Abstract Previous studies on the issue of the prognostic importance of treatment delay in breast cancer have shown inconsistent results. Furthermore, the association between the impact of treatment delay and molecular characteristics of tumors has not been adequately addressed. The purpose of this study is to examine the prognostic impact of initial surgical treatment delay after biopsy-proven cancer diagnosis in breast cancer patients. A total of 1,393 consecutive invasive breast cancer patients, treated in Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between July 2006 and June 2008, were included in this study. Patients with in situ or metastatic carcinoma at the time of diagnosis and patients in whom the dates of the initial pathologic diagnosis were unknown were excluded. The median time from biopsy-confirmed cancer diagnosis to initial surgical treatment was 25 days (range 0-134). When the patients were classified according to their treatment delay days (0 to 29, 30 to 59, and ≥60days), there was no difference in survival between ‘0-29days’ group and ‘30-59days’ group. However, for patients who experienced more than 60 days of initial delay in surgical treatment, the survival was significantly worse when compared to other groups (p = 0.034). The association between the treatment delay and poor outcome was only seen in patients with ER and PR negative tumors (p = 0.018) while patients with hormone-responsive tumors showed no such association. Patients with ER and PR negative tumors developed more recurrence and had shorter disease-free survival if they had treatment delay of more than 60 days. The prognostic importance of treatment delay of more than 60 days remained significant in predicting disease-free survival after adjusting for other known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, nodal status, cancer stage, nuclear grade and Ki-67 expression (HR 5.127; 95% CI, 1.350 to 19.472; p = 0.016). Our results suggest that having treatment delay of more than 60 days is associated with poor treatment outcome in patients with ER and PR negative breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-06-08.
Read full abstract