You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Advanced (including Drug Therapy) II (MP24)1 Sep 2021MP24-01 RESPONSE TO IMMUNE CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE IN PATIENTS WITH MICROSATELLITE INSTABLE AND HIGH TUMOR MUTATIONAL BURDEN PROSTATE CANCER Andrew T. Lenis, Vignesh Ravichandran, Hong Truong, Peter Reisz, Barbara Nweji, Karen Autio, Michael Morris, Susan Slovin, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Vincent Laudone, Behfar Ehdaie, Victor Reuter, Agnes Viale, Nikolaus Schultz, Anuradha Gopalan, Mark Donoghue, Konrad Stopsack, David Solit, and Wassim Abida Andrew T. LenisAndrew T. Lenis More articles by this author , Vignesh RavichandranVignesh Ravichandran More articles by this author , Hong TruongHong Truong More articles by this author , Peter ReiszPeter Reisz More articles by this author , Barbara NwejiBarbara Nweji More articles by this author , Karen AutioKaren Autio More articles by this author , Michael MorrisMichael Morris More articles by this author , Susan SlovinSusan Slovin More articles by this author , Hebert Alberto VargasHebert Alberto Vargas More articles by this author , Vincent LaudoneVincent Laudone More articles by this author , Behfar EhdaieBehfar Ehdaie More articles by this author , Victor ReuterVictor Reuter More articles by this author , Agnes VialeAgnes Viale More articles by this author , Nikolaus SchultzNikolaus Schultz More articles by this author , Anuradha GopalanAnuradha Gopalan More articles by this author , Mark DonoghueMark Donoghue More articles by this author , Konrad StopsackKonrad Stopsack More articles by this author , David SolitDavid Solit More articles by this author , and Wassim AbidaWassim Abida More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002015.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancers with high microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) are rare but recognized as molecular subgroups with therapeutic implications. Patients harboring either of these genomic features are candidates for treatment with immunotherapy (IO) based on tumor agnostic approvals. Given the potential for different underlying biology, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes in patients with MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-H prostate cancer treated with IO. METHODS: We identified men with prostate cancer who underwent paired tumor–normal genomic profiling with MSK-IMPACT, a targeted exome sequencing panel. MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer was defined as MSIsensor score ≥10 or MSIsensor score of ≥3 and <10 with evidence of a deleterious somatic or germline alteration in a mismatch repair gene (MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, or PMS2). TMB-H was defined as ≥10 in the absence of microsatellite instability. Response to IO was defined as a 50% decrease in PSA (PSA50). Median time to IO discontinuation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 2,351 men with prostate cancer who underwent MSK-IMPACT testing between 2/2014 and 2/2021, 62 (2.6%) were identified as having MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer and 29 (1.2%) as having TMB-H. Of the 62 patients with MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer, 29 (32%) were treated with IO and 26 had metastatic castration resistant disease and evaluable PSA levels. PSA50 was observed in 65% (17/26); no significant difference in response between MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-H patients was observed. The median time to IO discontinuation in patients with MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-H tumors was 20 (IQR: 10–107) and 12 (IQR: 9–15) weeks, respectively. At a median follow-up of 90 weeks, 35% (7/20) of MSI-H/dMMR and 33% (2/6) of TMB-H tumors were still on IO. MSIsensor scores and TMB were not significantly different between IO responders and non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-H prostate cancers are rare but up to two thirds of such patients respond to IO with many durable responses. MSIsensor score and TMB were not predictive of response to IO in these molecularly defined populations. Other clinical and genomic factors are being investigated to identify biomarkers to guide treatment selection. Source of Funding: This work was funded in part by the Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e411-e411 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Andrew T. Lenis More articles by this author Vignesh Ravichandran More articles by this author Hong Truong More articles by this author Peter Reisz More articles by this author Barbara Nweji More articles by this author Karen Autio More articles by this author Michael Morris More articles by this author Susan Slovin More articles by this author Hebert Alberto Vargas More articles by this author Vincent Laudone More articles by this author Behfar Ehdaie More articles by this author Victor Reuter More articles by this author Agnes Viale More articles by this author Nikolaus Schultz More articles by this author Anuradha Gopalan More articles by this author Mark Donoghue More articles by this author Konrad Stopsack More articles by this author David Solit More articles by this author Wassim Abida More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...