TOPIC: Diffuse Lung Disease TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a progressive fibrosing ILD, remains challenging and often results in prolonged misdiagnosis associated with treatment delays and ultimately, poor outcomes. The diagnosis of IPF is based upon the presence of either a radiographic or histologic Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) pattern. The Envisia Genomic Classifier (EGC), a clinically validated molecular diagnostic test for UIP in transbronchial biopsies, was developed as a “rule in” test for UIP with high specificity. Here, we evaluate the impact of the EGC on physicians’ clinical decision-making for patients undergoing evaluation of ILD. METHODS: This prospective randomized decision impact survey included 11 patient ILD case studies from the BRAVE clinical sample collection study. Patient cases were included if they had an HRCT scan without a definite UIP pattern, an EGC UIP+ result, and underwent a multidisciplinary team discussion that resulted in a final diagnosis of IPF. HRCT patterns included 67 (43%) classified as probable UIP, 51 (33%) indeterminate for UIP and 37 (24%) inconsistent with UIP. A physician survey was designed to test the hypothesis that including an EGC UIP+ result will increase their number of correct IPF diagnoses, their associated confidence of this diagnosis and increase their recommendation to initiate anti-fibrotic therapy without obtaining a surgical lung biopsy (SLB) or cryobiopsy (Cryo). Physicians were first presented with the patients’ clinical information without Envisia (pre) and then with Envisia (post). RESULTS: 81 US-based pulmonologists provided survey responses. Overall, IPF diagnoses increased from 47 (30%) pre-Envisia to 107 (69%) post-Envisia. When stratified by HRCT pattern to include only those that were indeterminate or inconsistent for UIP, the number of IPF diagnoses increased from 4 (4.5%) pre-Envisia to 48 (54.5%) post-Envisia (Odds Ratio (OR)= 30.4, p < 0.001). Similarly, in cases with a probable UIP HRCT pattern, there was an increase in IPF diagnoses with Envisia (OR= 7.24, p < 0.001). High confidence (≥ 90%) of ILD diagnoses also increased from 5.8% to 42% with Envisia (p < 0.001). Recommendation for antifibrotic treatment increased from 15 (10%) pre-Envisia to 72 (46.4%) post-Envisia, while the recommendation for SLB or Cryo decreased with Envisia (OR = 0.48, p= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The Envisia Genomic Classifier had a significant impact on physicians’ decision-making for patients undergoing ILD evaluation by increasing the number of correct IPF diagnoses that were made with high confidence as well as increasing the recommendation for antifibrotic therapy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Envisia Genomic Classifier has the potential to improve the outcome of IPF patients by facilitating an accurate IPF diagnosis and advancing earlier antifibrotic therapy. DISCLOSURES: Employee relationship with Veracyte, Inc Please note: 2 years Added 04/25/2021 by Sangeeta Bhorade, source=Web Response, value=Salary Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Genentech Please note: 2019-2020 Added 04/30/2021 by Amy Case, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Please note: 2019-2020 Added 04/30/2021 by Amy Case, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with Veracyte Please note: 2021 Added 04/30/2021 by Amy Case, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with Boehringer-Ingelheim Please note: 2021 Added 04/30/2021 by Amy Case, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria No relevant relationships by Sachin Chaudhary, source=Web Response Employee relationship with Veracyte Please note: >$100000 by Jing Huang, source=Web Response, value=Salary Employee relationship with Veracyte Please note: >$100000 by Marla Johnson, source=Web Response, value=Salary Employee relationship with Veracyte, Inc. Please note: 2008-present Added 05/10/2021 by Giulia Kennedy, source=Web Response, value=Salary No relevant relationships by Michael Kreuter, source=Web Response Advisory and speaker bureau relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Please note: $20001 - $100000 by Joseph Lasky, source=Web Response, value=Fees Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Genentech Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Joseph Lasky, source=Web Response, value=Fees Advisory Committee Member relationship with Veracyte Please note: $1-$1000 by Joseph Lasky, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Consultant relationship with Galecto Please note: 2019-2021 Added 04/30/2021 by Joseph Lasky, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Employee relationship with Veracyte Please note: >$100000 by Lori Lofaro, source=Web Response, value=Salary Advisory Committee Member relationship with veracyte Please note: 2020-2021 Added 04/30/2021 by Mary Beth Scholand, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Advisory Committee Member relationship with genentech Please note: 2020-2021 Added 04/30/2021 by Mary Beth Scholand, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Advisory Committee Member relationship with united therapeutics Please note: 2020-2021 Added 04/30/2021 by Mary Beth Scholand, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee No relevant relationships by Jennifer Tom, source=Web Response Consultant relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Please note: 2017-Currently Added 04/30/2021 by Avraham Unterman, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Advisory Committee Member relationship with Remedy Cell Please note: 2020-Currently Added 04/30/2021 by Avraham Unterman, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee
Read full abstract