Definitive Cast Research Articles

Accuracy of intraoral versus desktop scanners used in digitizing polyvinyl siloxane impression for fabricating a CAD-CAM customized post and core.

This in vitro study aimed to compare the 3-dimensional (3D) accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners when digitizing the post and core polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Ten extracted human teeth were prepared to build a post space in the root canal. Each tooth was scanned using a micro-computed tomography device (MCT), and the slice data were reconstructed as controls. A conventional quadrant polyvinyl siloxane impression was made and scanned thrice using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and a desktop blue-light scanner (IMS), with one of the scans randomly selected as the definitive cast. Precision was assessed by comparing the deviations among repeated scans. Trueness was evaluated by analyzing the deviations between the MCT and each definitive cast (MCT-IOS and MCT-IMS). The clinically acceptable root mean square (RMS) value was set to 50 µm. The mean RMS values of the repeated scans of IOS and IMS were 18.3 ± 3.9 µm and 13.9 ± 6.2 µm (P < 0.05), and the difference between them was 4.4 ± 5.9 µm. The mean RMS values of MCT-IOS and MCT-IMS were 28.3 ±3.0 µm and 31.3 ± 4.2 µm (P < 0.05), with a difference of 3.0 ± 2.9 µm. The RMS values were significantly lower than 50 µm (P < 0.05). The IOS showed slightly better trueness than the IMS but slightly lower precision. The precision and trueness of the two scanners for digitizing post and core impressions were acceptable for clinical application.

Intra-radicular retention with custom designed CAD-CAM fibRe-reinforced composite post-core: a dental technique.

A technique is outlined for utilising a polymeric composite reinforced with glass fibres in a three-dimensional mesh as a post-core in aesthetic cases. The clinical procedure involves obtaining an impression of the root canal space, scanning the definitive cast, and milling a fibre-reinforced composite post-core. Subsequently, the intra-radicular post-core is cemented using an adhesive resin cement. The use of custom-made computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) fibre-reinforced composite post-core facilitates repairability, provides better adaptation to the root canal space, avoids uneven cement thickness, ensures chemical adhesion to resin cement, and promotes favourable aesthetics when combined with all-ceramic crowns.

Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations

Statement of problemDespite the extensive studies on and comparisons of different implant impression techniques for completely edentulous patients, studies on novel techniques that combine conventional impression making with digital scanning are lacking. PurposeThe primary aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the impression scan body technique with conventional impression making and digital scanning for a completely edentulous mandibular arch. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between different implant angulations and interimplant distances in relation to the recording accuracy. Material and methodsAn edentulous mandibular definitive cast (control) was designed with 5 implants placed at different angles and interimplant distances. Three recording techniques were tested: a conventional impression with splinted copings (conventional) (n=15), an impression scan body technique where impression scan bodies were attached to the splinted impression copings in a conventional elastomeric impression and then digitally scanned with an extraoral scanner (n=15), and an intraoral digital scanning technique (digital) (n=15). For comparison, the definitive cast and the conventional impression stone casts were digitized into standard tessellation language (STL) datasets using the extraoral scanner. The 3-dimensional (3D) deviations between the 3 test groups and the control were calculated by superimposing the STL datasets. The 3D deviations from the control were compared by using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn post hoc test (α=.05). The Mann-Whitney test was used to investigate the effect of implant angulation and interimplant distance on impression accuracy (α=.05). ResultsThe conventional splinted-coping impression technique showed a mean 3D deviation of 0.408 mm. The impression scan body and intraoral digital scan showed similar mean 3D deviations, 0.219 mm and 0.257 mm, respectively (P=.334). Both techniques showed significantly lower 3D deviations than the conventional technique (P<.001). Implants at an angle of 5 degrees and 10 degrees showed a statistically significant difference (P=.010) with mean 3D deviations of 0.340 mm and 0.396 mm, respectively. Implants with 5-mm and 10-mm interimplant distance showed a significant difference (P<.001) with mean 3D deviations of 0.301 mm and 0.423 mm, respectively. ConclusionsThe impression scan body technique is comparable with intraoral digital scanning for a completely edentulous arch. Increased implant angulation and increased interimplant distance significantly reduced the accuracy of implant impression making or scanning.

A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.

To describe a new classification for intraoral scans based on the scan extension and to introduce a decision guideline to choose the scan extension for fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Multiple operator- and patient-related factors have been identified that can decrease the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs), including scan extension. However, the decision criteria for selecting scan extension for fabricating tooth- and implant-supported restorations is unclear. Based on the extension of the intraoral digital scans, three types of scans can be defined: half-arch (anterior or posterior), extended half-arch, and complete-arch scan. Variables to consider when choosing the scan extension include the number and location of units being restored, as well as the extension and location of edentulous areas. Additionally, the accuracy of the virtual definitive cast and the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured by using IOSs should be differentiated. A decision tree for selecting the scan extension is presented. The decision is based on the number and location of units being restored, and the extension and location of edentulous areas. Intraoral scans with reduced scan extension are indicated when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported crowns or short-span fixed prostheses, when the patient does not have more than one missing tooth in the area of the dental arch included in the scan. For the remaining clinical conditions, complete-arch intraoral scans are recommended. Scan extension is a clinician's decision that should be based on the number and location of units being restored and the extension and location of edentulous areas. Intraoral scans with a reduced scan extension is recommended, when possible.

Comparison of tissue displacement in edentulous arches among three-dimensional files obtained through different impression-making methods: A retrospective study.

To retrospectively compare and analyze differences in tissue displacement of edentulous arches among three-dimensional (3D) files obtained using various impression-making techniques. Fourteen patients who underwent prosthodontic treatment for edentulous arches at Yonsei University Dental Hospital between June 2020 and April 2023 were included in the study. Three types of 3D files were used for the evaluation of each arch: a 3D scan file of a definitive cast (Group DEF), a preliminary cast (Group PRE), and an intraoral scan file (Group IOS). The files were superimposed on a reference 3D scan file of the definitive cast group through best-fit matching using metrology software. Seventeen measurement points (MP1-4, RC1-6, TB1-2, and PPS1-5 for the maxilla and RP1-2, RC1-7, BS1-4, and LS1-4 for the mandible) were selected for both the maxillary (n = 13) and mandibular arches (n = 6). The deviation considering the direction (DD) between the three groups and the absolute deviation (AD) between the three groups were recorded. Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analyses (α = 0.05 and α = 0.0167, respectively). Concerning the DD values, at the RC4 point of the maxillary arch, Group PRE exhibited significantly higher values than Groups IOS (p = 0.006) and DEF (p < 0.001), and at the RC5 point of the maxillary arch, Group IOS exhibited significantly lower values than Groups PRE (p = 0.016) and DEF (p < 0.001). Group IOS showed significantly lower DD values in the mandibular arch than Group DEF at the RP2 and RC3 points (p < 0.167). The AD values in Groups PRE and IOS significantly differed from those in Group DEF (all p < 0.001) at all measurement points but did not exhibit significant differences between each other (p > 0.05). Different impression-making methods yielded different amounts of tissue displacement. The tendency of 3D files regarding tissue displacement varied at certain residual ridge crest areas and retromolar pad areas. The absolute amount of tissue displacement observed in the intraoral scan data was comparable to that observed in the preliminary casts.

A technique to convert a 3D printed cast used in the fabrication of an interim implant-supported crown into a definitive cast capturing the acquired emergence profile.

An esthetic peri-implant soft tissue contour is a critical element of the success of implant restorations in the esthetic zone. Once the optimal transmucosal soft tissue profile is formed, it needs to be accurately replicated on the master cast. This clinical technique involves the utilization of a silicone putty positioning index placed in the patient's mouth to accurately duplicate the external contour of teeth and soft tissue. By combining this positioning index with the implant-supported interim crown, the 3D-printed initial cast, which was used to fabricate the interim crown, can be conveniently and efficiently transformed into a definitive master cast.

Comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated using conventional impression and modified digital scan for complete denture: An in vivo study

Background: In prosthetic dentistry, making an impression to replicate the oral health and tooth morphology is regarded as a crucial step. It is essential to ensure that the intraoral state is replicated as exactly as possible throughout this process, because any mistakes or inconsistencies could significantly impact the quality of the entire denture. In secondary impression, it’s crucial to capture the resilient oral mucosa (oral vestibule and soft palate) in order to acquire a satisfactory retention. As an alternative to conventional impression, digital scanning has been widely used in complete denture procedure. Although the digital scanning of edentulous ridges is feasible, scanning resilient oral tissues in complete denture still cannot be supported digitally. This study focuses on modifying the digital scan and comparison of retention of record bases fabricated from these modified digital scan to the record bases fabricated using conventional impression. Objectives: To compare the retention of record base prepared from conventional impression to the retention of record base from modified digital scan. Methodology: A total of 18 patients with edentulous maxillary arches will be recruited. A modified intraoral scan of the maxilla will be made on nine patients and on the remaining nine patients, a conventionally border moulded impression with a custom tray will be made. A record base with heat polymerized acrylic resin will be made on the definitive cast. Using the modified scanned image, the CAD-CAM bases will be milled. A dynamometer will be placed onto the record base; this will simulate the dislodging forces, thus clinically testing record base retention. Expected outcome: The record bases from modified digital scan will show equivalent or higher retention compared to record bases from conventional impression. Conclusions: By the end of the study, we will know whether resiliency of tissues can be recorded by modified digital scans.

Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners

Statement of problemThe absence of fixed reference points can affect the trueness of complete arch intraoral digital implant scans. The effect of splinting intraoral scan bodies (ISBs) or the inclusion of artificial landmarks (AL) on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans is still unclear. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of splinting ISBs or the inclusion of AL on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs). Material and methodsSix tissue-level dental implants (Straumann Tissue Level) were placed in an edentulous patient, and the correspondent definitive cast was digitized with a desktop scanner (IScan4D LS3i) to obtain the reference digital cast. Digital scans (n=10) were performed with 5 IOSs: TRIOS 4, Virtuo Vivo, Medit i700, iTero Element 5D, and Cerec Primescan. Three different scanning techniques were evaluated: conventional (cIOSs), splinted (sIOSs), and AL (AL-IOSs). The scan data obtained were imported into a metrology software program and superimposed to the reference digital cast by using a best-fit algorithm. The overall deviations of the positions of the ISBs were evaluated by using the root-mean-square (RMS) error (α=.05). ResultsThe mean ±standard deviation trueness values for the cIOSs, sIOSs, and AL-IOSs groups were 48 ±8 µm, 53 ±7 µm, and 49 ±11 µm, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (P=.06). Significant differences were found for the IOSs used with each technique (P<.001). Primescan (27 ±4 µm cIOSs; 28 ±3 µm sIOSs; 31 ±3 µm AL-IOSs) showed significantly higher trueness than iTero 5D (47 ±5 µm cIOSs; 47 ±4 µm sIOSs; 50 ±6 µm AL-IOSs) (P=.002) and TRIOS 4 (93 ±18 µm cIOSs; 76 ±18 µm sIOSs; 107 ±13 µm AL-IOSs) (P=.001) for all techniques. In addition, no significant differences were found between the techniques by using iTero 5D or Primescan (P=.348 and P=.059, respectively). ConclusionsThe cIOSs, sIOSs, and AL-IOSs techniques showed similar trueness. The IOS used influenced the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans.

Trueness of 3-dimensionally printed complete arch implant analog casts

Statement of problemAlthough a completely digital workflow has numerous advantages, a physical definitive cast may be especially helpful for the accurate assembly of components of complex complete arch-fixed prostheses, the evaluation of esthetic and occlusion features, or prosthesis fabrication. Research on the accuracy of additive complete arch casts with implants positioned with a large anterior-posterior (A-P) spread is sparse. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness of complete arch 4-implant analog casts with a large A-P distribution fabricated with different 3-dimensional (3D) printers. Material and methodsTen systems were evaluated representing currently available printing technologies and materials for the additive fabrication of complete arch 4-implant analog casts and compared for deviations in the X-, Y-, and Z-axes from the master model scan (MMS), recorded in standard tessellation language (STL). The MMS was provided to the laboratory selected by the manufacturer, permitting them to create their specific cast with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture specific to a particular system, including analog receptacle offset settings. Laboratories fabricated N=10 casts and affixed analogs. A conventional splinted impression and stone cast (CON) was fabricated as a control. The casts were scanned with a precision laboratory scanner (D2000; 3Shape A/S), and files were imported into the Convince metrology software program (3Shape A/S) for comparison with the MMS for mean deviations in the X-, Y-, and Z- axes. A 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD comparison tests were performed between system groups and the 4 implant locations (α=.05). Comparative color maps were used to determine dimensional changes of the edentulous ridges. ResultsFor 2-dimensional deviations from the MMS in each of the 3 axes, the printer type, implant location, and interaction between those 2 variables were found to be statistically significant (P<.05). Comparisons among printers showed the smallest deviations for Asiga Pro 4K (ASG) and Stratasys Origin One (ORI) printers in both the X- and Y-axes and for CON in the Z-axis. For 3D deviations, comparison among printers indicated that ORI, SprintRay Pro55 S (SPR), and Ackuretta SOL (ACK) had the largest deviations, whereas CON and ASG showed the smallest deviations. Comparison color mapping demonstrates a disparity between printed model dimensional changes and implant analog positioning since the color maps of the casts’ ridge crests were not in concordance with the results of the implant analog deviations. ConclusionsASG, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus (MJP), 3D Systems NextDent 5100 (NEX), Stratasys J5 DentaJet (PJ5), Ivoclar PrograPrint PR5 (PR5), and Prodways ProMaker LD20 (PWY) were similar in terms of 3D deviations to the conventional stone cast control. Comparative color mapping showed the direction and quantity of the dimensional changes of the ridge crest frequently did not correlate with the 3D deviations of implant analog positioning. Implant analog insertion errors were predominantly responsible for analog position 3D deviations rather than the polymerization shrinkage of additive photopolymers.

Reverse scan technique: A verification method for the implant position in intraoral scans

This article describes a fully digital method of verifying and increasing the accuracy of the position of implants in extensive prosthetic restorations. This cost-effective, timesaving, and versatile procedure uses a laboratory scanner, a scannable implant analog, and a printed interim implant-supported prosthesis to refine the virtual definitive cast.

An indirect method of verifying passive fit of complete arch implant-supported frameworks fabricated from photogrammetry scans

The passive fit of frameworks on multi-unit abutments has been considered crucial for the long-term success of complete arch, implant-supported, fixed prostheses. 1 Jokstad A. Shokati B. New 3D technologies applied to assess the long-term clinical effects of misfit of the full jaw fixed prosthesis on dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 1129-1134 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Photogrammetry has demonstrated better accuracy than intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques to record the position of implants. 2 Sallorenzo A. Gómez-Polo M. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128: 1009-1016 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar However, errors introduced during fabrication may still compromise the passive fit of the definitive prosthesis, even with accurate scanning using the photogrammetry technique. 3 Al-Meraikhi H. Yilmaz B. McGlumphy E. Brantley W. Johnston W.M. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 409-416 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar The current intraoral methods of verifying passive fit, including visual inspection, tactile sensation, radiography, disclosing materials, screw resistance test, and the Sheffield test, are subjective and not capable of detecting lingual or subgingival misfit. 4 Abduo J. Bennani V. Waddell N. Lyons K. Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 506-515 PubMed Google Scholar In the conventional protocol, the definitive cast made from a custom tray elastomeric impression can be verified with a dental gypsum device. 5 Manzella C. Burello V. Bignardi C. Carossa S. Schierano G. A method to improve passive fit of frameworks on implant-supported prostheses: an in vivo study. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26: 577-579 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar However, since the frameworks made from photogrammetry are manufactured without a definitive cast, verifying the passive fit of the frameworks is challenging. 6 Rutkunas V. Larsson C. Vult von Steyern P. Mangano F. Gedrimiene A. Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant-supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22: 237-245 Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar In the treatment of the first patient, misfits were found between the frameworks and the 3-dimensional printed cast; therefore, the accuracy of the frameworks needed to be verified to determine whether the distortion was introduced during printing of the cast (Fig. 1A-C). An inexpensive and user-friendly method of verifying the passive fit of frameworks is described. Figure 1A, Intraoral view after removal of interim prosthesis. B, Impression scanning using photogrammetry technology. C, Misfits between framework and printed cast. D, Placement of abutment replicas. E, Fixture of replicas with dental gypsum. F, Evaluating fit of framework. View Large Image Figure Viewer Download Hi-res image

Comparison between digital superimposition and microcomputed tomography methods of fit assessment of removable partial denture frameworks

Statement of problemThe fit of removable partial denture frameworks should be assessed to optimize clinical adaptation. Potential discrepancies between framework and supporting structures are typically precisely measured with negative subtracts and high-resolution equipment. The growth of computer-aided engineering technology allows the development of new methods for the direct evaluation of discrepancies. However, how the methods compare is unclear. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to compare 2 digital methods of fit assessment based on direct digital superimposition and microcomputed tomography indirect analysis. Material and methodsTwelve cobalt chromium removable partial denture frameworks were fabricated by conventional lost-wax casting or additive manufacturing techniques. The thickness of the gap between occlusal rests and respective definitive cast rest seats (n=34) was evaluated by using 2 different digital methods. Silicone elastomer impressions of the gaps were obtained, and microcomputed tomography measurements were used as controls for validation purposes. Digitization of the framework, the respective definitive cast, and the combination was followed by digital superimposition and direct measurements with the Geomagic Control X software program. Because normality and homogeneity of variance were not verified (Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, P<.05), the data were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank and Spearman correlation tests (α=.05). ResultsThe thicknesses measured by microcomputed tomography (median=242 μm) and digital superimposition (median=236 μm) did not reveal statistically significant differences (P=.180). A positive correlation (ρ=0.612) was detected between the 2 methods of assessing fit. ConclusionsThe frameworks presented median gap thicknesses under the limit of clinical acceptability without differences between the proposed methods. The digital superimposition method was determined to be as acceptable as the high-resolution microcomputed tomography method for assessing removable partial denture framework fit.

Assessment of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations fabricated by three different methods using the triple-scan protocol.

The present study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations. A typodont maxillary left first molar was prepared for a lithium disilicate crown, scanned, and a master die fabricated. Three groups were created according to fabrication method (n = 10): conventional impression and press method (group C); scanning of definitive cast and milling method (group D); and intraoral scanning and milling method (group I). Assessment was performed using the triple-scan protocol. At the buccopalatal and mesiodistal sections, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG), axial internal gap (AI), and line angle internal gap (LI) were measured. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). AMD values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). MG values in group C were significantly lower than those in the buccal and distal areas in group D and all areas in group I (P < 0.05). AI values in the buccal and palatal areas in group D were significantly lower than those in the mesial and distal areas in group D and all areas in groups C and I (P < 0.05). LI values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). All three methods were clinically acceptable except for the marginal fit of the intraoral scanning and milling method, which was on the borderline of a clinically acceptable fit. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 37-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305).

A definitive cast partial denture post partial maxillectomy defect due to mucormycosis: A case report

Maxillectomy performed in acquired lesions is often very extensive or bilateral, sparing very less hard and soft tissue in the oral cavity. These defects need both surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation. A definitive prosthesis is inserted after complete healing, when the patient is accustomed to the interim prosthesis. Definitive obturator warrants better retention and stability and needs a meticulous planning in design for long-term use. This article explains about cast partial denture as a definitive obturator for a post surgical defect due to mucormycosis.

Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An in vitro study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings with and without splinting using polyether (PE) and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression materials in open-tray technique in recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions. An accurate impression results in an accurate definitive cast, thus minimizing the incidence of prosthesis misfit. The critical aspect is to record the three-dimensional location of the implant in bone rather than reproducing fine surface details. Precise fit of a fixed implant-supported prosthesis depends on the accuracy of the implant analog location within the definitive cast. Factors which affect impression accuracy include implant angulation, impression material, impression copings, technique, and splinting. A sample size of 80 study models fabricated from the impression of different groups was included. A reference master model based on All-on-4 implant concept with two parallel (implants 1 and 2) and two angulated (implant 3 at 17° and implant 4 at 30°) was fabricated using implant angulation guide. All impressions were recorded using open-tray impression technique. The groups were divided into two main groups of 40 samples each. Group A used hexed open-tray impression copings and Group B used nonhexed open-tray impression copings. Both the groups involved impression recording using splinted (Subgroup I) and nonsplinted impression copings (Subgroup II). Further, impressions in each subgroup were made using PE (Subsubgroups a) and PVS (Subsubgroup b). A total of eight subsubgroups with ten samples each were included. Impressions were recorded for each group and poured into Type IV die stone for fabrication of study models. After 24 h, the study models and reference master model were fitted with implant abutments for measurement with coordinate measuring machine. The mean differences of the interimplant distance R1 (1-2), R2 (1-3), R3 (2-4), and R4 (3-4) between the reference model and sample models in different subsubgroups were calculated and three-way analysis of variance test was applied with Tukey's post hoc tests. No significant difference was found in mean coronal deviations for distance R1, R2, and R3 (P > 0.05) between different study groups. P = 0.02 for R4 (distance between 17° and 30° implants) between impression materials subsubgroups suggested that significantly less distortion was created in location of highly angulated implants (>30°) using PVS impression material. Splinting and type of coping did not have a significant influence on impression accuracy. Increasing angulation decreased the accuracy. PVS was found equivalent in accuracy to rigid PE for recording parallel or angulated implants. Impressions of implants with higher angulations were recorded more accurately with PVS. The study found no difference in accuracy with or without splinting. Furthermore, nonhexed impression copings facilitate easier and accurate recording of multiple angulated implant location in bone.

Fabrication of a hollow open bulb obturator prosthesis using double investment technique: A case report

Surgical treatment of head and neck neoplasms has a major impact on patients in terms of their quality of life. Maxillary defects can result in speech impairment, mastication and swallowing difficulties as well as can affect facial esthetics. A prosthodontist can successfully provide a solution to all these problems that hamper the social well-being of a patient by delivering a well- fitting prosthesis. The clinician must also give special emphasis to the reduction of weight to enhance retention and stability. A case report on rehabilitating a hemi-maxillectomy patient with a definitive cast partial obturator is presented here.

Cast-free modified digital twin-stage technique for complete mouth rehabilitation: A dental technique

A technique for making a computer-aided design (CAD) of a complete arch restoration with a fully digital workflow is described. The virtual definitive cast was mounted on a virtual articulator, and the CAD was made in 2 stages: the anterior teeth followed by the posterior teeth. The settings of the virtual articulator were adjusted to make the CAD of anterior teeth by following Hobo and Takayama’s twin-stage philosophy to ensure disclusion of the posterior teeth during eccentric movements. Posterior teeth were designed in a second stage guided by the definitive CAD of the anterior teeth, determined by the mandibular movements of the virtual articulator.

Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans

ObjectivesTo assess the influence of implant angulation, humidity, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. MethodsA definitive cast with 4 parallel implant abutment analogs (P group), and another cast with 4 angulated (up to 30 degrees) implant abutment analogs (NP group) were digitized by using a scanner (7Series) (reference scans). Two subgroups were created: dry (D subgroup) and wet (W subgroup). For the D subgroup, the casts were digitized without altering the surface humidity by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (TRIOS 3). For the W subgroup, the cast surface was humidified with artificial saliva and digitized by using the same IOS. The interimplant distance discrepancies were assessed by computing linear and angular measurements. Trueness data was analyzed using 3-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests. The Bartlett test, followed by the pairwise comparison tests, was used to assess the precision (α=.05). ResultsRegarding the trueness, implant angulation (P<.001) and inter-implant distance measurement (P<.001) influenced the linear discrepancies. Implant angulation (P=.002), humidity conditions (P<.001), and inter-implant distance (P=.001) influenced the angular discrepancies. Regarding the precision, significant differences in the variance of linear and angular measurements and inter-implant distances were found. Humidity conditions (P<.001) influenced the scanning time. ConclusionsImplant angulation, humidity, and interimplant distance influenced the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. Parallel implants resulted in higher trueness and precision values. Dry conditions resulted in slightly higher scanning trueness and precision and shorter scanning time. Clinical significanceDrying the surface being scanned increases intraoral scanning accuracy and decreases intraoral scanning time.

Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I – Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study

Statement of problemClinical evidence is sparse on whether dentures fabricated by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) methods afford superior fit and retention when compared with those fabricated conventionally. PurposeThe purpose of this clinical controlled crossover study was to evaluate the peak retention force and fit of CAD-CAM manufactured (3D printed and milled) maxillary complete denture bases and conventional heat-polymerized bases (control). Material and methodsTwenty participants with edentulous maxillary arches were recruited. Impressions were made with a border-molded custom tray, and the resulting definitive cast was scanned. The conventional base was manufactured on the definitive cast with a hook and a 45-degree platform with a central notch and 2 lateral notches. The scan of the definitive cast was used for the fabrication of a milled and a printed base. The platform and hook position on the conventional base were transferred digitally to the milled and printed bases. All bases were scanned. A traction dynamometer was orientated into the notches, and retention was evaluated in the post dam and tuberosity areas. Scans were imported into a comparison software program which matched scans to their corresponding reference and performed a 3-dimensional comparison. The Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare between groups (confidence interval: 95%, α=.05). ResultsNineteen participants with a mean ±standard deviation age of 64.1 ±14.7 years completed all clinical sessions. No significant difference in peak retention was measured between milled (MB1), printed (PB1), and conventional (CB) bases in the post dam (CB: 12.44 ±9.62 N, PB1: 16.08 ±15.28 N, MB1: 14.52 ±17.07 N) and right tuberosity area (CB: 8.99 ±7.82 N, PB1: 11.28 ±9.57 N, MB1: 11.99 ±12.10 N). In the left tuberosity area, peak retention was lower for CB (10.03 ±8.39 N) than PB1 (14.98 ±14.72 N) and MB1 (13.55 ±15.53 N; P=.05). Compared with the definitive cast, the fit of the conventional base (0.18 ±0.01 mm) was closer than the printed (0.21 ±0.03 mm) and milled bases (0.21 ±0.02 mm) (P<.001). ConclusionsThe CD bases manufactured by CAD-CAM techniques provided retention and fit similar to that of conventionally manufactured bases and can therefore be considered suitable techniques.

Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II – conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study

Statement of problemAlthough the intraoral scanning of edentulous ridges is feasible, clinical evidence that the resulting denture retention is equivalent to that achieved with conventional impressions is lacking. PurposeThe purpose of this clinical study was to determine the retention of complete denture bases fabricated from digital intraoral scans versus conventional impressions by using border molding and posterior palatal seal compression. Material and methodsTwenty volunteers with an edentulous maxilla were recruited. An intraoral scan of the maxilla and a conventionally border-molded impression with a custom tray were made. The conventional impression was poured; the definitive cast was scanned. Three-dimensionally (3D) printed (PB1) and milled bases (MB1) were fabricated based on the scan of the definitive cast. Based on the intraoral scan, a 3D printed (PB2) and a milled base (MB2) were fabricated. On each base, a platform with a hook consisting of a central notch orienting the force against the post dam (PD) and 2 lateral notches orienting the forces against the left (LT) and right (RT) tuberosities was set in the center of the outer surface of the base. A traction dynamometer was inserted in the hook and oriented into the corresponding notch by applying force until dislodgement. All bases were subsequently stored in artificial saliva for 2 weeks and scanned. Retention testing was repeated by using the same procedure. To evaluate trueness and to visualize the differences on a color map, the scan of the definitive cast and the intraoral scans were matched and compared in 3 dimensions. The Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the retention of the different bases (95% confidence interval, α=.05). ResultsNineteen participants with a mean ±standard deviation age of 64.1 ±14.7 years completed the 4 study sessions. The retention of printed bases (PD: 16.08 ±15.28 N; LT: 14.98 ±14.72 N; RT: 11.28 ±9.57 N) and milled bases (PD:14.52 ±17.07 N; RT: 11.99 ±12.10 N; LT: 13.55 ±15.53 N) fabricated from conventional impressions presented significantly higher retentive forces than those printed (PD: 6.21 ±4.72 N; RT:5.12 ±2.78 N; LT: 4.45 ±2.77 N) and milled (PD: 6.58 ±4.92 N; RT: 4.65 ±2.63 N; LT: 5.02 ±3.58 N) from the intraoral scans (P<.05). The differences were significant in all directions of dislodgement, as well as after storage in artificial saliva for 2 weeks. Comparison of the 3D distances between the intraoral scan and the definitive cast revealed a mean deviation of 0.45 ±0.11 mm. ConclusionsConventional impressions of the edentulous maxilla, including the clinical steps of border molding and posterior palatal seal compression, provide better retention than digital intraoral scans with both milled and 3D printed denture bases.