There are three popular conjectures regarding litigation related to land and property. First, disputes over land and property are thought to form a large proportion of the case-load of Indian courts. Second, the quality of land records is to blame for the large volume and length of land and property-related litigation. Third, the complexity created by the sheer multitude of laws that govern land and property is to blame. Additionally, it is also thought that the Government is the single largest litigant in the constitutional courts. In this paper, we present a novel dataset of case-level data from the Delhi High Court and attempt to test these conjectures. We attempt to answer important questions regarding the volume, duration, and typologies of land and property-related disputes, as well as the typologies of litigants. We find that in the Delhi High Court, disputes related to land and property constitute 36% of the total substantive civil litigation. Further, the largest proportion of civil disputes, by far, is between private parties. The Government is a party to 50\% of all civil disputes, and it is the petitioner/appellant only in 7% of civil disputes. We further find that disputes related to tenancy/eviction, land acquisition and allotment of houses by DDA are the three most common types of disputes related to immovable property. Disputes originating from and related to issues in land records form a small proportion of the total disputes related to immovable property.