Degree Of Pain Control Research Articles

257 Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Choices, and Ileus: A Snapshot From a Teaching Hospital in a Developing Country

Abstract Aim In this study, we looked at the severity of postoperative pain, the type of analgesics used to control the pain, and the incidence of POI at Baghdad Teaching Hospital. We hypothesized that we would find an association between the type of analgesia used and POI. Method This observational study was conducted among 100 patients who were residents at the general surgery wards of Baghdad Teaching Hospital. A structured questionnaire was employed focusing on types of analgesics, degree of pain control, and the presence of ileus. Results Sixty-nine percent of patients received a combination of opioids and non-opioids. Moderate-to-severe pain was the most commonly reported category on pain scales. More than half of the patients (57%) were found to have POI during their hospital stay and there was a statistically significant association between the type of analgesia and POI development ( p = 0.001). Conclusions A mix of analgesics (opioids and non-opioids) was the most common regimen at our centre. The majority of the surgical inpatients reported having moderate-to-severe pain on both pain scales used in this study. Ileus incidence following abdominal surgeries (61%) was significantly higher than the reported incidence worldwide (10-30%). Postoperative ileus has multifactorial causes, one of which is the use of opioids for pain control. Considering the high incidence of ileus in our center and the association we found between the use of opioids and ileus, further studies should look at the doses of opioids used and whether alternative analgesic methods might result in less ileus.

Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus injection and continuous epidural injection in controlling nighttime pain and improving sleep quality after thoracotomy.

Postoperative pain after open thoracotomy is known to be very severe and affects sleep quality. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a programmed intermittent epidural bolus injection versus continuous epidural injection for controlling nighttime pain and improving sleep quality after thoracotomy. Seventy-six patients scheduled for open thoracotomy for lung cancer or other lung diseases were enrolled. The participants were divided into 2 groups. Group A was continuously injected with 0.2% levobupivacaine at 1.1 mL/h, and group B was injected intermittently with 3 mL 0.2% levobupivacaine at 3 hours intervals through a thoracic epidural catheter via a programmed infusion pump. Within 48 hours after surgery, the degree of pain control using visual analog scale and the patients' sleep conditions on postoperative day (POD) 0 and 1 were evaluated, and other adverse events were investigated. On POD 1 night, the visual analog scale in group B showed lower than group A (P = .009). Comparison of time to fall asleep showed no differences between 2 groups. Total sleep time was no difference on POD 0 but was longer in group B than that in group A on POD 1 (P = .042). Awakening from sleep on POD 0 was lower in group B than that in group A (P = .033), and satisfaction with sleep quality on POD 0 was superior in group B compared to group A (P = .005). Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred more frequently in group B than in group A (P = .018). The programmed intermittent epidural bolus technique of patient-controlled epidural analgesia reduces postoperative nighttime pain and improves sleep quality in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung cancer or other lung diseases.

Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Choices, and Ileus: A Snapshot from a Teaching Hospital in a Developing Country.

Background Pain relief can be achieved by diversity of methods with analgesics being the basic form of treatment. Analgesic safety and clinical effectiveness are the core factors in determining the analgesic of choice. One adverse effect of concern with opioids is the postoperative ileus (POI). Objective In this study, we looked at the severity of postoperative pain, the type of analgesics used to control the pain, and the incidence of POI at Baghdad Teaching Hospital. We hypothesized that we would find an association between the type of analgesia used and POI. Methods This observational study was conducted among 100 patients who were residents at the general surgery wards of Baghdad Teaching Hospital. A structured questionnaire was employed focusing on types of analgesics, degree of pain control, and the presence of ileus. Results Sixty-nine percent of patients received a combination of opioids and nonopioids. Moderate-to-severe pain was the most commonly reported category on pain scales. More than half of the patients (57%) were found to have POI during their hospital stay and there was a statistically significant association between the type of analgesia and POI development ( p =0.001). Conclusions A mix of analgesics (opioids and nonopioids) was the most common regimen at our center. The majority of the surgical inpatients reported having moderate-to-severe pain on both pain scales used in this study. Ileus incidence following abdominal surgeries (61%) was significantly higher than the reported incidence worldwide (10–30%). Postoperative ileus has multifactorial causes, one of which is the use of opioids for pain control. Considering the high incidence of ileus in our center and the association we found between the use of opioids and ileus, further studies should look at the doses of opioids used and whether alternative analgesic methods might result in less ileus.

Assessment of post-operative opioid prescribing practices in a community hospital ambulatory surgical center.

To evaluate the prescribing practices and opioid consumption in an ambulatory setting to inform the development of evidence-based guidelines. A prospective study of adults undergoing outpatient open and laparoscopic surgeries over 3 months. One week after discharge, a telephonic interview quantified the number of opioids prescribed and consumed, degree of pain control and satisfaction, and whether additional pain medication was requested. Community hospital ambulatory surgery center in Westchester County, New York. This study included 304 adults undergoing a variety of procedures by surgeons from multiple specialties. Quantify surgeons' postoperative opioid prescribing compared with patient opioid consumption. Eighty-one percent (N = 245) responded to the survey, of which 64 percent were prescribed opioids. Males and females were equally represented with the mean age of 59.4 years. Of those prescribed opioids, 92 percent filled the prescription. The most commonly prescribed opioids reported by the patients that filled their prescription (N = 145) were oxycodone (36.5 percent), oxycodone/acetaminophen (28.9 percent), and tramadol (22.7 percent). The mean number of opioid pills prescribed was 20 and the mean consumption was 6.7 pills, resulting in an average of 13 retained pills. Only 3.8 percent of the patients prescribed opioids at discharge called their provider for additional analgesia. Despite the low opioid consumption patients reported high satisfaction (4.5 on scale of 0-5) with pain control. Only 10.4 percent reported that the surgeon recommended an over the counter (OTC) analgesic option. There was variability in the amount of opioids prescribed within each surgical category. One week after outpatient surgery, patients consumed one-third of physician-prescribed opioids, yet they reported high pain management satisfaction. Our study will inform the development of a patient-centered interdisciplinary perioperative education program to more effectively tailor multimodal pain management in ambulatory surgical patients and collaterally reduce the number of retained opioids.

Pain Management in Pectus Excavatum Surgery: A Comparison of Subcutaneous Catheters Versus Epidurals in a Pediatric Population

Pectus excavatum is a common chest wall anomaly. Achieving optimal pain control is a priority for adolescents undergoing surgical correction of this condition. Options for pain control include the use of subcutaneous catheters (On-Q® pumps) and epidurals. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of using subcutaneous catheters for pain control and to compare them with the use of epidurals during surgical correction of pectus excavatum. We identified patients who underwent pectus excavatum repair at our institution between January 2010 and August 2016. Patients were divided into two cohorts (epidural or On-Q pump). Patient charts were reviewed for length of stay, pain scores, pain medications, and complications. A total of 124 patients were included. Forty percent of patients used an epidural (n = 50), and 60% had the On-Q pump (n = 74). The average patient age was 15.6 years. The average Haller index was 4.3. The On-Q pump population had a significant decrease in postoperative length of stay (mean [M] = 4.86, standard deviation [SD] = 0.85) compared with the epidural population (M = 5.60, SD = 0.97); P ≤ .001. There was a significant difference observed in pain scores for patients on the epidural (M = 2.91, SD = 1.13) and On-Q pump (M = 3.81, SD = 1.19; P ≤ .001). There was n = 1 wound infection in each group. The use of bilateral subcutaneous infusion catheters is a safe and effective method for pain control in patients undergoing surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Even though the degree of pain control is not necessarily superior to epidurals, in this study, the catheters were associated with a shorter postoperative length of stay in this patient population and did not increase the incidence of complications.

Morphine versus fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control in major hepatic resection surgeries including living liver donors: A retrospective study.

Background:Liver resection surgery results in significant postoperative pain. However, it is still not clear which opioids used by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) provides the best pain control and results in the least side effect in a patient with impaired liver function. Our hypothesis was that fentanyl is a better choice than morphine as it is a potent analgesic that its elimination half-life does not depend on the hepatic uptake and metabolism.The Study Purpose:Is to compare morphine and fentanyl PCA in liver resection patients as regards the degree of pain control, the consumption of opioids, and the side effects.Methods:A retrospective case–control study of hepatic resection patients who received postoperative morphine (Morph) or fentanyl (Fent) PCA. The study compared the pain scores, the morphine equivalent dose (MED), the number of demands requested as recorded by the PCA infusion pump, and the side effects every 12 h for 48 h.Results:This study yielded 40 patients; with the majority were living donor hepatic resection patients. There was no significant difference in the pain scores. However, the MED and the demands were significantly less in the Morph group. The P < 0.000, 0.0001, 0.0005, and 0.003, demands P < 0.002, 0.006, 0.014, and 0.013 at 12, 24, 48, and 36 h, respectively. The overall side effects were not different between the 2 groups at all time intervals measured; however, Morph patients were significantly more sedated in the first 12 h. There was one case of respiratory depression in the Morph group compared to two cases in the in the Fent group that needed treatment with naloxone.Conclusions:Although both groups had adequate pain control. The Morphine group reached faster pain control with less MED and PCA requests in liver resection patients, although it was more sedating in the first 12 h. However, fentanyl patients were less sedated; both drugs need close monitoring in the immediate postoperative period due to reported respiratory depressive effect and the need to use naloxone. The dosage of the PCA settings needs to be studied further to reach to the best dose with a reduced side effect. Further studies are recommended to reduce PCA dosages by introducing a multimodal approach of pain management relying on other methods with no additional sedative effects as regional anterior abdominal blocks.

Morphine vs. Fentanyl Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Major Hepatic Resection Surgeries Including Living Liver Donors

Background: Liver resection surgery results in significant postoperative pain. However, it is still not clear which opioids used by Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) provides the best pain control and results in the least side effect in a patient with impaired liver function. Our hypothesis was that fentanyl is a better choice than morphine as it is a potent analgesic that its elimination half-life does not depend on the hepatic uptake and metabolism. The Study Purpose: Is to compare Morphine and Fentanyl PCA in liver resection patients as regards the degree of pain control, the consumption of Opioids and the side effects. Methods: A retrospective case control study of hepatic resection patients who received postoperative morphine (Morph) or Fentanyl (Fent) (PCA). The study compared the pain scores, morphine equivalent dose (MED), the number of demands requested as recorded by the PCA infusion pump and the side effects every 12 hours for 48 hours. Results: The study yielded 40 patients; with the majority were living donor hepatic resection patients. There was no significant difference in the pain scores. However, the MED and the demands were significantly less in the Morph group. p value<0.000, 0.0001, 0.0005, 0,003, demands p<0.002, 0.006, 0.014, 0.013 at 12, 24, 48, 36 hours respectively. The overall side effects were not different between the 2 groups at all-time intervals measured, however Morph patients were significantly more sedated in the first 12 hours.

Association of Performance Status and Pain in Metastatic Bone Pain Management in the Spanish Clinical Setting.

Bone metastasis is the most common cause of cancer-related pain, and metastatic bone pain (MBP) is not only severe but also progressive in many patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between pain management and performance status in patients with metastatic bone cancer in the Spanish clinical setting. A 3-month follow-up prospective, epidemiologic, multicenter study was conducted in 579 patients to assess the evolution of their performance, the impact of pain control on sleep and functionality, and the degree of pain control according to analgesic treatment. In patients with MBP, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (1.5±0.7-1.3±0.7 and 1.3±0.8; p<0.001) and pain (6.5±1.4-2.8±1.9 and 2.1±1.9; p<0.001) improved significantly from baseline to months 1 and 3, as did functionality and sleep, after a treatment change consisting of increasing the administration of opioids. Evolution of ECOG and pain were closely related. ECOG and pain outcomes were significantly more favorable in patients treated with opioids versus non-opioid treatment, and in patients who did not need rescue medication versus those who did. MBP is currently poorly managed in Spain. ECOG improvement is closely and directly related to pain management in MBP. Opioid treatment and a lack of requirements for rescue medication are associated with better ECOG and pain outcomes in MBP patients. Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.L.

Assesment of The Effect of Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia in Children

Background: Preemptive analgesia, an evolving clinical concept, involves the introduction of an analgesic regimen before the onset of noxious stimuli, with the goal of preventing sensitization of the nervous system to subsequent stimuli that could amplify pain. Pain is inevitable after any surgery. Surgery offers the most promising setting for preemptive analgesia because the timing of noxious stimuli is known.Materials &amp; Methods: This prospective double blind study included 60 children (30 in each group), undergoing major surgery under general anesthesia. Each patient in the study group (Group II) received pre-emptive analgesia (Local anesthesia, per-rectal diclofenac just prior to surgery, per-rectal paracetamol 2 hours prior to surgery) and regular pattern of postoperative pain intervention with per rectal diclofenac and per rectal or oral paracetamol in different phases of postoperative pain management up to 48 hours. On the other hand, each patient of control group (Group I) received pre-emptive analgesia (Local anesthesia &amp; per-rectal diclofenac) regular pattern of postoperative pain intervention with per-rectal diclofenac in different phases of postoperative pain up to 48 hours. The degree of postoperative pain was assessed by universal pain assessment tools (VAS) at defined intervals.Results: Most children in the study group (Group II) has significantly better postoperative pain control with only mild pain at 4th postoperative hours. It is obvious that less pain in Group-II due to synergistic effect of paracetamol and diclofenac. In the control group (Group I) there was persistence of mild pain throughout the observation period i.e. up to 48 postoperative hours. The breakthrough pain occurred more in latter group, two patients needed rescue analgesia. Whereas no patient experienced breakthrough pain requiring rescue analgesia in study group (Group II).Conclusion: Therefore this study concludes that administrations of multimodal pre-emptive analgesia control pain more effectively in children in view of both the degree of pain control and sustainability of pain free state.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jpsb.v2i2.19545

Shaped Magnetic Field Pulses by Multi-Coil Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Differentially Modulate Anterior Cingulate Cortex Responses and Pain in Volunteers and Fibromyalgia Patients

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise in the alleviation of acute and chronic pain by altering the activity of cortical areas involved in pain sensation. However, current single-coil rTMS technology only allows for effects in surface cortical structures. The ability to affect activity in certain deep brain structures may however, allow for a better efficacy, safety, and tolerability. This study used PET imaging to determine whether a novel multi-coil rTMS would allow for preferential targeting of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), an area always activated with pain, and to provide preliminary evidence as to whether this targeted approach would allow for efficacious, safe, and tolerable analgesia both in a volunteer/acute pain model as well as in fibromyalgia chronic pain patients.MethodsPart 1: Different coil configurations were tested in a placebo-controlled crossover design in volunteers (N = 16). Tonic pain was induced using a capsaicin/thermal pain model and functional brain imaging was performed by means of H215O positron emission tomography – computed tomography (PET/CT) scans. Differences in NRS pain ratings between TMS and sham treatment (NRSTMS-NRSplacebo) which were recorded each minute during the 10 minute PET scans. Part 2: 16 fibromyalgia patients were subjected to 20 multi-coil rTMS treatments over 4 weeks and effects on standard pain scales (Brief Pain Inventory, item 5, i.e. average pain NRS over the last 24 hours) were recorded.ResultsA single 30 minute session using one of 3 tested rTMS coil configurations operated at 1 Hz consistently produced robust reduction (mean 70% on NRS scale) in evoked pain in volunteers. In fibromyalgia patients, the 20 rTMS sessions also produced a significant pain inhibition (43% reduction in NRS pain over last 24 hours), but only when operated at 10 Hz. This degree of pain control was maintained for at least 4 weeks after the final session.ConclusionMulti-coil rTMS may be a safe and effective treatment option for acute as well as for chronic pain, such as that accompanying fibromyalgia. Further studies are necessary to optimize configurations and settings as well as to elucidate the mechanisms that lead to the long-lasting pain control produced by these treatments.

Does dexamethasone improve the efficacy of ropivacaine in single-shot femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A randomized controlled study

Background This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding dexamethasone to ropivacaine on the duration and quality of single-shot femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Method Sixty patients scheduled for elective anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. At the end of the surgery, all patients received combined ultrasound stimulation-guided FNB using either 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (R group, n =30) or 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone (RC group, n =30). The duration of sensory block, pain degree, and opioid requirements were recorded. Results The duration of sensory block in the RC group was statistically longer than that in the R group (1782±288 vs. 1356±222 min; P Conclusion Addition of 8 mg dexamethasone to 0.5% ropivacaine prolongs the sensory blockade duration of single-shot femoral nerve block but does not affect the degree of pain control.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methadone Enantiomers in Hospice Patients With Cancer Pain

Racemic methadone is increasingly used to manage cancer pain. The authors studied 13 terminally ill patients with cancer pain, who underwent switching (rotation) from morphine to methadone. The relationship between initial morphine dose and final methadone dose, the pharmacokinetics of R- and S- methadone, and the degree of pain control and side effects were investigated. Preswitching serum morphine concentrations and second daily plasma concentrations of methadone were measured. The brief pain inventory (BPI) was used to assess pain every second day. "Worst pain" as measured by the BPI improved by >/=20% in 6 of the 13 patients. The mean morphine to methadone conversion ratio was 5.2 with wide interpatient variability (range 1.3 to 11). Average steady-state concentrations were 197 (98 to 379) mug/L and 272 (55 to 378) mug/L for R- and S-methadone, respectively. Mean population pharmacokinetic parameters for a 1-compartment model were 455 L and 338 L for apparent volume of distribution and 53.3 hours and 31.5 hours for half-life for R- and S- methadone, respectively. Bayesian estimates of apparent oral clearance for individual patients were 0.082 (0.052 to 0.112) L/kg/h and 0.117 (0.061 to 0.173) L/kg/h for R- and S- methadone, respectively (mean and 95% confidence interval). The low and variable clearance values generally resulted in slow achievement of steady-state concentrations over several days; inappropriately high plasma methadone levels occurred in 1 patient. Whereas optimal pain control was achieved in 46% of patients, there was no relationship with plasma concentrations of methadone. Best practice for methadone use in this patient group should include monitoring of both pain and methadone concentration.

Superiority of postoperative epidural over intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in orthopedic oncologic patients

Surgery for bone malignancy is associated with intense postoperative pain. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) are used currently for postoperative pain control. The degree of pain control after resection of bone malignancy under combined general and epidural anesthesia followed postoperatively by prospectively randomized PCEA (ropivacaine 3.2 mg + fentanyl 8 microg/dose) or IV-PCA (morphine 2 mg/dose) (n = 35/group) was assessed. Postoperative analgesia delivery continued for up to 96 h; intramuscular rescue with diclofenac 75 mg was also available. The mean hourly pain score among the PCEA patients was 3.0 +/- 0.9, compared with 4. 7 +/- 0.6 (P < .01) among the IV-PCA patients. All mean hourly pain scores in the PCEA patients, except for the first 2 hours of treatment, were less than 4/10, but they were higher in the IV-PCA patients. The demand for diclofenac was 2 times (n = 10) lower for the PCEA patients, compared with their IV counterparts (n = 20, P < .01); the same difference applied to the overall side effects (n = 15 vs n = 30, P < .01). Self-rated wakefulness and feelings of well-being were better in the PCEA patients. Postoperative ropivacaine + fentanyl via PCEA reduces pain better and affords better subjective feelings than IV morphine via PCA after resection of bone malignancy carried out under combined general and epidural anesthesia.

Simple outpatient postoperative analgesia using an orbital catheter after enucleation.

To evaluate an indwelling orbital catheter, placed at enucleation, for repeatable delivery of local anesthetic on an outpatient basis. A retrospective, noncomparative, case series medical record review was performed of patients undergoing enucleation and receiving an indwelling orbital pain-control catheter at surgery by us from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2001. Medical records were reviewed for hospitalization status postoperatively. Medical records of those patients treated on an outpatient basis were reviewed for patient and family comments about ease of use of the pain-control catheter and the degree of pain control and for any complications associated with catheter use. The main outcome measures included documented patient and family comments and physician medical record notes about catheter use and complications. Of the 85 patients, 67 were treated on an outpatient basis. The other 18 patients required a postoperative hospital admission for unassociated medical problems. Of the 67 patients, 58 (87%) reported using the catheter at home at least once. Of these 58 patients, 10 reported mild discomfort with catheter use, but in no case did the patient discontinue catheter use because of discomfort. All patients using the catheter reported pain relief lasting from 1(1/2) to 4 hours. No postoperative complications associated with catheter placement were observed. The orbital pain-control catheter allows a caregiver to easily and repeatedly deliver local anesthetic to the operative site following enucleation, resulting in effective postoperative analgesia while the patient recovers at home.

Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia — Retrospective Analysis of 61 Patients from Sri Lanka

Objectives: To identify the clinical features of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia in hospital patients in Sri Lanka and to assess the treatment outcomes.Patients and Methods: Clinical records of 61 patients who attended the Oral Medicine Clinic at the Dental Hospital in Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, during a 4-year period from July 1998 to July 2002 were analysed. All patients were diagnosed on the basis of clinical findings and conservatively managed with medical treatment. Follow up averaged 20.2 months.Results: Trigeminal neuralgia was more common in women (57%) than in men (43 %), with a peak incidence during the fifth and sixth decades of life, and with the right side of the face involved with a greater frequency than the left side (p = 0.003). Involvement of the mandibular branch was more frequent than the maxillary branch (p = 0.015). Of the 50 patients who were initially treated with carbamazepine alone, 62% had considerable pain control within 1 month. Sixty four percent of the remaining 11 patients treated with various combinations of carbamazepine and other drugs (phenytoin sodium, sodium valproate, and amitriptyline) had a considerable degree of pain control within 1 month. However, in the long-term, carbamazepine alone was effective only for 18 patients (29.5%).Conclusions: Medical treatment was effective for controlling pain from trigeminal neuralgia. Carbamazepine alone was effective only in the initial stages of the disease, a combination of carbamazepine with other drugs proved to be effective in achieving successful pain control in the long term.

Supplemental corticosteroids for dental patients with adrenal insufficiency: Reconsideration of the problem

Dental patients with primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, or AI, may be at risk of experiencing adrenal crisis during or after invasive procedures. Since the mid-1950s, supplemental steroids in rather large doses have been recommended for patients with AI to prevent adrenal crisis. To evaluate the need for supplemental steroids in these patients, the authors searched the literature from 1966 to 2000 using MEDLINE and textbooks for information that addressed AI and adrenal crisis in dentistry. Reference lists of relevant publications and review articles also were examined for information about the topic. The review identified only four reports of purported adrenal crisis in dentistry. Factors associated with the risk of adrenal crisis included the magnitude of surgery, the use of general anesthetics, the health status and stability of the patient, and the degree of pain control. The limited number of reported cases strongly suggests that adrenal crisis is a rare event in dentistry, especially for patients with secondary AI, and most routine dental procedures can be performed without glucocorticoid supplementation. The authors identify risk conditions for adrenal crisis and suggest new guidelines to prevent this problem in dental patients with AI.

Outcome of surgical treatment for chronic calcifying pancreatitis.

To evaluate the short and long-term results of surgical treatment of calcifying chronic pancreatitis in our center. We studied 55 consecutive patients operated on for chronic calcifying pancreatitis during a period of 12 years. The mean follow-up period was 6.2 years. Main outcome measures were operative mortality and morbidity, degree of pain control, diabetes onset, survival, and causes of death. The etiology was alcoholic in 48 patients and idiopathic in seven patients. A resection was performed in 78% of cases and a by-pass procedure was performed in 22%. Operative mortality was 3.6%; morbidity was 21.8%. A ductal adenocarcinoma was found in 3.6% of cases. The alcohol withdrawal rate was 78%. Complete pain control was achieved in 71.4% of the patients. Among diabetes, cirrhosis, type of surgery, smoking and alcohol abuse history, only alcohol withdrawal was associated with pain control (p < 0.03). A late reintervention was needed in only one patient in the by-pass group. Five and 10-year survival rates for the entire population were 80% and 61%, respectively. Among alcohol, cirrhosis, diabetes, and type of surgery, only the former was associated with survival (p < 0.003). Five-year actuarial survival was 55.6% for patients who continued drinking compared with 86.3% for ex-alcoholics. Surgical resection should be performed when required by the anatomical conditions because it was associated with good long-term pain control and low postoperative and late morbidity. Alcohol withdrawal has a key role for effective control of pain and prolonged survival.

Does Patient-Controlled Analgesia Achieve Better Control of Pain and Fewer Adverse Effects Than Intramuscular Analgesia?

To compare three analgesic regimens in patients undergoing colon resection: patient-controlled morphine sulfate analgesia (PCA), intramuscular (IM) morphine, and IM ketorolac tromethamine. Prospective randomized case series. Rural, private teaching hospital. All patients (307) scheduled to undergo a major colon resection between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1993, were eligible to participate. Of these, 10 (3%) were missed in the screening process, 132 (43%) declined participation, 73 (24%) were excluded, and 92 (30%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group. Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients never received the medication to which they were assigned, owing to administrative error; their data was not analyzed. Of the remaining patients, 31 were randomized to the PCA morphine group, 31 were randomized to the IM morphine group, and 28 were randomized to the IM ketorolac group. The randomly assigned drug was first administered in the post-anesthesia care unit. On arrival on the postoperative ward, the patient was asked to rate his or her pain using both a numerical rating scale and a visual analog scale at 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after arrival on the ward; and every 4 hours throughout the first 5 postoperative days. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered the day before surgery and then daily for the first 5 postoperative days. The first day the patient passed flatus after surgery was also recorded. The end points analyzed were adverse effects, duration of postoperative ileus, degree of pain control, length of hospitalization, and development of postoperative confusion as measured on serial MMSEs. Only two patients, both in the PCA group, reported adverse effects; neither required a change in analgesia group. Significantly more patients assigned to IM ketorolac broke protocol and required alternative analgesia than did patients in the morphine groups (32% ketorolac vs 16% IM morphine and 0% PCA). The ketorolac group had a significantly shorter duration of ileus than either morphine group (P<.0l). The ketorolac group also had significantly lower pain scores (P<.04) and less postoperative confusion than the morphine groups (P<.03), although these results are limited by missing values. The ketorolac group had a significantly shorter length of stay than either morphine group (P<.01), while there was no significant difference between the morphine groups (P=.75). While it appears that ketorolac provides a better postoperative course than either IM or PCA morphine in terms of pain control, postoperative confusion, length of stay, and duration of ileus, 18% of our patients assigned to ketorolac required additional analgesia, and there was a strong patient preference for PCA. Most patients should probably be managed with PCA narcotics, but the addition of ketorolac might reduce narcotic dose and resultant adverse effects. Those patients particularly prone to adverse effects should receive primarily ketorolac.

Reversible, Narcotic-Associated Mental Status Impairment in Patients with Metastatic Cancer

Pain and mental status were assessed in a series of 35 consecutive hospitalized patients with metastatic cancer receiving narcotics for pain that was difficult to control. Forty-five episodes of mental status impairment were detected in 27 of these patients. Fifteen patients had dose-related oversedation or organic brain syndrome. In only 4 could the narcotic dose be decreased without exacerbating the pain. Eleven patients had mental status impairment associated with factors other than the narcotic dose. These factors were: concurrent CNS-depressant drugs, presence of fever or infection, or changing from parental to average oral equianalgesic dose of narcotic. When these factors were corrected, mental function improved and remained stable despite resumption of the previous narcotic dose. Delirium occurred more frequently in patients over 65, while oversedation without delirium was more frequent in the younger group. For some patients with advanced metastatic cancer, pain relief and intact mental status cannot coexist. For others, correction of factors other than narcotics which can impair function can often lead to improved mental status without decreasing narcotic dose or decreasing the degree of pain control.