mann-Whitney U test evidenced that judging by the significance level (p &gt; 0.05), there is no basis for rejecting hypothesis zero.

Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Alliance for Surgery and Anesthesia Presence (ASAP): Building Sustainable Surgical Systems

Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Alliance for Surgery and Anesthesia Presence (ASAP): Building Sustainable Surgical Systems

World Health Organization Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care: 2011 and Beyond

The world's burden of surgical diseases is large and increasing. Unfortunately, <5 % of all surgical procedures are performed in countries ranked within the lowest one-third in terms of per-capita health expenditures [1]. The unmet need for surgical care results in unacceptable morbidity/mortality rates associated with a host of conditions (trauma, pregnancy-related complications, other emergencies). This is especially true for rural and marginalized populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recognizing that variations in the spectrum of surgical diseases are observed among and within countries, “essential” surgery and anesthesia may be viewed as a core group of services that can be delivered within the context of universal access. These high-priority interventions are those for which: (1) there is a large public health burden; (2) the treatment is highly successful; (3) the treatment is cost-effective [2]. To date, essential surgery and anesthesia have received minimal financial and political support as public health strategies because of the perception that the services are costly, are resource-intensive, require highly specialized training, and benefit only a fraction of the population relative to competing health interests. Evidence is amassing to refute these claims. The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (GIEESC) was launched in 2005. It is a global forum whose goal is to promote collaboration among a diverse group of stake-holders (individuals, institutions, societies, universities, ministries of health, other nongovernmental organizations) to strengthen the delivery of surgical services at the primary referral level in LMICs (http://www.who.int.surgery) [3–6]. The inaugural meeting was at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland in November 2005 [7], and subsequent biennial meetings were hosted by ministries of health in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania in September 2007) [8] and Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia in June 2009) [9]. There are currently more than 624 GIEESC members from 93 countries representing all six WHO regions. In all, 45 % of members are from LMICs. The LMICs with ≥10 GIEESC members are India, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Uganda. The WHO GIEESC members have contributed to a number of activities aimed at strengthening the delivery of essential surgical services in LMICs. One component involved the implementation, local adaptation, and translation of training tools that were developed by the WHO's Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (EESC) project, which was initiated in the Clinical Procedures Unit of the Department of Essential Health Technologies in 2004 [3–6]. These training tools include the WHO Integrated Management of Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (IMSCStoolkit [10] and the Manual of Surgical Care at the District Hospital [11]. These materials have been introduced in 39 countries through collaborations with the respective Ministry of Health (MoH) and WHO country offices. The materials have been translated into Mongolian, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Dari, and Farsi. A WHO situational analysis tool to assess the availability of EESC at the level of individual health facilities was developed in 2007. It was based on infrastructure, human resources, procedures, equipment, and supplies [12]. This questionnaire has now been utilized in more than 35 countries, and the data collected and entered in the WHO EESC Global Database has been published to highlight gross deficiencies in the availability of EESC [13–22]. The WHO EESC Global Database was created to facilitate data entry from different countries. The situational analysis tool has been integrated into the WHO's Service Availability Mapping (SAM) technology [23] with the goal of facilitating monitoring the availability of surgical services at the facilities level. This technology was introduced in Mongolia in 2009. Plans have been made to continue with a surgical module in the WHO's recent adaptation of facilities-based monitoring, Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA). A planning tool was developed to assist policymakers integrate EESC into their national health plans.An online Global MedNet serves as a platform for online discussions and for posting announcements and materials related to GIEESC (http://www.who.int/ surgery/globalinitiative/en/).

Survey of Surgery and Anesthesia Infrastructure in Ethiopia

Information regarding surgical capacity in the developing world is limited by the paucity of available data regarding surgical care, infrastructure, and human resources in the literature. The purpose of this study was to assess surgical and anesthesia infrastructure and human resources in Ethiopia as part of a larger study by the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative examining surgical and anesthesia capacity in ten low-income countries in Africa. A comprehensive survey tool developed by the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative was used to assess surgical capacity of hospitals in Ethiopia. A total of 20 hospitals were surveyed through convenience sampling. Eight areas of surgical and anesthesia care were examined, including access and availability, access to human resources, infrastructure, outcomes, operating room information and procedures, equipment, nongovernmental organization delivery of surgical services, and pharmaceuticals. Results were obtained over a 1-month period during October 2011. There is wide variation in accessibility, with hospital-to-population ratios ranging from 1:99,010 to 1:1,082,761. The overall physician to population ratio ranges from 1:4715 to 1:107,602. The average hospital has one to two operating rooms, 4.2 surgeons, one gynecologist, and 4.5 anesthesia providers-although in all but three hospitals anesthesiology was provided by nonphysician personnel only (i.e., a nurse anesthetist). Access to continuous electricity, running water, essential medications, and monitoring systems is very limited in all hospitals surveyed, although such access did vary across regions. This survey of Ethiopia's hospital resources attempts to identify specific areas of need where resources, education, and development can be targeted. Because the major surgical mortality comes from late presentations, increasing accessibility through infrastructure development would likely provide a major improvement in surgical morbidity and mortality rates. Infrastructure limitations of electricity, water, oxygen, and blood banking do not prove to be significant barriers to surgical care. The increasing number of physicians is promising, although efforts should be directed specifically toward increasing the number of anesthesiologists and surgeons in the country.

Training and practice of pediatric surgery in Africa: past, present, and future

The evolution and recognition of pediatric surgery as a specialty in Africa can be divided into 4 distinct phases, starting from early 1920s till the present. The pace of development has been quite variable in different parts of Africa. Despite all recent developments, the practice of pediatric surgery in Africa continues to face multiple challenges, including limited facilities, manpower shortages, the large number of sick children, disease patterns specific to the region, late presentation and advanced pathology, lack of pediatric surgeons outside the tertiary hospitals, and inadequate governmental support. Standardization of pediatric surgery training across the continent is advocated. Collaboration with well-established pediatric surgical training centers in Africa and other developed countries is necessary. The problems of delivery of pediatric surgical services need to be addressed urgently, if the African child is to have access to essential pediatric surgical services like his or her counterpart in the high-income parts of the world.

Three phases of the Pacific Islands Project (1995–2010)

The Pacific Islands Project (PIP), funded by AusAid and managed by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS), has progressed through three phases from 1995 to 2010. During this time, it has sent over 520 teams to 11 Pacific Island Countries, providing over 60,000 consultations and some 16,000 procedures. In addition to this delivery of specialist medical and surgical services that were not previously available in-country, the project has contributed as a partner in capacity building with the Fiji School of Medicine and Ministries of Health of the individual nations. By 2011, Fiji School of Medicine, which began postgraduate specialist training in 1998, had awarded 51 doctors a diploma in surgery (1 year), 20 of whom had completed their Masters in Medicine (4 years). PIP was independently evaluated on completion of every phase, including the bridging Phase III (2006-2010). The project delivered on its design, to deliver services, and also helped build capacity. The relationship established with the RACS throughout the project allowed Pacific Island graduates to access the Rowan Nicks scholarship, and the majority of MMed graduates received International Travel Grants to attend the Annual Scientific Meeting. PIP has been a highly successful partnership in delivering and building specialist medical services. Although AusAid contributed some $20 million over 16 years, the value added from pro bono contributions by Specialist Teams, Specialty Coordinators and the Project Directors amounted to an equivalent amount. With the emergence of Pacific Island-trained specialists, PIP is ready to move into a new phase where the agendas are set, monitored and managed within the Pacific, and RACS fulfils the role of a service provider. A critical mass of Pacific Island surgeons has been trained, so that sub-specialization will be an option for the general surgeons of the larger island nations.

Worlds apart: training in rural South Africa

Reforms in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services in the UK have reduced the opportunity for trainees to acquire 'hands-on' training. These problems are seen in other European countries and in North America. Surgical and anaesthetic services within developed health care systems tend to be specialised, and are often consultant led. In rural South Africa there is a shortage of surgeons and anaesthetists to service the population, and the public health care system is vastly over-burdened. Trauma accounts for a large percentage of the surgical and anaesthetic workload. This report compares the anaesthetic and surgical training experience of two first-year registrars during a 6-month training period in rural South Africa and a 6-month training period in the UK. Surgical and anaesthetic trainees from countries such as the UK can spend an out-of-programme training period in rural South Africa, thereby broadening their experience and exposure to trauma. They have the opportunity to take on a higher level of responsibility at an earlier stage of training, gaining 'hands-on' experience. Similarly, South African anaesthetic and surgical trainees can spend an out-of-programme training period in the UK, where they can learn the specialist procedures needed in their home country.

Appropriate working hours for surgical training according to Australasian trainees

The demands of surgical training, learning and service delivery compete with the need to minimize fatigue and maintain an acceptable lifestyle. The optimal balance of working hours is uncertain. This study aimed to define the appropriate hours to meet these requirements according to trainees. All Australian and New Zealand surgical trainees were surveyed. Roster structures, weekly working hours and weekly 'sleep loss hours' (<8 per night) because of 24-h calls were defined. These work practices were then correlated with sufficiency of training time, time for study, fatigue and its impacts, and work-life balance preferences. Multivariate and univariate analyses were performed. The response rate was 55.3% with responders representative of the total trainee body. Trainees who worked median 60 h/week (interquartile range: 55-65) considered their work hours to be appropriate for 'technical' and 'non-technical' training needs compared with 55 h/week (interquartile range: 50-60) regarded as appropriate for study/research needs. Working ≥65 h/week, or accruing ≥5.5 weekly 'sleep loss hours', was associated with increased fatigue, reduced ability to study, more frequent dozing while driving and impaired concentration at work. Trainees who considered they had an appropriate work-life balance worked median 55 h/week. Approximately, 60 h/week proved an appropriate balance of working hours for surgical training, although study and lifestyle demands are better met at around 55 h/week. Sleep loss is an important determinant of fatigue and its impacts, and work hours should not be considered in isolation.

Surgical services: shaping future directions

Advances in surgical techniques and anaesthetic practise have facilitated a significant change in the way surgery is currently delivered. In particular, short stay surgery including ambulatory surgery has become the norm for the majority of surgical conditions. However, the planning of surgical services has not always kept pace with nor capitalised on these clinical advances. Like many major urban centres in Australia, the Greater Sydney region is changing, in terms of population growth and configuration of clinical and operational networks. In conjunction with NSW Department of Health, the ministerially appointed Surgical Services Taskforce was tasked with determining the shape and direction of surgery in Greater Sydney over the next 5 to 10 years. Over 400 clinicians either attended hospitals forums or were contacted by the Surgery Futures project team. From the consultations, three models of service delivery were strongly advocated. These were the development of high volume short stay surgery centres, the establishment of specialty centres and the expansion of the streaming of planned and emergency surgery. These three major recommendations will require a significant reorganisation of surgical services in NSW. However, they are also relevant to surgical services planning elsewhere in Australia. It is imperative that these recommendations are incorporated into long term surgical planning in order to improve the efficiency and sustainability of surgical service delivery.