The objective of the study was to compare Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) pavements responses to static and dynamic loads. Two sets of non-destructive load testing were performed on RCC pavements. The first set used static loading and dynamic loading was utilized for the second. Static loading was provided by front wheels of a Letro-Porter (front loader) and a Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD) was used for dynamic loading. A back-calculation procedure for estimating concrete pavement parameters is also presented. The Roller Compacted Concrete pavements were located at Moran Terminal, Boston, Massachusetts. The pavement consisted of a RCC layer of 38 cm (15 in.), a 23-cm (9-in.) gravel subbase and a compacted subgrade. The RCC layer was constructed in three lifts from bottom to top of 14, 14, and 10 cm (5.5, 5.5 and 4 in.). Four slabs were selected for testing. Strains and deflections were measured for static loading tests. A Benkelman beam was used for measuring the static load induced deflections. Deflection basins were determined during HWD tests. Load transfer efficiency at cracks and construction joints was also measured for both tests. The back-calculation procedure has been demonstrated to be satisfactory in estimating in situ pavement material properties. Using estimated RCC elastic moduli and estimated moduli of subgrade reaction, the stresses in the slabs caused by the static loads were computed by the finite element computer program JSLAB and compared to field measured stresses. It was found that the computed stresses were always greater than the measured values. A factor of safety of about 4% can be expected when HWD deflection data are used in place of static vehicle test data in rigid pavement analysis and design.
Read full abstract